Weird Science Getting Weirder

lava tube.jpg

[Lava tube in Hawaii. Photo by ScienceTim.]


Years ago I had to give a talk at a gathering of physicists in Minneapolis -- this is when my aliens book came out -- and the science editor here at The Post told me to cover a news conference involving a new property of light. Several scientists were going to discuss their new paper, titled "A Composite Medium with Simultaneously Negative Permeability and Permittivity."

My assignment, it turned out, was the equivalent of being told to run out onto a football field and tackle Ladanian Tomlinson. The story pancaked me. I had no idea what they were talking about. My story was incomprehensible. Here's a sample:

' When microwaves are beamed through the material they become focused rather than diverging, as they normally would, the researchers said.

' It is the combination of the specially designed copper rings arranged against the copper wires that gives the material the property of reversing the normal response to energy, the researchers said...

'Smith, combing through scientific papers on "negative permeability," came across an obscure paper from 1968 written by a Russian theorist, V.G. Veselago. Veselago predicted that a material with electric and magnetic response to electromagnetic radiation that is the opposite to the norm, if such a thing were ever found or invented, would reverse the manner in which the energy traveled through it....'

(Why is there always an obscure Russian theorist involved in all these things?)

I am pretty sure -- and would be curious if anyone out there could confirm this -- that the Minneapolis announcement was connected to the research that has led to the new cloaking technologies, as described this morning by Rick Weiss in his story that says that blacker is the new black.

As a science, physics has already had a cloaking device, insofar as it is impossible for most of us to understand what the physicists are saying. I'm still trying to find out the precise size of a smithereen.

A while back I went to Switzerland to see the Large Hadron Collider under construction at CERN. The story is now published, in National Geographic. Check it out. The LHC is probably going to find a thingamajig called the Higgs boson.

What a Higgs boson will be good for, no one knows. But you can bet scientists will find some kind of nifty use for it.

'The cynic might say that there's no practical use for any of this, that there might be other uses for all the money and brainpower going into these particle guns. But we live in a civilization shaped by physics. We know that the forces within an atom are so powerful that, unleashed and directed against humanity, they can obliterate cities in an instant. The laptop computer on which I'm writing uses microprocessors that would not exist had we not discovered quantum physics and the quirky behavior of electrons. This story will be posted on the World Wide Web--invented, in case you hadn't heard, at CERN, by computer scientist Tim Berners-Lee. Maybe you're reading it while listening to your iPod, which wouldn't exist but for something called "giant magnetoresistance." Two physicists discovered it independently in the late 1980s, with not much thought of how it might eventually be used. It became crucial to making tiny consumer electronics that used magnetized hard disks. The physicists won a Nobel Prize in 2007, and you got a nifty sound system that's smaller than a Hershey bar.'

[By the way, I understand you can work on the LHC experiment in your own home. See this and this. ]

--

I think a gap year is a good idea.

By  |  February 20, 2008; 11:27 AM ET
Previous: Any Given Tuesday | Next: What McCain Should Have Said


Add Achenblog to Your Site
Be the first to know when there's a new installment of Achenblog! This widget is easy to add to your Web site, and it will update every time there's a new entry.
Get This Widget >>


Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



first? When scientists finally harness the energy posessed by the Higgs boson, I hope it's in the form af a blaster. I'd even be willing to wait in line for one.

Posted by: jack | February 20, 2008 12:40 PM

Repost from last kit:

Welcome back, RD, and sorry to hear about your loss.

About the missile and our satellite--

I find it ironic that we were so teed off at China for using a ballistic missile to shoot down their satellite just a few short months ago. The US gummint cited concerns such as orbital debris that could affect our satellites and space station as well as the worry that China could go on the offensive and shoot down others' satellites. But all of that stuff is no concern if we want to do it. And we are left saying, "What's your problem, world?"

Posted by: Gomer | February 20, 2008 12:51 PM

I had a cat called Boson for a short while. Everybody said it was the stoopidest name ever. The cat was named Mockmock for the rest of its long natural life. Like that's much better, right?

I have serious chowder umbrage to take, maybe later if time permits.

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 12:54 PM

Just don't call the cat Schroedinger...

:-)

Posted by: Scottynuke | February 20, 2008 1:00 PM

My son cleans glassware for a scientist studying nanotubes which didn't even exist when I was in college. I expect that by the time his kids are in college, life without nanotech will be unimaginably primitive. Down the rabbit hole weird is right.

Posted by: yellojkt | February 20, 2008 1:02 PM

All RIIIIGHT - subatomic physics!

C'mon now, don't we all remember that the size of the Higgs boson (that particle which determines how matter manages to actually have mass) will determine of the Standard Model holds up or not? I did Boodle that last week, IIRC.

As you slyly point out, Joel, *everything* depends on the Higgs boson.

Now, to try to work and read all this great stuff...

bc

Posted by: bc | February 20, 2008 1:04 PM

Cleaning nanotubes would require nanotube cleaners. Detail work. I think that I read somewhere that nanobots could deliver medicines to a specifically targeted cells in the body.

Posted by: jack | February 20, 2008 1:08 PM

Well, I'm not offering to go up the mast on the higgs boson chair, that's for sure.

Posted by: Yoki | February 20, 2008 1:08 PM

Actually, I believe you'd need picoscale cleaners to clean nanotubes...

And bc, you're saying that if the crew on "Lost" found the Higgs, everything would make sense?

*confused*

:-)

Posted by: Scottynuke | February 20, 2008 1:12 PM

Omni, just so's you know, I didn't take any umbrage, and I finished up that discussion at the bottom of the previous boodle.

Posted by: kbertocci | February 20, 2008 1:14 PM

So maybe there's an explanation for what Pegorano calls "Windows Rot", a sort of prostate enlargement of the operating system, which grows increasingly slow and incompetent with age. I think his conclusion was that by the time it gets really bad, it's probably time to cashier the hardware, too.

So should I switch to a Mac Mini?

Posted by: Dave of the Coonties | February 20, 2008 1:36 PM

I can't see the logic in the argument that kids are entering college too young, so let's send them overseas for community service. The article does go on to say that not all countries are safe, that usually students go overseas after a year or two in college, etc. If the Princeton program were organized this way, I can definitely see the benefit. But sending kids who are unprepared for college overseas may ensure that they never come back. I know I would have been hard-pressed as an 18-19-year-old to come back to hard work, school, and drinking laws that excluded me.

Posted by: Gomer | February 20, 2008 1:38 PM

Hi kber, I knew there was no umbrage. Just wanted to give credit where credit was due (or should that be debit).

The part of this kit that amused me was 'got a nifty sound system that's smaller than a Hershey bar.'

Ha ha, sound systems do get smaller. But candy bars have been getting bigger. I've seen Snickers® that if cut in half and laid side to side would be just about as big as the original Sony Walkman®.

I wonder if that meteorite wasn't actually a spaceship from the planet Krypton?

Posted by: omni | February 20, 2008 1:46 PM

Scottynuke, I prefer to think of it as capital "E" Everything.

And some things would still not make sense (and I'm not thinking of anyone in particular here), but Cosmically speaking, think of it as doing an inventory of God's Kitchen, and we know that there's a particular spice used in the Recipe of Creation (aka God's Soufflé), but we need to find it to determine how strong that spice is, and how much would be needed.

We humans can see and taste the Soufflé of Creation and we have a lot of the Ingredients spread out on the Kitchen Counter, but we're having a hard time reverse-engineering the Recipe (for example, we know how hot to make it, how long it's been baking, and most of the major ingredients). Finding the Higgs spice will help, but I suspect that our palate isn't nearly sophisticated enough to taste the entire Soufflé to begin with, so our attempts to figure out the Recipe will continue to keep falling flat. But Everything tastes so wonderful - so rich, and varied, and subltle, and strong, and fulFilling, and *real* - that we want the Recipe for ourselves, so we can make it whenever we want, and maybe change the Recipe around a bit to Make it the Way We Like It. It's in our nature to tinker and do a little home cookin', if you know what I mean (caution: Sports metaphor). I love reading cookbooks and learning how to make things for myself.

Personally, I think someone will figure the Recipe out at some point, but the folks that do Get to the Bottom of the Soufflé might not be what we'd consider People.

In the meantime, let's gather 'round the table and enjoy this fabulous meal together, speak of food and families and love and Everything.

Bon Appétit everyone.

bc

Posted by: bc | February 20, 2008 1:52 PM

Jasper White is regarded as a demi-god in Boston food circles. His chowder is outstanding, perhaps almost as good as Mudge's.

Here's his Fish Chowder, as posted on epicurios.com

new england fish chowder

50 Chowders: One-Pot Meals -- Clam, Corn & Beyond | August 2000

Jasper White

*
recipe
*
reviews (69)
*
my notes

To me, this is the most authentic and most important recipe in this book. It is the gold standard for chowder: a hearty main course with deep flavors, luxurious texture, and generous chunks of fish, onion, and potato. New England Fish Chowder is easy to make, uses simple ingredients, and doesn'2equire you to be fussy or exact. After making this chowder a few times, you will begin to understand the Zen of chowder.

Servings: Makes about 14 cups; serves 8 as a main course.
subscribe to Bon Appétit
Ingredients
4 ounces meaty salt pork, rind removed and cut into 1/3-inch dice
2 tablespoons unsalted butter
2 medium onions (14 ounces), cut into 3/4-inch dice
6 to 8 sprigs fresh summer savory or thyme, leaves removed and chopped (1 tablespoon)
2 dried bay leaves
2 pounds Yukon Gold, Maine, PEI, or other all-purpose potatoes, peeled and sliced 1/3-inch thick
5 cups Strong Fish Stock, Traditional Fish Stock, Chicken Stock, or water (as a last resort)
Kosher or sea salt and freshly ground black pepper
3 pounds skinless haddock or cod fillets, preferably over 1 inch thick, pinbones removed
1 1/2 cups heavy cream (or up to 2 cups if desired)

For garnish
2 tablespoons chopped fresh Italian parsley
2 tablespoons minced fresh chives
Preparation
1. Heat a 4- to 6-quart heavy pot over low heat and add the diced salt pork. Once it has rendered a few tablespoons of fat, increase the heat to medium and cook until the pork is a crisp golden brown. Use a slotted spoon to transfer the cracklings to a small ovenproof dish, leaving the fat in the pot, and reserve until later.

2. Add the butter, onions, savory or thyme, and bay leaves to the pot and sauté, stirring occasionally with a wooden spoon, for about 8 minutes, until the onions and softened but not browned.

3. Add the potatoes and stock. If the stock doesn'#over the potatoes, add just enough water to cover them. Turn up the heat and bring to a boil, cover, and cook the potatoes vigorously for about 10 minutes, until they are soft on the outside but still firm in the center. If the stock hasn'4hickened lightly, smash a few of the potato slices against the side of the pot and cook for a minute or two longer to release their starch. Reduce the heat to low and season assertively with salt and pepper (you want to almost overseason the chowder at this point to avoid having to stir it much once the fish is added). Add the fish fillets and cook over low heat for 5 minutes, then remove the pot from the heat and allow the chowder to sit for 10 minutes (the fish will finish cooking during this time).

4. Gently stir in the cream and taste for salt and pepper. If you are not serving the chowder within the hour, let it cool a bit, then refrigerate; cover the chowder after it has chilled completely. Otherwise, let it sit for up to an hour at room temperature, allowing the flavors to meld.

5. When ready to serve, reheat the chowder over low heat; don',et it boil. Warm the cracklings in a low oven (200 °F) for a few minutes.

6. Use a slotted spoon to mound the chunks of fish, the onions, and potatoes in the center of large soup plates or shallow bowls, and ladle the creamy broth around. Scatter the cracklings over the individual servings and finish each with a sprinkling of chopped parsley and minced chives.

CookŽotes
Cod and haddock are very similar, but large haddock is just a little firmer and doesn'"reak up quite as much as cod, making it easier to produce a chowder with large chunks of fish. But even more important than the type of fish is the way you prepare it. Both cod and haddock, and their cousins pollack and hake, all flake apart naturally. Therefore, it isn'.ecessary to cut them into pieces. Simply add the whole fillets to the chowder, cook it a few minutes longer, and remove it from the heat, without stirring it again. When you reheat the chowder, the fillets will break into lovely big chunks of tender white fish. Most fish can be used for New England Fish Chowder, but if the fish you choose is not native to New England, then your chowder should be called "New England style." Depending on their tendency to break up naturally, some fish need to be cut into pieces.

Strong Fish Stock made with the heads and bones from the cod or haddock you buy for chowder is by far the best choice for this recipe. I urge you to make it, but if you can'4here are alternatives listed in the recipe.

For equipment, you will need a 4- to 6-quart heavy pot with a lid, a slotted spoon, a wooden spoon, and a ladle.

Posted by: Maggie O'D | February 20, 2008 1:53 PM

At the other end of the university financial spectrum from Princeton, the Florida governor doesn't like whining about finances:

http://blogs.tampabay.com/buzz/2008/02/crist-blasts-st.html

Don't Princeton students tend to become Financial Engineers? If so, do they mainly need to learn Chinese or an Indian language? Or is financial engineering suddenly so discredited that they'll find some other line of work?

Posted by: Dave of the Coonties | February 20, 2008 1:54 PM

Just responding to something I saw in Mudge's post at the bottom of the old Kit--and that I see all over the place.

John McCain, like GW Bush before him, never said he wouldn't raise taxes. He said "no new taxes." There's a big difference.

The taxes I pay anyway may be go up, but thank the FSM I won't have to pay a Sweet Potato Tax.

Posted by: TBG | February 20, 2008 1:54 PM

I forgot to mention that I resent the idea that students are entering college too young. They are entering college at the same age as their parents and grandparents, who usually had to work to put themselves through school. Myself included, a large percentage of college students have their tuition, room and board paid for. They are going to college at the same age that many of their peers are going to war. To say that they are too young for college is inaccurate. To say that some 18-year-olds are not ready for college is more accurate. To say that many of these kids have been babied a bit too much would be even more accurate.

Posted by: Gomer | February 20, 2008 1:55 PM

BC! Huzzah, etc.

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 1:55 PM

The work on the compound copper material was partly funded by DARPA. Back in the day I used to haunt those halls (although after they asked I stopped the wailing) and can report that, indeed, they were going for stealth. One of the folks involved was massively influenced by the Romulan cloaking device. I'm not sure what happened to that effort. It's like it disappeared! Haha..ha..ha


Anyway, I was fascinated by the new uber-black material. I can see how it could easily lead to radar absorption materials. But neither of these are "stealth" in the fine Romulan tradition. For absorbers just create a big void. What you really need is a technology that bends light around something. This is true invisibility. But Spock said so much better in "Balance of Terror."

I am interested in this ultra black stuff as a way of enhancing solar efficiency.

Plus, I hear it is really, really slimming.

Posted by: RD Padouk | February 20, 2008 1:55 PM

A gap year may be nice, but what about the poor kids who can't afford to go overseas, and maybe not even live on a low income in Americorps because their talents aren't necessarily for direct social service?

I entered college at age 17 and I was so mature, I got mistaken for a grad student (I hung out with a few).

On the other hand, my brother hated high school so much that he took a gap year and worked in construction and then was fully motivated and got summa cum laude in college and has a master's now. For him it was the right choice.

For me, it wouldn't have been the right choice unless I had found something that was really as enriching as college would have been. Sometimes I regret I didn't think of taking 5 years for college instead of 4, but not too much.

I have a cousin who joined the marines out of high school. By age 22 he felt very world-weary and sad at how hated Americans could be in other countries. He got the work skills he wanted and is now a happy civilian with a family.

I'm starting to think that you shouldn't hold people back when they're ready NOW.

The real question is to give them more than one opportunity and let them defer admission or balance work/internships/opportunities and school. Part-time students should have scholarship opportunities like full-time students.

Gomer, my cousin eventually came back when his tour of duty was up. It's not all beer and skittles aboard.

Posted by: Wilbrod | February 20, 2008 1:57 PM

I think a gap year is a good idea too. We flirted with the concept because my daughter, although she was a good student in high school, wasn't especially successful in her college application process. She was accepted to her first choice school, but they didn't offer enough financial aid to make it a realistic scenario. She was unwilling to "settle" on an in-state school, so we were in a kind of stalemate situation, and considering that she was one of the youngest students in her graduating class, I thought it would be good to let her have a year off to develop her portfolio, since that's a major criterion for admission to art college.

Well, you would have thought I was suggesting that she should join a motorcycle gang and shoot heroin, or something. NOBODY else thought it would be a good idea; they were all scared to death that she would NEVER go to college if she took a year off.

I sent her off to a "pre-college" program the summer after she graduated. The faculty and admissions staff at that college--one she had not applied to--were very impressed with her and also mortified at the "gap year" idea. Bottom line, they recruited her, gave her a scholarship, and she's very happy there, in the second half of her junior year now. And we'll never know how that gap year would have turned out.

Posted by: kbertocci | February 20, 2008 1:57 PM

Agree with Gomer. You do not have to go far afield to get some of the stuffin' you need to do well in college.

Some kids to college; some kids to war; some kids lost in their parent's basement, high Halo scores amid pizza boxes and Mountain Dew cans......

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 1:59 PM

Agree with Gomer with this to add: If they're not ready for college, they're probably not ready for a year abroad.

Posted by: omni | February 20, 2008 2:00 PM

A guy my wife dated before me enlisted in the Navy for a year before enrolling at Emory. He claims it was a great experience for him. The Princeton volunteer work sounds like an extended summer camp/Grand Tour scam though.

Posted by: yellojkt | February 20, 2008 2:04 PM

I muffed my last post; meant to say the gap year is fine but it does not (should not?) be only the idea of heading off to save the world on your parent's nickel.....

KB is right about the gap-year fear. I guess the basement scenario is one case for fear. However, I know plenty of kids who went off to college and returned to the basement....

Under-appreciated also is a good trade or artisan school option. I know a young man who is now, a full-fledged piano tuner and luthier (guitar maker); he has two small businesses and as happy as a clam.

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 2:05 PM

RD, thanks for sharing your father's funeral with us. Your description brought back some beautifully poignant memories for me.

May he rest in peace.

Posted by: Maggie O'D | February 20, 2008 2:06 PM

wow, yello... I thought you and your wife started dating in middle school.

Oh.. wait... he joined the navy after she dated him. Whew.

Posted by: TBG | February 20, 2008 2:12 PM

I'm okay with the concept of a gap year, but what gets me is the study abroad programs. The son of a good friend is in Venice this semester, daughter of another is in Copenhagen and another in Florence. Friends of my daughter have done a semester in London. Where did I go wrong?

Posted by: Slyness | February 20, 2008 2:26 PM

Regarding a gap year. I think it is a super idea in principle, but hard to implement in reality.

Kids in many high schools are being worked much more than in years past because colleges are becoming increasingly competitive. It is a nasty cycle that neither the high schools nor the colleges seem willing to break.

For example, to have any hope of getting into the Virginia schools my son covets, he is working far more than I ever had to. I fear the lad may graduate in a catatonic state.

Therefore, I think a gap year, when he is able to relax and catch his breath a little before jumping into his freshman year, makes a lot of sense.

Alas, it isn't gonna happen. When I discuss this with him he recoils in horror.

High achieving college-bound kids do not take kindly to being held back a year. College is the goal. To push that goal back is perceived by such kids (and more than a few adults) as falling behind. Kids like my son do not like to fall behind. They want the prestige of being college students. And they want it now.

I think to succeed a gap year would have to become accepted as the cultural norm. Which won't happen until more kids do it.

Talk about your vicious cycles.

Posted by: RD Padouk | February 20, 2008 2:34 PM

"I'm still trying to find out the precise size of a smithereen." --The Boss

A smithereen cannot have "a precise size" until an acceptable definition of a unit of metaphor is developed and a mathematics to manipulate these units is created. Unfortunately, writers--even scientific writers--all have undefined parochial interests that prevent agreement on any definition, in part because clear definitions would make them more accountable for the drivel they often pass off onto the public as interesting thought, in part because Real Men go to Tehran.

I thought everyone knew that.

Posted by: MedallionOfFerret | February 20, 2008 2:36 PM

I don't understand all this fuss about finding the Higgs boson. Didn't anybody think of asking Higgs where he put it? Did anybody look on top of his dresser? Maybe he left it on the shelf over the bathroom sink when he put in his dentures in the morning and left for work.

*continued grumbling about having to do all the intellectual heavy lifting around here*

Posted by: Curmudgeon | February 20, 2008 2:36 PM

The kit reminded me of A. Manette Ansay's book of short stories. Its title is "Read This and Tell Me What It Says."

Exactly!

Mudge, do you have time to critique Jasper White's Fish Chowder recipe?

Posted by: Maggie O'D | February 20, 2008 2:43 PM

Mudge.. my mom would have asked him, "Did you look under your bed?"

Posted by: TBG | February 20, 2008 2:46 PM

I took a gap year, one and a half of them actually. I spent half of it in Vancouver BC to learn to speak English, so you might say it was lost time for me...
I think a mature teen can do worse than spending some time abroad learning another language and broadening his/her horizons somewhat.
New England fish/clam chowder is great but Manhattan chowder, the tomato-based one, is purty darn good too. In my mind it's chowder.
Now the umbrage. I've read in two different places (including the WaPo) that chowder may come from the French chaudière because fisherman cooked in a pail. This is beyond ridiculous.
A chaudrée, pronounced "show drey", is a traditional fish and shellfish soup of the Poitou-Charente region (i.e. Atlantic coast) usually containing potatoes and onion. Sounds familiar?
It is as common and varied on the Atlantic coast as bouillabaisse is on the Mediterranean coast. BTW a chaudrée is the content of a chaudron (cauldron). No flipping pail in sight.
A chaudrée recipe:
http://margaretsrecipes.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/chaudree-fish-stew/

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 2:47 PM

RD, welcome back.
The idea of a gap year to me is after graduation of college before deciding to enter the workforce or graduate school or other professional schools. But the one I saw here is for freshman class admitted into college. What can they do abroad for a year? I still remembered the panic to help my daughter (myself?) get acquainted with the idea of her leaving home for the first time.

Posted by: daiwanlan | February 20, 2008 2:50 PM

Zackly, TBG.

Maggie, I thought it looked terrific. Initially I wondered about putting in an entire fillet, but then it later made sense that it would break up itself into nice chunks. And I loved the phrase "the Zen of chowder." All in all, it had me salivating. I wondered about the relatively small amount of dairy: only 1 1/2 cups of heavy cream. Still...if it works, it works.

I know I'm gonna try it soon.

Posted by: Curmudgeon | February 20, 2008 2:54 PM

Chaudrée never contains cream or other liquid dairy product, so the NE version is really an original recipe. But it always contain butter and , you'll all be flabbergasted, white wine. Yes, white wine in a French recipe. I know. Pretty unbelievable.

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 3:09 PM

Woodstock: What's the password?
Ace Ventura: New England clam chowder.
Woodstock: Is that the red or the white?
Ace Ventura: Ah, I can never remember that. White.
[door opens]
Ace Ventura: Yes.

Posted by: omni | February 20, 2008 3:17 PM

"Who put the overalls in Mrs. Murphy's chowder?/Nobody answered so we asked a little louder."

Posted by: omni | February 20, 2008 3:19 PM

TBG,
Bonus points for paying attention. I "stole" my future wife from this guy in our junior/his senior year. He did his year in the navy and enrolled at Emory which is across town from my alma mater. He called me my first week in the dorms and all three of us got together for one awkward meeting that fall. Haven't seen him since.

His gap year came with a price. He still had five years of reserve duty to complete. For most kids a year before college is just going to chew up their or their parents savings as they "volunteer" on some program of dubious value. Not going to college immediately after high school also has serious health insurance coverage issues once kids turn 18. Still haven't figured out the intended value of this.

Posted by: yellojkt | February 20, 2008 3:21 PM

The boson will turn up in the last place Higgs looks for it.

Posted by: yellojkt | February 20, 2008 3:23 PM

In the Chowder that Is the Universe, the Higgs boson is the cream, mais non?

:-)

Posted by: Scottynuke | February 20, 2008 3:30 PM

Now, let's hear it for the Higgs Boson.

Since the sneaky thing is a prime suspect for being responsible for mass (whatever that is) and mass is very involved with momentum, and trying to change momentum is a large part of what makes the world such a difficult place to get around, then VIOLA, A Harnessed Higgs may put an end (or at least a controlled reduction) to all that difficulty and resistence, opening a new world where FREEDOM has real meaning.

But, first, the little booger must be found.

Posted by: lowen | February 20, 2008 3:34 PM

Seen on NY Times (please to be noting last sentance)...

"Roger Clemens withdrew Wednesday from a scheduled appearance at an upcoming ESPN event at Disney World because, he said in a statement, 'I believe my current participation could be a distraction.'
Clemens had confirmed on Feb. 7 or 8 that he would participate, said an ESPN spokesman, Josh Krulewitz, but that was before he testified last week before the House oversight committee about accusations made by his former personal trainer, Brian McNamee, that he used steroids and human growth hormone.
Clemens's name remains on the 'ESPN the Weekend' Web site along with a photograph of him posing with Goofy."

Posted by: Scottynuke | February 20, 2008 3:35 PM

But even with all this weird science we are no closer to getting pouty lipped supermodels to appear just by wearing bras on our head.

Not to mention the flying car and meal in a pill I was promised.

Posted by: yellojkt | February 20, 2008 3:36 PM

"Clemens's name remains on the 'ESPN the Weekend' Web site along with a photograph of him posing with Goofy."

I thought that was a picture of him with Arlen Spector.

Posted by: TBG | February 20, 2008 3:38 PM

Shrieking, that definition is indeed beyond the pail.

Maybe that chowderhead thought a cauldron was just french for "stew bucket."


Posted by: Wilbrod | February 20, 2008 3:42 PM

yellojkt, LOL.

Though with that talk of flying cars and meals in a pill I thought we were talking about Lindsey Lohan again.

Posted by: SonofCarl | February 20, 2008 3:44 PM

In an attempt to lure ScienceTim into the discussion I have posted a ScienceTim photo at the top of this kit.

Posted by: Achenbach | February 20, 2008 3:45 PM

The size of the Smithereens is 4: a singer/guitarist, lead guitarist, drummer, and a bass player.

You're welcome.

Posted by: yellojkt | February 20, 2008 3:48 PM

"But, first, the little booger must be found."

Underneath the desk is the traditional place to hide these.

Posted by: yellojkt | February 20, 2008 3:50 PM

Thanks for the lessons on chowder. I grew up on boiled dinner, which is corned beef plus cabbage plus your-what-have-you-handy root vegetables, especially potatoes.

Tis not stew;tis not chowder.

Tis yummy and satisfying. We, out West, typically made do with brisket because corned beef is rather an East Coast Jewish deli item.

We would send away to Omaha and Iowas City to get the corned beef for special occasions.

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 3:53 PM

SciTim, among other monikers, is ShutterbugTim.

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 3:55 PM

Snowing pretty good here on the west bank of the mighty Anacostia River. That sound you probably hear is the sound of sphincters tightening all over the region as traffic comes to a fullbore rush hour snarl.

Wilbrod, loved "beyond the pail."

Posted by: Curmudgeon | February 20, 2008 4:01 PM

No snow, here, Mudge, in College Park (Southern exposure). However, all school activities are closed...so, off to pick up CPBoy. Baked ziti in the oven, Alfredo-style....

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 4:03 PM

I would love to enter the discussion, except that:
(a) particle physics is not my bag, at all; and
(b) I am about to traipse up the mountain for an 18-hour work day, getting our instrument onto the telescope and starting observations of planets & stuff. So I expect to be a little busy.

Posted by: ScienceTim | February 20, 2008 4:23 PM

SciTim;

NukeSpouse and I watched an HD program on "The End of the Universe" (red giants, black holes, colliding galaxies, etc) and they had a lot of footage from the Mauna Kea facility. We watched very closely for you, but were denied the pleasure of shouting, "Hey, there's SciTim!"

Travel safely.

:-)

Posted by: Scottynuke | February 20, 2008 4:26 PM

I, too, would love to enter the discussion, except that:

(a) particle physics is not my bag, at all; and

(b) see (a) above.

Posted by: nonScienceTBG | February 20, 2008 4:53 PM

So true with me also, TBG, but think about how much we learn from those who do know something!

Posted by: Slyness | February 20, 2008 5:02 PM

Hi yello, Scotty, CP, Mudge and all!

Here I am with a few minutes to boodle, and what are the topics?
Higgs Boson--I got nuttin'
Chowder--Other than liking to say "chowdah" I got nuttin'
Gap year--I'm probably the poster girl for why kids need to go to college immediately after high school, lest they wait 7 years to do so.

Posted by: Raysmom | February 20, 2008 5:03 PM

Now Slyness, there's the tricky part. I *want* to learn this stuff. I know there are folks here who can impart this knowledge. I even tried to read the "Blacker Than Black" article this morning. But try as I might, it all sounds like Charlie Brown's teacher to me.

Posted by: Raysmom | February 20, 2008 5:07 PM

Loved Gunther's photo in the mag, Joel; certainly makes the particle accelerator look like a menancing Borg tunnel, only more colorful.

My understanding of why they have miles and miles of tunnel for such tiny particle came when I was trying to do Gaileo's experiment-- the faster the balls moved, the more margin of error in timing the acceleration.

At speeds nearly the speed of light, maybe the real surprise is that we don't need a tunnel hundreds of miles long to be sure our calculations are reliable.

Joel, have you talked to anybody about the gravitional wave detector NASA's launching? Two probes pretty far apart will attempt to detect any distortions caused by gravity waves (which would be pretty big to start with). Sounds good if it works. SciTim probably knows the name of that gizmo whachamacallit... LISA-- Laser interferometer Space Antenna.

http://lisa.jpl.nasa.gov/WHATIS/intro.html

Thus ends the extent of any "intelligent" discussion on the Higgs Boson from me. I'm still waiting for the real GUT of physics. I still suspect mass is related to electromagnetism somehow, just like a tree is related to leaves.

Wait, that made more sense inside my head than it did coming out. Bless my heart, I'm quitting now.



Posted by: Wilbrod | February 20, 2008 5:11 PM

"There once was a Boson named Higgs from Nantucket..."

Much more, and I'll get zapped.

Posted by: Don from I-270 | February 20, 2008 5:17 PM

Bless your sweet little heart, Wilbrod, I do appreciate your trying to teach me and Raysmom about physics!

I'd like to understand, but I rather doubt I have it in me to make the effort to master the background information. So I'll just be impressed with what the rest of you say.

Posted by: Slyness | February 20, 2008 5:18 PM

Stealing blatantly from Winston Churchill (an old friend of mine; we trade phrases back and forth all the time):

Science to me is `A Riddle Wrapped in a Mystery Inside an Enigma'

Particle Physics was invented waaay after my time.

Posted by: Maggie O'D | February 20, 2008 5:19 PM

I thought particle physics were people who could tell you all about the used furniture you were thinking of buying, where it's been, who used it, was there laughter in the house, etc. Oh wait, that's particle psychics.

Posted by: LostInThought | February 20, 2008 5:36 PM

As an "Amen" to Slyness 5:18, I have quick story, then I gotta run. Maggie, thanks for the eggplant parmasian receipe. It was a huge hit.

My daughter had invited an AirForce buddy to spend the weekend with us. They are just "good friends", but I could see my wife using her mom's X-Ray husband detector to see if he cut the mustard in that department. As for me, I was impressed that he had saved up a bunch of money in the AF, enough to travel the world for a number of months. Europe, Asia, you name it. Among other things, he studied Kung Fu at a Xaolin, China temple. He spent some time in Japan. (He also enjoys classic movies. Do I have K-guy's attention?) My daughter was afraid that her ignorant dad was going to embarrass her, I think.

He's a vegan, so we discussed what I should fix for meals. I asked if he liked eggplant. "Yes, I love the dish that Iranian restaurants serve..." he was struggling to remember the name of the dish.
"Baba ganush?(sp?)" I said, confidently. "I can got a good receipe for that." My wife looked at me, startled, with an expression that said, "Who the h e 1 1 are you, and what did you do with my husband?"

Later that night, as conversation wandered on about where he had been, I asked him what he thought of Kurasawa's work. He lit up like I had just pushed a button. Again, "the look" from my wife.

Moral of the story, pay attention to the boodle, and you won't embarras yourself in front of your kids. Your spouse will also wonder just who you've been seeing on the side. :-)

Posted by: Don from I-270 | February 20, 2008 5:39 PM

SCC "can got" fingers done got ahead o' de brain

Posted by: Don from I-270 | February 20, 2008 5:43 PM

Don, eggplant parm is SO non-vegan. Did you serve it to him as is, or did you make substitutes with non-dairy ingredients?

Speaking as an Alzheimer's Patient in training, I thought it was Cassandra who wanted eggplant recipes?

Posted by: Maggie O'D | February 20, 2008 5:48 PM

Oh oh, a war of words over wordless thoughts....

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080219203603.htm

Temple Grandin isn't alone in processing memories visually or without thought, but I must disagree that animals do not have any communicative abilities akin to language, if less complex. Tim Friend's "Animal Talk" really brings things into perspective. Second, since when is language divorced from sensory memory?

How many of you remember a memory as "words" only, no sensory input? Temple is confusing implict and explicit memory, as well as episodic memory vs other forms of memory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit_memory

Procedural memory is knowing how to walk, tie, play music, without consciously remembering how you acquired that skill.

Other forms can be recognition of familiar, recalling facts, etc. without remembering a specific incident when you learned this information.

In addition, repetition of the information in multiple contexts reinforces a specific association and reduces the strength of other associations when recalled. This forms the basis of language and abstract knowledge... and habit.

Episodic memory is strongest for unique encounters-- one-time learning of fear or positive associations. The integrity of episodic memories decay when accessed repeatedly as new associations form every time, or when similar memories keep being formed, overlapping.

As far as I have garnered from autistic writers, especially those with Asperger's syndrome, they have problems with sensory processing and dampening them down, and literally, they cannot coherently pay attention and process a face as a whole, but as bits and pieces there in order. They may retain episodic memory much longer because they are not able to associate similar memories very well.

Animals may well resemble autism in this way more than neurotypical people do, but it does not mean they lack this mechanism.

My dog almost certainly doesn't access episodic memory every time he's told to sit; he's practiced that command thousands of times in various situations-- it becomes a procedural memory instead.

As for me, I do indeed have the occasional strong episodic recall of the first time I learned something new, but subsequent times blur in my mind.

This is probably a safety mechanism imposed by our brains, because otherwise we'd be musing through volumes of memories and associations like how Proust wrote 3,200 pages when triggered by a Madeline cookie.
Normally we don't have that luxury, so we filter this out. I do believe that animals have this ability as well.

It perhaps not as strongly developed in animals due to shorter lifespans, and also that they may have filters already in place on what they learn and memorize in the first place.

Honeybees, for instance, have good memory for flowers despite having brains the size of a pinhead. They do this by attention-- they will stay on a flower for 30 seconds after finishing, just memorizing it and uploading it in their brain.

They do not memorize other things nearly as well because they don't engage in attention. I used to catch bees mid-air, hold in my hands for the buzz and they'd never learn my hands meant darkness was coming-- I could catch them again and again, and they never learned.

However, once I interrupted a bee memorizing the flower, captured it, and let it go-- and when I reached for it, it immediately avoided my hands. That was the only bee that showed an ability to remember being caught, because I had interrupted it when it was busy memorizing what it had already visited.

It's wasteful for a honeybee to remember all the landings that didn't lead to food rewards, so turning on attention/learning in specific situations is a nifty way to economize learning and memory.

Sounds like the difference between short-term memory and long-term memory, right?

It is possible that a person with Asperger's with sensory processing issues could not learn the association of hands with flowers as effortlessly as that bee did. But then, bees have complex communication and can learn symbolic rules in tests.

http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/102/14/5250

Maybe the bee was muttering to himself, "gnome hands.. been there, done that," instead of having an vivid episodic memory that the bee then was able to symbolize for other bees, but I doubt it.


Posted by: Wilbrod | February 20, 2008 5:53 PM

I must step in and correct all of you. Clearly, the gap year should NOT be given to students, it should be given to their parents. You go to Europe, the students stay at home till you return, hold down jobs, pay all your bills, etc.

It seems fair to me though just a bit hard to put into action.

Posted by: dr | February 20, 2008 6:01 PM

I think that particle psychics can only work with furniture constructed of Medium (ahem) density board.

I seem to vaguely remember being in some sort of late-night TV dream state and hearing Dionne Warwick talking about Particle Psychics. Or maybe it was furniture... I'm not sure, but I blame it on that last glass of port.

bc

Posted by: bc | February 20, 2008 6:08 PM

Don, that's priceless.

Since SD has l'umbrage, a limerick with a nod to him (and hey! on kit!)

Physics, you may know, has a Grail
"A bosun named Higgs" goes the tale
The French have a Collider
with which they hope they will find 'er
(when not making their soup in a pail)

Posted by: SonofCarl | February 20, 2008 6:10 PM

Don loved the story - I often get that "look" from my husband now when I come out with something I heard here. The science topics I can't even try to repeat - one has to understand a little to be able to retell a tidbit.

Posted by: dmd | February 20, 2008 6:15 PM

Wilbrod and SoC, I wish I had wit.
You(se) do.

Funny thing, the only thing you can do with ombrage in French is to prendre (take) it. I suspect a Latin root somewhere.

Don, we are an eggplant friendly family. I've done a couple of Persian/Iranian eggplant recipes from Claudia Roden's "Cooking from the axis of Evil" books (Arabesque and Tamarind&Saffron). If the guy had a description I might be able to find it. Iranian "layered" cooking is very good but a little labour intensive for my taste. I'm more of a Lebanese & Moroccan kind of guy. But I do the salted cucumber in strained yogurt thing, can't get enough of it with BBQed meat.

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 6:34 PM

Eggplant-friendly

I see a bumper sticker, a yard sign, magnets, and other promotional proppies; TBG, let's get Cafe Press a sizzling.

The boodle is eggplant-friendly. Feels political. And smacks of justice-seeking.

Onward. To the great Aubergine in the sky!

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 6:53 PM

dr, bless your heart, your idea of a gap year for parents, not students, is absolutely brilliant. Now, to figure out the funding...

Posted by: Curmudgeon | February 20, 2008 7:03 PM

DR -- let's plan a knitting gap year, where we head to the Andes to comb fibers from friendly Alpaca creatures.....etc.

Then, off to Kashmir -- damn the bombs and line of control and ages-old enmity -- where we can watch goats frolicking in the high fields of the Hindu Kush......

And, then to Japan for lessons in cute-crochet and kawaii-knitting.

Mudge, feel free to respond in nautical terms, etc. Macrame. Scrimshaw. Starboard. Hardtack.

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 7:06 PM

Here is science news, from two trusty sources
1)wwww.bookofjoe.com (blog that Mo Mo Do knows about)
and a
2)buddy who edits for the National Academy of Sciences.

GIGANTIC, prehistoric FROG

http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/0707599105v1?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=david+krause&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&sortspec=date&resourcetype=HWCIT

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 7:12 PM

SoC keeps his golden limerick laurels, again.

And, I get a raspberry for breaking the boodle.

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 7:17 PM

Would a knitting gap year be a loop year?

Posted by: SonofCarl | February 20, 2008 7:19 PM

I think that'd have casting off months, SoC.

BTW, don't encourage the gap year idea.. Joel is about to send a daughter off to college, and he might be all too ready for a gap year after this campaign is done.

Posted by: Wilbrod | February 20, 2008 7:24 PM

Great minds work together, CP. Here's the secondary source, along with an artist's rendering of the frog in question, a female 16' wide and an estimated 10 lbs/4.53kg:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/19/science/18frog.html

Posted by: jack | February 20, 2008 7:25 PM

Maybe the CIA should waterboard Higgs to make him confess where he last put his boson. Much less onerous than the GHC.

CeePee, I like everything froggish, so I'm really happy to know we now have a "glimpse of the anuran assemblage that occupied Madagascar before the Tertiary radiation of mantellids and microhylids that now dominate the anuran fauna", whatever that means.

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 7:28 PM

Spotted that a couple days ago. I love the genus name: /Beelzebufo/.

Posted by: Wilbrod | February 20, 2008 7:29 PM

SoC -- loop year, yes, but the other loopy year might be spent in bedlam.

Wilbrod, am contemplating your entry. Lots there. I have had three Aspy students so far, only one who told me that he is Aspy. Wow. Interesting to teach them. Metaphor and other visual ways of explaining concepts are sometimes hard because they want to take them literally.

For example, when I tried to explain "spin" -- the journalism kind, I launched into the 40s swing song of

AC-CENT-TCHU-ATE THE POSITIVE (Mister In-Between)

(Johnny Mercer / Harold Arlen)

You've got to accentuate the positive
Eliminate the negative
Latch on to the affirmative
Don't mess with Mister In-Between

---
He decide to compare orbital spin in physics to journalism spin in a three-page comparison essay. He QUOTED me, thusly:

According to Professor MacGillicuddy-Parkian, "You've got to accentuate the positive,Eliminate the negative, Latch on to the affirmative, Don't mess with Mister In-Between."

But, in a footnote to me, he say, "I still don't get this Mr. Stuff."

Great kid; exhausting, though, because he would follow me out of class to keep talking about spin, orbitals, pi mesons, quarks, Einstein-Bose condensates, the probability that the Hadron Collider might explode and take us all to the great Aubergine in the sky......

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 7:34 PM

SD: Means we have a peek at what kind of frogs lived THEN before we got the frogs that are there NOW.

C+ on the writing.
"Too wordy; revise. Either put lengthy Biospeak in direct quotes or simplify. (Check definitions and references and/or ask a second source to explain!)"


Posted by: Wilbrod | February 20, 2008 7:35 PM

It says the male frog was smaller. Was that really true, or did her butt just *look* big in that outfit?

It also says she was "a lady PAC-man frog, on steroids". I guess that would explain the deep voice, but wouldn't she have a mustache?

Posted by: LostInThought | February 20, 2008 7:36 PM

Wow, Jack. I hope your students enjoyed that one. And, yes, a flabspenderous genus name!

Pardon the typos: VERY COLD IN HEAR, below 60. I shall not last long.

SD -- just for fun, tell us the Frenchie for spatchcock, again. Such a meal that Gi-huge-ic froggie would make.

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 7:37 PM

Whenever I see news of giants like the frog, I always think of that giagundo, bus sized fossil croc that fellow from the U of Chicago found. And dragonflies with 6 foot wingspans. I imagine that the naiads from that species baited some pretty large fish.

Posted by: jack | February 20, 2008 7:38 PM

LiT, your comment about the female-generosity-ness would suggest this fraction:

Y/X rather than X/Y

(I bet this gets through. Take that, Hal!)

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 7:41 PM

Don't mess with Missus Beelzebufo. You were warned here, in Achenblog land.

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 7:44 PM

You just reminded me of my father. Whenever someone came to visit after we were sent to bed but before we fell asleep, we heard them. The next day we asked him who was there the night before, and he always said it was Aloysius McGillicuddy. If we pressed further he said that he just arrived from Labbasheeby. We knew not to ask any more questions.

Good times. His grandchildren frequently quote him no matter how little they remember him.

Posted by: Maggie O'D | February 20, 2008 7:45 PM

Clearing out here in hagerstown

Posted by: greenwithenvy | February 20, 2008 7:46 PM

CP, Wilbrod, I saw this story earlier in the day. Last summer our office donated some obsolete computer equipment to a company that converts the equipment to bliss boards, keyboards similar to what I believe is used in this article.

The story is of a young autistic girl and how she learned to speak through the computer - quite amazing.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080217/favaro_carly_080217/20080217/

Posted by: dmd | February 20, 2008 7:46 PM

Oh my, MoD, Aloysius MacGillicuddy was also invoked that way in my house. Must be standard operating Irish procedure (SOIP).

I should call myself Anastasia Aloysia MacGillicuddy-Parkian.....wow.

Apologies to any real MG peeps. Wasn't Lucy Ricardo's maiden name MacGillicuddy? 1000 points to someone how knows without wiki-trip.

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 7:53 PM

Jasuz, that Aloysius sure did visit a lot of our families! He was a darlin' man, that one. Grand.

Posted by: Yoki | February 20, 2008 7:55 PM

En crapaudine CP, "toadlike".

I made Cornish hens (poussins i.e. chicks) en crapaudine then closed them around a mound of stuffing to present them in their natural position, as suggested in the WaPo recipe for turkey around X-mas. A grand meal if I can say so myself. I have now carpaudined turkey, chicken and Cornish hens. Duck should be the next step.

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 7:56 PM

En crapaudine CP, "toadlike".

I made Cornish hens (poussins i.e. chicks) en crapaudine then closed them around a mound of stuffing to present them in their natural position, as suggested in the WaPo recipe for turkey around X-mas. A grand meal if I can say so myself. I have now carpaudined turkey, chicken and Cornish hens. Duck should be the next step.

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 7:56 PM

I swear I didn't double posted. The Puppy must have done it.

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 7:57 PM

Things that happened at yesterday's Obama rally that weren't reported by Milbank or local reporter Greg Jefferson.

An older Hispanic woman who sat with the bigwigs in the shaded portion of Guadalupe Plaza was able to ask Obama a question during the town hall portion of his appearance about taxes, she having retired from a position with the Internal Revenue Service. Obama answered her and threw in a "Muchas Gracias," but when he started talking about earned income tax credits, young people left in droves. Apparently, they couldn't take a serious policy discussion from their "American Idol" candidate.

At the Clinton rally, giving personal information was voluntary. Several volunteers stood, each solo, at various spots along the length of the line, with clipboards for those so inclined.

At the Obama rally, giving personal information was mandatory. I balked and spoke with a campaign volunteer about it. She left me standing in the line and went back down Guadalupe St. to Plaza Guadalupe to check. Yes, it was required that the information portion of the "ticket" to get in be filled out. A number of volunteers handed out a ticket, with a stub to be torn off at the door, to each person who was standing in lone and who wanted to attend the rally.

I asked if someone from the campaign was going to check the information on the information portion of the ticket against a driver's license. This 30-something woman shrugged and walked off, muttering that she was just a local volunteer. You bet I filled out my card--with completely bogus information.

Is Obama that desperate to win in south central Texas that he requires personal information be mandatory?

Posted by: Loomis | February 20, 2008 7:59 PM

SCC I didn't carpaudined anything either. I

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 7:59 PM

The giant puppy would have trouble clicking that tiny Submit button with his enormous paws. Gosh, but he's cute.

Posted by: Yoki | February 20, 2008 8:03 PM

Love this pointy-headed Kit, Joel. Good to see you "back", and in top form. Politics junkie though I am, I rely on the Boodle for science and News of Weird. Like coming home.

2/3 way through Boodle. No time to catch up. Busy with special projects requiring actual deadline-type work. Working halfway from home; in at 7, out mid-morning, dropping in some afternoons, working whenever can during day. Email. Bah. [insert grumble about IT idiot director who thinks emailing confidential documents more secure than remote access] Ivansdad with flu, going to San Antonio tomorrow to "help" Ivansgramma get home from hospital (read: stay OUT OF WAY until no more flu). The Boy with god knows what, missed 3 days of school, seems better. If good, school tomorrow. If not, doctor. I will not be sick. No time.

Short-order cook for 3 days, tonight: grilled cheese sandwich. Fruit plate with ham. For me, ground beef with spinach, leeks, egg (bast**d Joe's Special, if you know that recipe from CA). 1/2 perfectly good bottle of chateau-neuf-du-pape gone, some into supper dish. Choir rehearsal maybe interesting. Family under orders, lights out at 9 even if I'm not home.

This too shall pass. Right?

Howdy RD. Welcome home.

Gomer, loved comment about "immature" college students. Cannot pinpoint it. Very nice.

I hope more later. Carry on, all.

Posted by: Ivansmom | February 20, 2008 8:10 PM

Jaysus back at you, Yoki! Who knew that MacGillicuddy belonged to all of us Ol' Sod-ers. Funny times three, at least.

Gilla is from Giolla, which means servant of or devotee of. Often, this trims to Gil, as in

Gilbride (devotee of St. Brigid)
Gilmary
Gilmartin
Gilchrist

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 8:13 PM

Oooh great picture Joel. I missed a giant puppy? definitely be back for that.

did I mention 4 long tedious phone calls, 3 while trying to work from home, all on subjects infinitely tangential to anything I am actually involved in? They want to talk to me, not me to them. Advice to all, except 1 where I just put the phone down until the voice stopped then picked it up and said something soothing. Bad. Bad. Penance someday.

Time to sing. Very cold here now. Good nights to all.

Posted by: Ivansmom | February 20, 2008 8:13 PM

I know why that ancient giant frog went extinct: Because it tasted like chicken.

After the C-T event (whatever you choose to believe it was) 65 million years ago and the larger animals began dying off, everything was fair game.

Pangaea Fried Beelzebufo: It's what's for dinner.

bc


Posted by: bc | February 20, 2008 8:17 PM

Yes, CP. I'm not completely correct on all the terminology I used, I believe, but I'm going by what I know of animal learning (which involves dog training).

If you train a complex command without the dog knowing what all the bits mean, it falls apart or the dog guesses at things. In some cases, the dog can really anticipate a predictable command so well they seem brilliant, but they're only latching onto some things, like most second-language learners would.

So the rule is to generalize so the dog knows what a word always mean, and keep it simple and use words which the dog understands fully and build up meaning.

As I said once, to somebody who insisted "fetch" was language enough for a dog, "If you're in the bathroom and you shout out FETCH, the dog has no idea what you want him to get. None. If he does fetch something, he's either guessing from familiar objects to fetch or you've only trained him to fetch one thing."

To me, pointing and other "nonverbal cues" is indeed part of language (as it is in ASL). It's not a perspective most people share of course, because they're called "nonverbal" cues. In ASL they're part of the overall grammar.

Autism, I think, is an argument for the opposite.

Some severely speechless autistic children can learn to read and write language just fine; even write poetry. They can learn and use words in order just fine; this isn't aphasia or the other language impairment disorders we know.

Instead, the problem comes from trouble with input to their language systems, whether sensory or cognitive (likely both) that affects their ability to engage with social contact/conversation with others.

Some deaf with significant language delay also tend to be literal when handling written language because they're working so hard to understand new words and alien concepts that they miss the nuances. The more complex the material is, their stress becomes such that they can be suspicious when others laugh, thinking perhaps the joke is on them somehow, as they lack so much context for judging others' social responses appropriately.

I have a friend who grew up lipreading and she's horrible at listening to jokes because she's so busy trying to guess and piece what is being said, that she misses the joke until others laugh. She does better with signed and written jokes, but signed jokes had better be short and simple so she doesn't miss nuances (as it's not her first language).

I suspect there are multiple autistic disorders myself, and that the common thread is lack of eye contact and impairment in social cognition; because people with autism can have very different cognitive talents and weaknesses.

They thought sign language would help autistic children learn language. It didn't (except in cases where the autistic child has hypersensitive hearing or hearing loss)... the problem isn't in HEARING words for most.

My response to your Aspie student would have been to explain personification to him, and that it may indicate a fictional component, and to ask him if he could rephrase what you had said differently (probably couldn't), according to how he understands it.
Since he wrote a 3 page essay, he apparently has an certain ability to rephrase linguistic information, which is promising.
Then I'd probably discuss positive reinforcement techniques (in autistic circles, a similar form is called "applied behavior analysis"... he might recognize this term), and explain that the objective of spin is to shape people's attitudes by using positive reinforcement and suppressing any stimuli that might be punitive, and avoiding any neutral or ambiguous stimuli that might drown out the positive reinforcement.

But I do like that song :).

In his case, he heard spin and it hooked up to information he loved and he couldn't separate "spin" from physics... just like a dog that's taught to fetch a ball on "fetch" so long will have problems understanding... "fetch sock;" the associative learning is so strong that it has to be partially erased first for other associations to form.

It would be interesting if he in fact knows "spin" as a verb as in "to spin a top." It is possible he does not.


I have a cousin who would probably characterize himself (once I told him about Asperger's and he read up on it) as having a very mild autistic-spectrum disorder, including problems with eye contact, social awkwardness and a literal tendency.

Posted by: Wilbrod | February 20, 2008 8:18 PM

Hope many of you are able to get out and watch the lunar eclipse tonight, moon is so bright right now. I am trting to talk pictures as the younger child cannot stay up late enough to see the full eclipse.

Posted by: dmd | February 20, 2008 8:20 PM

Thanks, Wilbrod. DMD, I appreciated hearing about the computer donations to make connection possible. E.M. Forster's best sentence ever?

Only connect. (Frontispiece to _Howard's End_)

I am hoping to catch a
glimpse of the
'clipse

Snow petered out here; what about others in this zone?

Off to check the sky with perennial puppy Poodle-MacGillicuddy-Parkian.

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 8:24 PM

dmd - alas, we are overcast here in Northern Virginia. I am bitterly disappointed because I find Lunar Eclipses a delight to watch. I especially like that "blood red moon" bit. Gets the primordial memories stirring.

Plus, you can look at a Lunar Eclipse and not fall down in blinding pain.

Oh well.

Posted by: RD Padouk | February 20, 2008 8:25 PM

SCC:

Autism is an argument for the opposite point of view to the idea that "nonverbal language" is separate from verbal language.

"Nonverbal gesture" fluency (whether heard or seen) are key for building up reception and conversational skills in any language.

Such "nonverbal" gestures have been found in speech-- an study that I was drafting a blog entry on. Guess I should finish it.

Posted by: Wilbrod | February 20, 2008 8:25 PM

LOL, Don, yes indeedy, the things we learn on the boodle!

Ivansmom, life will get better. We promise.

I'm charging up the camera battery so I can take pictures of the eclipse. I hope I can get it to work.

Mr. T is in better shape now, Carolina is out front of NC State.

Posted by: Slyness | February 20, 2008 8:26 PM

Ooh wait! I stand corrected! (That happens a lot.) The skies have opened to reveal a glorious full moon. Perhaps I shall have my moment of primal memory after all.

Now, where *did* I put those ceremonial robes?

Posted by: RD Padouk | February 20, 2008 8:29 PM

Now if only I could explain to a very excited 7 year old that the moon takes its time turning red. One of our kitchen windows looks right out at the moon right now - the little one doesn't understand why I don't just sit there and watch - non-stop!

Posted by: dmd | February 20, 2008 8:30 PM

eggxactly bc, beezelbufo legs fried in garlic butter andd served with a nice crusty baguette, hummmmmm, the breakfast of champion.

Right Yoki, and there is the brain thing too. As often commented in Dogue de Bordeaux circles the guy who named English bulldog the stupidest dog was not Dogue savvy. They are cute, friendly, the nicest dogs to handle and bury your hands in but clever they aren't.
Mrs Denizen's grand-mother, in her middle 90s, almost blind, almost deaf, loves the puppy for the tactile experience. The DdB really are like nothing else as a touchy-feely experience. But we have to be careful, the stupid thing is now quite a bit heavier than the old lady.

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 8:33 PM

ivansmom, i felt an asthma attack coming on while reading your comment. It made me breathless to read it.

that was me for the eggplant recipes.

this kit is too high for me. not. one. idea. about. the. subject. not. one. but I'm sure JA knows what he's talking aobut.

time for bed. I am sleepy and tired. have a good night, boodle. sweet dreams.

I hope you guys will listen to the radio program. We need the support. It's WKDX.net and click on Live Feed. In Hamlet, North Carolina. Thanks a bunch. Every Wednesday from eleven until eleven fifteen.

Posted by: cassandra s | February 20, 2008 8:34 PM

We have crystal clear skies thanks to the -16C/4F temperature so a Puppy walk is scheduled in the 21:30-10:00 time slot.
Thee moon is simply spectacular right now.

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 8:40 PM

SCC I manage to even screw up numbers now. 21:30-22:00.

*furiously looking for fleece-lined ceremonial robes for RDP and myself*

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 8:43 PM

Hey, the sky's clear and I can see the lunar eclipse starting from my bedroom window.

Sweet.

bc

Posted by: bc | February 20, 2008 8:49 PM

Clear here, too, with mysterious clouds whisking past. Chilly now. So, will head out again in 15.

BC has the best room in the house.

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 8:54 PM

I'm running out to take pictures every four or five minutes, I should go dig out a lawn chair and just sit down out there. I also need a tripod but the pictures are turning out okay. At least I'm only deleting about half of them.

The sky is clear and the eclipse is spectacular.

Posted by: Slyness | February 20, 2008 9:10 PM

Very cool. Nice of the weather to cooperate by providing perfect viewing conditions in the D.C. area. Fifteen or twenty degrees warmer wouldn't have hurt my feelings, but I guess you can't have everything!

Posted by: Bob S. | February 20, 2008 9:21 PM

Went outside with my binoculars, I can just barely see the shadow moving across the mountains of the moon.

Very cool.

View's still nice from my bedroom, and it's a good 35 deg F warmer there, too.

bc

Posted by: bc | February 20, 2008 9:24 PM

Moon is about halfway eclipsed, the obscured half is starting to turn red.

I love this stuff.

bc

Posted by: bc | February 20, 2008 9:30 PM

Been checking out the eclispe and it's awesome,I have to remind myself to not watch it on my way home. Also been telling guests to check it out. Our european guests are heading home tomorrow and are enjoying their last night in America.

Is it bon jour, or bon soir?

Posted by: greenwithenvy | February 20, 2008 9:33 PM

gwe, bonsoir is goodnight, either arriving or leaving.
Bonjour is hello (greeting upon meeting) or have a good day (greeting upon leaving).
Adieux is farewell (do not expect to see them again).
On se revoit? (Should we see again?) is popular these days.
Off to a walk with the Puppy to look at the PURPLE moon.

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 9:42 PM

gwe, bonsoir is at night (say later than 16:00), bonjour during daylight.

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 9:45 PM

About 3/4 of the moon in shadow.

Thinking about baying at it.

Wha- hair growing on the back of my hands and my teeth hurt... feel strange.

Notice i need haircut *bad*.
Something happening.

Ahhhh - WHHHOOOOOOOOOOO!

Posted by: bc | February 20, 2008 9:48 PM

It is beautiful out there. Nearing totality. Is it any wonder that the evening sky and the glowing objects contained within have prompted such wonder?

Posted by: RD Padouk | February 20, 2008 9:49 PM

WaaaHOOOOOOOO!

Waaaaa-HOOOOOOOO!

Feels good to talk to bloody moon
i notice i need shave now

my hair is definitely NOT perfect

Waaaaahhhhh-HOOOOOOOOOO!

Posted by: bc | February 20, 2008 9:54 PM

Pome by Canadian P.K. Page, perfect for this eve.

Stargazer.

The very stars are justified,
The galaxy italicized.
I have proofread and
proofread the beautiful script,
There are no errors

Posted by: College Parkian | February 20, 2008 9:55 PM

I miss Warren Zevon.

Posted by: RD Padouk | February 20, 2008 9:56 PM

Waaa-HOOOOOOOOOO!

me 2 rd grr
red moon with white edge
i think of mars turned on side

and me turning inside out

Waaaaaah - HOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHH!

Posted by: bc | February 20, 2008 9:59 PM

bc - I thought about the mars bit too. The last little bit looks just like the polar ice cap.

Posted by: RD Padouk | February 20, 2008 10:02 PM

Warren Zevon. Me too. Waaa Hoooo - even though all clouds here. No moon.

Time for bed. Tomorrow is another day. Fondue, all, vaya con queso.

Posted by: Ivansmom | February 20, 2008 10:07 PM

WaaaaAAAAAA - HOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHH!

run and play in snow now
hunt for dinner

howl at beautiful red moon

Waaaaa-HOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooo!

Posted by: bc | February 20, 2008 10:08 PM

Bioutifool moon. Even the stars pitched in here, in this perfectly clear night.
A very good lunar elipse it is, although the Puppy wasn't impressed. The little (purebred) b@stard managed to steal a bit of birdfood though. Little gourmet that he is he likes the lard/suet/peanut butter/seed mix.

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 10:15 PM

Wow! We lucked out here too. Sky cleared and we watched through "S" 's new telescope. It was beautiful and eerie. We also saw Saturn!! We could see the rings. Now that was incredibly cool! Had to come in to get warm, can't watch to the end as we have to get up in the morning. But it was a sight worth remembering. How fortunate we all are that the weather cleared.

Posted by: Bad Sneakers | February 20, 2008 10:16 PM

Pretty cool how a few stars became visible after the moon was engulfed.

Could we use engulfed and devoured?

Posted by: greenwithenvy | February 20, 2008 10:16 PM

Can I come and run and play with you bc?

Posted by: greenwithenvy | February 20, 2008 10:17 PM

Waaa-HOOOOOOOOOOOO!

grrrrr
snif?
grrrrrrrrr

Waaaaahhhhhh-HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Posted by: bc | February 20, 2008 10:18 PM

Calm down bc, I hear silver bullets sliding down Winchester 94's tubular magazines...

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 10:19 PM

Story of alleged, rumored McCain affair broke a couple of hours ago at the NYT online, will run in tomorrow's paper.

Larry King and Jon Stewart discussed the story 10 minutes into King's interview with Stewart on CNN. The story consuming the first 15 minutes of the Anderson Cooper show with a talking head, Capeheart, IIRC, from the Washington Post--much talk about the timing of the NYT article.

Posted by: Loomis | February 20, 2008 10:23 PM

"Man has sex with woman" headline Linda. Thanks. That's rare.

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 10:38 PM

The eclipse was so cool I had to come in and take a shower to warm up my feet.

I took lots of pictures, but it was hard to get the moon in view and snap and keep it in the field of view. (Idea for birthday: tripod.) I'll download the photos tomorrow. If any are good, I may upload them to Flickr.

Posted by: Slyness | February 20, 2008 10:40 PM

Waaaa-HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

greenie come run with the pack

not scared of silver bullets
you have to hit me to hurt me

grrrrr

Waaaahhhhh- HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Posted by: bc | February 20, 2008 10:42 PM

McCain's alleged paramour (or power mower as we call them in the Frostfam)graduated from IUP the same year as a close friend. If Ms. Iseman was a synchronized swimmer then they surely knew each other. If I can unearth anything substantive, or even speculative, I'll be sure to let y'all know.

Off to back boodle skim.

Posted by: frostbitten | February 20, 2008 10:45 PM

We just went outside to see if we could see anything from the missile shoot-down attempt. Nothing yet. We'll check after sunset to see if there's any visible debris -- actually what we might expect to see would be the cloud of hydrazine. Of course, maybe they didn't launch.

Posted by: ScienceTim | February 20, 2008 10:47 PM

"I saw the new moon late yestreen
With the old moon in her arm;
And if we go to sea, master,
I fear we'll come to harm."


Posted by: Kay | February 20, 2008 10:49 PM

I went out and took some pictures of the lunar eclipse, but I'm not sure how well they will come out since I had two glasses of wine and five shots of amaretto while celebrating my birthday. Something tells me Edwin Hubble has nothing to worry about.

Posted by: yellojkt | February 20, 2008 10:49 PM

Sciece Tim, I hope your tracking is better than what we had back then. Kosmos whatever was mostly lost in the background.
I would really like to se a sketch of the satellite to verify that the hydrazine issue was really an item or just, as usual with this admin, a distraction. But they won't of course, the secrecy freaks.

Posted by: shrieking denizen | February 20, 2008 10:56 PM

Beautiful eclipse, right outside the back door. Thanks to the boodle for alerting me about it yesterday and reminding me tonight.

Posted by: TBG | February 20, 2008 11:00 PM

"truckin I'm a goin home,oh wo baby where I belong"

Happy Birthday Yellow

Posted by: greenwithenvy | February 20, 2008 11:15 PM

Here's some more wonderful moonlight to end the evening, from Debussy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcpamvLB2JU&feature=related

Posted by: SonofCarl | February 20, 2008 11:17 PM

Oooooooh- man.

I just had the *weirdest* dream.

Hmmm.
My throat's sore, I've got some sort of lint or hair in my teeth, and -- hey, where are my clothes?

Looks like the neighbor's dog got loose again, too. There are tracks in the snow all over the yard, and they weren't there a couple of hours ago.

Hey, it looks like the eclipse is almost over -- did I miss it?

bc

Posted by: bc | February 20, 2008 11:28 PM

Out here in Colorado the lunar eclipse has been spectacular. Still is.

Chocolate and milk.

Couldn't have asked for better.

Yummy.

Posted by: eidrib | February 20, 2008 11:29 PM

Happy Birthday yellojkt.

Tomorrow, I'm going to talk psychics, er, I mean physics, waves in the Higgs ocean, Observers, dark matter and dark energy, GUT feelings, thought experiments, Copenhagen, Cosmology, Uncertainty, string and Many Worlds theories, Calibi-Yau spaces, sock-eating aliens, Relativity and Reality.

But first, I need some sleep.
I feel awfully tired, like I've been on a long run.

G'night, all.

bc

Posted by: bc | February 20, 2008 11:45 PM

I'm hiding sister and I'm dreaming
I'm riding down your moonlight mile
I'm hiding baby and I'm dreaming
I'm riding down your moonlight mile
I'm riding down your moonlight mile

Even saw the eclipse out here - looked cloudy earlier, but cleared up in time.

Posted by: mostlylurking | February 20, 2008 11:46 PM

Great!

Posted by: eidrib | February 20, 2008 11:50 PM

The scary blood red moon had the coyotes howling so buddy and I howled right back.
I imagine the colour is a result of the shorter wavelengths getting caught up in the earth's atmosphere rather than from pollution. Both?
The shadow on the moon during the last eclipse was bright blue so I'm looking forward to the net one in 3 years. Maybe it'll be a nice purple or stripes.

Posted by: Boko999 | February 21, 2008 12:00 AM

bc, you're a nut. i mean that in an affectionate way.

i has a good view of the lunar eclipse around 7:15 our time.
it was around 2/3 blocked, maybe a little more.

rd, welcome back.

Posted by: L.A. lurker | February 21, 2008 12:02 AM

bc, those dog tracks were mine.. I uh, had to escort a friend back home before he broke into the wrong yard and got shot with silver.

Sorry to muss up your nice and soft snow, but hope you understand.

P.S. I borrowed some froze steak from your freezer as a lure. One of those nights where I sure feel Siriusly Black.

Posted by: Wilbrodog | February 21, 2008 12:29 AM

Long night. My MIL was fairly mobile and relatively sharp until she broke her arm a couple of weeks ago. She's taken about 10 giant steps back on both counts and is very slow to answer simple questions, or be conversational, and has adopted a stooped, shuffling gait. My wife is going to start inquiring about the possibility that her mom has Parkinsons. Kind of tough, as we had a dear friend succumb to that condition on Valentines Day. My wife had to go over to help with Mom earlier as she has a lot of pain in her left leg. On the optimistic side the pain could be due to the fall, but it could be as bad as metastasis. Looks like x-rays and possibly a bone scan. Observing the eclipse with the kids provided some respite from the pressures of the evening. Pretty cool.

Posted by: jack | February 21, 2008 12:44 AM

Ivansmom, please tell me the confidential e-mail is encrypted. The VPN? Depends on what security he's put there.

Shrieking, :-) and :-). Also, is it *en crapaudine* or *carpaudined?* The first sounds like, well, that little place in CT.

Posted by: dbG | February 21, 2008 2:39 AM

Welcome back, RD. Thanks for the description of your father's funeral service. My knowledge of mass is whatever Hollywood tells me.

There is no gap year thingy thing over here. If you are able to secure a place at the university, don't dilly dally about it, just hurry up and finish. Then go get a job and earn some money.

Jack, I hope your MIL will get better and not have Parkinsons.

Posted by: rainforest | February 21, 2008 3:16 AM

Beezlebufo!!! *ROFLPMPGETE* :-)

Spatchcocked Beezlebufo? Beezlebufo en crapaudine?

Wait, I know! Beezlebufo with a mornay sauce served in a Provencale manner with shallots and aubergines garnished with truffle pate, brandy with a fried egg on top and spam! :-))))

Coverage of the satellite shootdown all seems to be based on the same unnamed sources, I'm shocked...

It was sure tough to sleep last night, all that howling and odd lights. Hmmmm.

*one-last-jam-packed-day-of-a-short-workweek Grover waves* :-)

Posted by: Scottynuke | February 21, 2008 5:08 AM

Good morning, all. Nice of you to join me. 5 more hours in the work day, today. Having some telescope and instrument problems (our fault), but we think we have them sorted out. Ms. Hotel Mauna Kea is singing along with James Taylor here. We're working on the photography for three different future videos, in between doing astronomy.

Posted by: ScienceTim | February 21, 2008 5:28 AM

Good morning, friends. Nice to see you here so early Science Tim. And Ivansmom, I hope everyone is feeling better this morning at your home. Yello, happy birthday, and may you have many more.

I did not see the moon thing last night, just too, too, tired and sleepy. I hope we get some pictures.

Scotty, Slyness, Mudge, Martooni, good, good morning to you, and all.*waving*

Well, it's getting down and dirty. The talking heads were on a rant about the McCain deal, wonder is it true? And tonight is the debate with Clinton and Obama, correct? That might be testy. If I can just keep my eyes open long enough to watch.

I have my coffee here, and I'm talking to my imaginary friends on the computer. At a real early hour in the morning, before the sun comes up. And looking at fingers that remind me of twinkies. And they have the nerve to hurt.

I'm going to offer this, and I probably should not, but I think some of us are holding our breath concerning Obama. The reason: Fear. Why? This is a country that race impacts deeply, perhaps not as much as before, but it is still there, and that may not be good. I don't want it to be so. I pray we have gotten beyond that. That we judge a man not by the color of his skin, but by the content of his character. I believe this is one of the most fascinating election I've ever had the pleasure to witness during my short lifetime. History in the making, and I hope it is all good.

Have a great day, folks. I hope the weather where you are adds to that statement.

God loves us so much more than we can imagine through Him that died for all, Jesus Christ.

Posted by: cassandra s | February 21, 2008 6:05 AM

Good morning, daiwanlan.

And if you're listening this morning, hello Nani, and we miss your stories.

Posted by: cassandra s | February 21, 2008 6:08 AM

'Morning, Boodle. I see Scotty's already up. Yes, all that howling last night made it difficult to sleep. I had a strange dream of a very hair man with a Chinese menu in his hand dancing with Queen Elizabeth -- no idea why. His hair was perfect, though, I seem to recall. Most odd.

Well, there's big news this morning, though you won't read it in the Post. The NYT has a big story about McCain having a "romantic relationship" with a lobbyist 8 years ago, and nhis staff took pains to isolate her from his office. The Post picked up the NYT story and repeats a lot of it-- but omits any and all references to their relationship possibly/allegedly being "romantic" as well as professional.

It's too early to tell whether the story is gonna get "legs" or not.

Posted by: Curmudgeon | February 21, 2008 6:12 AM

Because we know that any "romantic" relationship disqualifies a person from public office because it demonstrates "bad judgment". Presidents from certain unnamed European countries can squire their pregnant girlfriend around on official business, but any hint of hanky-panky in America throws the wheels off the bus.

Gonna be a fun election. Let's hope that Obama guy is a squeaky clean boy scout.

Posted by: yellojkt | February 21, 2008 6:42 AM

Good morning, everybody! Cassandra, I hope the fingers aren't bothering you.

bc, you and Wilbrodog, too funny and punny. Siriusly Black, indeed!

I wish I had had the energy to see the eclipse all the way through, but I gave up when it was full and went to bed. The last time I watched an eclipse, I was at the beach with friends and we sat on the porch of the beach-front house till it was all over. Alas, I don't have that energy any longer.

Posted by: Slyness | February 21, 2008 7:13 AM

SciTim's position at Mauna Kea is safe from me. Here are my pictures of the eclipse last night:

http://livebythefoma.blogspot.com/2008/02/drunken-astronomy.html

That portfolio isn't getting me any astronomy (or photography) jobs.

Posted by: yellojkt | February 21, 2008 7:15 AM

well, yello, considering that Obama has said certain thing concerning his life, we can go from that information, that his is not a squeaky clean boy scout life. you think?

the story had legs last night at some point, mudge.

Posted by: cassandra s | February 21, 2008 7:17 AM

Happy Birthday Yello.

RD, that was a wonderful piece about your Dad's funeral. As a lapsed Catholic I can agree about the soothing quality of the Mass.

Hope everyone has recovered from the effects of the eclipse. It was so much fun to watch, I can't wait for the next one.

Posted by: Bad Sneakers | February 21, 2008 7:23 AM

Slyness

the fingers do hurt but that's because I cut the nails too deep. In their swollen state, they're just stiff and hard to move.

I wish I could walk again. That would help a lot. The police chief here told us not to walk alone in this area. And I was walking early and alone. People would walk up behind me,and I would not hear them and it was frightening. Anyway, the leg got bad too. Just a bunch of stuff, but I miss walking terribly.

Posted by: cassandra s | February 21, 2008 7:26 AM

cassandra,
Obama has never hidden many things in his past, but there is an odd randomness to what sticks in the public's mind as scandalous. Something he may never have thought of as significant could turn out to be bigger than he thought. That is why Hillary crows that she is fully vetted. There isn't much of her life that hasn't been hashed and rehashed endlessly.

Posted by: yellojkt | February 21, 2008 7:34 AM

Cassandra, walking is such a pleasure; sorry this is not possible now.

Kay, welcome or nice to see you. I saw your moon pome last night.

Chilly. Chilly.

Friday looks to be slippy, slidey around these parts. So, enjoy your Thursday.

Night summary: Moon eclipsed; satellite blitzed; Hillary miffed; McCain p!ssed; what else have we today?

Posted by: College Parkian | February 21, 2008 7:37 AM

CP, brilliant!

Posted by: Bad Sneakers | February 21, 2008 7:47 AM

Boko999 - the red color is indeed because of light being scattered by the earth's atmosphere as it travels to the moon. The blue light is scattered from the main path of the light leaving the red light behind. This is Rayleigh scattering and explains why sunsets and sunrises are red, while the daytime sky is blue. It's physics in action.

Posted by: RD Padouk | February 21, 2008 7:51 AM

And more physics in action...

http://editorial.autos.msn.com/article.aspx?cp-documentid=457882

*paging bc*

With apologies to Arte Johnson, this iz vellllllllllllllllly eeeeenteresting...

:-)

Posted by: Scottynuke | February 21, 2008 8:00 AM

The end of the satellite is just the final chapter in a long weird tale.

Of course, we like the new lunch room.


Posted by: RD Padouk | February 21, 2008 8:01 AM

Happy birthday, yello!

Posted by: jack | February 21, 2008 8:02 AM

Yello aged (gracefully); McCain first-paged; Britney raged; Moon amazed;

Hiya, Bad Sneakers; and no, my internet is not out.

Just practicing for the Gary Cooper Olympics.

Posted by: College Parkian | February 21, 2008 8:18 AM

I finally got the chance to read Joel's article. It is brilliantly insightful and charmingly witty. He's kinda predictable that way.

I was trained as a solid state physicist who meandered over to electromagnetic signals as kind of a diversion. My understanding of high-energy physics is much like that of a casual biker watching the Tour d' France. I understand what they are trying to do. I get the underlying concepts. But I stand in awe at the sheer intellectual stamina of those in this field.

The rock-star physicist Richard Feynman once claimed that the most important idea in science is that we are made up of little particles. What the High Energy Physicists are doing is finding what the particles that make up the particles that make up the particles are. Some suggest this is a futile effort, but I think it is a noble one for the reasons Joel so eloquently describes.

What more fundamental question in science is there than "What are we made of"? For if one really understands the fundamental underpinnings of the universe, everything else should follow.

Posted by: RD Padouk | February 21, 2008 8:25 AM

Psst, RD

Love and stardust

Posted by: College Parkian | February 21, 2008 8:34 AM

Semicolon is the word of day. Happy birthday, Yello.

Posted by: daiwanlan | February 21, 2008 8:38 AM

We are also million-year-old carbon, CP.

:-)

Posted by: Scottynuke | February 21, 2008 8:38 AM

Cassandra, maybe we could meet halfway and walk together. Wouldn't that be fun?

Sounds like a happy birthday, yello, hope you enjoyed it.

Thanks for that explanation, RD, physics in plain English. I love this place.

Posted by: Slyness | February 21, 2008 8:53 AM

LOVE the semicolon;
FEAR the colon.

Posted by: College Parkian | February 21, 2008 8:55 AM

RD, glad you're home safe and I'd like to add my condolences. Thank you for sharing everything with us.

Posted by: dbG | February 21, 2008 9:00 AM

CP, you would be surprised at the number of people that aren't able to walk either because of a physical ailment or because of safety reasons.

As one gets older safety becomes a serious issue. The older person can't run and more than likely can't fight either. As for me, I depise guns.

Yello, I suppose your take on this is correct. I think anytime an affair is mentioned and the person involved is an older man, it just seems kind of humorous to me. And I've dated older men in the past. That could possibly be the reason for my perspective on the issue. Anyway, Ame