Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
The new Washington
Post Weather website
Jump to CWG's
Latest Full Forecast
Outside now? Radar, temps
and more: Weather Wall
Follow us on Twitter (@capitalweather) and become a fan on Facebook
Posted at 10:30 AM ET, 06/ 9/2008

Freedman: Climate News from the Arctic to Kiribati

By Andrew Freedman

With presidential politics dominating much of the news coverage last week, along with the D.C. area thunderstorms and the heat, there were several climate change science news items that may have slipped past your Doppler 9000.

First up was another sobering assessment of Arctic sea ice cover. The National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) announced on June 3 that the Arctic sea ice is "on track for extreme melt" this summer. Last year Arctic sea ice set a new record low at the end of the melt season, when the Northwest Passage was largely ice free.

Keep reading for more climate news. For the blistering full forecast, see Jason's post and check out NatCast for the outlook for tonight's game.

As I wrote on May 19, this year the sea ice cover is especially vulnerable due to the prevalence of seasonal ice, which is thinner than the multi-year ice that typically survives the melt season. The problem is that in recent years much of the multi-year ice has melted, leaving only the seasonal ice left to face the punishing Arctic summer sun.

Since my article appeared, data has come in indicating that the ice is already melting at a fast rate. According to Walt Meir, a research scientist at the NSIDC, trends observed in May indicate that the sea ice is on track to melt significantly again, although he said the actual extent of the melting depends on numerous factors. Last year, he said, there was "a perfect storm" of ocean and atmospheric conditions that combined to set the record. He put the odds of setting a new record low this year at about 50/50.

"It's definitely going to be a very low year," Meier said in a telephone interview.

The NSIDC's June 3rd update noted the appearance of several "polynyas" in the ice pack. According to the center, polynyas (which sound like the title of a Russian submarine in a Cold War movie) are defined as "irregularly shaped areas of persistent open water that are sustained by winds or ocean heat." Currently there are large coastal polynyas off of the Alaskan coast, in Baffin Bay, and near the Canadian Archipelago.

Polynyas can form from upwelling of warm water, or from persistent offshore winds that push sea ice away from the coast and prevent new ice from taking hold in that area, Meier said.

Meier said the presence of polynyas is not unusual, since they typically are seen in some areas at this time of year. However, they are more numerous now than usually occur at this time of year, and some are much larger than normal. For example, the Baffin Bay polynya, which is a normal occurrence in May, is close to reaching a record size. Much above normal temperatures in the Baffin Bay region during May might have contributed to the large polynya formation.

Meier said these areas of open water might be related to the prevalence of young ice, since it is more prone to breaking up under stress than older, thicker ice. Polynyas are important to keep an eye on because the open water absorbs more heat from the sun than ice cover does, thereby warming up faster and melting the ice along its edges. "That can speed up the melt," Meier said.

Rain Forest Destruction Continues at a Rapid Rate

Rain forest destruction also made news last week, with the release of a study that used satellite imagery to estimate the loss of rain forest in ecologically rich Papua New Guinea. The study, which claimed to be the first comprehensive accounting of that nation's rain forests, found that the country's total forest cover has been declining at the alarmingly fast rate of about 1,400 square miles annually, or about 1.4 percent of the country's total forest cover per year. According to the New York Times, that would mean that if this rate continues, by 2021 more than 80 percent of Papua New Guinea's accessible forest would be badly degraded or cleared.

The issue of rain forest destruction is of critical importance for policy makers who are trying to reduce the world's greenhouse gas emissions. The rain forests act as a giant carbon sink without which levels of carbon dioxide, a major greenhouse gas, would be significantly higher. Because of this, countries such as Papua New Guinea are seeking to be compensated by the international community to keep their forests intact, but thus far they have not received funding on a scale that would compete with the economic incentives for cutting down forests for logging and agriculture.

In the introduction to the study, Belden Namah, Papua New Guinea's forests minister, stated that time is still left for trends to be reversed. "Over the past decades we have imagined that our forests are limitless - perhaps the rapid modernization that has occurred in PNG has made us reticent to accept the notions of scarcity - perhaps we have been too focused on local developments to see the big picture," Namah wrote. "Regardless, if this report is the bitter pill that we need to swallow to ensure that we maintain our forests into the foreseeable future, so be it."

The journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society devoted its May issue to covering rain forest destruction in a different part of the world, the Amazon. The articles explore the links between the loss of forests and regional climate change, noting the potential for regional drought to develop in the area due to a combination of climate change and habitat destruction.

Warning from Kiribati

The leader of the small Pacific island nation of Kiribati warned the international community last week that his country may already be doomed due to climate change-related increases in sea level.

"We may be beyond redemption, we may be at the point of no return where the emissions in the atmosphere will carry on to contribute to climate change to produce a sea-level change that in time our small low-lying islands will be submerged," he said, according to an article by the AFP.

U.S. Senate Shenanigans

And finally, on a lighter note I'd like to take a moment to recognize the poor Senate clerks who had to read the entire text of a climate change bill in the Senate in the midst of the tempests that bore down on Washington last Wednesday. It may have been one of the worst days on the job for them, but it was the best thing that could have happened for sales of my upcoming seven-disk compilation of spoken word legislation.

By Andrew Freedman  | June 9, 2008; 10:30 AM ET
Categories:  Climate Change  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: NatCast: A Hot Night
Next: Really, Really, Really Hot: Live Chat at 2:30 p.m.

Comments

Does anyone know what the impact of the polar ice melt this year will be on the Polar Bear population? I believe that they are supposed to be listed on the endangered species list.

Posted by: nbahn | June 9, 2008 10:56 AM | Report abuse

Posted by: Mr. Q. | June 9, 2008 11:30 AM | Report abuse

Dr. Hansen, one of the world's biggest global warming alarmists also happens to be in charge of recording global temperature data for NASA.

I always thought it was a supremely bad idea to have one of the loudest voices arguing for global warming to be the person in charge of keeping the temperature data. It just seems like a really bad idea. He "has a dog in the fight" so to speak. His reputation is on the line.

What many people probably don't know is that Dr. Hansen routinely adjusts the temperature numbers. And I don't mean just the current measurements! He has also made "adjustments" to past temperature measurements. I knew it was only a matter of time until this caught up with him. I am surprised it has taken this long.

But a newspaper has finally gotten wise to Dr. Hansen's manipulation of the data!! As if that revelation isn't bad enough, they also accuse Dr. Hansen of cherry picking his data.

Ouch!!

The article is devastating and a must read.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/05/goddard_nasa_thermometer/print.html

When will our American media report on this? Or will they ever report it? My guess is that they won't report it. What do other's think? Will the American media report this?

Mr. Q.

Posted by: Mr. Q. | June 9, 2008 11:52 AM | Report abuse

"polynyas (which sound like the title of a Russian submarine in a Cold War movie) "

That's because polynya is a Russian word.

Posted by: wiredog | June 9, 2008 12:55 PM | Report abuse

I learned a couple of years ago that the correct pronunciation of "Kiribati" is "Ki-ri-bahss." So stop saying "Kee-ree-bah-tee"!

Posted by: Hrrundivbakshi | June 9, 2008 1:59 PM | Report abuse

Melting of Arctic and Antartic ice is not likely, in itself, to affect mean sea levels. This is something that has been strongly hyped by the Al Gore crowd with little or no real evidence to back it up. Why? Simple. Ice melting at the poles does not ADD any water to the world's existing supply. It does not put any MORE water into the oceans than already exists....one must remember that ice is simply existing water in a solid form. All that the melting of the polar ice caps and snow levels does is change solid water to liquid water. However, it WILL add fresh water to the oceans and decrease the salt level somewhat.....what that will do to marine biology remains to be seen. And, of course, seals, penguins, and polar bears may find their natural habitats shrinking some.

Posted by: Mike | June 9, 2008 5:46 PM | Report abuse

Mike, your analysis of the sea level rise issue is incomplete. You need to distinguish between sea ice, such as what covers the Arctic, and glacial ice. Glacial ice melt, such as melt from the ice covering the land surface of Antarctica, would increase sea levels, whereas sea ice melting would not.

Posted by: Andrew Freedman, Capital Weather Gang | June 9, 2008 11:14 PM | Report abuse


I heard on the down low that Polar Bears are headed the way of the Wooly Mammoth

UNLESS WE STOP IT!

UNITE PEOPLE! We owe the earth for the harm we have caused it. Its all our fault! If it wasnt for man the dinosaurs would still be around! Selfish bastards!

Posted by: PK | June 10, 2008 1:22 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2012 The Washington Post Company