Bush Hits on Stimulus, Earmark Reform

Early in his speech tonight, President Bush hit the brief portions of his speech targeted at two hot-button issues on the Hill -- the economic stimulus package and earmark reform.

"The temptation will be to load up the bill," Bush said of the stimulus plan. "That would delay it or derail it, and neither option is acceptable. This is a good agreement that will keep our economy growing and our people working. And this Congress must pass it as soon as possible."

Those lines drew applause from the GOP side of the aisle, but not from Democrats. It's worth noting what Bush didn't say -- that he would veto the package if the Senate tinkers with it too much. He also didn't single out any specific proposed Democratic add-ons, such as expansion of unemployment insurance and food stamps, as being unacceptable.

Bush could have used much sharper rhetoric as a warning to the Senate, and he didn't. He did, however, vow that "if any bill raising taxes reaches my desk, I will veto it" (though Bush slurred and it sounded more like "raizhing ... reashes.")

As expected, Bush soon thereafter addressed spending projects, saying, "The people's trust in their government is undermined by congressional earmarks - special interest projects that are often snuck in at the last minute, without discussion or debate."

Bush wants spending bills this year that "cut the cost and number of earmarks in half" from last year's levels, or he'll veto them.

"And tomorrow, I will issue an executive order that directs federal agencies to ignore any future earmark that is not voted on by Congress," Bush said.

What Bush is doing with that second element is essentially daring members to start writing earmarks directly into law, rather than simply putting them into bill report language. Privately, members from both parties have said today they're not sure if that's a good idea, since it would remove more of what little flexibility federal agencies currently have to move money around between accounts.

There will be more updates later. As an aside, press releases "reacting" to the speech from left and right have been rolling in for a couple of hours, but Capitol Briefing can't share them with you because he would be arrested by the Embargo Police.

By Ben Pershing |  January 28, 2008; 9:23 PM ET Agenda
Previous: SOTU Expectations Low on the Hill | Next: In Packed Statuary Hall, As Many Opinions As People

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



Some think that Bush may try to pull some sort of prank during the SOTU [SATIRE]:

http://www.voterswrite.org/2008/01/bush-to-place-w.html

Posted by: Nick Mockiavelli, Santa Monica, CA | January 28, 2008 9:38 PM

Bush's speechwriter just copied an entire section of the 2003 SOTU and swapped "IRAN" for "IRAQ." He carefully deleted the 16 words about "seeking uranium from Africa"...I guess that's considered improvement?

Posted by: National Insecurity | January 28, 2008 9:58 PM

Brit Hume of Fox News just stated that it appeared that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi was mouthing responses to the President's statements during the State of the Union -- complete with an instant video replay for closer analysis. This is pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. This so-called editorial commentary surely qualifies as one of the worst examples of yellow journalism I've ever seen.

Posted by: motogp46 | January 28, 2008 10:42 PM

Don't expect the Democrats to be sending the President any appropriations bills that he's going to veto - unless they calculate that it's to their political advantage to do so.

Given that we're in an election year, there was always a fair chance that Congress would not finish all the appropriations bills by the start of FY2009 (October 1) any way. Rather than give Republicans a political opportunity in the midst of an election, Democrats need only kick the can down the road by passing a continuing resolution until January 21, 2009 - when they will have a different President to deal with.

Posted by: Alan Dillingham, Alchemy GS | January 28, 2008 11:37 PM

Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! http://mqnenyppbvb.com

Posted by: xvqivpdhez | February 24, 2008 8:39 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2007 The Washington Post Company