Comment Box: Why Is Anna Nicole Front Page News?
Why is this front page news? No impact on our lives at all. Much like Princess Diana. As nice as she was... I really did not care. Moving on... -- MediaHound
Well, you've asked it so I guess I have to try to answer, though I think the answer may involve pop psychology 101, voyeurism, a celebrity-obsessed culture and plain old human nature. Luckily, scads of people way smarter than me have already thought this one through. If you're still interested, keep reading for a sampling of their insight.
The L.A. Times' Tim Rutten (registration required), as mentioned this morning by Howard Kurtz, describes the wall-to-wall coverage of Smith's death as a response to media expectations -- after all, both Princess Diana and O.J. Simpson pushed our threshold for tabloid crossovers to a new level. But he also offers this more basic explanation:
"Americans have a hard time abiding a tale of struggle without reward, or a story without a happy ending, which is why we so often confer a disproportionate posthumous attention on the plucky but dubious dead. Depending on how you look at it, it's a reflection of either our collective good-heartedness or our common sappiness. Maybe the ultimate guarantor of the former is our unwillingness to worry too much about the latter."
The Post's Philip Kennicott, writing in Friday's Style section, posited that we cared because Smith was "the most famous gold digger in America" and challenged our cultural ideals about marriage, money and sex:
"'Courtesan,' which in a different age is probably what she would have been labeled (even though she was married), is a category we don't have much use for anymore. The woman who makes sexual alliances for money, who was less than a blushing bride but not so fallen as a prostitute, was once a vigorous cultural type..."
Writing on Salon.com, Tracy Clark-Flory took it one step further, saying:
"There's extreme cultural anxiety over women who traffic in sex, period -- whether they're prostitutes, strippers, trophy wives or gold diggers. Part of that anxiety is driven by the ease with which intimacy and attraction can be feigned, sure. But there's also an anxiety that stretches clear across the gender divide ... As much as some men may feel anxiety about their ability to attract women without the allures of money or power, women can also feel anxiety about their ability to achieve [fill in the blank] without employing their sexual wiles."
So, there you have it. We err (and care) because we are human.
Is that your name for real: or is a combo of Liz Smith and Kitty Kelley? -- Submitted via Thursday's chat
Are you kidding me? If I were to adopt a nom de plume, I can assure you I would go for something with a little oomph, something that forces the eye to stop on the page -- not my grandmother's name. Maybe something like Angelina Woodward... and that's just off the top of my head.
---
Have questions? Send them to celebritology@washingtonpost.com or submit them during Thursday's 2 p.m. Celebritology Live discussion.
By Liz |
February 12, 2007; 10:45 AM ET
| Category:
Anna Nicole Smith
,
Comment Box
Previous: Morning Mix: Smith's Partner Gives Interview |
Next: Morning Mix: Bodyguard Says He May Be Smith's Baby's Daddy
» Share Tips and Submissions
Posted by: byoolin | February 12, 2007 11:33 AM
Perhaps because Ms. Smith won a huge Supreme Court victory in May, and is dead by February? And her son died in her hosptial room? And there's a rejected jury award of $474 million hanging in the balance over the life of the 5-month-old. Even if Anna Nicole Smith had been a modest nobody, the case of the "$474 million dollar baby" has a fascinating ring to it.
Posted by: Amelia | February 12, 2007 11:37 AM
Methinks that the "experts" are being much too kind in their evaluation of human nature and our morbid fascination with the likes of Anna Nicole in her demise. We are are fascinated for the same reasons that we are fascinated with a car wreck on the beltway or a house burning down. First and foremost, we're just glad it's not us. But, secondly, we want to see this bad person, who breaks all the rules, not get rewarded. When people like this come to a bad end, it reinforces our faith in our middle-class values. Nice girls don't marry old men for their fortunes and pose for Playboy and get rich and live happily ever after. At least, we want to believe that they don't.
Posted by: Carol B | February 12, 2007 11:56 AM
Liz,
OFF TOPIC ALERT! I've been trying for weeks to view the transcripts of your chat, but I can't get to them. HELP!!!
Posted by: FuzzyCat | February 12, 2007 12:10 PM
Did any of you notice in byoolin's link that Zsa Zsa Gabor's husband is now owning up to a long term affair with ANS and claims he might be the father? The more we dig into this woman's life, the crazier it gets.
Posted by: JK | February 12, 2007 12:14 PM
I don't think my motives for being interested in the drama of ANS's death is prurient or like looking at a highway wreck, or that it makes me happy and satisfied that she is dead instead of me.
I think she was an interesting and dramatic person simply because of her eventful life and image (and boobs). She was always on the make, too, and wasn't ashamed to say so.
She was a character. Too bad it had to end the way it did.
Posted by: Barb | February 12, 2007 12:15 PM
While I don't believe that demise of ANS deserve the media wag it's getting -- and aren't I adding to it with this post? -- I will confess feeling a certain kinship with her. In 1984 at the age of 19, I nearly took up with a Houston oilman old enough to be my father, only a millionaire, though. So, the notion that a man would rock his family for attention from a sweet young thing isn't foreign to me...and rock it would have, as we're talking a Gay relationship well before Ellen and Rosie. While the money may have been appealing, the confines of the deal surely would have driven me to prescription or street drugs, too, in a hurry.
Posted by: bigolpoofter | February 12, 2007 12:29 PM
why ask why?
It is what it is.
Judging her and her life is useless.
Opinions are expressed about someone based on what is read or heard about them. This is not fact, it's the way it's spun to sell the story. None of us know the truth about Ms. Smith's situation.
Posted by: mustang sally | February 12, 2007 12:29 PM
Watching Anna Nicole Smith's travails has been like falling off a cliff that was high enough to keep you from landing for 18 years. And now the landing has happened. We were embarrassed for her tawdriness and envious of her audacity. If it doesn't turn out she was murdered, we can put a blanket over this one and pretend it was just a dream.
Posted by: McLeanGirl | February 12, 2007 12:34 PM
Sex. Money. Infidelity. Fame. Social climber. Outcast. Drugs. Glamour. (Early)death. Family quarrels. Rise from rags to riches to rags. Female using males using female. Dead child. New child.
Shakespeare meets National Enquirer.
Posted by: | February 12, 2007 12:46 PM
I don't think the writers of Law & Order could write an episode as believable as this whole real-life Anna Nicole debacle.
Posted by: Bored @ work | February 12, 2007 1:20 PM
I find it interesting that the media attributes the over reporting regarding Anna Nicole to the public's interest. I was watching MSNBC on the premise that they were going to cover the Vets who are opposed to the Iraq war at 4 p.m. Instead they went on for hours covering ANS. I regret Ms. Smith met such an untimely death but quite frankly I did not need to know much more than the fact that she had passed. The media decided I wanted this saturation coverage---WRONG!
Posted by: Gainesville, Va | February 12, 2007 5:40 PM
It is front-page news because the people who bring us tabloid media are insane. And that includes CNN. The other day I was in a waiting room that had CNN on the TV and for over 90 minutes they talked about the diaper astronaut. Nothing else. Just wall-to-wall diaper astronaut. It was as if the rest of the world did not exist. Then Anna Nicole died so the feeding frenzy moved to that. Yesterday on one of the tv "news" stations the graphic at the bottom of the screen said "Anna Nicole Smith Dies!" With an exclamation point. As if it had just happened moments ago. Disgusting.
Posted by: imho | February 12, 2007 6:10 PM
Even though she frequently had over-the-top behavior, she was usually upfront & real about her feelings. I think that emotional authenticity connected with many people after her son died, particularly those who watched her reality show & with other women (many guys don't seem to get that women can be connected to someone they don't know personally).
So you have someone that some people had watched for 2 years on TV and others had seen in the news regularly - plus someone who was unpredictable - plus someone who was obviously emotionally fragile which brings out our sympathy - plus someone who seemed to get herself stuck in these unusual very public situations - then you throw in the tragic unbelievable death of her son - and it makes the news that she died herself just unbelievable. Kind of like lightening striking the same person twice while everyone is watching & not believing it is happening. I think that produced so much of the initial interest (The "o-my-God-I-can't-believed-this-all-happened-to-one-person--this-is-a-double-tragedy" factor).
Then you add all these questions about what killed her, what is going to happen to her poor little motherless daughter, who in the world is the baby daddy, who is going to come out of the woodwork next, and the whole 3-ring circus - and I think that produced the subsequent interest.
Posted by: abcd5 | February 12, 2007 6:23 PM
Global Warming.
When I think about all the mega watts of energy spent by the numerous TV towers, up and down the USA. All the cable TV energy, all the trees killed for news paper print. All the energy wasted on this bimbo. Enough energy is wasted on this non event to supply Washington DC for at least one year.
Posted by: Sao Paulo airport | February 13, 2007 1:10 PM
I agree with the other commentaries, however,
the issue of her daughter is what keeps me
tuning in to Fox news, etc.
It seems the baby's future is at stake, and
as a mother, I am praying the real father
will take her and dissapear into raising her.
The other men here that are claiming to be
the father is such a sad story..obviously
they only want her so they can legally continue the fight against the Marshall
family for an enourmous amount of money.
hopefully, Larry Birkhead will turn out
to e the real father, the others seem to
be pretending to care, etc...
Posted by: Lady L | February 14, 2007 12:44 PM
Could I just simply extend my sympathy to those who loved her? By the way, where are they?
Posted by: aprilmay | February 17, 2007 9:45 PM
Could I just simply extend my sympathy to those who loved her? By the way, where are they?
Posted by: aprilmay | February 17, 2007 9:46 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.
The must- bookmark blog for your daily dose of celeb- centric news, irreverent analysis and the best celeb-tracking community on the Web.
On the AP newswire today:
A newspaper published two photographs on its front page Monday showing Anna Nicole Smith lying in bed fully clothed in a romantic embrace with the Bahamian immigration minister, who approved her application for permanent residency.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070212/ap_on_en_tv/anna_nicole_smith_bahamas