'Lost' Analysis: Finale Thoughts
This week, Jen Chaney and I were again joined by leading "Lost" scholar J. Wood to draw conclusions about "Lost's" two-hour season finale. Massive spoilers and a summer reading list ahead.

R.I.P. Charlie. (Photo courtesy ABC)
Liz: No need to embellish or qualify this statement: last night's finale was phenomenal. In fact, it was so good that I didn't even realize until it ended that we didn't really get that many answers and were in fact left to ponder a whole new set of questions until "Lost's" return in January 2008.
Jen, J., let's get down to it. Maybe we can start with what we think was the most significant moment from last night's show. For me, it was bearded Jack's offhand reference to his father. It underscored my pet theory that the Losties inhabit an alternate universe and this bearded Jack another in which Christian Shepard never died. So what do we call his bearded scenes? Flashbacks? Flash-forwards? Flash Gordons? What?
J. Wood: When Jack told Hamil to call his dad down and they'd see who was more drunk, it confirmed for me another pet theory -- that when Des saved Charlie, he changed the past and present as well as the future. In "White Rabbit," Charlie couldn't swim -- now he's the Northern England swim champion. And where did Kate's freckles go?
Liz: May explain why he didn't try to swim out through that window that was clearly large enough for him.
J. Wood: I wondered about that, because it seemed like he might have made it through the portal -- unless the rush of water was too much, and/or Charlie had just accepted that if he didn't die and fulfill Desmond's flash, they wouldn't make it off the island.
Jen: I'm still mulling over so much of last night in my head. The ending really opens up a whole new chapter for the story and turns everything on its ear. In fact, many things were turned inside-out last night. Instead of the usual flashbacks, we got a flash-forward. And it seemed to me that Charlie and Jack essentially switched places. Charlie -- a drug addict when he arrived on the island -- made the ultimate sacrifice and became a hero. (I thought that was so terribly sad and beautifully handled, but more on that later.) Meanwhile our hero Jack did what he thought was heroic, but as a result, he has now hit bottom and started popping the pills. This gets to the whole fate vs. free will issue, which may be the central theme of the show.
Much more after the jump and don't forget to log in for today's 3 p.m. "Lost" chat...
Liz: But J., as we know, Desmond ultimately didn't save Charlie and one could argue that the earlier "saves" were all meant to be, thereby allowing Charlie (the musician) to be there to key "Good Vibrations" into the signal-jamming keypad.
Jen: I also think Charlie was the one who set the Beach Boys code in the first place. I think when the hatch exploded and that was that time rupture, allowing Charlie to set the stage for what would become his fate. He didn't remember it, but Desmond did.
Liz: And bearded Jack listens to old school Nirvana, so I'll give him a little wiggle room on the whole pill-popping thing. But whose funeral was he attending? Lost Easter Eggs has posted a screengrab of the newspaper clipping, but there's really not much there to make out.
(Screengrab courtesy losteastereggs.blogspot.com)
J. Wood: That's the tricky thing with Des's saves; when he changes one element (like Charlie not drowning or getting zapped by lightning), there's no telling how many other things altered. It's like a domino effect; had Charlie gotten fried earlier in the season, maybe they wouldn't have needed someone to key in a Beach Boys tune
Liz: Just to be clear, Jen -- You're saying that Charlie set the signal-jamming code when? In some alternate past that had him working with Dharma or the Others or what? J., what's your take?
J. Wood: Now that's wild, Charlie setting the code in the first place. And it plays nice with the idea that Jacob is Locke.
Jen: I think the funeral was either Locke's or Sawyer's, based on future Kate's reaction to the news. That added a whole new level of meaning to that phrase "Either we're going to live together or die alone." (Kudos to Rose, BTW, for threatening to smack Jack upside the head if he said it.) That notion is now more than just a motivational speech Jack made on the island; it seems like a prophecy that Jack fulfilled by ensuring they would all be rescued. Locke's words just beforehand were very carefully chosen -- "You weren't meant to do this." In other words, it's not your fate. But Jack -- unlike Charlie -- exercised free will. And apparently that's not a good thing.
Liz: Let's talk about Locke for a minute, though. Why didn't he stop Jack if that's what he was roused by Walt (Walt!) to do? Did he also exercise free will?
J. Wood: Or was he roused by Walt to stop Naomi? After "The Brig," it seemed Locke wasn't a killer. He had no problem putting a knife into Naomi, but couldn't even maim Jack.
Jen: I can't fully explain the Charlie/"Vibrations" thing, but when Bonnie mentioned that a musician had created it, there was a look of recognition on Charlie's face that made me think maybe he had something to do with it. He could have just been realizing that he was in fact fated to enter those keys, but who else on the island would have been a musician?
J. Wood: Hard to say who else might have been a musician. I never would have guessed Juliet for a baby doctor until we were told about her.
Liz: Good point, and I wouldn't be surprised if there were some amateur folkies among the Dharma set. How else would they spend long island nights if not gathered round a campfire paying homage to Jerry Garcia?
J. Wood: With Jack mirroring Charlie, I think we get that reflected in the way other characters keep calling both Charlie and Jack heroes in the last two episodes. One is, one isn't.
I bet Horace Goodpseed knew a few chords.
Liz: But the interesting thing there is that Jack thinks he's a hero. He thinks he's doing the right thing, but finds out too late that he was wrong. The flip side of which is, of course, that Ben was right.
Which makes me wonder if it was Ben in that coffin
J. Wood: Jen, with the free will vs. determinism; so you're suggesting that they really aren't supposed to have free will, and expressing it messes up their balance?
J. Wood: Ben in the coffin -- it did seem like a short coffin. That could be Ben, Alex, Karl, Claire, maybe even Aaron
Jen: True enough, someone else could have been a music man. I'll let that theory go then, at least for now. I hadn't considered Ben being dead. Why would he leave the island even if rescuers showed up? I would think he and Locke would just stay. We obviously need to know more about the circumstances of the rescue to really answer some of these questions.
Liz: Ben could have been forced to leave the island, taken back to civilization by Jack to pay for his misdeeds.
Jen: I don't think it would have been Claire or Aaron, simply because of the bitterness in Kate's voice when she asked, "Why would I go to his funeral?" Ben is a good guess. And who was the "he" who was back home waiting for Kate? Could that be Sawyer, father of their baby?
Liz: J., any literary or larger thematic elements Jen and I may have missed in last night's 120 minutes?
J. Wood: On the free will vs. determinism bit, what's interesting (maybe) is how the philosopher Hume split the difference with compatibilism. He thought determinism was bunk, and free will didn't work without a little bit of determinism -- every action we do is in part determined by previous events. His whole point, though, is that it comes down to personal responsibility; neither free will nor determinism got you that, he thought.
The major allusion for this episode was just in the title itself, "Through the Looking Glass." It links us back to "White Rabbit" in the first season, and Lewis Carroll's book is all about finding your assumptions are mistaken.
Liz: So what you're saying, J., is that the Losties are basically destined to exhibit free will? Or do I flunk?
J. Wood: That's a good way to put it -- that they're destined to exhibit free will, if they want to take personal responsibility for their actions. And it seems everyone on this island -- Lostie or Other -- is pretty concerned with taking responsibility.
Jen: Re: free will -- Jack appears to ultimately have been punished for exercising his free will. I thought the writers purposely contrasted that with Charlie who, as you said, could have found a way to get out of that room if he'd wanted to. But he chose to meet his fate. Of course, that's a choice, too. Maybe it comes back down to faith vs. reason. As a "reasonable" man, Jack believes that being rescued is the ultimate good he can do. But maybe it isn't. Maybe going back to reality makes them even more "lost" than they already were.
Liz: I don't think we can talk about free will vs. fate, though, without mentioning Walt. If the island is capable of preventing acts of free will (as it did when Walt turned up to tell Locke what to do), then why doesn't it exercise that option more often? Why not have Walt stop Jack from making that call?
J. Wood: If that was Walt
Liz: Yes, and not another smoke monster trick.
Jen: I don't think the island prevents acts of free will. Those acts just don't always meet with the best consequences sometimes. I too am not sure that was the real Walt. It may have been a hallucination.
J. Wood: One of Alice's lines from the book plays into this episode nicely: "Somehow it seems to fill my head with ideas -- only I don't know exactly what they are! However, SOMEBODY killed SOMETHING: that's clear, at any rate."
Liz: Let's talk about the ship that supposedly rescues at least Jack and Kate. If not Penny's, then whose?
J. Wood: Helgus Antonius?
That's Mr. Paik's ship -- he built it for Mittelwerk when he took over the Hanso Foundation. The Lost Experience is starting to pay off.
It was only mentioned a couple times, though.
Liz: For those not familiar with that name, here's the Lostpedia entry.
Jen: J., I want to get back to an interesting observation you made earlier -- about Kate's missing freckles. She was lit so strangely, almost dreamily, in that last scene. It made me question whether what was happening in the future was real or if it can be altered somehow. I feel like that's what ultimately will happen on the show -- that Jack, who yearns "to go back," will turn back time Cher-style and redeem himself and the lives of his friends. Am I a cock-eyed optimist?
Liz: The subtle differences in Kate's appearance reminded me of the Gwyneth Paltrow movie "Sliding Doors" -- another interesting couple of hours about the ability of one's free will to affect the future, but also possible alternate realities.
Jen, any thoughts on the ship?
J. Wood: You know, I went back to review a few episodes -- not far back enough, but at least in "Catch-22," feckless Kate is looking more and more like freckleless Kate. And that started after Des started saving Charlie. And no one noticed; I don't think Sawyer called her freckles anymore.
Liz: Yes, and Kate acknowledged that when she said "Why are you calling me, Kate?" But I took that as more of an observation that he was no longer his playful self.
J. Wood: No longer playful, and more and more a cold-blooded killer.
Liz: Could be another interesting exercise in free will determining the future. He chose to kill the real Sawyer and somehow consigned himself to the fate of a sociopath.
J. Wood: The little bit I do know about this ship, Helgus Antonius, is that Mittelwerk needed a "special" ship, and no regular ship could take him where he needed to go. He hired Paik Heavy Industries to make that ship. The Helgus Antonius line pretty much ends there.
Jen: Wow, that's really interesting, J. Now I'll have to go back and look, too. I'm not sure what to make of the ship, but -- on a related subject -- I think it stinks that so many important details came out of the Lost Experience. I think the concept of the Experience is cool, mind you, but the fact that they explain the numbers via the game, and not on the show, frustrates me a bit.
Liz: I didn't take part in the Lost Experience. Care to elaborate on any other interesting revelations?
J. Wood: I've been curious if they'll come back to the numbers at all. It seemed like too important a point to leave in that ancillary narrative between the seasons.
Liz: Agreed. For a fleeting moment last night, I thought perhaps the code Charlie needed to enter would be the numbers.
J. Wood: The key things I got from the Lost Experience were what the numbers were for and why the Dharma Initiative went to the island; that Thomas Mittelwerk overthrew Alvar Hanso as head of the Hanso Foundation (and Mittelwerk is your generally shady character, from Austria, vaguely fascist); and that the game was designed to forge this interactive online community, like what we're taking part in right now. In that way, the game is still continuing.
Liz: Also, if we're talking details like Kate's freckles, did anyone notice that island Jack's stubble was clearly grey on one side of his face while flash Jack's beard was fully brown?
Jen: I didn't do it either, only read details here and there. But a number of my friends keep saying, "What's the deal with the numbers?" And those, aka the Valenzetti Equation, are explained here.
J. Wood: Jack's beard -- absolutely more grizzled on the island.
Jen: I did notice the gray. His flash-forward beard also looked very fake, but that's a make-up issue. Speaking of, I'm wondering if next season, the episodes will take place in the present, with the flashbacks taking us back to the island.
Liz: Same here. Or if we'll see alternate presents/futures vying with each other to stifle one another. Let's talk about Jack and Juliet's kiss briefly. Significant?
J. Wood: The numbers are a cool feature that I'm pretty sure they'll have to come back to. Each one represents a factor in the Valenzetti Equation (and Valenzetti shows up on the blast door map). Those factors are things like how fast we're using fossil fuels, what's the rate of world population growth, the rate of attendant disease with that growth, etc., all leading up to how much time we have left before we extinguish ourselves from this planet.
What seemed most significant is shortly after Juliet plants one on him, he tells Kate he loves her. Juliet and Jack have been visiting each other's tent for a while now, and that admission came out of nowhere. And also sets us up for seeing that Jack tracks Kate in the future when they get off the island.
Liz: His admission of love struck me as odd at the time. It seemed like more of a religious kind of love as in "Jesus loves all of his disciples." Jack the savior.
Jen: I interpreted the kiss as a kiss goodbye, a farewell to any potential romance between them.
His "I love you" to Kate was a little out-of-nowhere. But I always believed he had those feelings for her so I wasn't completely surprised.
J. Wood: Do you more or less trust Juliet? She's been lying right up until the end.
Liz: You know, in the end I trust her. I think she's as mixed up as Jack when it comes to how to do the right thing, but I think she does ultimately strive to do right.
Jen: Maybe I'm a dummy, but I do trust Juliet. She lied to Sawyer about the guns but not for bad reasons, or at least it appears that way.
J. Wood: On the "what kind of flash structures will we get," I hope they don't set it in the future and make the fourth season island flashbacks; it's interesting, but will it maintain audience interest? The weirdness of the island is what forges the mythology, so if they did that, it'd have to be heavy on the flashbacks. Flash-forwards, however, turn the show into another kind of game with the audience, where we can try to puzzle things together.
Liz: J. -- Jack's "golden ticket." A reference to "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory?"

R.I.P. Mikhail? (Photo courtesy ABC)
Jen: Question about Mikhail/McPatchy -- Is it fair to conclude at this point that the dude is immortal? (Like Richard, who doesn't age?) I think he's a native of the island and somehow Ben doesn't realize that. He seemed surprised when Mikhail survived the sonar fence shock attack. Once again, he managed to live through a harpoon to the heart.
Liz: Mikhail as Rasputin. I like that. He does definitely seem to have his own agenda and only follow Ben's orders when it coincides with his own. He also seemed interested in turning off the jamming signal.
J. Wood: I want to go back and see if he was wearing a special vest that might have dampened the harpoon's damage, but even then, did he blow himself up with the grenade? He was right there when he blew the portal.
Mikhail as Rasputin! You can't shoot him, you can't drown him...
And if Jack's Golden Ticket takes him around the world in an Oceanic flight, that makes the planes the place where dreams are made.
Jen: Re: audience interest -- what do you think the audience will say after last night's episode? We all seem to agree that it advanced the narrative in interesting ways. At the same time, I think the "snake in the mailbox" hype kind of did a disservice to the finale. The ending was not an "Oh my God! A snake! And in a mailbox no less!" kind of conclusion. It was more like, "Ooooh ... weird ... a snake. What could that mean?" People seemed to be expecting a big shocker and this wasn't quite that.
And I love the golden ticket connection.
J. Wood: I think the shocker was meant to be the fact that it was a flash-forward. But, as you've both pointed out, it's all the little things that settle in about this episode that really make it.
Liz: But we were specifically told that the finale would be "game changing" so we have to assume that some significant change in thrust or format has taken place, but we may not actually get the full impact until next year's season opener. Which brings us to the speculative part of this exercise. Where are we going?
J. Wood: By the way, did the scenes of Bonnie and Gretta in the portal room remind you of 2001, when HAL is watching the astronauts talk? Every time the camera went to that portal window, it seemed very Kubrick (and it wouldn't be the first time they cited him).
Liz: Yes, and actually, those two reminded me of Sigourney Weaver's Ellen Ripley and Linda Hamilton's Sarah Connor.
Jen: But as we know, the average American viewer doesn't always have patience for little things. Where are we going? That hearkens back to Charlie question in the pilot -- Where are we? Frankly, I don't think we know the answer to that question yet. Where is the island? Where are we time-wise? And did someone bring Vincent on the rescue boat? Because if they left that dog behind I'm going to be really upset.
J. Wood: Speculation: A good part of the upcoming season will be little subtle changes -- like Kate's freckles and Charlie swimming, and not so subtle ones like Christian Shephard still alive -- that we'll need to track. And I think tracking those will pay off.
Hurley was walking Vincent up to the tower -- Vincent was pulling all over the place, just like my dogs.
Liz: I hope you're right, J., because that strikes me as the most interesting place to take the show if the network hopes to hold our interest for three more years.
Speaking of Hurley -- did it seem like he'd taken the time to wash and wax Roger Workman's microbus before busting onto the beach to save the day?
Jen: The bus did look remarkably clean. Another important detail we need to track?
That's the central issue, though: Will there be payoff? We have three seasons to go. "Lost" is a show that requires thoughtfulness and patience of its viewers. I wonder how many people can continue to exhibit those characteristics. Phew. Glad to hear that detail about Vincent, which I missed. I didn't want to force the SPCA to track down the island coordinates and go save that sweet pup.
J. Wood: Where are we time-wise; someone on my blog asked "When are we?" There was a bit of a clue to that in the name of the man who answered the sat phone.
Jen: Remind us of his name again?
J. Wood: Minkowski. I listened to it seven times, because I was a guest-commentator on the Entertainment Weekly Lost column a couple days ago and mentioned Minkowski space, so when I heard that name, I did a little flip.
Liz: And a quick search of Google reveals: "Minkowski developed a new view of space and time and laid the mathematical foundation of the theory of relativity."
J. Wood: Yep. It goes back to Dr. Manhattan from Alan Moore's "Watchmen." Dr. Manhattan experiences Minkowski space as it is. Minkowski argued that space and time are connected, and since all space exists at once, so does all time. This helped make Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity work. Dr. Manhattan in the graphic novel experiences Minkowski space as it is, so he experiences all time at once. But if Minkowski space is real (and there's enough evidence for it), that means if Des changes the future, he is indeed changing the past and present as well.
Liz: By the way, EW's just posted a Q&A with Dominic Monaghan about his exit from "Lost" and he mentions that his death scene was filmed on May 4. Interesting to know the producers don't have much lead time on this stuff.
Jen: Honestly, can either of you think of a TV show that has worked on so many levels and with so many layers? You can watch "Lost" and just follow the basic plot, but you can also use it as a springboard to explore philosophy, literature, religion. And it all informs the show. I think the writers are secretly trying to make the American public more educated. Too bad most of them are busy watching "American Idol."
Liz: The only other show even half this complex is "The Simpsons." No snickers, please.
J. Wood: Nope, I've never seen a show that works so intricately. It's even changed the way I'm approaching my Ph.D work (I'm looking at some predecessors in books and film that do similar things). I know some scholars who'd totally agree with you on "The Simpsons", Liz.
Messers Cuselof have been joking on the podcast about how tightly they worked with the final episodes and how they edited right up to about two days before air time -- which is partly just how television works.
Jen: Question for you, J: There are so many works of literature that "Lost" draws from. For summer reading purposes, which would you say are the most important ones to check out as a means to getting the show? And I agree about "The Simpsons," but I don't think it requires as much analysis. It's an added bonus that some episodes lead to analysis, but there isn't much mystery demanding dissection. (Although where IS Springfield? Are the Simpsons "Lost," too?) The finale of that show was brilliantly funny, by the way.
Liz: Good question about summer reading, Jen. I'm about a third of my way through a re-read of "The Talisman." J., what else should we take to the beach?
Jen: I finally got "The Talisman." One of my local libraries -- and I'm not making this up -- actually lost their copy. Says it's in the system, but it's nowhere to be found. So it took a while to track it down.
J. Wood: As far as summer reading goes, there are a few things that may add to someone's viewing. "A Tale of Two Cities" came up a few times. Virginia Woolf wrote a book called "Jacob's Room" where the character of Jacob never appears, but is described through a series of other characters' impressions. There's a not very good "lost world" book by a guy named Merritt called "The Moon Pool." It's about finding two lost civilizations who live underground, are warring, and worship a a manifestation of the moon.
Jen: J., I would have expected you to also recommend your own book. Come on, what kind of self-promoter are you?
J. Wood: I'm actually going through Lewis Carroll, a bit for fun. I think L. Frank Baum will also come back -- and he's kind of creepy, because if you look into that man's life, he was getting into the occult and theosophy.
Heh. I'll be updating my book over the summer as well.
Liz: Excellent. I'd like to ask the producers to mix in a little Lovecraft and Poe since I know a bit about them. Would make it more convenient for me to analyze.
J. Wood: Oh, One last lit bomb I'll drop: "The Smoky God." I'm still tracking it, but it's a short transcript of a supposedly true story by a Norwegian sailor, Olaf Jansen, again about a lost world and, well, a smoky god.
Liz: J., Jen -- I hate to think this is it till 2008, but it's a fact. So tell me where we're going to start season 4.
J. Wood: Do you think there may be anything to tide us over until February? (Besides a reading syllabus.)
Liz: Well, let's hope for some good DVD extras.
Jen: The seasons always begin in a new place we have never seen before. That's why I think the next one will open in an apartment or home or workplace in the present day (or future, whatever) of one of the Losties. In addition to answering more questions about the island, I think the show has to tell us what happens to our central characters after the rescue. Then, eventually, undo all of those fates and somehow take us back to the very beginning by the series finale.
J. Wood: Here's what I'm hoping for: A Geronimo Jackson "Greatest Hits" release. With Carlton Cuse on banjo.
Liz: J., for shame! I expected a serious, yet convoluted, answer from someone of your academic stature.
Jen: Yes, I'm sure I'll review the DVD so I can fill you guys in on that ahead of the game. More Easter egg hunting -- really, it's the best we can hope for until January. (I'm going to cry...)
Liz: In episode one, I'm betting we'll finally see this rescue ship and find out who leaves the island. But remember, Desmond knows the ship is not what it seems, so what wrench will his knowledge throw in the works? Will he make it back to the rest of the Losties in time to use that knowledge?
J. Wood: Fourth season may be a lot about those people on the freighter, actually.
Liz: And now that Dominic Monaghan is free, I don't see any reason why Driveshaft shouldn't join the "American Idol" summer tour.
J. Wood: Bets on his showing up in flashbacks/flash-forwards? Especially if Jack somehow gets back to the island and "resets" things. In the future, that is.
Liz: I would bet he shows up at least once. Claire needs some kind of closure with his death.
J. Wood: So does Aaron.
Jen: Wait, more characters? Please, no more Poochies. One last word on Charlie -- was I the only one sad to see him die? Right after he drowned and they immediately closed in on a crying Aaron, it was as if the baby knew his pseudo-daddy was gone. So heart-breaking. I'll miss Driveshaft.
Liz: And his ring is still lodged in the side of Aaron's crib waiting to be found.
In the final analysis, yes, I was sorry to see Charlie go. But I think that was because he was so well-written and vital in these last few episodes.
J. Wood: That ring, and Dexter Stratton -- another person we may learn something about (maybe a deep flashback).
Jen: True. So maybe Charlie isn't truly dead. Which also means -- Liz, you know where I'm going -- that maybe Boone is still alive, too! Dare to dream.
J. Wood: Charlie really came around in the past few episodes. I think part of that has to do with how well the entire ensemble has been acting.
Liz: So, until next year then?
J. Wood: I'll be anxiously waiting.
Jen: Me, too.
Liz: Alrighty then, let's get lost. (Groan).
J. Wood: Most of us are going to be a bit lost for nine months. Bittersweet.
Liz: On to your comments and don't forget that Jen and I will be helming a special one-hour "Lost" chat today at 3 p.m. ET.
By Liz |
May 24, 2007; 10:33 AM ET
| Category:
Lost
,
TV
Previous: Morning Mix: O'Donnell vs. Hasselbeck, Again |
Next: Morning Mix: George Clooney's $350K Kiss
» Share Tips and Submissions
Posted by: Charlie's Angel | May 24, 2007 11:29 AM
I thought that Jack asked Kate if she went to her funeral. I was thinking it was Juliet's.
Posted by: petal | May 24, 2007 11:42 AM
At first I was also thinking that Juliet was in the coffin, since Kate had that strong "Why would I go" reaction. However, the funeral director said that no one showed up and unless things went really wonky, Juliet's sister was alive and definitely would have gone to the funeral. This makes me lean more heavily to the "Ben in the coffin" theory.
Posted by: YetAnotherLostFan | May 24, 2007 11:47 AM
Could it have been Walt in the coffin? Or Michael? Why a black neighborhood?
Posted by: kathleen | May 24, 2007 11:49 AM
I was sad to see Charlie go, too, Jen! I am not one of the Hobbit-haters on this blog.
What will we do for seven months?
Major questions raised:
Was Jack just delusional from drugs when he asked to bring his father down to see who was drunker? Because his father WAS Chief of Surgery, and if this new bald guy is now the Chief, then maybe Jack's father isn't alive. Did the new Chief say something like, "I can't do that" when Jack demands they get Christian from upstairs?
In all the flashBACKS, we have the sense that the characters are remembering those past events as they go about their island antics in the "present." Are the flashFORWARDS available to them, too? Can Jack SEE those experiences as he's leading them to the tower?
Where does Moses lead his followers? That is, what does the tower represent in a Biblical interpretation? And if Jack's Moses, who is Ben? And Locke?
Any answers from my fellow Losties?
Posted by: Kelli | May 24, 2007 11:50 AM
Liz: May explain why he didn't try to swim out through that window that was clearly large enough for him.
J. Wood: I wondered about that, because it seemed like he might have made it through the portal -- unless the rush of water was too much, and/or Charlie had just accepted that if he didn't die and fulfill Desmond's flash, they wouldn't make it off the island.
More to the point, why didn't he go on the other side of the door with Desmond before the grenade went off -- he had time to do it.
Posted by: Colorado Kool Aid | May 24, 2007 11:52 AM
Re: Kate's lack of freckles in the flash-forward scene. Kate has quite obviously been make-up free on the island, and I think the lack of freckles was just from a foundation, because she looked all pretty and made up now that she was back int he "real" world. I also think the coffin's was Ben's, especially if Jack, because of his desperation to go get back to the island, thinks that his actions on the island previously caused Ben to die back in the real world. Just a thought.
Posted by: andrea | May 24, 2007 12:01 PM
Okay, I may be getting way ahead of myself here, but when I looked at the screengrabs (zoomed in) of the newspaper clipping, it looked like it said something about the body of J____ (fold in the paper) ___entham. This made me think of Jeremy Bentham, the English philosopher (certainly not the first one on the show). Bentham was perhaps best known for his concept of the Panopticon. From Wikipedia:
"The Panopticon is a type of prison building designed by English philosopher Jeremy Bentham in the late eighteenth century. The concept of the design is to allow an observer to observe (-opticon) all (pan-) prisoners without the prisoners being able to tell if they are being observed or not, thus conveying a "sentiment of an invisible omniscience." In his own words, Bentham described the Panopticon as "a new mode of obtaining power of mind over mind, in a quantity hitherto without example."
Sounds a bit like the island, especially all of the hatches. Also, it would be funny if the character in the coffin were named Jeremy Bentham because he requested that his body be preserved after death. It's still on display in London.
Posted by: Agfras | May 24, 2007 12:05 PM
Anyone else notice on that losteastereggs site they said that the name of the funeral home, "Hoffs Drawlar" is an anagram for Flash Forward?
Those producers have too much time on their hands as do most of us that obsess about this show!!
But I wouldn't have it any other way!!
Posted by: Bored @ work | May 24, 2007 12:06 PM
Show jumped the shark. The drama was driven by the question "will (can) they get off island?" Now, the closest they can come is "will (can) they avoid getting off the island" which is a jarring switch and also just not any fun.
Posted by: Section 506 (After moving) | May 24, 2007 12:07 PM
Kathleen, I had a similar thought, given the neighborhood and no turnout and Kate's comments, I thought Michael. If Ben was honest with him and he got away, perhaps he was coerced into helping whoever Naomi was working for to find the island again.
However, the screenshots of the article in Jack's hand look to have a name that doesn't come any where near Michael's. It might be someone we get introduced to between the end of Season 3 and the time of the flash forward.
What I don't get is Locke backing down at the end.
Posted by: drweidner | May 24, 2007 12:08 PM
I completely agree re Kate and no freckles. I have freckles (though not a lot and not very pronounced) and when I wear foundation, you can't see them.
I first wondered why Charlie didn't swim out the window, but when there was another shot of him in the room - it looked like his shoulders were far too broad to fit through the hole.
Was that real Walt? How would smokey monster morph into an older Walt (he definitely looked like he had grown up a lot) - Did Michael and Walt ever really leave the island? It seemed to me like the Walt, considered special, was saving Locke, the other special one.
Posted by: Catherine | May 24, 2007 12:08 PM
I think that, as time moves forward on the island, it moves backwards in real life. When Jack and Kate left the island, they returned to a time in their lives that was before the plane crash, when Jack still had a brown beard and not a grey one, and his father was still alive.
That would also open up the possibility that they have been on the island multiple times. Crash on the island, get rescued, go back in time, crash on the island again. I'm not sure whether they realize it again, but this would really give new meaning to Kate's "Here we go again" last episode.
The screencaps on Lost Easter Eggs look like the obituary is about J___ ____angham. My thinking is that we don't know who this is yet, but this might be the one person who has the power to end whatever time loop they're stuck in.
Also, if you look at the screencaps on Lost Media, it looks like a regular-sized coffin to me.
Posted by: stef | May 24, 2007 12:11 PM
Charlie could have gotten out of the porthole, could have gone out through the door before the grenade, etc., but chose not too. He knew that in order for Desmond's vision to come true (and Claire be rescued), he had to die.
However, there's one technical problem with the drowning scene. Since the room would have to be air tight in order to hold in/out water, the water inside the room would have risen to the top of the porthole, then stopped, due to the pressure of the air in the top of the room. This is the same reason why the opening to the station (through which Charlie entered) didn't flood the rest of the station.
Oh well, I guess they didn't think of that.
Posted by: Joe | May 24, 2007 12:11 PM
Section 506, I completely disagree. Putting this new twist in, we have no idea where the show is going and how it will end (instead of assuming the end of the show would be the typical Hollywood ending of rescue). Now the question is how do they get off the island, when do they get off the island, who gets off the island (as Jack and Kate are the only ones we KNOW made it), etc.
I'm wondering though...did Kate's past crimes just disappear when she showed back up in LA? You would think she would still be wanted by the police, no?
Posted by: Dan | May 24, 2007 12:11 PM
Just saw on lost easter eggs, the name of the funeral parlor was HOFFS/DRAWLAR which is ana anagram for FLASH FORWARD - whoa!
Posted by: EP | May 24, 2007 12:13 PM
Jack's flash forward: clearly reminiscent of early references to Lost Horizon & Shangrila. The Lost Island seems far from the idyllic place of a Shangrila, but the island did create a true community, beautiful setting, even though beset with the adversarial Others and Smoky. Jack clearly has the kind of depression related to the loss of the adventure and comradeship of his adventure. This is sometimes seen in returning military, and was somewhat seen in the crew of the Endurance (Shackelford's expedition to Antartica that was stranded for 3 years).
Many of the men never found any activity after their rescue that was even remotely as significant as the Endurance experience. Simmilar experiences also reported by people with out-of-body experiences, who return to real life.
A quibble: the directors clearly wanted us to see the Jack parts as flashbacks, and I thought he might have been returning from his Thailand adventure from earlier this season. The new Chief also created this sense, as it appeared from their conversation that Jack had been gone a good while, so his explanation of the long weekend flights later didn't really explain Jack's apparent "absence" from the hospital adequately. When Jack was in the bad neighborhood, I actually expected him to encounter Anna Lucia some way (if it had been a flashback). I had the sense through the whole second season that Jack and Anna Lucia had somehow or crossed paths in L.A. before that drink in the airport.
As to the action on the island last night, a great show, with explosions, intrigue, betrayal, special effects, and the wonderful Hurley surprise! We cheered! Plus mother and daughter reunited.
As to Charlie, husband again noted the echoes of Lord of the Ring, where the "humans" create a battle to distract the evil forces while the noble Hobbit undergoes the ordeal to "turn off" the evil power. In this case, Charlie the hobbit was turning off the jamming signal, while the battle on the beach took place, any many Others (Orcs) were killed, with exciting battle scenes.
I wonder if the body in L.A. was Michael, with Kate's anger aimed at his betrayal of them, and his murder of Libby & Anna Lucia. The neighborhood would sort of make sense and the coffin size would be about right.
I think Jack could be sad for him, with Kate still holding a grudge.
Posted by: Lindytx | May 24, 2007 12:17 PM
I for one, was blown away by last nights episode. I think that for many people there was a lot of overspeculation/mega-hype and compared to that, it may have been a let down. But I think that what the writers left us with is stronger than what we were imagining two weeks ago.
I dont think Jack's dad was alive during the flashbacks, I think the show is too straight forward for that. I respectfully disagree with J. Woods about Desmond changing the future/present/past with every vision. The continuity of space/time needs to be somewhat structured for the foundation of the show to remain relevant. If we start bouncing around to alternate realities, the LOST fans are going to have a hard time making sense of anything that has happened since the Pilot episode.
I think one of the main revelations of the show has been our relation to the world around us, and how we are apart of something bigger. The end of season one opened us up to a larger community on the island with "the Others." Season two showed us that the island was meant for a bigger purpose with the Dharma Initiative. Season three, for lack of a simpler explination shows us that there is someone "bigger" than Ben (i.e. Jacob).
LOST Producers have already mentioned that Jacob will be a major character in Season 4. Perhaps we will be introduced to the "bigger" conflict between Jacob and the Freighter, and why exactly Jacob, Locke and Ben are so afraid of making that telephone call. I hope so anyway. See you all next year!
Posted by: Adam | May 24, 2007 12:19 PM
I hope they don't leave Hawaii -- that location adds so much wonder to the story.
I agree that the end was more of a "Whoah," than a "WOW." And it's killing me that they didn't answer the two pivital questions from Season 2:
Why did that statue have 4 toes?
Why was Libby in the assylum?
Posted by: Sixagon | May 24, 2007 12:22 PM
I think Jack mentioning his father doesn't mean his father's still alive. I think it means that Jack has slipped so far into his psychosis that the "reality" of his world doesn't match up to the empirical. His father's dead; notice the looks he gets from the people he mentions his father to.
My wife's never watched "Lost" and I was explaining the flashback structure to her. "But what if this [Bearded Jack] is the present, and the island scenes are in the past." Ho ho, I chuckled.
Posted by: John | May 24, 2007 12:26 PM
I thought Oceanic Airlines had ceased operation as a result of the crash, yet Jack was on an Oceanic flight in the flashforward. Another clue that past/present/future is being altered?
Posted by: oceanic_air | May 24, 2007 12:27 PM
BTW, the Simpsons' home town of Springfield has officially been acknowledged as Springfield, Kentucky.
Posted by: John | May 24, 2007 12:28 PM
Another thing. Kate mentioned that he would be wondering where she was, when talking to Jack. At first I was thinking Sawyer but now I'm thinking she got together with someone else. How gross would it be if it were Ben or Locke?
Props to Charlie for letting Des know that it's not Penny's boat and doing what he felt needed to be done. To Sawyer for getting rid the other, the blind trust these people were having was becoming tiring. To Jack for leading, although I think that's gonna come back to bite him. To Sayid for just being Sayid and to the Hurlster for that move with the van. Hopefully this ushers in a new age of Losties kicking butt in the a.m. and taking names in the p.m.
Posted by: petal | May 24, 2007 12:31 PM
Charlie! Swim out of the porthole, Dude!
Great lines from the night:
Rose - "Jack, if you tell me Live together, die alone, I'm going to punch you in your face!"
Hurley- "Dude, I saved them all."
How about some props for Hurley the hero?!? Good for you, man!
Not a spectacular show, IMHO. It was enjoyable, but didn't provide the Holy-whatever moment (Jen) I was looking for. I suspected the flash-forward thing from the very beginning when Jack jumped at the turbulence on the plane. I thought it was interesting but I always figured they'd get off the island someday. And I think Jack was delerious on drugs and longing for the past when he demanded they bring his father down to see how drunk he was - no altered reality.
The only interesting part to me is now this ship.... if not Penny's then whose? Is Ben right? Do the Others and Losties end up teaming up against another hostile force coming to the island? (Live together, die alone?) Was Penny able to locate the island through her brief confab with Charlie?
Sorry that more about Jacob wasn't set up in this show too, since the producers say he's going to become so integral, a tease for that would have been nice. And I guess were supposed to assume Walt told Locke what everyone was up to?
Maybe I was expecting a little too much, but it left me feeling flat. But I have until Januray to think about it I guess, and get jazzed up for its return!
Posted by: Dave | May 24, 2007 12:33 PM
Am I the only one who thinks the coolest part of last night's episode was when Sayid killed the Other with his feet? I mean, I loved the whole thing, but that was awesome!
Posted by: Tricia | May 24, 2007 12:38 PM
Over the last few weeks, we were led to believe that five people (only) were going to die before the end of the season. I lost count on all the bodies last night. What gives?
Posted by: ecko fan | May 24, 2007 12:39 PM
Definitely Ben in the coffin - The funeral director said "Friend or Family" to which Jack replied "Neither". Plus, no one showed up. Who would!? Since Jack had the intent to kill Ben, maybe he was just going to make sure he was really dead. If he was telling Kate in the flash forward that they never should have left the island and that they had to go back, maybe his discovery of Ben's death (& powers/connections) made him realize that he never would be able to get back and that is what (almost) made him go over the edge?
Posted by: LB | May 24, 2007 12:40 PM
OK was I the only that noticed that our little Walt wasn't so little anymore?
Naturally the kid playing him aged so I suppose the character had to also, but I wonder if that was intended?
It seems as though he looked about 10 when he left & now he's looks about 15!
Posted by: Bored @ work | May 24, 2007 12:41 PM
Liz and Jen - how can you trust Juliet? Every time I look at that impassive expression it just looks like pure evil to me. She's Ben's twin.
Posted by: Hungover | May 24, 2007 12:43 PM
Walt was huge -- he was supposed to be 10 when he crashed, but I believe the actor is about 15 or so in real life.
I am wondering if the writers will work that into the story -- For example, using the whole time-loop or alternate reality theory... or just ignore the fact that the 10-year-old Walt actually looks like a teenager. Walt was shown wearing the same clothes as when we last saw him.
Posted by: Nine more months! | May 24, 2007 12:45 PM
I think the apparent consequences of exercising free will suggest a Garden of Eden scenario on the island. If you put your faith in the island it takes care of you but if you make your own decisions it punishes you. Future Jack seems to be acting as if he's realized that he was essentially banished from the Garden of Eden because of his own decisions. Also I was intrigued by Ben's reference to a Temple. I think Lost is going Biblical.
Posted by: Collins | May 24, 2007 12:47 PM
I simply can't believe the writers and directors of a TV show would make the plotline as deep and thick and innocuous, based on such hardcore references to philosophy and theory, as the blog hosts and co-called experts intimate.
After all, it's still television, and it's still a mainstream audience, and if you're going to carry their interest for six years, you just can't come back with a final storyline based on hyper-kooky theories, musings and back-references that the majority of your viewership has never heard or really gives a crap about.
In the end, I think it's all much simpler, with reference points built in as teasers and nuance. But the conclusion of the series has to come around to a simple, fully explainable, uncomplicated thesis.
Otherwise, your vested audience looks up, kinda like they did at the end of "Seinfeld," and say, "wtf?
Posted by: RickNmd | May 24, 2007 12:49 PM
Re: J___ ____angham.
Jacob?
Posted by: Big Fan | May 24, 2007 12:50 PM
The reference to the Temple and Walt's reappearance was very Matrix for me. John saying he can't move his legs and Walt telling him that he can was very Morpheus/Neo to me, mind of matter, and the Temple in Matrix was where the members of Zion felt they were the safest from the outside intruders.
Anyone else think that the ship was Penny's dad's? Many thought last season Mr. Widmore had a relationship with Dharma. It would also explain why Naomi had the picture of Desmond and Penny.
Posted by: Dan | May 24, 2007 12:53 PM
If the kid who appeared to Locke was indeed Walt, why did he appear SO much older? Theoretically, he should just be little bit older - like a month or so - if one show approximately equals one day on the island. that kid looked a couple of years or so older. . .
Posted by: | May 24, 2007 12:55 PM
left me feeling like I did when China Beach wound down.
Posted by: morose | May 24, 2007 12:56 PM
Don't people get freckles from too much sun? Maybe they went away when she started living in a house. My first guess about the coffin was that it was Rose because 1) black neighborhood, 2) she had terminal cancer before arriving on the island. Although, there would have to be some other plot point for no one to mourn her. She is clearly the smartest person on the whole island.
Posted by: Roger Workman | May 24, 2007 12:58 PM
Ok folks, stop worrying about the size of the coffin. You're looking for clues that aren't there. I am pretty sure that coffins come in one standard size unless you were to have one custom made and that funeral home didn't look terribly upscale.
Posted by: rnm | May 24, 2007 1:00 PM
Based on the neighborhood and lack of turnout at the funeral, I think it's Sawyer in the coffin. Note that it was a standard, cheapo pine coffin.
The way things were left between Kate and Sawyer, there is now obvious disdain between them.
And when Kate says, "he's going to wonder where I am," I think it's her kid, courtesy of Sawyer's li'l swimmers.
Posted by: rickNmd | May 24, 2007 1:02 PM
Best line of the night: Reunited mother's first words to her daughter: "Help me tie him up?" Ah, mother-daughter bonding...yes, pun intended...
Posted by: Hungover | May 24, 2007 1:03 PM
Jack is in the coffin. That is why he said to the funeral parlor director that he wasn't either family of friend of the deceased, and why he did not need or want to look in the coffin when offered.Jack wants to go back to the island because he really is not supposed to be in the same parallel uiverse with his parallel self; Jack return to civilization may have actually killed his parallel self....
Posted by: fangorina | May 24, 2007 1:04 PM
The site that Liz mentioned has a screen-shot of the newspaper clipping and it says "The body of Jo..." You can clearly see the Jo on the newspaper. John Locke is the only person I can think of whose names starts like that.
Posted by: Tdot | May 24, 2007 1:06 PM
RickNmd - you didn't get the end of Seinfeld? I thought it was brilliant! I think everyone says "the American public" can't handle complexity as though we geniuses are the only ones who can truly appreciate the show. It has many levels and for the most part the highbrow stuff escapes me. But Charlie and Sayid were bad ass "Hiro"s, and I'll be watching for three more years.
Posted by: NancyNPDX | May 24, 2007 1:08 PM
what about when Charlie died how the porthole made a saint halo around his head? When Charlie was hung the first time and "died" the rope around his head formed a halo as well...so was Charlie always destined to die as a saint? a hero?
Posted by: Drive Shaft Daddy | May 24, 2007 1:09 PM
What did Sawyer say when he shot Tom? I don't remember...
I think the newspaper clipping also mentions that this person is from New York. Ben was born in the Portland area.
Does anyone know Michael's last name? Maybe Michael is his middle name and his real first name starts with a J?
Posted by: question | May 24, 2007 1:09 PM
Tricia--No, you were not the only one. Not only did I find it awesome but so friggin SEXY! I love me some Sayid!
I would like to note that I am glad our three shooter didn't get killed (especially Jin & Sayid).
Posted by: Linda | May 24, 2007 1:10 PM
J(o)____ ___angham, people. Unless someone has had their name legally changed, there's no way it's Jack Shepherd, Sawyer (James Ford), John Locke, Rose, Michael, or Ben Linus. It has to be someone we haven't met yet.
Posted by: stef | May 24, 2007 1:10 PM
NancyNPDX, yes I did get to the end of "Seinfeld," and like so very many, when it ended, I looked around and said, "that's it? That's what you are giving us? That's your swan song?"
Thanks for nothing.
Posted by: rickNmd | May 24, 2007 1:14 PM
Linda:
I was watching at home by myself last night and I swear when Sayid did that I yelled "That was friggin' awesome!" Just substitute another word for "friggin'"
Posted by: Tricia | May 24, 2007 1:16 PM
hey, jerry said that's seinfeld was -- a show about nothing.
Posted by: b | May 24, 2007 1:18 PM
Jack was crying over the newspaper article. Or was he crying because he is a mess now?
Posted by: Tears | May 24, 2007 1:19 PM
Anyone have thoughts on Mikhail's comment to Ben that he thought the two women in the Looking Glass were "on assignment in Canada"?
Posted by: rnm | May 24, 2007 1:20 PM
In Season I, Claire's baby was very significant. That part of the story has been nearly dropped it seems, in favor of _every_ baby being significant. Is Claire's baby going to turn out to be someone special?
Posted by: m.a.t. | May 24, 2007 1:25 PM
There's something that hits me about the show (and the rampant speculation that surrounds it) false assumptions and jumping to conclusions.
Desmond assumed that Penny was on the boat.
Jack assumes that he's doing the right thing (always).
That seems to lead them down wrong paths.
As far as the 'game' changing. We're now past the halfway point, we're closer to the end than the begning.....so flashbacks become flashforwards.
Posted by: Kim | May 24, 2007 1:26 PM
My husband and I scrutinized the screenshot of the newspaper clipping for a few minutes last night. The headline says something like "Man found -------- downtown loft"
From what we could make out and concur with what others posted on the lost easter eggs site, the article continues:
The body of J------ ---------ham of New York was found shortly after 4 a.m. in the ----- of Grand Avenue.
In the next graph, something about The Tower and a beam?
That was all we could decipher but could we really expect them to clearly show the full article? That wouldn't be any fun, now would it?
I think it could be either Locke or Ben in the coffin (which I do think is a regular sized coffin, in one screenshot from above with Jack placing his hand on it, it looks like Jack could fit into it as well).
Michael could be an option and he is from New York.
I just don't know but it is very intriguing.
About Walt: Yes, it also bothered me that he appeared so much older. Obviously, in real life the actor has aged over the past couple of years but too quickly for the time that has lapsed on the island. Surely the pridcuers realize this so I would not be surprised that they work that into the story as well.
Kate was very made up at the end. I wondered if "He" was Sawyer as well. Still stumped on the whole fugitive thing but maybe we'll get some answers eventually.
Hurley was awesome! I also loved the bodies-flying-through the air explosions for some reason.
I, too, will miss Charlie, though he had his irritating moments he never bothered me enough to want to see him go. I think he probably realized he could have escaped but was holding onto the hope that Desmond's vision was correct and his death would help save Claire and Aaron. He had to take the chance.
All in all... I was very pleased with the finale and anxiously awaiting Jan. '08!
Posted by: clipping | May 24, 2007 1:26 PM
Bits and pieces from the screencap of the obit that Jack was holding...
"Los Angeles
Man found d[ead in]
Downtown loft
The body of J[o]____ [L]antham of New York was _____ shortly after 4 a.m. in the ______ block of Grand Avenue.
The _________ a [door]man at The T____ ____ ____ ____ loud noises ____ ______'s loft, nota_____ ____________ly _he Coney _____ ____ ____-recovered _____ tten____ the ____ a beam in the ______ _____.
_____ room _____ ______________ cond________"
Not very conclusive.
Posted by: CheekyMonkey | May 24, 2007 1:27 PM
dur, Producers, not pridcuers.... sorry!
Posted by: clipping | May 24, 2007 1:29 PM
I was intrigued by the Juliet/Sawyer dialogue before they got to the beach. He asked why she was going back and she said "karma. why are you going?" and he didn't have an answer. but now i wonder more about his karmic debt and whether or not he was supposed to kill somebody else and what that means for his character. granted i thought that charlie killing ethan would doom him as well and it didn't. he still got to be a hero in the end.
Posted by: rb | May 24, 2007 1:33 PM
re: Section 506 - The question has never been "will (can) they get off island?" so much as "will (can) the LOST be FOUND?" I esp like the double-entendre of 'will' in view of the fate vs free-will them of the show.
Hopefully they'll post my theory (submitted to the 3 pm chat) on the desire to be rescued is a fantasy about giving up responsiblity for one's life. So by being rescued from the island, Jack rejects self-determination and remains lost after all.
Posted by: Metaphor | May 24, 2007 1:33 PM
I was intrigued by the Juliet/Sawyer dialogue before they got to the beach. He asked why she was going back and she said "karma. why are you going?" and he didn't have an answer. but now i wonder more about his karmic debt and whether or not he was supposed to kill somebody else and what that means for his character. granted i thought that charlie killing ethan would doom him as well and it didn't. he still got to be a hero in the end.
Posted by: rb | May 24, 2007 1:33 PM
Kate was driving a Volvo when she met Jack at the airport. Somehow, this makes me think that she did not end up with Sawyer...
Posted by: Agfras | May 24, 2007 1:35 PM
Michael was a Construction Contractor right? Maybe he was hit in the head with a beam and died?
Posted by: | May 24, 2007 1:36 PM
Couple of notes:
1) Jin all the sudden speaks all this english?
2) Who else was annoyed when Tom announces that he "shot the sand 3 times" instead of shooting the prisoners?
3) Anyone notice on Kate's voicemail when Jack kept calling her phone, the number was a 305 or 315 area code? That's not LA.
4) Jack was definitely greying in his bearded stubble. But in the flash-forward, he's all dark and lovely.
5) In the coffin - my money's on Ben. Although the parlour area was a little shady.
6) McPatchy just doesn't die....
7) Penny just HAPPENS to be sending a signal out when Charlie is there?
Posted by: | May 24, 2007 1:38 PM
I counted 14 deaths:
7 gun-toting Others in the initial attack
3 more Others in Hurley's van-page
2 female Others in the Looking Glass station
1 Naomi
1 Charlie
That's certainly more than the 5 that was rumored before the finale.
Does this mean that the balance of power will swing in the Lostties favor in Season 4?
Posted by: body count | May 24, 2007 1:39 PM
When did Naomi die? I must have missed something??
Posted by: what? | May 24, 2007 1:42 PM
but was Naomi really dead? All we know is she got a knife in the back (symbolic in some way?) and from other "deaths" on Lost I don't know if this is conclusive evidence.
Posted by: Catherine | May 24, 2007 1:43 PM
Call me a simpleton, but I think the whole plotline is fairly linear. I agree with a few posters that the whole rid in the space/time continuum would get too crazy for the viewership. Last night we found out some folks got off the island. That's the only thing we do know. Jack clearly can't handle it...either for something he did or didn't do in the time between calling for help and getting rescued. Kate, on the surface, looks to be handling things much better but still is troubled by the events.
The next year will likely be much like the storylines on "The Nine" (although it was only on for a few months this season) - telling back and front stories at the same time. Obviously, they've been doing this for three years so now we'll get back-back stories (pre-crash), back-stories (island), and front-stories (post-rescue).
Posted by: Castaway | May 24, 2007 1:43 PM
I've coined a phrase for the off-the-island scenes featuring a bearded Dr. Shepard last night: "Flash-jacks."
Posted by: Copyright | May 24, 2007 1:44 PM
Fellow Lost Obsessors:
The answer is obvious. They get off the island, but in order for that to happen, everything that brought them to the island has be reversed (Jack's dad isn't dead, Kate didn't kill her stepfather, Jack and Kate meeting in secret, etc). The next three seasons will be about what goes on when they get back, with flashforwards to them contemplating the virtue of them leaving the island.
One problem with my theory: Who is Kate referring to when she says, "I have to get back before he notices." A son? Her fiance? Sawyer (that wouldn't work with this theory though)?
Posted by: Julie | May 24, 2007 1:47 PM
Why do people keep saying that Jack's beard in the flashforward was dark? Everyone in the group I watched with commented on how he had so much grey in it. Maybe some people need better televisions. :-)
Posted by: rnm | May 24, 2007 1:48 PM
If Jack's father is still alive, wouldn't it be interesting (and twisted) if Kate ended up married to Jack's father?
Posted by: cb | May 24, 2007 1:59 PM
Copyright- You're about three years too late. TWOP has been using the term "Flash-Jack" to refer to any Jack-centric flashback since the first season. Perhaps you can work with D. Trump to trademark the phrase "you're fired".
Posted by: Raoul Duke | May 24, 2007 2:01 PM
1 - The island has some source of power or healing or whatever (haven't figured out EXACTLY what it is at this point)that has drawn people to it for centuries.
2 - The Others are the lineage of people who "protect" the island. They apparently can't die, don't age, etc. (or do so much differently than "mortals")
3 - Throughout time, the Others have managed to protect the island and fight off the outsiders.
4 - Darma was the most recent and best equipped attempt to study/harness the powers of the island (the Black Rock ship and the Big Foot statue worshipers being earlier groups).
5 - The Others couldn't take out Darma alone so they recruited Ben as a "believer" and had him wipe out Darma and set him as at de facto leader. But he's still mortal
6 - The Darma group who wasn't on the island had gotten enough info to know the island holds something really important. I'm banking on it being something they could use for world domination (new weapon, fountain of youth, healing, etc.). So they want the island back to exploit its powers. My money is on Penny's dad being is charge of this "new" Darma group.
7 - Desmond was "sacrificed" in the guise of a sailing race to find the island. (Missing some details here, but Hurley's girlfriend who gave Desmond the boat might have also somehow been used to lure the plane to island as well...hmmm)
8 - Penny found out about her dad's plans and has been looking for Desmond herself.
9 - Once the Oceanic flight went down and the island gave off the huge pulses of magnetic energy, Darma picked them up and sent the ship/Naomi to find them. They'd have to have the resources to stage a plane crash and recovery, but let's assume they do.
10 - Since Ben's losing his grip on keeping control, the Other's picked the best and brightest of the Losties to be the new leader. That's Locke.
Posted by: Theorist | May 24, 2007 2:02 PM
Kelli - Where did Moses lead his people? Out of captivity (in Egypt), through the Red Sea, thence through the desert, to the Promised Land, though he himself was denied entry to the Promised Land.
As for the tower, it could possibly represent the Tower of Babel - built by humans who cooperated with one another to reach the heavens; but the nerve of them irritated God, who struck it down and then made it impossible for the humans to communicate with one another by making them speak in many different languages.
Posted by: Jean | May 24, 2007 2:04 PM
Best Episode Ever!
Now, my old theory of "other-others" is revived based on what Ben said, that there are prople trying to find the island and they are on the ship and on Penny saying it was not her boat (Naomi lied). I expect season 4 to be the Lostie/Others working to fight off the other-others as they try to secure the island for themselves.
Ben said he killed 40 people to secure the island, meaning the Dharma village I presume, but Dharma had to be bigger than 40 people. The rest of Dharma is trying to find the island Ben and crew kicked them off of and hid from the outside world. And Dharma seems very fascist to me. Bad people. That makes Ben, in my mind, a good guy who uses very bad methods to achieve his aims. That is probably why the Others are ready to dump Ben.
Locke's appearance was very strange. It seemed to be an afterthought for the writers. Walt dod look old, as he is in real life.
The flash forward was interesting but I did not find it that important. I really do not care what happens after they get off the island because for me that will be the end of the show. But imagine that they were not rescued but remained and joined the Others. Jack could have been cast out while Kate is actively working for the Others and was worried about whether Jacob knew where she was. The Volvo points to the wealth Dharma related people seem to have ... though I like Acura better :^) Oh yea, and for who was in the coffin ... someone Jack thought more people should have come to see off, someone he though had earned a lot of respect but evidently had not. That is probably Desmond. A person who for their entire life had been screwing up and making enemies, just like Jack.
Posted by: Sully | May 24, 2007 2:04 PM
I realize why (from a plot perspective) why people feel the need to be so cryptic, but why doesn't Locke just TELL Jack why he isn't meant to get them off the island? Does Locke not know, and just taking it all based on his faith in the island?
Posted by: mizbinkley | May 24, 2007 2:05 PM
A couple of things...
Jack and Kate make no reference to the gender of the person in the coffin, contrary to Jen and Liz's speculation. It was just "the funeral."
McPatchy released the grenade only a second or less before it blew up, so unless he is really Rasputin, then I think he'll be pretty dead.
Regarding the flooded room, the room will fill with water. The Looking Glass station was about 40 feet underwater. At that depth, the air in the room will be exposed to a water pressure of about 30 psi. Air is compressible, so the room will flood past the window.
Posted by: LostieLostie | May 24, 2007 2:08 PM
Locke can't spell it out because the point is that Jack is suppose to make his OWN DECISION. Not so much about what the choice is, it's more deciding to take the leap of faith, acting on belief rather than on rational basis.
Posted by: for mizbinkley | May 24, 2007 2:13 PM
I'm having an exceptionally busy work day today, so unfortunately I won't be able to get through the entire analysis and myriad of responses already posted here, but I wanted to say THANKS to Liz, Jen and J for their extra long analysis today and the upcoming chat! I admit I was really disappointed initially in the episode but, at least from the first few paragraphs I have read, there is definitely more going on with the season finale than I had originally seen, so I'm beginning to see the light and all is not lost.
I haven't scrolled through all the posts, so this may be old news, but here are two points I thought of after the epidsode last night:
1 - The funeral. The scenes leading up to Jack entering the funeral parlor were made to look as though they were specifically trying to give us clues that the funeral home was in a mostly black part of LA, which makes me think that it wasn't Ben, Locke, Sawyer, etc in that coffin. Michael? Walt? I'm personally leaning towards it being someone we don't know yet.
2 - All through the series, Ben has maintained that he is the good guy and he has definitely been pleading the case recently for not allowing anyone to get off the island. So from the scenes we have seen from the "future", are we now supposed to think that Ben has been right all along because somehow he knows what happens when people leave the island and he's trying to protect them as he's said all along?
So that's my quick two cents, I'm sure most of that has already been suggested and it's killing me I don't have time for scrolling all the posts!
Posted by: Lost at Work | May 24, 2007 2:18 PM
Did Naomi lie? Desmond mistook his vision of a parachutist as being Penny. They find that Naomi has a photo of Des & Penny but I don't remember anyone asking Naomi about that. I recall that Naomi recognizes Des and calls him by name. Naomi also says something about not searching for Oceanic 815 but a search based on a signal (i.e., the hatch explosion?). But did Naomi ever actually mention Penny?
Posted by: Anonymous | May 24, 2007 2:19 PM
To answer question's question : Sawyer said he shot Tom even though he surrendered because "I didn't believe him." I didn't believe him either, Sawyer. Right on.
When Mikail said "I thought you said the Looking Glass was flooded." Ben paused a long time before he replied "I lied." I wonder if he was lying when he said he lied. Maybe he's aware of the many time loops, and knew it was flooded, or would be.
Posted by: going round and round | May 24, 2007 2:27 PM
if someone/the others faked/staged a plane crash off the australia shore somewhere, they won't want the survivors of the plane crash ever popping back up and saying, we aren't really dead! That would reek havoc for the ones who staged it and lied to the world, so they might be on the boat coming to make sure they are actually all dead?
Posted by: new idea | May 24, 2007 2:30 PM
If the name on the obit started with a J, it might be Juliette OR Jacob or even Rousseau. Are there any other Losties with names that start with J?
Posted by: Vicki Contavespi | May 24, 2007 2:32 PM
Timelines:
Did anyone get the sense that the purge happened rather recently, like 5 years before the 2004 crash? Ben stated, "I did something recently..." Before, I was thinking the purge was a decade ago. Also, the gun Locke found was not too rusted, and Hurley's van still ran.
Secondly, Russo - what has she been doing for 16 years! Never seen The Flame, Never seen Alex, never returned to the tower and maybe change the message. ???
The Temple- Liz and Jen -no one seems to have commented much about that reference. A temple seems like a hugh factor for the story line.
Posted by: dr | May 24, 2007 2:32 PM
If the name on the obit started with a J, it might be Juliette OR Jacob or even Rousseau. Are there any other Losties with names that start with J?
Posted by: Vicki Contavespi | May 24, 2007 2:33 PM
I think Ben paused because he needed to figure out a plan, not because his head was full of interwoven time lines.
Posted by: LostieLostie | May 24, 2007 2:34 PM
If the name on the obit started with a J, couldn't it be Jacob or Juliete or even Rousseau? Any other Losties with names starting with a J?
Posted by: Vicki Contavespi | May 24, 2007 2:34 PM
As for Mikhail's immortality - it looked to me like he was shot with a taser (two leads that seemed to fly out), not a harpoon. I kept wondering why Desmond didn't shoot him to finish him off, or cover him like he did the other bodies. It seemed obvious that he was going to wake up and do some sort of mischief.
Posted by: Lost Already | May 24, 2007 2:35 PM
SO glad I stopped watching this show . . .
Posted by: | May 24, 2007 2:39 PM
Every time I stick up for the intelligence of the American public I'm proven wrong. Sigh...Hopefully after Lost is cancelled next year, the producers will be able to produce a final movie or something to explain it all.
Thanks guys - it's been great. Type to you next year.
Posted by: nANCYnpdx | May 24, 2007 2:40 PM
dr:
I agree about the temple. that was the first mention of it that I had ever heard.
Maybe that's where the four-toed giants are...
Posted by: LostieLostie | May 24, 2007 2:42 PM
ENDINGS
As for Seinfeld....the last show ended with the same conversation that started the very first (pilot) episode.
A conversation between Jerry and George about the placement of the button (buttonhole). In the first episode, they were in the diner and in the last in jail with Kramer & Elaine...but the same conversation.
And that is why Jerry said "I feel like we already had this conversation..."
Just an FYI
Posted by: Sweetli30 | May 24, 2007 2:43 PM
question, Sawyer said the killing of Tom was for taking Walt off the boat.
Posted by: Elsie | May 24, 2007 2:44 PM
Loved last night's episode, but did feel totally depressed that the Losties escape from the island ends in wrecked lives (i.e. Jack). I can't believe that the end result will be so heartbreaking! But after reading the posts and the analysis, I'm feeling a bit more optimistic.
RE: the funeral and etc. The funeral parlor was definitely in a black neighborhood and that has to be of some significance. Has to be. Secondly, I am not so sure that Jack was in L.A. I grew up in SoCal and I really can't think of a bridge in the L.A. area that matches the one Jack was on. Any other CA expats out there with ideas?? Also, the hospital seemed very...old, and my husband remarked that most medicine supply rooms in hospitals have alarms or codes to enter (although I guess Jack would have had the code if he worked there). also didn't notice many (or any) palm trees. And palm trees are all over the L.A. area, 'hood, Beverly Hills and everywhere in between, even at LAX. So not sure if Jack was really in L.A. Just seemed weird to me. Also the neighborhood where the funeral was, also, didn't really seem like the L.A. area. But I could be wrong.
Overall, loved the episode, but really hope we can alter the past so as to arrive, in the end, at a happy future for Jack and the other Losties. BTW, I was totally SHOCKED by the ending myself. It was just so tragic and heartbreaking and unexpected for me. LOVE LOST!!!!
Posted by: CA Expat | May 24, 2007 2:44 PM
Gotta love Sayid-I hit the TIVO and watched that 2-3 times. I've always loved Sayid and I knew that they weren't killed when the guns went off. My husband laughs at me when I go nuts over Sayid!!
Posted by: leeni | May 24, 2007 2:44 PM
I don't think Lost is headed for cancellation. At its low point this season, it still drew in over 14 million viewers, and has been in the top 15 most watched tv shows.
How does that translate to imminent cancellation?
Posted by: LostieLostie | May 24, 2007 2:47 PM
Timeline again on the purge:
Agruments for a recent purge (5 years out).
1. Dharma still delivering food.
2. Ben's comments.
3. Ben lieing to the others about the outside world and preventing contact as much as possible. How long were Bonnie and Co. in the looking glass awaiting the next order? 2-3 years, maybe, 10, I doubt it, they would be teenagers. It seemd recent from McPatchy's comments that they were in Canada.
4. Perhaps when Des came to the island, then Ben went into hiding?
Other thoughts?
Posted by: dr | May 24, 2007 2:47 PM
Raoul,
First, what is TWOP?
Second, whatever it is, perhaps it should refer to all Dr. Shepard-centric off-island scenes that occur in the past as "Jack-backs." That will enable us to now now refer to all Dr. Shepard-centric off-island scenes that occur in the future as "flash-jacks."
Since time is apparently just a dimension like space, and therefore the past, present and future are all occurring at once, "TWOP" can easily make this change. Hopefully doing so will not kill any main characters or change the shapes of Ben's glasses.
Lastly, I realize that the fact that the past, present and future are all occuring at once undermines the distinction between "Jack-backs" and "Flash-jacks." However, I'm just tryign to make a silly joke.
What I really want to copyright is Stephen Colbert's name for the Felcity Huffman - William H. Macy couple: Filliam H. Muffman.
Posted by: Copyright | May 24, 2007 2:49 PM
dr
I think Rousseau screws your timeline. If she was on a research ship that crashed 16 years ago, why wouldn't she have found the Dharma-ites, and their still-functioning facilities. She didn't go ape-sh!t batty right away on the island, and I also recall she said the Others killed her colleagues.
Furthermore, she found the transmitter pretty fast, and I imagine that the Dharma-ites would not have like their radio tower commandeered by a loopy french woman for 11 years.
Posted by: LostieLostie | May 24, 2007 2:52 PM
Perhaps there was no actual flash-forward in this episode, but a number of flash-backs. I was thinking that maybe the actual time sequence in the show corresponded to Jack in the plane; the LA scenes, etc.; and that he was having flashbacks with regards to what happened in the island.
Posted by: HulloMatilda | May 24, 2007 2:53 PM
Darma kept dropping food and giving Ben & Co the info on the Losties because they needed to find the island...
WAIT...strike that. They have to know where the island is or how would they drop the food.?
Damn, now I'm all confused.
Posted by: Castaway | May 24, 2007 2:55 PM
HulloMatilda:
I did notice that the flashback theme came during the scenes that are being called flash-forwards, unlike the usual island scene transition-to-flashback.
Posted by: LostieLostie | May 24, 2007 2:56 PM
dr, good call on the temple, I just submitted a question to the chat about it.
CA Expat, there's a bridge that's in like a million movies in LA. It crosses the mighty Los Angeles River (I'm kidding about the mighty part)
Posted by: Kim | May 24, 2007 2:57 PM
LostieLostie, are you sure that Kate didn't say "why would I go to HIS funeral?"?
Posted by: rnm | May 24, 2007 2:59 PM
I think the funeral parlor name, Hoffs/Drawler, an anagram for flash forward, sets us in the future along with Sarah being pregnant.
Rousseau said she killed her team as each got the sickness. Before that, several of them had hiked to the tower. She was seven months pregnant when they arrived on the island, and she gave birth to Alex alone. It is a mystery that she never explored the entire place in all those years, but there were many dangers and she was alone and fearful.
Posted by: Elsie | May 24, 2007 2:59 PM
Hey, why can't Jacob be black? Maybe a survivor of the slaver ship.
Also, why is no one making a big deal about Rousseau saying she wouldn't leave the island. If there really is some significance to the difference between those who are trying to leave the island and those who are trying to stay, she has to be key. She's the only person who is working to contact help, but still wanting to stay.
Posted by: Jacob | May 24, 2007 3:00 PM
I have to catch up on everyting above, but I'm convinced that Ben is in the coffin (besides, who would come to his funeral? He was born on teh continent, but moved as a child, and knows no one on teh continent since both his parents are dead). Jack would probably go to the funeral b/c he seems to want to get back to the island terribly (I think, mostly, b/c he was happier on the island that with rreality on the mainland). Jack is upset b/c he needed Ben to get back (consider the scene in his apartment with all the maps on teh floor).
Also, I think that the boat is Penny's boat. it's interesting that Ben knows abotu teh group trying to find the island, but I wonder if Ben ever really knew about Desmond and that's why they're looking for hte island. Ben may see them as a threat to their society but they're really only looking for Desmond. Desmond's presence there is independent of the Others and Losties. I think that Penny will use that short transmission as a way to fuel more motivation to find the island, considering someone she doenst' know just said Desmond's name before she did!
I like that we had a future-flash-forward, but for me what gave it away was the cell phone that Jack uses (Moto KRZR -which only came out a few months ago). Which makes me question how long have they been back? I like how they have opened up the show to telling us they get back, but I don't have closure with knowing that they get back. To me, the closure is finally finding out what this island is afterall.
Posted by: EricGewiz | May 24, 2007 3:00 PM
LostieLostie
Her lack of whereabouts makes my point. She never went anywhere or saw anything from her comments. She had never seen the Flame station in 16 years? I think she weirded out in Cerberus territory, hiding from Smokey. She very well could have ignored, bypassed, whatever the Dharma folks. Also, the Others, Richard et 'al, were already there before Dharma and during. If they took Alex 16 years ago, then she grew up in the clan. Question remains is when Ben claimed her as his daughter...he knew about Russeau - which supports your claim. It might make more snes that Ben was incharge at T-16years and took her in/away, but maybe not. Did Russeau recognize Ben as the kidnapper? She did not claim so back in S2 when she captured him, just that he was an other.
Posted by: dr | May 24, 2007 3:00 PM
mm
I just watched a few scenes again this afternoon, that being one of them. Kate says "why would I go to THE funeral?"
Posted by: LostieLostie | May 24, 2007 3:02 PM
Where did Charlie get that rockin' pen that writes so well underwater?
And more seriously....I too was cheering when Sayid snapped that guys neck and when Sawyer blew Big Tom away. Go Sawyer, he's back! And when Jack beat the crap out of Ben.
I mean how much can a person take? Enough! let's kick some Others ass and get the hell out of here already.
On GP, I would kick Ben's manipulative butt. The minute he opens his mouth you know its lies and manipulation. He's like a svengali or something.
Are we not taking notice of the lost of faith experienced by Locke and the fact that he couldn't move his legs while lying in the pit. He was grabbing his pants leg to move his legs around. It was not until Walt showed up and restored his belief did Locke regain his faith and walk.
Faith.
I think there is more to it than makeup when it comes to Kate's freckles and lack thereof. That comment where she noted that "since when do u call me Kate?" to Sawyer was telling.
Despite the fact that there are new questions that need answering...I thought this was one of the best episodes they've done in a while.
Though, I hated the fact that Gin missed the target on his dynamite, where older Bernard asked for "holy" intervention and hit his right on...that dang FAITH again.
Posted by: Key question.... | May 24, 2007 3:02 PM
2 questions/observations. In the opening scene isn't Jin and Sun sitting in the row behind Jack. Also, when Jack shows up at the wake he tries to call a number and the message I believe says you've reach 305-something something. 305 is a Miami area code where Julliet lives. Maybe Jack goes from Island Hero to mainland stalker.
Posted by: Thomas | May 24, 2007 3:05 PM
The funniest line of the night, I thought, was from Ben, when Alex was upset and asking why he tried to brainwash Carl:
"I didn't want you to get pregnant!"
But he said it JUST like a dad.
Posted by: Preggers | May 24, 2007 3:10 PM
A few black faces hanging out makes a neighborhood "black" and "shady"???? Isn't this 2007...or maybe it IS 2007...
Posted by: Walt's brother | May 24, 2007 3:11 PM
The person in the coffin could and might very well be a character that has not yet been introduced
Posted by: nmoses | May 24, 2007 3:17 PM
The neighborhood WAS shady, or poor anyway - gray, cheap-looking, low rise buildings - the pine coffin, the folding chairs, the sign at the funeral home. It was shady, OK?
And was it black? Perhaps it's a stretch to assume just because everyone in the scene was black. Sorry to jump to conclusions - but all we know is what we're told.
Posted by: OH PLEASE | May 24, 2007 3:17 PM
If you look closely at the newspaper clipping from Jack's hand, it is in fact stated that a man was found, so this removes any possibility of Rose and Juliette. And between the references to the tower, the beam, and the idea of reliving something over and over again could relate to the Dark Tower series. History is doomed to repeat itself until it occurs perfectly, as it was meant to.
Posted by: AMANDA | May 24, 2007 3:17 PM
Copyright- TWOP is a website called Television Without Pity, which provides recaps of various shows, along with discussion forums. My point was mostly that the term "Flash-Jack" has been around, and I've noticed other folks here trying to post stuff as original when it's been all over the interwebs for awhile.
With regard to the area code when Jack is attempting to call Kate, I thought I heard "310"; 310 is listed as: S California: Beverly Hills, West Hollywood, West Los Angeles. I think maybe Ocham's Razor (not to be confused with Jack's RZR) might apply here.
Posted by: Raoul Duke | May 24, 2007 3:23 PM
LostieLostie,
Not to belabor the point, but your supposition about the water compressing the air in the room is incorrect. The air in the room is already at a higher pressure, since the air in the entire station is at a higher pressure due to the open submarine access point. It would not be compressed further. The porthole is about halfway up the room wall, so the water would fill to the top of the porthole, leaving about 4-5 feet of breathable air in the top of the room. The writers/directors simply screwed up the physics.
Posted by: Joe | May 24, 2007 3:23 PM
Re: Jack's "flash forwards" taking place in L.A. Where is the hospital Jack worked? He told the new Chief of Surgery that he had worked there many years. Is it in Los Angeles? If so, then the flash forwards had to take place there because the accident victims were brought there.
However, if it is not there, then Los Angeles may just be stuck in people's minds because of the dateline on the news article. Remember, Jack noticed the news article on the airplane. But he picked up the newspaper on the airplane so that is another thing to consider. I wonder if anyone has tried to capture the screenshot of when he picked up the paper on the plane. That may provide some more clues?
Also, the article talks about a MAN's death so we can assume it is a MAN's funeral BUT that does not necessarily mean that the funeral is for the person in the article. Just a thought.
I do think it is significant that t
The must- bookmark blog for your daily dose of celeb- centric news, irreverent analysis and the best celeb-tracking community on the Web.
You'll know why I had to do what I did