Album review: Ciara, "Basic Instinct"
Ciara tries to make amends for her recent work with "Basic Instinct."
It's here, right on schedule: The back-to-basics album, the one that comes after the hit debut and the failed experimental album but before the inevitable comeback disc. In Ciara's case, "Basic Instinct" is meant to erase the memory of '09's "Fantasy Ride," a clunky, medium-high concept disc about which, she would apparently like you to know, she is very, very sorry.
Ciara began her career as the Princess of Crunk, which wasn't exactly a job title with a promising future. Her next few releases flitted between club tracks and ballads without landing on anything memorable. Ciara has a pretty wisp of a voice and an in-between persona - not too slutty, not too sassy, not too proud, not too anything. She seems less like a performer than a device, a framework that songs get draped over.

Throughout "Basic Instinct," the usual superstar producers (Tricky Stewart, The-Dream) do the usual things (slow jams, Auto-Tuned, synth-heavy bangers) with the usual results, only less so. Ciara hasn't yet found her killer song, her "Umbrella," and she hasn't the gravity to carry off lesser songs like "Girls Get Your Money," a snappy but terrible ode to girls, and how they'd like to, you know, get money and stuff, which was probably irredeemable anyway.
The rest is merely uneven: The fine, thumping "Gimmie Dat," with its booming bass, offers a throughline to Ciara's crunk past. On the title track, she laments time spent on the red carpet instead of in the studio. It's a personalized mea culpa that's meant to make it okay to like Ciara again, a feat that remains beyond her limited powers of persuasion.
By
Allison Stewart
| December 14, 2010; 12:00 PM ET
Categories:
Quick spins
| Tags:
Ciara
Save & Share:
Previous: Album review: Crystal Bowersox, "Farmer's Daughter"
Next: Album review: R. Kelly, "Love Letter"
Can't sing. At all.
Posted by: Godfather_of_Goals | December 14, 2010 3:06 PM | Report abuse











We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.