Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 2:22 PM ET, 01/27/2010

The populists dominate

By David Ignatius

It wasn’t exactly Robbespierre, but when French President Nicholas Sarkozy called on global “citoyens” to reform the economic system, he seemed to be calling for an international populist movement. I wouldn’t call his tone “anti-globalization,” but the speech he gave was the clearest signal I’ve seen yet that in the aftermath of the economic crisis, we are entering a “post-globalization” moment when the rules are up for grabs.

Who but Sarkozy could make this diatribe on international economics so entertaining? The man is the most interesting person to watch in international politics: On stage, he scowls, he shrugs, he points, he struts -- all with the most animated gestures. Dressed in one of his skinny “Rat Pack” suits, a la Dean Martin or Peter Lawford, he was spellbinding. I can’t remember an anti-capitalist speech that got a standing ovation from an audience made up mostly of wealthy capitalists. But that’s the Davos magic, you might say.

Sarkozy’s speech was like a bad dream for partisans of the American Entreprise Institute. He called for global regulation of a capitalist system that he said had “skidded out of control” with the 2008 financial crisis. He said that over-emphasis on free trade had “weakened democracy.” He urged the world to “leave behind the culture of experts” that created the crisis. He proposed a values-based capitalism that treats free-markets as a means, not an end. He blasted currency manipulators (read Chinese leaders) and soulless speculators for whom “the present was all that mattered” (read American bankers).

Sarko’s prescription was a classic French dose of interventionism. Indeed, he said, this traditional European social democratic approach had been the pathway out of the 2008 crisis. “Without state intervention, everything would have collapsed,” he said.

This sort of anti-market talk is the patter of this year’s Davos, and it scares me a little, frankly. I heard versions of it today from financier George Soros, World Economic Forum president Klaus Schwab, Swiss President Doris Leuthard, and various business leaders and economists. Combined with the new wave of born-again populism from President Obama and the Democrats after the Massachusetts blowout, this talk suggests that we are in for a period of after-the-fact overreaction.

You have to remind yourself that for Europeans this financial crisis has proved a point they have been arguing for decades -- that economic “liberalism,” of the sort found in Britain and the United States, creates a dangerous over-reliance on the market. They say, as Sarkozy did today, that this extreme Anglo-Saxon liberalism (yes, the French give it a racial-cultural face) subordinates human values to economic ones. Looking at Lehman Brothers and AIG, it’s hard now to make the counter-argument.

This is a moment in which all the usual Davos talk about how a rising economic tide has lifted all the boats, about how free trade has created wealth and improved incomes in nearly every country. That pro-market rhetoric is played out, for now. Citoyens, to the barricades!

By David Ignatius  | January 27, 2010; 2:22 PM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Is Davos dissing India?
Next: In Davos, talk of Massachusetts

Comments

Sarkozy is a sort of Bill Clinton. He goes around mouthing a bunch of rhetoric that sounds good and looks good on televion, but in fact means relatively little and accomplishes even less.

The jury is still out on whehter or not Obama will just be another Bill Clinton or whether he will do actual damage of the kind done by George Bush junior. Or he could chart a third course of action to try to engage the American people in what is really wrong with their government and what might be done to fix it- as did Ross Perot. Perot may have personally been a nutjob, but most of his public policy ideas were very sound. Perot actually tried to educate the public, with his little charts on the Federal deficit and so forth. Only Obama can overcome the status quo of doing nothing; the Senate just rejected his idea of a deficit commission because lobbyists on the left united with lobbyists in the right to defeat the idea. When one single idea gets that much attention to try to defeat it, it's probably a really good idea. Obama has backed off putting pressure on Israel, he's backed off putting pressure on the auto unions, he's backed off from his campaign pledge to make a line-by-line review of the Federal budget. He's going to have to threaten the Congress with some vetos; just voting "present" won't cut it here in dealing with those knuckleheads, or they'll continue to walk all over him.

Posted by: ripvanwinkleincollege | January 27, 2010 3:06 PM | Report abuse

After the year that we've been through, we're all French. Viva La France!!

Posted by: dbert4 | January 27, 2010 3:15 PM | Report abuse

Good analogy I am sure, of our new friend from France. Was not that long ago, they detested we Yanks. History tells us, they are harmless. With Obama in office, and all his shirt tail left wingers, I am sure, the French believe, we will come to our senses, and be like them. A Welfare State.

Posted by: dangreen3 | January 27, 2010 7:38 PM | Report abuse

USA in particular is resembling the Weimar Repubilc of Germany after WWI with polarisation of the country into two distant groups. Clinton's Third Way is dead, and two extremes are toughing it out.

Looking beyond Sarko's reactionary vision, continental Europe managed to ride thru the storm, mostly created in USA and UK. They didn't have CDOs, sub-prime junk and regulatory atmosphere is unified in European countries and at EU level.

As for Davos itself, it is just a high end conference that has no posture but hype about hype.

Posted by: ordak100 | January 28, 2010 4:48 AM | Report abuse

I wonder what it is that is 'scary' for Ignatius about social-democracy? Does he include the Scandinavians and northern and central European governments that have social democrats in power? These parties are the most consistent real Keynesians over the last 40 years--they have argued for even longer that market systems that are untamed will regularly misbehave in ways that can jeopardize the entire system itself. What is scary about the prospect of taking an eyes-wide-open approach to managing modern hyper-financialized U.S. capitalism? Or should I understand the comment by viewing Ignatius as just an uneasy Burkean defender of the status quo ante?

Posted by: crockpost | January 28, 2010 5:49 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company