All the President's Men, All the Time

The Post's Watergate team of Bob Woodward, Carl Bernstein and Ben Bradlee hasn't worked together for a while, but they were definitely out and about and on air today.

Woodward and Bernstein started off their day on MSNBC and Don Imus, according to Tina Gulland, the Post's Director of Television and Radio Projects. Next, they appeared on the Today Show. Then, Good Morning America and at 9 pm, they'll sit down with Larry King Live.

Bradlee took questions on washingtonpost.com is scheduled to appear tonight onHardball with Chris Matthews.

The weekend is still up in the air, Gulland said, although Woodward has said he's through being interviewed for a while.

-- Hal Straus

By washingtonpost.com |  June 2, 2005; 3:40 PM ET  | Category:  Bob Woodward , Carl Bernstein
Previous: 'All the President's' Amazon.com Sales |

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



He is a true American Hero, I just wish we had a few today. You haven't been giving us the truth you have become a mouthpiece for for this secretive administration. My hope is that you will actually hire some journalists that actually report and investigate stories. I no longer reley on the american press for information.. The WP has not broken a major story since watergate. SAD

Posted by: Gerri Mace | June 2, 2005 06:04 PM

Joking aside, has anyone noticed the similarity is faces between Mark Felt in his earlier days, 1975ish, and the new French PM Dominique de Villepin?

Google their images and you will see: separated at birth? amazing resemblance.

Posted by: David Hume | June 3, 2005 12:22 AM

If I go to Washington DC, do American people help me ?

I am a real serious mind-control victim from only one Japan's crazy freemason Toshiba Corp since Nov 1997.
I post such a things to BBSes and blogs in the World since Sep 2004, hoping many people like Toshiba persons maybe can read minds by remote-sensing.

Many people like Toshiba persons can mind-control people ? (But they don't know Toshiba persons are really risky to the World.)


For World Peace, in the World, only Russian Pravda informs that Science Technology "Mind-control" exists. Japanese major press never inform real Mind-control. (I am not a communist.)

Dr. Igor Smirnov's "Mind control: The Zombie Effect" (Pravda Nov 10, 2004).
http://english.pravda.ru/science/19/94/379/14567_.html
- It said "Methods of latent impact on the human psyche are no longer secret."

"Psychic security department protects Russian presidents from external psychological influence" (Pravda Jan 6, 2005)
http://english.pravda.ru/main/18/90/362/14790_psychic.html
- Former Russian President Boris Yeltsin had Federal Security Service against Mind-Control. Americans have created radiators of modulated signals, which control people's behavior thousands of kilometers from afar.

"JOHN FLEMING: THE SHOCKING MENACE OF SATELLITE SURVEILLANCE FULL VERSION OF THE ARTICLE" (Pravda Jul 14, 2001)
http://english.pravda.ru/main/2001/07/14/10131.html
- Mr. John Fleming is an American journalist. His root may be an Indian. He is the author of The War of All Against All: An Analysis of Conflict in Society (International Scholars Publications, 2000).

by Seitaro Kanamaru, a Japanese
kanamaru_seitaro@hotmail.com
* My BBS threads in English :
I am an Mind-Control Victim by Toshiba Corp since 1997.
http://www.perc.ca/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=794
(My face is at http://www.discussanything.com/forums/showthread.php?p=838876.)
* My site in Japanese (This is not smart.)
http://jbbs.livedoor.jp/news/1301/

Posted by: Seitaro Kanamaru | June 3, 2005 07:39 AM

It just goes to show...be loyal and true, keep your mouth shut to protect your source, and he will reward you by giving the scoop to vanity fair!

God I LOVE the moral fortitude of our leaders, don't you?

Posted by: http://www.kelleybell.blogspot.com | June 3, 2005 10:45 AM

Bob Woodward is being disingenous about his relationship with Alexander Haig's military faction determined to bring down Nixon for their own reasons.

watergate.com

Posted by: Howard Beale | June 3, 2005 09:56 PM

http://watergate.com

Woodward and Moorer in Conflict over Woodward's White House Role

In June 2, 2005's Washington Post, Bob Woodward stated that his role with Navy in regards to the White House was merely that of a courier.

"In 1970, when I was serving as a lieutenant in the U.S. Navy and assigned to Adm. Thomas H. Moorer, the chief of naval operations, I sometimes acted as a courier, taking documents to the White House."

"One evening I was dispatched with a package to the lower level of the West Wing of the White House, where there was a little waiting area near the Situation Room. It could be a long wait for the right person to come out and sign for the material, sometimes an hour or more, and after I had been waiting for a while a tall man with perfectly combed gray hair came in and sat down near me. His suit was dark, his shirt white and his necktie subdued. He was probably 25 to 30 years older than I and was carrying what looked like a file case or briefcase. He was very distinguished-looking and had a studied air of confidence, the posture and calm of someone used to giving orders and having them obeyed instantly. . . "

Unfortunately, this contradicts with the statements confirmed by his supervisor, Chief of Naval Operations, Adm. Thomas H. Moorer; that he was sent to the White House to brief Alexander Haig.

Interview with Admiral Thomas H. Moorer [excerpt]
by Robert Gettlin -- October 4, 1989

GETTLIN:

See the thing about it, he had contacts at the White House, from his time that he went over there at the situation room. Now I've talked to a number of people, including people at the NSC, and they said that part of the job that Woodward had when he went over there is that he briefed Al Haig. Did you-- were you aware of that?

MOORER:

Sure

GETTLIN:

You were.

MOORER:

Of course.

GETTLIN:

Well, why was--

MOORER:

[INAUDIBLE]

GETTLIN:

Why was he briefing Haig over there?

MOORER:

Because I was on the telephone with Haig 8 or 9 times a day about whatever's going on, the same thing with Kissinger.

GETTLIN:

Yeah.

MOORER:

And it's the job of a uh, people in the Pentagon to keep the President informed.

GETTLIN:

Yeah.

MOORER:

The President was Commander in Chief, and Haig was simply the channel that got into, it went from Haig [INAUDIBLE] to the President.

Hear the excerpts and read the transcripts of Bob Gettlin's Interview with Admiral Moorer.

The stories below also provide links featuring Melvin Laird and Jerry Friedheim confirming Woodward's Role as White House briefer. For a 90 minute interview with Bob Woodward from March 1989, click here.

Posted by: watergate.com | June 3, 2005 10:00 PM

Silent Coup

Tells you everything you need to know about Bob Woodward and Alexander Haig.

Posted by: Howard Beale | June 3, 2005 10:03 PM

Richard M. Brayall
67 Garfield St. (401) 849-6077
Newport, RI 02840
July 25, 2005

To: Congress and the Senate
Subject: Campaign Money, Organized Crime and a Dual Government.

Dear Sir/Madam:
Tupperware Home Parties, a division of Dart & Kraft (hereforth abbreviated Dart) and government officials robbed a billion dollars off the American Public. Dart was a corporate citizen- special interest protected in the courts in exchange for campaign (bribe) money. Dart and others created a corruption ring inside the (est. 4,000) government and the courts. The dual government made sure there was no government intervention, no media coverage while the statue of limitations ran. If anyone filed a complaint, the corrupt courts would bankrupt the litigant with the creation of complexities, delays and costs while suppressing crucial evidence.1/.

In 1986, I informed the dual-corrupt government of Dart's racketeering nationwide. The dual government said they couldn't intervene. By 1987, I filed a complaint. Dart's (50) lawyers argued the statue of limitations barred the complaint without a fiduciary relationship. Dart's lawyers knew that Tupperware's Distributors Accounting Service (DAS) was the accountant for all distributors worldwide. Dart's lawyers and corrupt judges knew that DAS robbed the distributor's accounts interstate, never remitted state sales taxes collected, filed false tax returns and laundered money for over 30 years. By 1988, the FTC admitted Dart violated racketeering- franchise laws nationwide (Wall St. Jr. 11/14/88). Later President Bush, who was financed by Dart, removed all accountants from the inquiry. By 1989, I bankrupted. By 1991, before I could testify before Congress, Dart had a corrupt judge unlawfully dismiss my bankruptcy. By 1994, a USDC judge gave me permission to serve 34 federal agents/judges for racketeering. Between 1991-1999, Dart used corrupt state/federal judges to cover up the fact that Dart was never audited for over 30 years. By 1999 all court proceedings ended. By 2001, dual government had to make sure all court records were erased or the above would link Dart to a corruption ring inside the government. By 2000-2003, Congress and others wouldn't intervene. By 2005, President Bush wouldn't intervene. A Congressional person notified the US Attorney, who couldn't bring a grand jury because of the statue of limitations. While someone is telling the media they can't print this story for it's in a phony grand jury, investigation or a protective order somewhere?

The statue of limitations is tolled for I received death threats, became disabled and laid low for years. Dart's criminal organization still exists within the government. Dart and others have changed corporate names while the statue of limitations ran to eliminate future prosecution or liability. I have never been charged for making false allegations for that would uncover all. I only asked: "Who Was the Accountant?" This letter is a matter of public record. After 20 years, as a whistle blower, I'm pleading for Congressional-Senate Inquiry or media coverage.
Yours truly,

1/Justin W. Dart was the CEO for the Cal. Rep. Party (1949-1983)-CFO Nationally, Dart & Kraft, Dart-Walgreen -Rexall Drug, principal pharmaceutical supplier to US. Dart made Presidents ever since Eisenhower-Nixon. Dart was associated with 80% of the Warren Comm., but never mentioned during Watergate. Dart put Reagon/Bush in the White House (Vanity Fair-July 1998). Dir. Tele-Satellite Comm. (NY Times-Bohemian Club)-Reagon/Bush. Most Justices know Dart. The above violates the RICO statue originally written by Dart's archenemy, the Kennedy's. Dart's scheme is being done by many outside the US. It's estimated over 50% of the campaign money comes from the Far East, Europe, China, etc. See Title 18 USC ยง 1961-1965-Racketeering, 201-Bribery, 1505-1510-Obstruction of Justice, tampering with a witness et seq. See Washington Post Blog: Brayall v. Dart- Deepthroat. (Continued on P.2-background).

Page 2 of 2. BACKGROUND:
1. In 1975, my wife joined Tupperware Home Parties, a div. of Dart & Kraft (hereforth abbreviated Dart). Between 1975-1981, she competed in sales with sales managers from every state to become a Tupperware Distributor. It's common knowledge that Tupperware was a company of women singing songs, saying the Lord's prayer, trust, love, sharing and caring with sales in the billions. To become a distributor, a Tupperware manager must trust Dart officials in setting up a distribution center. Here a husband is required to quit his job, join his wife in selling and warehousing. Dart requires couples to move to another state, invest their savings and assets in setting up the distribution center.
2. By May 1986, we just couldn't make the profits Dart officials stated distributors made nationwide. We told Dart officials we quit and to sell their distributorship. Only Dart can resell the distributorship to another couple. Dart had a thousand applicants waiting for years to become a Tupperware distributor. Instead Dart officials showed us how we were in the top 10% for profits in the nation operating minus $60,000 a year with a debt of $198,000 not paid for two years. Dart then sent us $300,000 worth of inventory as an ongoing settlement. Later Dart officials reneged on the partial settlement and refused to post payments. By December 1986, I said I was going to federal authorities. Dart officials then offered me a bribe ($200k) not to report the racketeering. Dart feared we knew too much about Tupperware's Distributor's Accounting Services, who did the accounting for the distributors worldwide. I had already notified the FBI who wouldn't intervene. Dart officials threatened to bankrupt me if I didn't cooperate through the use of the courts.
3. By May 1987, a law firm filed a complaint after finding duplicative complaints filed in Calif., Mass., and NY. Then I suffered disabling cerebral bleed(s) of the brain. Dart's (50) lawyers argued the statue of limitations barred the complaint for there was no fiduciary relationship. While Dart's lawyers knew that Dart/Tupperware's Distributors Accounting Service (DAS) did all the accounting and was the accountant for all distributors worldwide. Dart's lawyers and corrupt judges knew that DAS robbed the distributor's accounts, never remitted state sales taxes collected, filed false tax returns and laundered money for over 30 years. By 1988, the FTC admitted Dart violated racketeering laws. (Wall St. Jr. 11/14/88-PB1).
4. By 1988, the FTC had my wife and I flown into to train FTC (FBI) agents on how Dart and others robbed the distributors accounts interstate. How Dart concealed the fraud scheme, laundered money, collected state sales taxes without remittance, filed false tax returns and never issued 1099s for witness's silence. By the time we arrived, the President, who was financed by Dart, shut down the inquiry. While a US Attorney said to lay low for a grand jury, who disappeared. In between 11 different courts to ask who was the Accountant?
5. By Sept. 1989, I bankrupted. My wife and family moved to a house with dirt floors. We got our food and clothing from a shelter. Between 1989-1991, Dart used the Brayall's bankruptcy to threaten distributors nationwide with bankruptcy if they didn't sign a franchise disclosure statements which contained releases for any unlawful acts committed over the decades. In between I received death threats.
6. By April 1991, Dart had a corrupt USDC judge unlawfully dismiss the bankruptcy. Other USDC judges had to now cover up for Dart robbing over $279,000 interstate. No one dared to investigate Dart and others.
7. By April 1994, a USDC Judge gave me permission to serve 34 agents-judges for racketeering. Which was switched between courts until it looked like a timely appeal wasn't filed. I have never received that order.
8. By October 1999: Brayall v. US (FBI) et al., state ordered injunction, state court actions, Congressional-FTC Inquiry, grand jury, bankruptcy, no agreements to end any litigation, $279,000 robbed interstate, judges covering up for each had to be and were erased. The US Supreme Court denied writ of certiorari 5 times. Almost 12 years, 40 courts-70 judges to ask who was the accountant. Between 1991-1999, Dart used dual state/federal judges to cover up for no audits for over 30 years. By 1999 all court proceedings ended.
9. Between 1999-2005, I wrote to Congress and others who couldn't intervene or investigate the above.
10. By 2005, I asked President Bush to intervene, who said he couldn't intervene into court proceedings.
11. How did Dart and others know: (1) A FTC-Congressional Inquiry, grand jury or a US Attorney would disappear? (2) Dart's 50 lawyers could lie before 40 courts, 70 judges for almost 12 years? (3) A USDC Judge would dismiss a discharged bankruptcy? (4) State and federal judges would cover up interstate robberies nationwide? (5) State officials wouldn't investigate sales taxes collected and never remitted for decades? (6) The FBI-IRS wouldn't investigate false tax returns or interstate robberies for decades? (8) Escape liability for franchise fraud nationwide? (9) Cover up the above in phony courts, grand juries for over 20 years? 9. Stop media coverage for over 20 years?

Posted by: Watergate Part II.- Brayall v. Dart Industries Inc. (CFO Rep. Party 1949-1983) et al. | July 26, 2005 03:38 AM

I was interviewed recently on a radio talk show on whether Judge Roberts was served as a defendant in Brayall v. U.S. et. al.

The US Solicitor General admitted he had complete knowledge of the case, but said he didn't think the judge was served as a defendant. He should have answered: I don't know. This is with the knowledge that Dart and corrupt government officials robbed billions off the American Public. This is with the knowledge that all court records and law books (40 courts-70 judges) were erased. This is with the knowledge that corrupt government officials are making sure the American Public never discovers how they have been robbed. This is with the knowledge that corrupt campaign money is linked to organized crime within the government. With the knowledge that if the American Public discovers the above, they'll be outraged and demand a complete investigation as to who acted to cover up the robberies. Finally, I believe we can't spread democracy in the world with hypocrisies, for that aids to terrorists-terrorism. I only need one honest newspaper to disclose the above to the American Public.

Posted by: Richard Brayall | September 16, 2005 05:12 PM

Haliburton robbed billions off the American Public. Dart's organization (under different names) will use the same methods used in the Brayall cases to evade liability/prosecution. There is enough bribe money to cover up all. If the bribe money doesn't work, they'll tie it up in the courts with the aid from the judges. The Justice Department will keep the FBI at bay until evidence can be completely destroyed or discredited.

Posted by: Richard Brayall | September 20, 2005 01:44 PM

I wish I would had read this before becoming a Tupperware Distributor. We too were relocated after 1 month of moving, we went on New Business model. I then had to close the warehouse,fire secretaries, hold rallies in hotel rooms. 2 years later they went on New compensation plan designed to get rid of Distributors. This has destroyed our dreams with Tupperware. We can't afford to have rallies in hotel rooms anymore. They want us to hold meetings in our homes. This company cheats people by baiting them on false hopes & dreams. I have watched distributors 1 by 1 fold. Its just a matter of time before they all do. Thanks Tupperware for going in Target that really let your salesforce know how much you appreciate them. The Tuppeware franchise contract should let everyone know just how corrupt this company that is owned by Dart is.

Posted by: Former Tupperware Distributor | October 18, 2005 01:47 PM

We were Dist. for about 10 years in the 80's - 90's. I wish we as "Retired Distributors" could get together and compare notes. I'm sure Earl and Brownie must shaking their heads at what has become of Tupperware.

Posted by: Another former Dist. | February 9, 2006 01:36 PM

Dear fellow Tupperware Distributor(s):
The following are questions for Tupperware Distributors, previous to becoming franchises:

1. What years were you a Tupperware Distributor or a Franchise?
2. How did you first learn of an FTC investigation involving Tupperware-Dart?
3. What happened to Tupperware after franchise disclosure statements-agreements were given out?
4. Had Tupperware officials given you full and material financial disclosures, would you have bought a distributorship?
5. How did you learn of the Brayall's court actions?
6. Did you of free will, sign a franchise agreement releasing Tupperware (or it's affiliates) from any wrong doings or unlawful acts?
7. Did Tupperware's Distributors Accounting Service (DAS) do the accounting for your distributorship?
8. We're your Tupperware DAS accounting statements ever audited by Tupperware's DAS, your accountant or the IRS?
a) Can you name any of the accountants who worked for Tupperware's DAS?

I would appreciate it you would notify all past Tupperware Distributors in this matter.

Posted by: Richard B. | March 11, 2006 07:06 PM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




 
 

© 2006 The Washington Post Company