Pakistan Shifts the War on Terrorism

What's going on in the counter-terror war in Pakistan? Last week we learned that the U.S. military's chief liaison, Maj. Gen. Jay W. Hood, has been pulled from the country, ostensibly because of his previous assignment as commander of the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay. Hood was called "notorious" in the Pakistani media and was roundly denounced by Pakistani politicians, symbolizing in many minds the mistreatment of Muslims that are perceived in this part of the world since the war against terrorism began.

The Hood departure also comes at a time when the Government Accountability Office is questioning whether the United States has any kind of plan to fight terrorism in the Pakistan. Though the United States has significantly increased its capacity for covert action and attacks in the region over the past year, its policy of relying on Gen. Pervez Musharraf and Pakistani forces to lead the fight against al Qaeda and the Taliban has fallen into disarray after the country's parliamentary elections and the elevation of a new civilian government.

A key element of the change in governance in Pakistan has been a repudiation of the joint U.S.-Pakistan military-oriented pursuit and thus the strategy of the Bush administration. Washington, and certainly none of the candidates, has fully digested this shift. But it is a tricky, particularly since it comes at a time when a "surge" in Afghanistan is increasing pressure on the part of those fighting the United States to seek even more of a sanctuary in Pakistan.

No one questions that the rugged border area skirting Pakistan and Afghanistan is home to Osama bin Laden and the remaining al Qaeda leadership, the remnants of Afghanistan's Taliban movement, an indigenous Pakistani Taliban and other military Islamist armed groups.

The areas of greatest concern are the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, a sliver of land sandwiched between the country's Northwest Province and Afghanistan; and the North West Frontier Province (NWFP), one of four Pakistani provinces with its own parliament and government.

A new government comprising secular parties has replaced the Islamist-led government of the NWFP and the region is now headed by 37-year-old Amir Haider Khan Hoti, a grand nephew of the great Pashtun leader Bacha Khan.

Some are hailing his rise as a reversal of decades of historical wrongs that has saddled the region under Pakistani control despite ethnic homogeneity and close ties to Afghanistan. The new minister is openly defending the interests of the Pashtun society and believes that the external fighting being waged from the border areas and Afghanistan can be settled through traditional "jirga" (negotiations) that bring together the government, elders and clerics and civil society. He says he is against external pressure to bring "normalcy" to the region. Last Friday, Khan Hoti said disputes could only be resolved through the traditional tribal customs of Pashtun society.

What has marked the rule of Hoti so far is action to broker peace with local Taliban and even foreign al Qaeda fighters, as well as other local "militant" organizations that have fought against the government. One such militant leader, who has been in prison for six years, was released in late April, and in return the previously banned organization he heads has signed a peace agreement with the government. Sufi Mohammad, the chief of banned group Tahreek Nifaz-e-Shariat Mohammadi (TNSM), an organization that seeks the imposition of Islamic law, led fighters against U.S. military forces in Afghanistan after 9/11. He was arrested in October 2001 as he returned from Afghanistan.

Hoti speaks of defeating terrorism, but says he does not want to pursue a military-led counter-insurgency "at the cost of people's lives." Hoti has said that the U.S. must end missile strikes by drone. "To some extent, the interests of Pakistan have been sacrificed to the war on terror. We've suffered a lot," he told McClatchy Newspapers in April. The United States "`should let us handle it, let Pakistan handle it." In response to Hoti's new plan, The News in Pakistan editorialized: "It is obvious that any further US intervention in the region will aggravate rather than resolve problems."

Can a less-military-oriented process be successful, particularly when there is an increase in military activity next door in Afghanistan? After six years of hunter-killer pursuits, it is at least worth accepting that a new strategy is needed.

By William M. Arkin |  May 12, 2008; 1:00 PM ET Pakistan , War on Terrorism
Previous: A Secret Afghanistan Mission Prepares for War with Iran | Next: Gates the Substitute Teacher

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



STATUS of the Pakistan NUKES ?????? You know, the ones Pakistan uses to threaten India with -- the ones in Osama's backyard (there for the taking) -- the ones made possible curtousy of Dick Cheney (during his Reagan years) -- the ones that make Pakistan (not Iraq or anywhere else) "the most dangerous place on Earth".

I hope to hell there is somebody (with a brain / and some power) in Washington that has a plan in place to 'secure' (by whatever means necessary) these weapons and shut down all "three"of their nuclear munitions facilities. We hear all this huffing and puffing about Iran/nukes but the "reality" exist in
Pakistan.

The biggest (not so funny) laugh in all this is that Bush preaches Democracy and free elections in Pakistan but that premise is the last thing we need. Given that the majority of Pakistani's are religous zealots aligned with Osama , its entirely possible that (and maybe probable) they could elect Osama himself (or his operatives) to the Pakistani presidency -- and do it "Democratically" at that , and thereby hand the devil the keys to Pandora's Box.
Sadly, there are many places in the world that actually 'need' a dictator and Pakistan is one of them (at least until those nukes are rendered harmless).

One more thing while we're on the subject -- "SIBEL EDMUNDS".

Posted by: DMcD | May 22, 2008 1:28 AM

I know some of you may think this following article does not belong here.
But I argue that our National Security begins at home.
I have been exposing the Terrorist and Criminals who run and control the town/county that I was born and raised in as well I lived in most of my life as a duty to my Country and my fellow American Citizens.
The following is how the Terrorists and Criminals who run and control my home town/county have chosen to get their revenge on me for my Honesty.
Terrorists and Criminals have no Honor.


Deputies Jason Breining,Tim Schlundt,Duaine Pittman and Prosecutors Jessica Sutherland,Perry and Judge Justin and Attorney Tim Williams are all criminals and as that they have taken up the task of revenge against me for the Terrorists that I have reported on then they are equally Terrorists according to the Law.
The following are the Court Records (case 08-3891-FY) and Evidence( to see these records and evidence go to www.myspace.com/jacktownnews )
of Jackson County Michigans corrupt Sheriffs Departments attempt to frame me Mr. Bengt V. Thulin first on four Felony Weapons charges. When that failed they continued their attempt to frame me with two Misdemeanors for "Illegal possesion of a Signaling Device" and the law says that I was legal. The Dash Cam Video does not show the two flare guns as loaded and the Jackson County Sheriffs Department deleted Three minutes and nineteen seconds of audio where the corrupt deputies talked about the fact that the flare guns were empty and also talked about how they were going to frame me. They also stole $600.00 in the form of six one hundred dollar bills from me that I had in my money belt and I had photo copied them like I always do prior to securing them in my money belt. The Dash Cam Video from the Jackson County Squad Car will be on UTUBE cut into ten minute increments with links to it on this site page. The Court Records and Evidence are photo's in this site page under "My Pics" as well. I go to court on the 14th and 16th of May 2008. You can follow this cases progression on www.d12.com which is the courts own web site. From the Corrupt Jackson County Sheriffs Deputies (Detective Tim Schlunt, Detective Duane M. Pitman and Deputy Jason Breining) to Prosecutor Jessica Sutherland P61467 and Prosecutor Perry to Judge Justin to my own Court appointed Lawyer Timothy Williams. The Sheriffs Deputies Framed me. The Prosecutors knowingly participated in the framining of me. To Judge Justin refused to punish Jackson County Sheriff Deputy Captain Kevin Stellingworth who knowingly and willfully refused to obey the Subpeona to turn over the Dash Cam Video which proves I am innocent of the charges that I am being framed with. Which makes Judge Justin and Captain Kevin Stellingworth Guilty of violating "MCL 750.478 Willful neglect of Duty". I also have an Audio Recording of myself having a conversation with Sue of Jackson Civil Process where she tells me how Captain Kevin Stellingworth tried to get me to violate my PR Bond buy entering the Jackson County Sheriffs Department to pick up the Dash Cam Video that the Court had Ordered him to deliver to me according to the Subpeona signed by Judge Justin 4-28-2008. For a better understanding of how they are framing me I have given posted comments to each one of these documents in "My Pics". Please feal free to veiw and read them.
Audio Proof Jackson Sheriffs attempt to set me up
Now go to www. myspace. com/jacktowntruthandjustice to listen to the recording of Sue Rose of Jackson Civil Process and myself while she tells me that according to Captain Kevin Stellingworth of the Jackson County Sheriffs Department I had to after 5 buisness days to walk in the front door of the Jackson County Sheriffs Department and pick up in person the Dash Cam Video that I had Subpeona'ed. The Subpeona clearly Ordered them to deliver it to me at my P.O. Box no later then May 7th 2008 . They told them to tell me to pick it up in person when they had full knowledge of the fact that my Personal Recognicance Bond clearly stated that I can not enter the Jackson County Sheriffs Department. They deliberately tried to set me up by getting me to violate my PR Bond. Veiw all the Evidence for yourself. Then decide.
I no that I am innocent. Now see it for yourselves.
Sincerely,
Mr. Bengt V. Thulin
Ret. Court Officer State of Michigan
Jackson , Michigan


Posted by: Ben Thulin | May 15, 2008 10:40 AM

Thanks for posting about Pakistan - the country that indeed poses the greatest international terrorism/nuclear proliferation threat.

Arkin, your piece highlights the fundamental problem with counterinsurgency via air-to-ground missile.

Moin Ansari is right about the failure of our policy, and right again about the cause of failure: way too many people cashing big checks for hardware and consultancy on the path to defeat and deepening crisis.

Posted by: al75 | May 13, 2008 9:05 AM

Dimitry,

To pick up on a thread about Arkin's blog and it's relationship with the Washington Post.

Here's an interesting column from the WP's ombudsman.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/10/AR2005121000938.html

Turns out the Washington Post newspaper are not nd Washingtonpost.com are only loosely affiliated (journalism-wise).

"The Post Web site is owned by the Washington Post Co., but it is not run by the newspaper. It is a separate company called Washington Post-Newsweek Interactive, or WPNI, with offices in Arlington.

Yes, The Post provides the vast majority of the Web site's content. But the Web site has its own staff of 65 editorial employees and its own features ..."

So. There are TWO Washington Posts! And they have different editorial boards and policies. Who knew???

Posted by: Frank | May 12, 2008 11:58 PM

It is the fighters of this rugged area, according to holy books, that will bring to justice those habitual criminals who began their criminal lives by dropping nuclear bombs in Japan and used chemical and biological gases against innocent Veitnamese people.

Posted by: Sarapathi Kumaran | May 12, 2008 11:28 PM

Mr Khan Hoti, will a jirga deliver Ayman al-Zawahri to justice?

Posted by: SamEllison | May 12, 2008 10:36 PM

Pakistan is lawless country. Laws are written in the books but never implemented.

It has many reasons, but one of the most important single reason that I see is that there is " No justice ". I mean real Justice for every Pakistani, regardless of who the person is.

When this will happen, many problems will solved and country could be on the right track.

Posted by: Anwar Syed | May 12, 2008 8:42 PM

Perhaps Moin Ansari's suggestion has some merit and should be tried. The Chinese had no problem with the Olympia flame in Pakistan. Unlike many large countries, they do not have a geopolitical missionary agenda. Every countries foreign policy should be based on their national interest and not on some missionary political theory that they believe other countries must follow.

Posted by: P. J. Casey | May 12, 2008 6:30 PM

Perhaps Moin Ansari's suggestion has some merit and should be tried. The Chinese had no problem with the Olympia flame in Pakistan. Unlike many large countries, they do not have a geopolitical missionary agenda. Every countries foreign policy should be based on their national interest and not on some missionary political theory that they believe other countries must follow.

Posted by: P. J. Casey | May 12, 2008 6:30 PM

The problem certainly does not need to be aggravated. We all know that terrorism is a bad thing. But Hoti's views are not all bad. What is wrong with letting Pakistan solve its own problem among its own people? After the mess has been made in Iraq, it seems to me that the U.S. would walk softly, but don't forsake to use the big stick for the right purpose.

Posted by: beautiful11 | May 12, 2008 5:25 PM

PIck a rock any rock and you will find ten consultants trying to give their 2 cents worth on Pakistan.

The $80 Billion think tank industry was as wrong on Iraq as it is on Afghanistan.

This entire Global War on Terro (GWOT) is a mis conceived idea. China has achieved 100 the results in eliminating the terrorists in Xingiang provine than all of NATO combined and then some.

Key to the Chinese success: Less tlak, less drama and no schock and awe. The wroked with the Pakistanis quitly who helped them eliminate the terrorists and the terror outfits.

The US with all its toys and drones, and satallites has lost the battle in Iraq and Afgahnistan and lost the hearts and minds of Pakistanis and Afghans.

The Chinese and won the hearts and minds of the Paksitanis.

A new apporach based on a massive marshall plan for Pakistan has to be tried...and forget the pennies $650 million spent over a period of 5 years--half of which stays in the US anyway.

See http://www.rupeenews.com for some real analysis

Posted by: Moin Ansari | May 12, 2008 2:05 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2007 The Washington Post Company