Today's Columns: The Strongest Case for Barack Obama

NYT: Thomas Friedman notes that "the strongest case one could make" for Barack Obama in 2008 is "rarely articulated": In the wake of eight years of George W. Bush, Obama has the "potential to repair the broken relationship between America and the world" ... Kirk Johnson argues that America can begin to restore its moral credibility abroad by offering more help to the four million Iraqis who have been displaced by war.

Plus ... Maureen Dowd on the scandal surrounding World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz.

USA Today: Ralph Peters explains why the Bush administration's "worst" mistake in Iraq was to hold elections in the country before questions of the country's ethnic and religious identity had been resolved. "Because the administration and its partners lacked the vision and fortitude to dismantle Iraq and draw more promising borders for Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds," Peters argues, "the series of elections in which Iraqis braved terror to go to the polls had nothing to do with strengthening a nation and everything to do with empowering ethnic supremacists and religious demagogues."

WaPo: David Ignatius believes that a new threat is emerging in the Kurdish areas of northern Iraq: "The core issue is Kurdish nationalism, which worries Iraq's powerful northern neighbor, Turkey, which has a substantial Kurdish minority. The Bush administration has tried to finesse the problem, hoping to keep two friends happy: The Kurds have been America's most reliable partner in Iraq, while the Turks are a crucial ally in the region. But in recent weeks, this strategy has been breaking down" ... Ruth Marcus explains how it would be best for both the Justice Department and the World Bank if Alberto Gonzales and Paul Wolfowitz resigned from the helms of their respective organizations.

WSJ: Arthur Brooks applauds Vice President Dick Cheney's sense of charity, noting that he and his wife donated 78 percent of their 2005 income, or $6.9 million.

By Rob Anderson |  April 18, 2007; 6:16 AM ET
Previous: Today's Editorials: Why Abstinence-Only Sex Ed is Like Chicken Soup | Next: Today's Hot Topic: Making Sense of Virginia Tech

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



I voted for Bush both times. After his reelection he said "I believe this is a mandate of the people". I knew at that moment we were in trouble. A vote is not a mandate. I cannot speak badly about his first term, I was glad he was there, and especially after 9-11. However, his lack of understanding regarding other cultures is glaring, as is Cheney's, even though I find his intent more cunning. Both have lost my trust. The reason, their seeming lack of concern for the inhabitants of America. Thet have lost sight of whom they serve. Cultural understanding of Iraq was essential. Not all there were our enemy. The ruler was. Someone that should have been eliminated during the Gulf war. I'm beginning to think the presidents ire is due the criticism of his father over the Gulf war. I would hope not, but why would he pursue his coarse in view of the growing dosapproval of what is happening in Iraq. No thought given to the will of the people. One of us is going to be wrong. It is hard to say who. I do know that the pressures coming to bear on the American public are becoming unbearable. This seems to be the time that the middleclass will disappear because of the overwhelming cost(money) of trying to live. The cost of gas, utilities, and now food is the rape of America. I want a change, and I don't want any rhetoric from either party. I want truth, and action.

Posted by: Darby Marcum | April 18, 2007 10:27 AM

So Ralph Peters of USAToday thinks that the Bush administration's "worst" mistake in Iraq was holding elections prematurely. Where was he when Bush was lying (and I am firmly convinced he was lying) in order to justify entry of the U.S. into this war in the first place. Any subsequent mistake his adminstration made following that entry pales by comparison to that absolute blunder. I believe that only the present division in Congress prevents his impeachment.

Posted by: C. M. Proctor | April 18, 2007 03:37 PM

Just as Fox News has become a propaganda tool of the Right, the Wall Street Journal has become a propaganda tool of the Rich. The ideology of Free Markets and Free Trade has been cherry-picked to justify uncontrolled globalization, while ignoring the domestic consequences of unbalanced trade policies and allowing fraudulent business practices to make hay while the deregulation sun shines upon them. But the economy is only booming on paper, and the stock market is padded with profits from overseas and growth in areas we should not be proud of -- government spending on pork and war, overpriced health care, and predatory financial services. It used to be padded by housing too, but that party is very much over, as everyone without a vested interest in the housing market saw coming years ago. In the streets, everyone in America can see plainly that our wealth has been spilling over the lowered trade barriers and flowing across the world like a flood from a broken dam. We can either adopt austerity policies now, or later when the IMF starts treating us like any other 3rd world country.

Posted by: toddpw | April 18, 2007 06:45 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2007 The Washington Post Company