Naked Fur Protesters

It has been an eventful day with not one but THREE naked fur protesters. The first two turned out in all of their glory at the Valentino show this afternoon. I was sitting at the show watching the models parade down the runway with Veronica Lake hair and film-noir red lips when out of the corner of my eye I saw a naked tush. A blonde woman had disrobed and unfurled an anti-fur banner. The only thing she was wearing was a "no fur" sign painted on her back and a determined expression.


Fur protester (REUTERS/Charles Platiau)


The security guards tackled her as if they were going for a Super Bowl ring and she flew directly into the lap of Glamour's editor-in-chief Cindi Leive. Cindi, ever the journalist, shook off her surprise and immediately reached for her cell phone to snap the woman's picture. Readers of the magazine may want to look for the snapshot on an upcoming editor's page. The fashion crowd, ever blase, simply noted, "Wow, no cellulite!"

Soon after the blonde had been tackled and removed, a brunette stripped off her trench coat and made a beeline for the runway. She also managed to do the full monty before the guards hustled her out of the room.

Later in the day, at the Christian Lacroix show, another blonde stripped and held up a sign in protest of fur. She managed to get a few long seconds in front of a bank of cameras before the security team managed to throw a suit jacket around her shoulders and haul her out.

I'm not sure why all the stripping fur protesters are women. A man would at least add a little variety. But whether male or female, they've certainly got their work cut out for them. Designers are having a real love affair with fur this season.

While going from one side of Paris to the other on the way to a show, it occurred to me, as I looked at the schedule, that none of the designers of the major houses here are women. Milan has Miuccia Prada, Donatella Versace, Alberta Ferretti, Gucci's Frida Giannini, Angela Missoni, Silvia Fendi and so on. Milan is practically dominated by female designers. Paris has Ann Demeulemeester, Comme des Garcon's Rei Kawakubo, Stella McCartney and Sophia Kokosalaki, who is designing her own line as well as Vionnet and a couple of other lesser-known names. But the really big or prestigious houses -- Chanel, Valentino, Givenchy, Lanvin, Balenciaga, Dior, Yves Saint Laurent --are all helmed by men. I'm not sure what to make of that, but it seems odd and well, just not right. It's not that I don't think men can design for women, it's just that diversity is always a good thing. The more ideas and points of view, the better.

By Robin Givhan |  February 28, 2007; 6:04 PM ET Paris
Previous: Kobra TV | Next: Poiret

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



Are you the lady who was on Head of the Class or the lady on Good Morning America?

Posted by: Nellie | March 1, 2007 1:10 PM

Now I don't own a fur anything and never have, but these twits make me want to run out and buy all fur accessories and take up hunting to boot. What a bunch of looney's! I wonder how long it will take our teenagers to start using Peta as derisive term, rather like the now "That's so gay!".

Posted by: MikeB | March 1, 2007 1:19 PM

Too bad MikeB is a homophobe...I am so sorry Mike. It would have made his comments more interesting without the grade school reference. Although, it appears the author and he have similar interest.
The article is fluff (no pun intended). The scope and meaning leaves one wondering how a statement/opinion as strong as one the protesters expressed can be summed up with musings surrounding gender issues?

Posted by: Matt | March 1, 2007 2:22 PM

you go girls,fur looks better on the animal,designers just wanna make money,cheap skates!!

Posted by: Jamie Nash | March 16, 2007 8:00 AM

I say NO TO FUR forever!

www.modernidol.com

Posted by: MikeTraps | March 19, 2007 10:54 AM

If/when the torture of extreme confinement and an on-the-cheap barbarous death happens to humans, most of us would be appalled and would wish not to be associated with such barbarity. When the exact same thing happens to our animal cousins, who feel pain, loneliness and anguish just as humans do, there is a much smaller outcry. Why? Lack of empathy. Animals, as slaves used to be, are considered beneath us and undeserving of our concern. Hence the snide comments, as from MikeB above, who, alas, has plenty of company. Speciesism belongs in the same line of shameful stereotyping as racism, misogyny and homophobia. People who buy fur, after being faced with the facts, are beneath contempt.

Posted by: Diana Cartier | March 19, 2007 6:35 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2010 The Washington Post Company