Faster Forward
Subscribe to this Blog

Good Enough vs. New Enough

Thursday's column covers the latest iteration of a portable device that debuted in its current shape back in 2003, and which hasn't seen too many changes in the last couple of years. (You can probably guess what it is, but let's preserve some suspense for now.)

There's nothing wrong with a developer forgoing upgrades if the product in question already does everything it needs to and nothing more. For example, it's safe to say that the hammer is pretty much a solved problem.

But the computing and electronics industries are too young to have reached such an apex. Whether we're talking about TVs, MP3 players, laptops or digital cameras, there's almost always something else that could be done better, some flaw that ought to be fixed or some missing feature found in competing products. And when these issues go unaddressed over multiple updates, familiarity breeds discontent.

That seems to be the case with the subject of Thursday's column, but I could say the same of most other electronic devices. Most, but not all: I can think of one gadget I own as "good enough not to tinker with further." The identity of that thing--a machine I use almost every day--appears after the jump... any guesses on what it is? Do you regard any of your own digital devices as "done" in this way?

Answer: My watch, a Citizen "Eco-Drive" model. It could not be much simpler to operate, because its display only consists of hour, minute and second hands and it includes only one control, the crown that you pull out and rotate to adjust the time. Since it runs off a solar cell hidden in its face, there's no battery to replace. And it's remarkably slim as well. The worst thing I can say about it is that the bezel has picked up some scratches over the years.

(Now I'm worried that I've just jinxed the thing by praising it so lavishly.)

By Rob Pegoraro |  May 15, 2007; 1:47 PM ET  | Category:  Gadgets
Previous: Dressing for Tech Success | Next: DRM's Demise Accelerates

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



I think it's the same with cars. There's never an "out-of-the-box" product that meets your exact requirements. Either there's something missing/broken or there's too many unwanted features that you didn't want to pay for (FM tuners, calendars, etc). Cellphones are the biggest example of part 2.

Posted by: tallbear | May 15, 2007 2:50 PM

I predict your Thursday column will discuss Palm handheld organizers, such as the Tungsten E. I recall that you owned a Tungsten E and had trouble with the durability of its cover. I don't have that problem because I don't use the Tungsten E very much, although I used to take it to meetings with a portable keyboard and use it as a tiny laptop, which always caught the interest of other attendees. Palm's synching software hasn't been updated (except for daylight savings time) seemingly in centuries, so I predict that's what you're going to discuss. I still sync my Palm Tungsten E every day. The reason? So I don't forget how to do so. Occasionally, it's useful for me to look up calendar items on the device. But the fact that it doesn't connect to the Internet is a big liability. I also think MP3 players are pretty well developed. I don't really want them to connect wirelessly to anything, except perhaps to a radio signal, which they already do. So the "improvements" that have been made to MP3 players over the past few years -- such as the ability to play videos, "beam" things to other MP3 players, or access Yahoo's music streaming system -- have been pretty inconsequential to me. Thanks for Faster Forward. -- Sincerely, Stu Borma

Posted by: Stu Borman | May 15, 2007 3:06 PM

I think what is perhaps even more annoying than "too many features" is a "tease" of features. For example, the iPod bothers to put in a contact/calendar/note capability but has never developed it to a point that might make it useful. Or my Nintendo DS has possiblities in that same direction but doesn't follow through. AppleTV is probably another example, and many cell phones pack in sort of helpful features without the power or capability to fulfill the purpose adequately.

Of course all of these are things that could be further developed with time - but that "tease" is what really drives me batty. If the developer isn't going to follow through I'd rather they left the space for the parts they do so well.

Posted by: Lani | May 15, 2007 4:01 PM

He has to be talking about the Treo. I'm debating buying one and wonder if they'll come out with a new version the day after I buy it. And is it worth it to wait. Very frustrating.

Posted by: Omar | May 15, 2007 4:56 PM

I have a TI-35 calculator that I bought in 1983. Still works fine, and does everything I need a calculator to do. Except that the numbers and symbols have worn off the keys, so I bought a new calculator. Also a TI-35. Why not? The old one lasted decades.

My cell phone. A Motorola. Has the phone book and makes calls. Nothing more needed.

The iPod Nano seems to be pretty feature complete for an mp3 player.

Sure, I could buy one device that has the functionality of all of the above, but why? It wouldn't be as good a calculator as the TI. Unless it had the same size keyboard, in which case it would be too big to be a decent cell phone. If it had the functionality of the iPod, what would that do to the standby time for the cell phone?

Oh, and my 'PDA' is a pocket sized, paper, notebook. With a pen.

Posted by: wiredog | May 16, 2007 8:59 AM

My guess is your Treo. I am still waiting for a Palm fix for Vista. At this point, I cannot hotsync either my Treo 700p nor my LifeDrive and I am not happy even though Palm assures me that it's coming probably or that I can transfer files right now. Yes, I can but not nearly as easily as I did with setup on Windows 2000. Did they not know Vista was coming? Does Bill make this difficult? What? I thought there were new owners eager to work on this sort of thing for Palm. !@#$%

Posted by: Claire | May 16, 2007 11:14 AM

I think I have at least 3 digital devices purchased in the last year that are so incomplete that I wish i hadn't bought them. One is a phone (Nokia N80), a camera (Canon G7) and watch (Seiko something). It's frustrating that the convergent devices are getting less able to handle the individual functions, and barely compensate with the integration factor. I have keep the manual for my watch handy, because it is so easy to jog some buttons and get it into a state that I can't recover from from memory (I wish it had a reboot!!)

Claire: No, Microsoft publishes APIs, has long betas and encourages third-parties to use its technologies. Palm is one of a handful (unintentional) companies that is slow to react. But then again for the most part, MS, Palm ... draw from the same labour pool.

Posted by: Mike | May 16, 2007 11:53 AM

Some products are perfect out of the box. I have a Leica M2 which is almost as old as I am and it still takes fabulous pictures. The shuttter is still accurate and it is a constant source of comments from other photographers. Another perfect out of the box product is the Rolex GMT watch. Mine is thirty years old and still keeps time within the +/- 1 minute parameter of a certified chronograph. Yes, there are newer and more stylish watches, in some people's opinion, but none are better. It is rare that an industrial product is perfect out of the box, but it happens. Unfortunately,a cost is no object mindset produces them.

Posted by: Larry | May 16, 2007 12:12 PM

Never mind what I said about tomorrow's review--that's going to hold a week for a piece written about some breaking digital-music news. (You can probably guess what that is, too!)

- RP

Posted by: Rob Pegoraro | May 16, 2007 12:18 PM

I know that this isn't something you regularly write about but I'd say pick-up trucks. I'll never buy another with the original bed on it. The third party ones are better built, cheaper and much more versatile.
On the neg side what the phone companies have done through their financial access to the Congress resulting in a stranglehold on the FCC is criminal. We now are in the position that our tech is implemented in 3rd world countries such that they are benefiting from say wiMax and we are not.
The world turned upside down.
I'm reliably informed that the average Japanese can buy voice and data at 23Mb/sec for about 20 bucks a month. I'm paying what 3 times that for voice and 1.5 Mb /sec from Cox. Yeesh.

Posted by: Rob Irwin | May 16, 2007 1:10 PM

I want more from a watch.
The photo cell is great.
However, what is today's date?
What day of the week is it?
Can't I have a reminder of my next appointment (without a PDA)?
If centuries old clocks could keep track of moon phases, why not today's watches?
Does it synchronize with NIST?
Will it measure elapsed time?
What time is it at my destination?

While all the above frequently make operation complex, I do not think that is a necessary consequence.

Posted by: GeorgeM | May 16, 2007 4:05 PM

You big tease.

Posted by: Ronnie | May 16, 2007 11:48 PM

My Palm TX! I got a 2 G SD memory and downloaded all my Diana Krall collection, so with an earphone it is my music player (dare I say iPod?). I can can display my pictures on it from another chip (am a professional photographer). It has all my appointments and contacts, I can play games with the resident games and also off of a chip, I can get on the internet by WIFI, I can look at my eMail, keep reminders and notes, calculate, read a book, type a WORD file, I can beam stuff to my wife's TX.
Nuff said

Posted by: Jim Planck | May 17, 2007 2:55 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2008 The Washington Post Company