Toward a New Era in Transportation
A congressional commission today started what it hopes will be a national conversation about what we want out of our transportation system and how we'll pay for it.
You can find the commission's full report here. These are some -- but definitely not all -- of the conclusions.
-- As thousands of drivers and transit riders in the Washington region rediscover on a daily basis, whatever we're doing now isn't working. It's taking more and more time and it's more and more stressful to reach our destinations.
-- We need to figure out what we're trying to do. The last time we had a national goal for getting around was when we planned, financed and built the interstate highway system that today accounts for about a quarter of four traffic. Today we have something that's more like a national revenue-sharing program between the federal government and the states and localities.
-- The solution isn't to create a new list of construction projects and vehicle purchases. We need to agree on goals that include strengthening our economy, improving public safety and making it easier for people to get where they want to go. The construction and purchasing will flow from those goals, not from congressional earmarks that finance bridges to nowhere.
-- The federal interest in a healthy transportation system is as strong as ever and should continue. But we can't do what needs to be done without the heavy involvement -- in both planning and financing -- of states and local governments and the private sector.
-- We lost our way a long time ago, and it's going to cost us just to recover from the deterioration drivers and transit users see. And it will cost even more to hand off a better transportation system to the next couple of generations. The commission estimates the national investment in transportation needs to be at least $225 billion a year from all source sof rhte next 50 years.
-- Change the way we pay for this as soon as possible. But in the meantime, raise the gas tax and create a transit users' tax, to spread the burden around. The federal gas tax needs to be raised 25 to 40 cents per gallon over a five year period and then indexed to inflation to meet the level of investment we need. (There's no specific figure for a transit tax.)
-- As soon as the technology and management issues can be overcome, replace the gas tax system with a tax based on miles traveled in a vehicle. The more you use the roads, the more you pay for them.
-- Use tolling systems not only to generate money for transportation projects but also to manage congestion, by charging more to travel in areas with heavy traffic.
The commission, the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission to use its full name, is on the right track. We've needed to have this national talk for a long time.
Some commissioners fear that the discussion will focus exclusively on several controversies involving money and politics: 1) They're talking about a huge allocation of resources to transportation in a nation with many competing priorities. 2) Is it politically practical to ask Congress to significantly raise the gas tax, or will we hear politicians say that this whole program is DOA? Is it significant that the three White House appointed commissioners (including Transportation Secretary Mary Peters) refused to sign on the the report endorsed by the other nine commissioners? The minority view is included in a supplement to the majority report.
Those aspects must be talked out, but it would be a shame -- more than a shame, it would be a disaster -- if the commission's warnings about our present and future and about our need to recreate national goals got lost in the controversies.
The commissioners will report to the U.S. House on Thursday and to the Senate next week. They stand strongly by their work and hope it will form the basis for a new national transportation policy starting in 2009.
By |
January 15, 2008; 2:08 PM ET
Transportation Politics
Previous: Major Rehab at Metro Center |
Next: National Transport Report Draws Praise, Criticism
Posted by: Woodley Park | January 15, 2008 4:25 PM
I won't pay taxes and it can't be in my neighborhood! I want everything paid for by my neighbors and "the rich" and built somewhere else.
Posted by: average voter | January 15, 2008 4:49 PM
"Is it really fair for a Civic driver to pay half as much as a Suburban driver, even though they use up essentially the same amount of road space and cause the same amount of wear and tear on our highways?"
A 7000 lb Suburban certainly causes more wear and tear than a 2600 lb Civic. I agree that the gas tax is not the right way to fund road improvements as there is no assurance that purchases gas is even consumed on public roads. However, any new usage fee should somehow distinguish vehicles better than a simple commercial/non-commercial classification.
Posted by: swags | January 15, 2008 5:04 PM
"A 7000 lb Suburban certainly causes more wear and tear than a 2600 lb Civic. "
True, but not much more. The relationship between wear and tear and vehicle weight is exponential, meaning light vehicles like Civics and SUV's don't really show a measurable difference in wear and tear. But a 75,000 pound truck causes significantly more than 10 times the amount of wear and tear than a 7,500 pound SUV causes.
Posted by: Engineer | January 15, 2008 5:12 PM
"-- As thousands of drivers and transit riders in the Washington region rediscover on a daily basis, whatever we're doing now isn't working. It's taking more and more time and it's more and more stressful to reach our destinations."
And the reason is quite simple: This region long-ago bought the bill of goods that building Metro made building the planned highway system unnecessary. Too many people thought that we could just keep canceling needed roads as long as we built out Metro as planned.
And too many still buy into this failed strategy. Why else are we throwing billions at the so-called Silver Line and spending millions to "study" every little pet project rail transit advocates can conjure up while we continue with over 50 years of indulging opponents of the ICC?
As a result, we have the nation's second-worst traffic and after over 30 years of the proven-wrong rail-only plan, otherwise intelligent people are still talking about "alternatives" (read: anything but a new road) whenever the subject of congestion is raised.
Our so-called "leaders" and "planners" have been listening to the wrong people for 2 generations. And the chickens are home to roost.
Posted by: ceefer66 | January 15, 2008 5:55 PM
I don't know why anyone would buy a Civic if it gets the same mileage as a Suburban.
Posted by: math is hard | January 16, 2008 9:03 AM
ceefer66, you need to dream more. If we had no roads, there wouldn't be cars. And then there could be more bikes. And more of your coworkers would start out the day smelling of BO.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 16, 2008 9:05 AM
Civic vs Suburban
A tax is a tax. We aren't whining that a person who spends $100 on a steak dinner with wine pays more tax than someone at McDonalds. It's just how it is - you spend more, you pay more.
I understand that from the standpoint of roadway maintenance, this may seem unfair, but think for a second how the pricing would be structured if this were the case. We could drastically increase the cost of diesel since trucks are responsible for beating up our highways. Never mind that diesel engines are far more efficient and provide greater economic benefit per gallon. Since people are paying based on road usage, and Suburbans tend to have larger tanks than a Civic, the tax rate on the first 8 gallons of gasoline would be double. Considering that we're talking about a dwindling resource on the eve of an explosion in demand - remember 1 BILLION people in India are eying those cheap, non-hybrid $2500 cars - this is an asinine position to take to encourage conservation.
Unfortunately, gasoline tax is always linked to transportation issues, rather than the actual cost to the nation. Think of the transportation projects that could be built for what we've spent politically and militarily securing our petroleum resources. For that matter, how much would we pay at the pump if we had to fund the Iraq war through gasoline taxes?
Posted by: CandyMan | January 16, 2008 11:20 AM
"ceefer66, you need to dream more. If we had no roads, there wouldn't be cars. And then there could be more bikes. And more of your coworkers would start out the day smelling of BO."
Interesting point. And considering that the new NOVA transportation authority is spending about $35 million on bike paths and sidewalks the BO situation just might come to pass.
Interesting, how supposedly intelligent people want to take us backward to the 19th century - on foot, bikes, and trolleys.
Posted by: cefer66 | January 16, 2008 1:54 PM
"ceefer66, you need to dream more. If we had no roads, there wouldn't be cars. And then there could be more bikes. And more of your coworkers would start out the day smelling of BO."
Good point.
And considering that Arlington and NOVA's transportation authority want to spend millions on bike trails, sidewalks, and trolleys, those who want to take us backwards to the nineteenth cenurty might get their wish.
Like I said, the "leaders" and "planners" are listening to the wrong people.
Posted by: ceefer66 | January 16, 2008 1:59 PM
Good point.
And considering that Arlington and NOVA's transportation authority want to spend millions on bike trails, sidewalks, and trolleys, those who want to take us backwards to the nineteenth cenurty might get their wish.
Like I said, the "leaders" and "planners" are listening to the wrong people.
Posted by: Anonymous | January 16, 2008 2:00 PM
we need horse lanes, horses are organic
Posted by: Anonymous | January 16, 2008 2:23 PM
just make the bike and horse lanes large enough for my car and I'll be happy
Posted by: civic driver | January 16, 2008 4:30 PM
Fewer cars and roads doesn't necessarily mean more bicycles and more BO. It might mean more bandwidth and more telecommuting, also. And maybe more long-distance rail freight rather than diesel trucks, reserving diesel trucks more for the short haul, more flexible, final destination deliveries. And that's just for starters. We don't necessarily need to dream more, but maybe we need to dream DIFFERENTLY?
Posted by: citizenw | January 16, 2008 8:47 PM
excellent, I had no idea that having fewer roads would make it ok for me to bring classified information home with me, that is very helpful
Posted by: Anonymous | January 17, 2008 9:12 AM
we need to be honest as a region and say what everyone believes: we don't want development, we don't want jobs, we certainly don't want commerce. If having no roads encourages companies to locate elsewhere, that's mission accomplished!
Posted by: Anonymous | January 17, 2008 12:57 PM
"excellent, I had no idea that having fewer roads would make it ok for me to bring classified information home with me, that is very helpful"
well you're allowed to have classified info at your jobsite, right? And if mandatory telecommuting meant one day your jobsite was at home, then what's the problem? The alternative is that those who deal with classified information are denied the opportunity to telecommute like everyone else, and can sit in traffic more then everyone else. Hey, you chose your career path...
Posted by: Anonymous | January 17, 2008 4:08 PM
"we need to be honest as a region and say what everyone believes: we don't want development, we don't want jobs, we certainly don't want commerce. If having no roads encourages companies to locate elsewhere, that's mission accomplished!"
Who says we need to be growing? Can't we be a successful region with what we already have, and allow other regions with more room to have all this growth? And who says you need roads to attract jobs? NYC has no problem attracting jobs, and well over 80% of workers in Manhattan don't use cars to get to work...
Posted by: Anonymous | January 17, 2008 4:10 PM
the region needs to stop attracting jobs, jobs bring people and people bring cars and kids and pets and CO2 emissions, being more like detroit is the answer, they have much better housing prices
Posted by: Anonymous | January 17, 2008 9:19 PM
in Manhattan, they're allowed to build new buildings more than 2 stories tall
Posted by: Anonymous | January 17, 2008 9:23 PM
"the region needs to stop attracting jobs, jobs bring people and people bring cars and kids and pets and CO2 emissions, being more like detroit is the answer, they have much better housing prices"
Are you kidding or are you just stupid?
Detroit is a DYING city. Keep up with your opposition to roads, growth and progress and you just might get your wish. Then you and your bike will have the streets all to yourself.
What an idiot!
Posted by: CEEAF | January 18, 2008 12:32 AM
CEEAF, you finally understand what we environmentalists and NIMCs are looking for
Posted by: Anonymous | January 18, 2008 9:07 AM
Care consulting health management news
Posted by: asdsa | February 3, 2008 6:35 PM
Care consulting health management news
Posted by: asdsa | February 3, 2008 10:12 PM
Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! http://byjjzcbjrvrwc.com
Posted by: haripdtyna | February 24, 2008 8:40 AM
Big spender lyrics
Posted by: zyptc | March 15, 2008 12:29 AM
Moms big tits
Posted by: wyakh | March 15, 2008 2:29 AM
Torin big red
Posted by: wonst | March 15, 2008 2:58 AM
Indian boys
Posted by: jnhac | March 15, 2008 6:59 AM
Nude boy forum
Posted by: wvkcz | March 15, 2008 7:29 AM
Rage boy
Posted by: euphs | March 15, 2008 7:59 AM
California cpa
Posted by: qqovs | March 15, 2008 9:59 AM
California dreamin
Posted by: zxkst | March 15, 2008 10:29 AM
California nose surgery
Posted by: hgflg | March 15, 2008 10:59 AM
California realtors
Posted by: cefad | March 15, 2008 11:29 AM
Posted by: ggdqj | March 15, 2008 1:59 PM
I like this work! New york city male blepharoplasty nmzdw
Posted by: rwpty | March 18, 2008 8:08 AM
I like your site! Newcastle city council ykysf
Posted by: jrcwf | March 18, 2008 8:39 AM
I like your wishes! Ford focus road test qjcel
Posted by: fetja | March 18, 2008 12:08 PM
I like this wishes! Ford motor credit co ctjez
Posted by: dtgpc | March 18, 2008 12:39 PM
Good wishes! Friendship ford ocmfi
Posted by: kpgkz | March 18, 2008 1:38 PM
Nice site! Servicing ac for 1989 ford truck hhrbg
Posted by: lxfte | March 18, 2008 2:38 PM
Best portal! Free mobile unlock codes uvyhn
Posted by: zpjts | March 19, 2008 5:08 AM
I like your portal! Morse code letters niivt
Posted by: cnsvy | March 19, 2008 6:08 AM
Beautiful site! Old navy promo code nqczs
Posted by: uvjvi | March 19, 2008 6:38 AM
Good wishes! Penal code 175.10 kvmez
Posted by: gmrrr | March 19, 2008 7:09 AM
I like this portal! Troe unlock code rnqjy
Posted by: zehjq | March 19, 2008 8:08 AM
Best wishes! Custom wheels mercedes thxsl
Posted by: fipxk | March 19, 2008 3:05 PM
Great work! Gibson les paul custom mgvfs
Posted by: zijpe | March 19, 2008 3:54 PM
Good work! Florida charter fishing elcfd
Posted by: knhob | March 24, 2008 8:38 AM
Nice wishes! Florida marine accident attorney aefrs
Posted by: pwiky | March 24, 2008 10:08 AM
I like this site! Florida offshore fishing charter iwjjk
Posted by: yrldi | March 24, 2008 10:38 AM
I like your portal! Spinal fluid loss symptoms xqjhl
Posted by: snfnn | March 24, 2008 11:08 AM
Nice work! Symptoms of blood clot in leg myhfk
Posted by: yheee | March 24, 2008 11:38 AM
Great site! Symptoms of gestational diabetes dfcyf
Posted by: vbzzt | March 24, 2008 12:08 PM
Great work! Symptoms of ptsd bvled
Posted by: vcrna | March 24, 2008 12:38 PM
I like your wishes! Weird symptoms of perimenopause rjxtd
Posted by: kfzma | March 24, 2008 1:08 PM
Wow, cool man, big thanks! http://ktbetpqqrwotk.com
Posted by: clzounmqlu | April 22, 2008 6:59 AM
Posted by: advyndooqu | April 22, 2008 11:39 AM
Best site! Youngest models bbs zncok
Posted by: djejy | April 22, 2008 4:53 PM
Good wishes! Model plan afaceri omgal
Posted by: wmhuf | April 22, 2008 5:23 PM
Best work! Models naked wqvhb
Posted by: pioaj | April 22, 2008 5:53 PM
Good site! Sweet heidi model fylio
Posted by: rftyf | April 22, 2008 7:23 PM
Nice wishes! Young russian model txjcu
Posted by: dbwuc | April 22, 2008 8:29 PM
Best wishes! Crocs on sale jmuvn
Posted by: cxvlp | April 22, 2008 9:53 PM
I like this portal! Destin florida condos for sale gssvx
Posted by: hbhxc | April 22, 2008 10:23 PM
Best work! East tn land for sale zelfq
Posted by: yrahm | April 22, 2008 10:53 PM
Nice site! Goldwing for sale viliz
Posted by: rhvut | April 23, 2008 12:23 AM
Best portal! Hudson car for sale classic rmylv
Posted by: aejla | April 23, 2008 12:53 AM
Best site! Glassing a wood boat ltlyr
Posted by: abohu | April 23, 2008 1:23 AM
Nice portal! Olympic boats vywpf
Posted by: pcwgg | April 23, 2008 2:23 AM
Beautiful portal! Ranger boat decals cqwjk
Posted by: rwtqi | April 23, 2008 2:53 AM
Beautiful work! Vietnamese boat people awmwj
Posted by: jlqdb | April 23, 2008 3:52 AM
Good site! Custom print 50 oz wgows
Posted by: zvebt | April 27, 2008 1:02 PM
Best portal! Custom tube bending dcwlc
Posted by: pmfxn | April 27, 2008 1:32 PM
Best wishes! Custom wheels mercedes bjdar
Posted by: kqqam | April 27, 2008 2:02 PM
Best portal! Gibson les paul custom hfpqi
Posted by: zjzow | April 27, 2008 2:32 PM
Nice work! Dog yeast infection hrbde
Posted by: ucmyu | April 27, 2008 6:32 PM
I like your work! Electronic dog fence lqpbz
Posted by: nrrcj | April 27, 2008 7:02 PM
I like your site! xcmgq
Posted by: gjdew | April 27, 2008 7:32 PM
Good portal! Is milk good for dogs wshan
Posted by: kfnzz | April 27, 2008 8:32 PM
I like your wishes! California nose surgery lurpd
Posted by: wjupn | April 27, 2008 11:02 PM
Beautiful wishes! Naturistmusings march ufuiw
Posted by: bbqsc | April 30, 2008 7:32 AM
Good wishes! Randall march ixjbj
Posted by: apxlu | April 30, 2008 8:32 AM
I like your wishes! Hand applique society zxbzl
Posted by: hjkxm | April 30, 2008 11:02 AM
Beautiful work! Lighthouse society qtizz
Posted by: npvnr | April 30, 2008 11:32 AM
Beautiful wishes! Catman cohen myspace vwtos
Posted by: ndjqq | April 30, 2008 1:02 PM
I like your work! Movie myspace layouts zlbgp
Posted by: baejy | April 30, 2008 3:02 PM
I like your portal! Myspace color chart kblts
Posted by: ypffk | April 30, 2008 3:32 PM
Good work! Ap nation high school football rankings dfsfg
Posted by: wvswy | April 30, 2008 11:32 PM
Nice work! Football betting tips swjuz
Posted by: hgwyr | May 1, 2008 12:32 AM
Great work! Football playbook gnvwz
Posted by: jdqss | May 1, 2008 1:01 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.

I applaud Congress for starting this conversation. I understand that many people cringe at the thought of new taxes. But the fact is that right now, we pay less than half of what we paid in transportation taxes 40 years ago, when inflation is accounted for. All this at a time when we need more transportation infrastructure and options than ever before. I've heard people from everywhere on the political spectrum, including some of the most conservative Republicans I know, say that transportation is one thing that should be managed by the government. If we are going to have it managed in a central fashion, we might as well adequately fund it.
The gasoline tax cannot continue to be a viable source of funding for our transportation system. First off, some users pay twice as much in use taxes as others, just by nature of the vehicle they drive. Is it really fair for a Civic driver to pay half as much as a Suburban driver, even though they use up essentially the same amount of road space and cause the same amount of wear and tear on our highways? What about those who use hybrids? They take up the same amount of road space too. How about alternative fuel or electric vehicles? How do we charge them their fair share?
But of course a major part of the problem is not just funding. There are a few other very important issues, like environmental reviews. I am a huge fan of environmental reviews of transportation projects with plenty of documentation, and then reaching a compromise where we can serve the humans and still protect the animals, plants, and neighborhoods from destruction. But at the same time, the frivolous appeals have gotten way out of control. The ICC is a perfect example of how the process is not supposed to work.
And while we're dealing with this sort of stuff, we need to convince people that building whatever we want, wherever we want, whenever we want, putting in a huge parking lot, demanding that everyone arrive and depart only by auto, and then not upgrading the roads or providing any transportation alternatives has been a collossal disaster. I'm not saying we have to embrace "Smart Growth" and turn everything into Manhattan, but would it hurt to have some "smarter growth"? Such as having retail nearby so when we plop down 5,000 new houses they don't have to drive 7 miles on 2-lane roads to get to a grocery store? How about ensuring that roads are upgraded, schools are built, etc. at the same time the development occurs instead of 10 years later? How about ensuring that housing and jobs grow at the same rate in smaller areas, so you don't have "lets create tons of jobs and they will live somewhere else" (Arlington, Fairfax), and "lets build tons of houses and send them all up I-95 to go to work everyday" (Stafford, Fredericksburg)? How about coordinating large, regional growth with upgrades to major roadways in the area?
How about we get over our fear of mass transit? I've heard plenty of, "I don't feel like using it, therefore I don't think anyone should have any." It's one thing to say "I'm going to do whatever I want" when you are out in the country, or even in a small city where your impact on society as a whole is small. But when you have a metro area with millions of people, and we encourage everyone to do what they want, what is best for them, instead of what is best for society as a whole, then we will be doomed. Too many people, too many differing ideas, too much conflict. You can already see it today.
And lastly, lets get with the program when it comes to telecommuting. There is no reason why a civilized nation like us still requires all but a negligible percentage of workers to come to an office everyday when much of their work can be completed at home using a simple broadband connection to the company server.
Sorry for the long post.