Question Four: The Wizard Effect

With just one day until All "Hallow's" Eve, we turn to broader, cultural issues related to Harry Potter, prompted by today's piece in Style by Bob Thompson.

To directly borrow the query raised in that article: Did the Harry Potter books really change the world? Are more kids reading and are children's books more popular because of Rowling's novels? Or, as Thompson's story implies, is that all a bunch of bunk? Share your comments below, and don't forget to join Thompson for an online Q&A on this very subject today at noon ET.

By Jen Chaney |  July 19, 2007; 8:50 AM ET
Previous: Question Three: The Leak | Next: Question Five: Potter Plans

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



It is definitely getting more kids to read. The only question is - do they keep reading other books? I know a lot of my classmates in Middle School when the first book came out actually did start reading more.

Posted by: Moshe | July 19, 2007 11:12 AM

I'ts very mean. I'm compleatly tempted to search for the spoilers, but I won't.

Posted by: Malissa | July 19, 2007 12:32 PM

I'ts very mean. I'm compleatly tempted to search for the spoilers, but I won't.

Posted by: Malissa | July 19, 2007 12:32 PM

I think it did affect the kids to read more. The kids might have just read
the "Harry Potter" books because they were interested in the magics and fantasies but after they're done with "Harry Potter", they'll probably want another book to entertain them. So I should put it this way: The kids have tasted the joy of reading books. When you taste something, and it's good, you definately want it more. Same with the books.

Posted by: John | July 19, 2007 08:07 PM

Imagination inspires. Books inspire, allow us to dream and make us think all of which are good things. I have personally witnessed many children reading the Harry Potter books becomr voracious readers. All it takes is a spark and Harry Potter has provided that.

Posted by: Kim | July 19, 2007 11:21 PM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




 
 

© 2007 The Washington Post Company