Partition: Not Viable Outcome
Sen. John McCain asked what the two officials think of "soft partition."
Amb. Crocker came out against selling off Iraq for parts. "Partition, in my view, is not a viable outcome," he said.
He didn't say what was.
By The Washington Post |
September 11, 2007; 3:11 PM ET
Previous: The Good Old Days |
Next: Melancholy About Maliki
Posted by: rogerr | September 11, 2007 03:25 PM
McCain showed very weak in my observance.
I don't think his questions brought any of the answers that HE NEEDS.
I lived in Arizona for 10 years, and I do have a bias with this Senator. I have never seen a politician in my life, turn like he has.
Thank God for Karma!!
Posted by: marinemomof3 | September 11, 2007 03:46 PM
Just because someone is educated about military affairs, doesn't mean they apply common sense or make the right decisions when it comes to military affairs.
Posted by: Scarlofs | September 11, 2007 04:19 PM
Keep bloging, Tom. If half of the fascinating exchanges you cite are in the Post's printed story in the morning, I'll be surprised. George Lardner.
Posted by: lardnerg@yahoo.com | September 11, 2007 05:15 PM
Post a Comment
We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.
How is more time, the staus quo' going to help people settle disputes they do not want to settle. The U.S. being in Iraq creates an excuse for not solving the problems that the Iraqis need to solve on their own.