Ring one up for Zimmerman

The Nationals came into today's game having scored just five runs in their first three Grapefruit League games. Ryan Zimmerman upped that in the top of the first off Shawn Chacon, ripping a line-drive, two-run homer that got out over the left field fence in a hurry.

Zimmerman is now 4 for 4 (including the Georgetown game) on the spring with a homer and three singles. He also put on a show during batting practice.

Steven Shell, the right-hander who is getting this chance because he impressed in bullpen sessions, got roughed up a bit in the first, allowing a triple to Mark Loretta -- one that went under the glove of Austin Kearns, who looked like he expected to catch the ball -- and a double to Lance Berkman.

After one, Nationals 2, Astros 1.

By Barry Svrluga |  March 2, 2008; 1:25 PM ET
Previous: Lineup against the Astros | Next: Back-to-back jacks

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



Luis Jimenez? This is news to me, but evidently the guy is a 6-4, lefthanded 1B, former O's and BoSox prospect now considered a bit of a minor-league journeyman, but he is only 25 (turns 26 in May), and he hit .328/.399/.591 for AA-Bowie last year. Anybody have any insight here?

Posted by: Bob L. Head | March 2, 2008 1:44 PM

Report from Ft Lauderdale - Nats lead 3-1 in the middle of the 2nd. Two nice singles for both Guzman and Frank Diaz, anchor the offense, while Mock struggled to hit spots with his fastball in the 1st.

Posted by: Trapper John | March 2, 2008 1:45 PM

GHF, Zimmerman's hand seems to be doing okay.

Posted by: natsfan1a | March 2, 2008 1:50 PM

Nats lineup vs the O's:

Guzman-6
Diaz-7
Dukes-8
B Boone-DH
Langerhans-9
Whitney-3
Harris-4
Moeller-2
Orr-5

Mock pitching.

Posted by: Trapper John | March 2, 2008 1:51 PM

Dont know much about Jimenez-but 6'4" and left handed sound good.

Posted by: Nats4Tommy | March 2, 2008 2:02 PM

Shell's line - 3IP 2H 1ER 2BB 3K

Not too bad

Posted by: natsinthevalley | March 2, 2008 2:05 PM

either swanni's sarcasm is pegging the meter or he's gone off the deep end (referring to his post in 'guess the rotation').

matt, i'm with bobL in the "signing an average starter for a reasonable price and keeping prospects in AA is a solid approach" thinking. i think the issue many of us have is with that "a lot of free-agent pitching with varying talent" analysis. i don't think the talent with most of that list varied all that much. and swapping out one 4-5 starter for another 4-5 starter just doesn't do much. at least not IMO. we have a big pile of 4-5 starters. i'd be more interested in a 2-3, who would make a difference. the kind of guy patterson or hill could be, if we could rely on them to be healthy. but i don't see the point in spending a few million to add a couple of more 4-5 guys.

Posted by: 231 | March 2, 2008 2:10 PM

Hey Trapper John, thanks for the on-site reporting!

I'll be down there later this month myself -- what's the ST training schedule like? As in, when do they start in the morning, what's the most interesting thing to watch/time to be there, when is best to chase a few of your kids favorite players for autographs, etc? Any advice would be appreciated.

Posted by: Bob L. Head | March 2, 2008 2:13 PM

can i just say that i want to see boone make this team. i hope he keeps this up.

Posted by: natsinthevalley | March 2, 2008 2:16 PM

After three, it's 4-3 Nats in Lauderdale. Dukes lost a routine fly in the sun in the bottom of the second, and in so doing prolonged the inning, allowing the O's to tie it at three. But doubles from Boone and Harris gave the Nats the lead again,and Rob Bell hurled a scoreless third to leave the Nats with a one-run lead.

Posted by: Trapper John | March 2, 2008 2:22 PM

Found this on Jimenez (a.k.a. "Little Papi," he weighs 275):

http://www.redsoxnation.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=22280

Also this scouting report from SonsofSamHorn:

"Big Venezuelan has very high power potential but strikes out a ton. Still manages to maintain a high OBP. Actually has decent speed for a man of his size. Has MLB potential if he can show more plate discipline. Defensively, Jimenez lacks great lateral quickness, but his glove is decent."

Posted by: Bob L. Head | March 2, 2008 2:26 PM

Has anyone heard if there will be any radio broadcasts of the Nats spring training games? Last year, there were ten and the then-WTWP schedule was published by March 1. National Journal reports are okay, but would be even better to hear at least ten games on the radio.

Posted by: Margaret Gentry | March 2, 2008 2:31 PM

Bob - the beach was too nice this morning to head to the park early. Sorry. ;)

Posted by: Trapper John | March 2, 2008 2:32 PM

You can listen to local feed of the Astros game here:

http://www.ktrh.com/main.html

Posted by: natsfan1a | March 2, 2008 2:37 PM

After five, it's 4-4. Bell had been moving it around pretty well till he hung one up that got crushed to straight-away center by Markakis in the bottom of the fifth. But Harris preventing the inning from deteriorating when he dove to snag a hot Luke Scott grounder and turned an amazing double play.

Posted by: Trapper John | March 2, 2008 2:54 PM

Three up, three down for the o's in the bottom of the sixth, as Bacsik looks good (at least by Bacsik standards).

4-4 after six in lauderdale.

Posted by: Trapper John | March 2, 2008 3:05 PM

Here's the ST radio info, Margaret:

http://www.3wtradio.com/?sid=1313107&nid=26

Posted by: natsfan1a | March 2, 2008 3:16 PM

Looks like Detweiler got roughed up by the O's. 3H, 2R

Posted by: Positively Half St. | March 2, 2008 3:27 PM

CS for Milledge at 3B making him 2-3 so far in ST. 66% makes me think "green light" will be off or will it?

Posted by: Keenan | March 2, 2008 3:28 PM

6-5 O's after 7.5 in Lauderdale. Detwiler did, in fact, get roughed up. No movement on his breaking stuff, and less speed than we saw last fall. Disappointing.

Posted by: Trapper John | March 2, 2008 3:31 PM

Thanks anyway Trapper, glad you enjoyed the beach!

Re: Milledge stealing, 75% is the cutoff, but there's no reason to shut him down after 3 attempts in ST. I think Manny will give him his head all of this month and then evaluate at that point.

Posted by: Bob L. Head | March 2, 2008 3:34 PM

I think it was 74%, whatever that means...

Posted by: natsfan1a | March 2, 2008 3:44 PM

OK, seems the Nats will beat Houston, but what's up with the O's game?

Posted by: Positively Half St. | March 2, 2008 3:46 PM

Hey, don't jinx it. :)

Posted by: natsfan1a | March 2, 2008 3:47 PM

Good point. At least Schroeder has one out so far.

Posted by: Positively Half St. | March 2, 2008 3:49 PM

G. Guzman has had a good day trying to stick as a Rule 5 guy. Two outs.

Posted by: Positively Half St. | March 2, 2008 3:51 PM

The seamheads say that a 75% success rate when stealing bases is the rate necessary to make attempted steals worth the risk that you're giving up an out whenever you get caught. Or something like that. In any case there is obviously no material difference between 75% and 74%.

Posted by: Bob L. Head | March 2, 2008 3:53 PM

Seems Brian Sanches didn't do much for his chances to stick as a pitcher, though. O's beating us hard, now.

Posted by: Positively Half St. | March 2, 2008 3:54 PM

The Astros broadcaster gave him two blue stars (on his scorecard, I assume) and called it the play of the game.

---

G. Guzman has had a good day trying to stick as a Rule 5 guy. Two outs.

Posted by: natsfan1a | March 2, 2008 3:57 PM

Thanks, Bob L. for the background. I'm not a stats person and 74% struck me as funny somehow.

---

The seamheads say that a 75% success rate when stealing bases is the rate necessary to make attempted steals worth the risk that you're giving up an out whenever you get caught. Or something like that. In any case there is obviously no material difference between 75% and 74%.

Posted by: natsfan1a | March 2, 2008 3:58 PM

Fun in the sun in Ft. Lauderdale...

I love the back end of split squad games, you never know what is going to happen...

Posted by: OldGuy | March 2, 2008 4:03 PM

Five-run top o' the ninth means 10-9 Nats lead! Thanks to a bunch of mostly anonymous batters - but Bernadina's double was the linchpin.

Posted by: Trapper John | March 2, 2008 4:08 PM

Ack! How did we lose?

Posted by: Positively Half St. | March 2, 2008 4:19 PM

Ah, well. Sidearmer Warden gives up a few doubles, and the one-run lead turns into a loss.

Posted by: Trapper John | March 2, 2008 4:22 PM

Bye-bye, Jim Ed.

Posted by: Positively Half St. | March 2, 2008 4:25 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2007 The Washington Post Company