Ravens Make a Panic Move

NEW YORK--I didn't particularly like what the Ravens did, trading back up (after trading down earlier) to take Delaware quarterback Joe Flacco with the 18th pick.

Fellow quarterbacks Brian Brohm of Louisville and Chad Henne of Michigan were still available. The Ravens could have stayed put at 26th and gotten one of the three. They were wary of another quarterback-needy team trading in front of them to get Flacco, but so what? Flacco is not that significantly better than Brohm or Henne to merit such a move. To me, they panicked.

By Cindy Boren |  April 26, 2008; 5:50 PM ET  | Category:  Draft
Previous: Dissecting the Redskins' Trade | Next: A Timely First Round

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



I like the, "Ironic Twist," that the Raven's have created with this pick. This kid from Delaware was in Pittsburg and they gave up on him. The Pittsburg Steelers had a quarterback back in 1955 and they gave up on that kid! Turns out, that kid came to Baltimore as a backup in 1956. He eventually became the greatest QB to ever play the game!

Now, the Baltimore Football Franchise has picked another Pittsburg castaway, 50 years after the Colts won their first NFL Title, with that Pittsburg reject!

I don't know anything about this big kid, but I love, "A story in the making!"

Posted by: New Mexico Mike | April 26, 2008 7:26 PM

Maske mark my words, Flacco is the next Tom Brady and the Ravens will rule the NFL!!!!!!!!1

Posted by: Big Stickerz | April 26, 2008 9:09 PM

You're right on, Mark.

The Ravens could have had Henne or Brohm (and probably Flacco) with the 38th pick, let alone the 26th. And Ray Rice (Rutgers RB) with the 55th?

I think Ozzie is losing his touch.

Posted by: Baltimoron | April 26, 2008 10:18 PM

ravers suck. flacco is a mental midget, a weak man.

Posted by: dear bmore glow-stix fans, | April 26, 2008 10:41 PM

pittsburgh has an "h" in it.

Posted by: steelers | April 27, 2008 7:57 PM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




 
 

© 2007 The Washington Post Company