Wuerl on Benedict

When you least expect it, expect it: a sports analogy about Pope Benedict.

Speaking to reporters and editors at The Washington Post yesterday about the pope's upcoming visit to Washington, Archbishop Donald Wuerl said Americans should expect something different from the man than what they saw when he served in his previous job as longtime head of the Congregation for The Doctrine of the Faith. That role required being a watchdog for Catholic doctrine.

Back then, Wuerl said, one of Benedict's key responsibilities was "to throw a flag if someone went out of bounds. If you're going to have intellectual ferment, intellectual discussion, you also have to have someone who throws the flag."

As pope, Wuerl said, Benedict has a different role - to be the living link to the Apostle Peter, to the earliest days of Christianity and to spread a message of hope to Catholics and non-Catholics alike, "that we are capable of a personal relationship with God." That, Wuerl says, is something many Americans want to hear, particularly at a time when religious practice and belief are in dramatic flux. He believes recent data showing one in ten Americans is an ex-Catholic simply reflects normal American "drifting," and "shopping around." The history and truth of Catholicism, he says, will bring them back eventually.

"In our country we are so taken up with the individual. Everyone wants to realize their greatest potential, and that's good, but there are some things we do as a family," he said. People want to know: "How do I verify that what I believe is more than just what I think about things? Our function is to make people realize it's in this 2,000-year-old family that you find that verification."

Articulating the core agenda of Pope Benedict, Wuerl said Catholics drifted in recent decades because the church failed to teach the basics of their doctrine. "We were trying all kinds of new things, and outreach was to be personalized. We didn't tell the next generation what we actually believed." Benedict is often called catechist-in-chief; Wuerl in his previous post in Pittsburgh was called "the teaching bishop."

Wuerl was vague about some hot topics, including whether the pope will discuss the church's sexual abuse scandal and/or speak with sex abuse victims. "I'd assume somewhere he will address that topic. One thing I'd like to renew again is the sorrow of church leadership that this happened."

Asked if the pope would speak out against the war in Iraq when he meets with President Bush, Wuerl said he didn't know what Benedict will say in the private meeting the two men will have April 16 at the White House. The Vatican - and then-Cardinal Ratzinger condemned the U.S. attack before the war began, but "once the decision was made, the question now is: How do we get out in a way that's responsible?" Wuerl said.

But there are other vexing questions being mulled at archdiocesan HQ, Wuerl said, namely: How do we get enough chairs on the infield of Nationals Park without violating city fire code? "I never thought one of my concerns as archbishop would be color-coded seating."

By Michelle Boorstein |  March 18, 2008; 4:34 PM ET
Previous: The Pope and Iraq | Next: Popemobile Alert!

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



A living linke to Peter?? Not really. What we have though is a link to the flaws in Christianity:

The Pope should address but will not for economic and theological reasons, the flaws in Catholicism and Christianity:

A synopsis-

1. Abraham founder/father of three major religions was either the embellishment of the lives of three different men or a mythical character as was Moses, the "Tablet-Man" who talked to burning bushes and made much magic in Egypt.

1.5 million Conservative Jews and their rabbis have relegated Abraham to the myth pile along with most if not all the OT. http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/ConservativeTorah.htm

2. Jesus was an illiterate Jewish peasant/carpenter/simple preacher man who suffered from hallucinations (if you believe his "biographers" i.e. visions of satan aka the demon of the demented), has been characterized anywhere from the Messiah from Nazareth to a mythical character from mythical Nazareth to a mamzer from Nazareth (Professor Bruce Chilton, in his book Rabbi Jesus). Analyses of Jesus' life by many contemporary NT scholars (e.g. Professors Crossan, Borg and Fredriksen, On Faith panelists) via the NT and related documents have concluded that only about 30% of Jesus' sayings and ways noted in the NT were authentic. The rest being embellishments (e.g. miracles)/hallucinations made/had by the NT authors to impress various Christian, Jewish and Pagan sects.

The 30% of the NT that is "authentic Jesus" like everything in life was borrowed/plagiarized and/or improved from those who came before. In Jesus' case, it was the ways and sayings of the Babylonians, Greeks, Persians, Egyptians, Hittites, Canaanites, OT, John the Baptizer and possibly the ways and sayings of traveling Greek Cynics. http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/theories.html

For added "pizzazz", Catholic/Christian theologians divided god the singularity into three persons and invented atonement as an added guilt trip for the "pew people" to go along with this trinity of overseers. By doing so, they made god the padre into god the "filicider".


3. Luther, Calvin, Joe Smith, Henry VIII, Wesley et al, founders of Christian-based religions, also suffered from the belief in/hallucinations of "pretty wingy talking flying fictional thingie" visits and "prophecies" for profits analogous to the myths of Catholicism (resurrections, apparitions, ascensions and immaculate conceptions).


Posted by: Concerned The Christian Now Liberated | March 18, 2008 08:31 PM

Fallen Catholics will return when hell freezes over - should be any day now.

Posted by: perspective | March 27, 2008 09:24 AM

Donald Wuerl is now the teaching Archbishop. I have learned so much from Donald Wuerl through his books and TV programs when he was in Pittsburgh. He continues to explain things very well now that he is in Washington D.C.

Posted by: John Kniesner | April 6, 2008 10:42 AM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2008 The Washington Post Company