Redskins Insider, by Jason La Canfora Redskins Insider

Reche Caldwell Says A Deal With The Skins "looks really good."

Caldwell just told me he had a great visit here and thinks he will sign very shortly. Just waiting on a few details, he said, but he is ready to go.
When I offered "congratulations," he said, "Thanks." And not, "well, we don't have a deal yet," or any of that stuff.

You have to think this guy will be the No. 3 WR at the least fairly soon. I have thought for a long time this will be the last year in Washington for a certain other receiver, and the presence of this guy suddenly gives them a solid starting option beyond Moss and Randle El.

By Jason La Canfora |  September 11, 2007; 2:36 PM ET
Previous: Reche Caldwell in the building | Next: Caldwell Signs 1 Year Deal

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



first!

Posted by: first | September 11, 2007 2:42 PM

Fly me to the moon, and let me play among the stars!

Posted by: Anonymous | September 11, 2007 2:43 PM

bbeeeepp

Posted by: Anonymous | September 11, 2007 2:50 PM

Why is Lloyd such an asshat? Every teammate says he's the most talented receiver out there yet he continues to play like he could give a f.
Hopefully this Caldwell dude is the answer, I don't remember ever seeing him play.

Posted by: Yo | September 11, 2007 2:53 PM

GREAT NEWS, wearing my whip cream bikini and doing the Hustle...feelin the flow...

Posted by: Anonymous | September 11, 2007 2:54 PM

cL, from the vanished thread, nfl.com says Caldwell is 6'0" and 220 lbs. Kind of like jm220 ... only, you know, rc220.

Posted by: dcsween | September 11, 2007 2:55 PM

Before bashing this we should ask ourselves the following:

R) Is he an upgrade over what we have now?
III) Is he the best available receiver?

I think the answers are yes and yes. No one is expecting pro bowl numbers. We just need some kind of production out of our #3 receiver and we are currently not getting any.

You could make the argument for McCardell, but he's like 76 years old. With crazy eyes, theres some potential down the road as well.

Posted by: etrod | September 11, 2007 2:55 PM

Posted by: Anonymous | September 11, 2007 2:55 PM

6th!

Posted by: SeanTay77 | September 11, 2007 2:55 PM

I believe Mr. La Canfora may have misheard and thus misquoted the guy. He said "looks really big" ... which is how everything looks from behind his peepers.

Posted by: dcsween | September 11, 2007 2:56 PM

first
first
first
Am I the only one seeing 3's?
Am I the only one seeing 3's?
Am I the only one seeing 3's?

Posted by: first, first, first | September 11, 2007 2:56 PM

Henceforth on this blog, Reche Caldwell will be known as "RC220".

Let it be done!

Posted by: Anonymous | September 11, 2007 2:56 PM

Don't forget that Caldwell put up those numbers last year against #1 corners. This year he'll be going against #2 or 3 corners.

Posted by: bigfish | September 11, 2007 2:57 PM

Cindy just lost about 30 posts switching this Carlos LaCanfora triple move back to one post.

The Boren Ultimatum will now be changed to 99970.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 11, 2007 2:58 PM

What's with the two fake Nate posts today? Not me, dudes. It would be sort of an honor if it weren't so creepy. Just come in with the Barney Fife and "this blog stinks" stuff, okay, hater dude?

I've been busy trying to reconcile a new and improved Boren Ultimatum with my plan to, you know, get a little bit of Work done.

*sigh*

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | September 11, 2007 2:58 PM

When you said congratulations, I bet he looked surprised.

Posted by: Joe in Raleigh | September 11, 2007 2:59 PM

He didn't tell "you" that, Jason. He told all of the reports at the same time (since at least 2 other reporters are reporting Caldwell told the entire group of reporters that it "looks really good"). Don't act like you have a scoop gleaned from a private one-on-one conversation with the guy.

Posted by: John | September 11, 2007 2:59 PM

I guess they studied the film and saw Lloyd, Brandon's "effort" on the INT in the end zone, and that was the last straw. No plasma tv for this sjkhole. He should get an old 13" black and white with rabbit ears.

Posted by: 4-12 | September 11, 2007 3:00 PM

He needs to re-sign with someone right away -- REALLY expensive contact lenses -- specially made from scooped-out jelly fish.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 11, 2007 3:00 PM

guess that means lloyd should start making some plays on special teams before he has to find a new job. what a BUST!

and i'm excited about wade getting the nod. this makes more sense and wade is definetly good enough to start (as good as jansen or samuels... not really). and this way they can bring in heyer to spell wade and especially samuels who still isn't in 100% game form.

Posted by: jaws | September 11, 2007 3:00 PM

I really don't get this conundrum over WR. We have a dude who works his butt off and runs good routes and blocks downfield and actually catches the ball when you throw it to him -- his name is James Thrash. He's not the fastest wheel on the truck, but he does go round and round.

Throw it to Thrash!

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | September 11, 2007 3:00 PM

Caldwell did nothing against #2 and #3 cornerbacks while he was in San Diego.

Chances are good that we will sign, never catch a pass, get cut in the off-season, sign with the 40ers, and be All Pro next year.

Posted by: El Fan Tom | September 11, 2007 3:00 PM

Who farted?

Posted by: This blog stinks | September 11, 2007 3:00 PM

Sounds like La DorkCanfora tried to play our boy Reche into spilling the beans before anything was official. Smooth move Exlax!

Posted by: Harry Dick | September 11, 2007 3:00 PM

Sign him - Cut Lloyd. Lloyd's a disgrace. He is the poster child for having non-guaranteed contracts although the Skins as usual paid this guy too much in guaranteed bonus money. I think the final straw was the interception this game where he got completely outhustled and just showed no want to whatsoever. Bye!

PS Guarantee Lloyd is dumb enough to blow however millions of dollars he has too. Haha! He's just that type of dude.

Posted by: Rob P | September 11, 2007 3:01 PM

Way to show your optimism there El Fan or shall I say "Debbie Downer".

Posted by: bigfish | September 11, 2007 3:01 PM

John - relax. It's not that big of a deal that Jason was not the only reporter there.

Posted by: BT | September 11, 2007 3:02 PM

Jason- Good job keeping blog peeps informed!

Posted by: MVA | September 11, 2007 3:02 PM

Rule #76 No Excuses, Play like a Champion

This comment counts towards both Redskins related content and "jibba jabba."

Posted by: Dorf | September 11, 2007 3:02 PM

As long as we sign the guy for around the minimum, with a minimal signging bonus, I'm definitely cool with Caldwell. I just don't understand what we're going to do with Brandon Lloyd's contract. I guess we could always deactive the guy every week and then "LaVar" him at the end of the season, right? Or should I say "Springs" him now?

Posted by: Ricky Bobby | September 11, 2007 3:03 PM

1) Quit picking on Jason
2) Quit saying "who farted"
3) Quit saying "first"

Posted by: Not getting any at home and sexually frustrated | September 11, 2007 3:03 PM

Joe in Raleigh, hilarious.

Critical question on Caldewell: is the proper pronunciation of his first name "raysh", "reesh," "ray-shay," "reh-shay," or "anyone other than Brandon Lloyd"?

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | September 11, 2007 3:03 PM

Sorry people, but Reche Caldwell is way better than Lloyd AND Thrash. Love Thrash the football player, but the guy is done as a receiver. He was slow 5 yrs ago. Think he is any faster now???

Posted by: Rob P | September 11, 2007 3:03 PM

Joe,

I got it and laughed.

How about RC 20/20 cause you know he's got perfect vision.

Posted by: Skinz | September 11, 2007 3:04 PM

How tall is Reche...what's the skinny on him?

Posted by: nyskinsfan | September 11, 2007 3:05 PM

Why wait? Cut out the cancer now before it spreads.

Brandon Lloyd -- meet the scalpel.

Posted by: The Oncologist | September 11, 2007 3:05 PM

Redskins Depth Chart - Wide Receiver

1) Santana Moss
2) A. Randle El
3) RC220
4) Asshat
5) James Thrash

Posted by: TM | September 11, 2007 3:05 PM

Rob P, read previous thread about cuts/trades counting towards the salaray cap. I don't claim to understand it, but its not an option from what the other hamsters say.

Posted by: Dorf | September 11, 2007 3:05 PM

I would agree to cut Lloyd, but I have a better idea. Personal punt protector...

Posted by: BT | September 11, 2007 3:06 PM

May have been going against #1 Recievers but he also had Tom Brady throwing to him.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 11, 2007 3:06 PM

Posted by: thigh master | September 11, 2007 3:06 PM

reh-shay

Posted by: Anonymous | September 11, 2007 3:07 PM

What did the bag of chips say to the battery?

Posted by: Free to lay | September 11, 2007 3:07 PM

Joe,

I got it and laughed.

How about RC 20/20 cause you know he's got perfect vision.

Posted by: Skinz | September 11, 2007 03:04 PM

LMGO!

Posted by: jonnie5 | September 11, 2007 3:07 PM

Dammit Danny, show me the money!!!!!!

Posted by: Reche Caldwell | September 11, 2007 3:07 PM

Once again, cutting Lloyd would put us OVER the cap and we'd lose draft picks as a result.

You can send him home like the Eagles did TO but cutting him would be like punching yourself in the groin to rid yourself of a headache.

Posted by: Just sayzin is all... | September 11, 2007 3:08 PM

No plasma tv for this sjkhole. He should get an old 13" black and white with rabbit ears.

Posted by: 4-12 | September 11, 2007 03:00 PM

LMAO. Maybe just a 5" tv for him

Posted by: dcskin | September 11, 2007 3:08 PM

Jon, maybe what he meant was he asked the question and Caldwell answered. That would be tellng him, since he asked the question. Besides, who the SJK cares?

Posted by: TE85 | September 11, 2007 3:09 PM

Dorf - I am not an expert, but I believe that Llyod would count against next year's salary cap. I am not sure where we stand for next year. When I say "where we stand," of course, I mean how far we are over.

Posted by: BT | September 11, 2007 3:09 PM

I still can't believe we gave up everything we did to trade and sign for Lloyd. Since the offseason of '00 didn't teach them anything, I really hope the 3 critical offseason mistakes of '06 (Lloyd, Duckett, Arch) finally wake these idiots in the FO up.

Nate,

Let's wait to see the numbers on Caldwell. If they gave him something way over the miniumum and/or a big bonus, I will scream about not just using Thrash as well...

Posted by: Ricky Bobby | September 11, 2007 3:10 PM

You can send him home like the Eagles did TO but cutting him would be like punching yourself in the groin to rid yourself of a headache.

Posted by: Just sayzin is all... | September 11, 2007 03:08 PM

I wouldn't have a problem with that...sending him home, not punching myself in the groin that is.

Posted by: bigfish | September 11, 2007 3:11 PM

Cutting a player results in his unamortized signing bonus being accelerated to the current year.

Translation - The Redskins cannot cut Lloyd because they don't have the cap space to do so.

Posted by: CW | September 11, 2007 3:11 PM

Yeah Ricky Bobbie,

This Springs' situation could be "strange" like LaVArr's, but as we learned with LaVArr you never know what's going on behind the scenes. Remember with LaVArr it turned out he barely knew the team had a defensive playbook. I was dying to know why Springs did not play more as Smoot and Rogers were being picked apart underneath. Well now we know Gibbs and Springs aren't on the same page as far as his "health" is concerned. Weird!

What happened to Smoot? I remember his 2nd/3rd yr, I thought he outplayed Champ Bailey and, of course, he was getting more balls thrown his way too.

Posted by: Rob P | September 11, 2007 3:13 PM

How many seasons does Lloyd have to be a skin without it hurting so much?

Posted by: Hi | September 11, 2007 3:13 PM

He received a 10 Mil signing bonus. If he gets cut now, the magority will spill over into next year, but we don't have enough cap room this year to asorb the '07 hit. Or we have just enough cap room and we won't be able to sign players as others get injured during the season if we cut #85........

Posted by: 4th | September 11, 2007 3:13 PM

Nate, Madden (if I'm remembering this right) pronounced it RESH-ay. I pronounce it R-E-L-I-E-F.

Posted by: dcsween | September 11, 2007 3:13 PM

I don't see any pressing need to cut Lloyd, especially if it has grievous cap implications for next season.

Hate to give up on a guy after one season plus one week, however historically bad he's been in that span.

Let Lloyd, Reche and Thrash duke it out for #3 and #4 WR, and eventually work in this speedy Bodiford kid for a few snaps here in there. Lloyd can be active or inactive week to week, whatever.

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | September 11, 2007 3:14 PM

Lloyd had his chance. Kick him out and the rest of team will applaud. This Skins play hard and there is nothing worse than seeing a play where 10 guys bust their butts and the 11th guy doesn't care. Cut Lloyd -- or have Chris Samuels could beat the crap out of him and put Lloyd on IR if you can't afford the cap hit. Getting rid of Lloyd is addition by subtraction.

At the start of the season, we had a number 1 in Santana, a 3 in Randle El and a 4 in Thrash. But no number 2 because Lloyd is a nothing. Randle El stepped up and we have a 2. So a 3 is what we need and Caldwell seems reasonable. Especially since the guy has something to prove

Posted by: AL | September 11, 2007 3:14 PM

Frye traded from Browns to Seahawks... can anyone say Brady

Cowboys DT Ferguson out for season... nice

Posted by: Zebra | September 11, 2007 3:14 PM

P.S. The NFL will not approve any transaction that would cause the team to exceed the salary cap.

Personal Punt Protector and Pine Baron will be Lloyd's best two options.

Posted by: CW | September 11, 2007 3:15 PM

I expect lloyd, brandon to be cut in March of '08, as a post-June 1 designee. The majority of his dead cap hit will be in the '09 season that way.

Posted by: 4-12 | September 11, 2007 3:15 PM

POSTED 3:09 p.m. EDT, September 11, 2007

'SKINS EYEBALLING CALDWELL

Jason La Canfora of the Washington Post reports that the Redskins are visiting with free-agent receiver Reche Caldwell.

Caldwell led the Patriots in receptions and yardage in 2006. He was cut on September 3.

Because Caldwell is a vested veteran, teams likely waited to court him until after Week One. Any vested veteran who is on a team's opening-day roster can elect to take the remainder of his base salary as termination pay.

Wow. That was quick....

Somebody must have emailed them...

Posted by: 4th via PFT.com | September 11, 2007 3:15 PM

slick move jason!!!

reche caldwell is 2 to 3 inches taller than the skins #1 and #2 receiver.

SPLIT REC YDS AVG LNG TD ATT YDS
2006 61 760 12.5 62 4 1 5 5.0 5

i'll take these numbers!!!

Posted by: dealer | September 11, 2007 3:16 PM

Posted by: Anonymous | September 11, 2007 3:17 PM

Zebra- Flag on yourself for cheering an injury, even to a hated rival.

Posted by: 4-12 | September 11, 2007 3:17 PM

Dorf and everyone,
I know they probably can't cut him for all the technical cap reasons, which I don't have the time or inclination to figure out anymore. But, do something to embarrass him like the Bucs did to K. Johnson. It's like he is not even fulfilling his contract. Sue his dumbass!!!

Posted by: Rob P | September 11, 2007 3:18 PM

If anything this will give BL a kick in the nuts that he has to produce or he's gone. It's kind of like what they did with the corners to get more production out of them. With BL looking over his shoulder this might be the one thing that will jumpstart him into the kind of WR he can be.

Posted by: boobsweat | September 11, 2007 3:19 PM

i'll take these numbers!!!

Posted by: dealer | September 11, 2007 03:16 PM

Was those #s because of RC220 or 3 Championship ring Brady?

I think we went down this road before guys who are hyped:

David Patten

Posted by: 4th | September 11, 2007 3:19 PM

dealer, i don't think so ... maybe taller than the #2 WIDE receiver, but Cooley is still the number 2 receiver (or, at least, was covered like he was by the Phins).

Posted by: dcsween | September 11, 2007 3:20 PM

Posted by: Daddy-O | September 11, 2007 3:20 PM

like i said before let's TO #85! cuz if they cut it him now majority of the hit will be taken next year (as 4th said above) if they wait until the season's over then they can distribute the hit over 2008 and 2009.

Posted by: dealer | September 11, 2007 3:20 PM

I'm going to go with it's just you Daddy-O.

Posted by: boobsweat | September 11, 2007 3:22 PM

4th, i'll take david patten, lisa patten, juwana patten and late granny patten over #85 :)

Posted by: dealer | September 11, 2007 3:22 PM

4th he is coming in as #3 receiver and not a # 1 or 2.

Posted by: jm220 | September 11, 2007 3:23 PM

Rob P, I would love more than anything to see him smack a valet parker around and for him to find his car sitting in Redskins Park on cinder blocks. He hasn't done anything to earn anyone's love (as a player... never met the guy personally)

At least the guy isn't a locker room issue and doesn't steal from his teammates.

(remember Micheal Westbrook and Albert Connell?)

Posted by: Dorf | September 11, 2007 3:23 PM

HAHAHAHAHA

F ME!

I was hangin/posted on the double post thread...think man its quiet up here today...

I am moron, just call me Skippy

Posted by: Chris Larry | September 11, 2007 3:25 PM

"STEINBERG: Did you see that quote I got from Fred Smoot when I asked him to compare getting hit by 21 with getting hit by 30?:

"That's just like asking yourself if you were to get shot, would you rather get shot with a .45 bullet or a nine millimeter," Smoot said. "Then you ask yourself, 'Does it really matter?' Both of 'em are gonna hurt."
"

Ehh, wasn't PAtten coming in as a #3 as well? Or was it a #3? I'm just saying, I'm not sold on the guy, yet......

Posted by: 4th | September 11, 2007 3:26 PM

Thanks Jason - Good job

This is my first post. I have been reading the insider for a over a year now and even though I disagree with Jason sometimes. I want to say thanks for the quick updates and keeping me informed.

Posted by: TrueSkinsFan | September 11, 2007 3:26 PM

Let Lloyd, Reche and Thrash duke it out

nate, the season has begun. that stuff is for preseason. who you gonna blame for #85? you guessed it. weird Al.

at this point i want don breux alone in that box up there and call up richie pettibone.

Posted by: dealer | September 11, 2007 3:27 PM

Send Lloyd home. Guys like that hurt the team just by being around.

While Thrash is a great team guy, he is just not effective as a receiver anymore. So we do need a number 3.

In the offseason, I wrote that resigning Thrash and Jansen to their deals was a case of the Skins spending too much on guys past their prime. Their contracts were too long and expensive.

Hope the Caldwell offer is rational though ... I'm guessing the Skins aren't the only interested party

Posted by: AL | September 11, 2007 3:27 PM

4th - that is funny. I think that Patten was brought in as a #2. Just seemed like he was a #3.

Posted by: BT | September 11, 2007 3:27 PM

Why is everybody so excited about Reche Caldwell? He's not that good. Exhibit A: He's unemployed more than a two weeks after being cut. Exhibit A1: his career numbers. Exhbit B: Two dropped TDs in AFC championship game. Last season was a fluke. He was "best" receiver on a team where if you're remotely open the QB will hit you.

Regarding Springs: You too would be pissed if you prepared all week for a project at work and as you're about to go in and give your presentation the boss comes up and, without any explanation, says we're going to let Fred do it. This is some more of Dan's "big screen" SJK. Even Stevie Wonder can see that.

Posted by: LH | September 11, 2007 3:28 PM

F Skippy!

Posted by: Skinz | September 11, 2007 3:28 PM

He was unemployed for a week because he is a vested veteran and no one wanted to guarantee his contract.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 11, 2007 3:30 PM

Choosy moms choose JIF

Posted by: Dorf | September 11, 2007 3:31 PM

beep beep

Posted by: Anonymous | September 11, 2007 3:32 PM

LH, regarding RC: we're not excited about reche. we're excited about what it means for #85. like i say gimme great granny patten over there instead of #85.

re: springs: agreed. thass all i'm saying. and don't even think that that was not intentional. these guys are supersmart up there.

I want Don Breux and Richie Pettibone!

Posted by: dealer | September 11, 2007 3:32 PM

new post.

Posted by: Skinz | September 11, 2007 3:32 PM

F the Pats. Reche put up just as many yards in both of his last 2 seasons with the Chargers and 4 more TD's than Lloyd has since he's been with the Skins. He's also much younger than Patten was when we brought him on.

Posted by: bigfish | September 11, 2007 3:33 PM

I rather have Marvcus Patton playing WR than Lloyd, Lloyd null and void.

Posted by: k Squared | September 11, 2007 3:35 PM

13-D

Posted by: SCSkinsFan | September 11, 2007 3:35 PM

I got a fix to the B.Lloyd problem that I think everybody will like. Lets put him on the 2nd string O in practice and have him constanly run across the middle against the Reaper and L2, then I would guess by the end of the week he is either on the IR or quits.

Also, on the sportsline power rankings, where do we fall, that site is blocked here?

Posted by: gethanr13 | September 11, 2007 3:37 PM

Hey, what is everyone wearing?

Posted by: Anyone want to cyber? | September 11, 2007 3:37 PM

I'll take General Patton and Dick Van Patton over #85

Posted by: Anonymous | September 11, 2007 3:38 PM

beep beep..........

Posted by: Anonymous | September 11, 2007 3:38 PM

Caldwell is a little above average all around which makes him our #2 in a few weeks time. The one thing he does have is loads of heart which instantly puts him ahead of he-who's-name-should-never-be-metioned-again-in-the-same-sentance-as Redskin. Once he was a huge talent, but hasn't been the same since a bad knee injury a few years ago. Above average upfield speed, good routes, decent hands, and he caught more passes than anyone on our team last year. He is definitely the best FA WR out there available.

I liked Mcardell, but this is the right move. Too bad we can't pick up two and dump the bum we have, but that was the good old days pre-salary cap.

Posted by: AJ | September 11, 2007 3:40 PM

We rank 17

Posted by: AJ | September 11, 2007 3:41 PM

Huge mistake not trading brunell to hou for A. Johnson. I think that kid's going to have a breakout year. He'll easily be a #1 wr in a couple years.

Posted by: Big Mistake | September 11, 2007 3:43 PM

Somebody asked earlier. 6 feet, 210 pounds

Not a big, but bigger than most of ours. We need a big dependable WR to move the sticks, but this guy can do the job.

Posted by: AJ | September 11, 2007 3:51 PM

Houston is bad but they are not on crack. Nobody offered us their ALREADY #1 WR for Brunella. They didn't go out and get Schaub so they could get rid of the only talent their to throw to.

Posted by: AJ | September 11, 2007 3:54 PM

"there to throw to"

Posted by: AJ | September 11, 2007 3:55 PM

Andre Johnson a #1 reciever in a few years? Are we talking about pro bowler Andre Johnson? I think he is already there.

The Texans trading him for Brunell? Who is your source? Larry, Moe, or Curly?

Posted by: BT | September 11, 2007 3:59 PM

Time for a Code Red for the receiver! or the Joker treatment (soap wrapped in a towell and wail on the reciver)

Posted by: IMB Fan | September 11, 2007 4:24 PM

Brandon Lloyd has a vagina!

Posted by: sicwidit | September 11, 2007 4:28 PM

The previous comment is derogatory to all those that have vaginas.

Posted by: bangkokben | September 11, 2007 10:17 PM

WELCOME RECHE !!! You are a BIG improvement over the thief in our WR corps stealing Danny's money.

#85?? #85?? Calling #85 !!... Oh there you are... guess what? Welcome to Special Teams !!!

Posted by: Thaiphoon | September 12, 2007 10:27 AM

pbeoryifv qmkhjct ethqwx efrcxa gwqzbcjrk pnoqhgs fkzgcbhw

Posted by: mukcv hrntacvu | October 26, 2007 8:19 AM

txdzfo ezpyf jvkdy dplka nrapltbwk vrap cgelb http://www.nswuyp.jyrmtviq.com

Posted by: qrfz jlhxap | October 26, 2007 8:20 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2007 The Washington Post Company