Cornering The Corners
Just kind of mulling over the impact of the Carlos Rogers injury, and the more I think about it the deeper a problem it appears to be. Obviously, there is the obvious fact that there is a significant dropoff between Rogers and Macklin/Torrence, who would be forced into a larger role with him out.
The Redskins hoped to have a rotation all season of Carlos, Springs and Smoot, and were watching Springs's snaps closely and bringing along Smoot slowly with his hamstring problem. That's out the window now. Smoot's hamstring is looking like something that could be aggravated at any time, and to expect him to be 100 percent in the second half is stretching it, to excuse the pun. You have to think teams will try to test him deep a bit and see just how much that hammy barks at him.
Springs has been by far the best cover guy in the slot this season, which presents problems now. You're going to probably have to move him outside now, because putting Torrence there for 50 snaps a game would be too much to ask. Springs excels at some of the man coverage techniques they often use underneath within the Cover-2 umbrella, and Pierson Prioleau can play there some, too, but again, as much as some opponents might spread this defense, it could be a difficult match a smaller safety on some of the slot receivers in the league.
So now you're losing talent at a few spots. The spill over is probably inevitable and the depth is really going to be tested now.
The Redskins made a calculated decision that their upgraded secondary would buy more time for the front 4 to get after the QB. Taking Carlos out of the mix entirely and having Smoot on a bad hamstring is hardly ideal under any circumstances much less these. The D Line has had some excellent outings, but obviously not on Sunday. Getting pressure out of three-and-four-man rushes is more imperative now than ever.
Also, talked to some people around the league about the nature of ACL and MCL injuries for corners in particular, with all the cutting and acceleration and quick-twitch movements, it's reasonable to think that while you can return in 9 months, it's often more like 18 months when a player recovers full explosiveness.
It will be very interesting to see if the injury situations with Carlos and Smoot will have any impact on what has seemed to be the imminent post-season departure of Springs. I doubt it, because with offseason rest Fred's hammy will get back to normal, but most teams figure they need at least 3 proven NFL-ready corners, so I could see them being in the market for them again this spring.
Randoms: This, to me, might be the most telling stat of all for the Redskins: Jason Campbell has attempted 3 fewer passes in 7 games this season - with one of the NFL's worst rushing attacks, then he did in his 7 starts last season, when the Redskins had a dominant rushing game in the second half and the QB had no prior experience. Sure, the O Line is suffering a whole lot more this season and pass protection is not as stout, and you want to protect JC, but for him to not even have as many attempts as last season strikes me as startling. I'm sure the "take the handcuffs off JC" contingent would agree ... Driving my wife's Ford Escape to the service shop - again - Tuesday, when next to me is a dude in probably like a 2001 Subaru - like an Outback-type car, like a mini-minivan - sitting on custom, spinning rims. Car was not embellished in any other way. That, too, blew my mind ...
The Red Sox are now the Yankees. Get used to it ... If there is a bigger narcissistic punk in pro sports than A-Fraud, please email me and let me know ... Looks like we've got Sleeping Beauty for Chloe tonight - the costume is already borderline shredded from her trying to wear it every day for, oh, the past 5 weeks - and I'm pretty sure Rocco will be stuffed inside the lobster costume we got for Chloe when she was his age. She never let us put anything on her head, but he's a little more laid back, so getting the antennae on him should require less cajoling ... Most boring clause in the English language: NBA Opening Night ... Lauren and I never get to the movies, like once a year, but anyone who has not read and seen "Into The Wild," I can not recommend it more strongly. If you have the SundanceChannel, look for the "Iconoclasts" episode with Sean Penn and the book's author, Jon Krakauer, as well. Pretty amazingly sad and poignant true story about a NoVa kid, who also happened to be a Skins fan growing up ... Hope everyone has a safe and fun Halloween.
By Jason La Canfora |
October 31, 2007; 12:09 PM ET
Previous: Guest Blog - AEE |
Next: I'll Show You Running Up The Score
Posted by: SAK | October 31, 2007 12:15 PM
NBA opening night is looking pretty exciting if this Skins team is going nowhere.
Posted by: Smith | October 31, 2007 12:16 PM
IM FREE
Posted by: Whats Upppppp hehehe | October 31, 2007 12:16 PM
hayy loooc att me ieye cann posstt wit reest uv youu yeaa
Posted by: jm220s farterr | October 31, 2007 12:22 PM
eny yew duummys waannt twoo wearn hal two sppell eemailme cuse yew gays r weally sttuupidd !!! heahochahehd
Posted by: talwennt evelueater | October 31, 2007 12:25 PM
to me one of most important things to do is
sign springs to a long term deal he is by far our best corner
Posted by: pete | October 31, 2007 12:26 PM
I've been trying to say this and everyone keeps saying...."you got to run to set up the pass" which is obviously what Joe thinks, but come on, we can't run!!!!! its time to open it up, how do you think the 6-1 Packers feel about run first......You can't tell me they're a better team than we are....
Posted by: Jack | October 31, 2007 12:27 PM
"I'm sure the "take the handcuffs off JC" contingent would agree"
If you would have stopped here it would have been a good post. We DO NOT CARE about the Red Sux, your personal life or gay movies on the Sundance Channel.
Posted by: Hack | October 31, 2007 12:29 PM
Packers - 6 and 1
Redskins - 4 and 3. 1 of those losses to the Packers.
The Packers are a better team.
Posted by: Fact | October 31, 2007 12:31 PM
j22o yi uew alwayss piking on mee i do noting 2 uew?
Posted by: Anonymous | October 31, 2007 12:31 PM
Hack, Why do you read the blog if your upset what is written? Now thats a hack!lol
Posted by: Tommy | October 31, 2007 12:32 PM
Hey, the OB is back. so when does this registration nonsense begin??? back in the summer of 06, we didnt need registration..all the newbies have sent this blog awry. im back to help
Posted by: Macaca Johnson | October 31, 2007 12:32 PM
nate is going to cry when he see the blog is noot reggistaatioon
Posted by: jm220 is boofer | October 31, 2007 12:33 PM
there is a bigger narcissistic punk in pro sports than A-Fraud, please email me and let me know ...
Uh we played his team last weekend.... the Triple-S Sleeveless Sweat Shirt.
Posted by: Skinz | October 31, 2007 12:34 PM
jm220 is boofer
Posted by: Anonymous | October 31, 2007 12:35 PM
It's time we implemented an offense like the Pats or Colts. Shotgun all the time, four wide sets.
Play action out of this like the Pats did to us. Our receivers are quick enough to get open underneath and in space. The Skins have to start playing to their strength, or should I say avoid their major offensive weakness- the line.
Short quick passes will keep the opponents from getting any pressure while bringing press coverage. This will enable us to take deep shots.
Posted by: 6 cent | October 31, 2007 12:36 PM
Now thats a hack!lol
Posted by: Tommy | October 31, 2007 12:32 PM
Which is why I signed as "Hack". At least I can admit it. I'm not a writer for one of the the largest newspapers in the US either. The Was. Post should be embarrassed.
And if "talent evaluator" and others are going to criticize bloggers for grammar and spelling then they should expect more out of the person that writes the blog in the first place.
Posted by: Hack | October 31, 2007 12:36 PM
' Most boring clause in the English language: NBA Opening Night ... '
Sorry, I'll go with pitchers and catchers reporting.
F baseball.
Posted by: etrod | October 31, 2007 12:38 PM
And another thing. Gibbs needs to make a decision. Call all the plays himself or let Al do it. A company with two CEO's never works.
Posted by: 6 cent | October 31, 2007 12:38 PM
Hello everyone.
What happend to regisration?
A couple of things...
Nate,
Simply put, you're the man. I read your late post from last night (BTW 10:52 post wasn't me) and when I finished reading I got the impression that you're a good person. Usually I won't come to that conclusion before meeting someone but I think its warranted in this case.
You can bet your last two quarters that I will continue to post, especially after being encouraged.
To anyone I have had a war of words with, I would like to put that in the pre-registration past. I see this as a opportunity to start fresh with each indivdual here. Two words: I'm sorry.
Its a shame that we can't get pass the idiots who choose to highjack names. I'll be honest, sometimes its kind of funny, but then again I only had my identity stolen (lol) once and the fake post wasn't harsh at all. I still don't advocate it though.
Moving On, I don't know how to feel about this Sundays game. I think both teams they feel they have a lot to prove. The skins just came off an embarassing loss and the Jets are 1-7, with a green (No pun) QB. I hope fans aren't looking past the Jets. Don't be fooled by the 1-7 record. They aren't that good, but they are playing their NFC buddies at home, and given the Redskins recent history in Joy-Z, I don't know.
I don't think the injuries are the fault of the training staff. Over the past few season, although while suffering injuries (Portis, Thomas), the Skins have been rather lucky in avoiding the injury bug. Jason La Canfora expressed in the preseason about how the Redskins were very lucky to avoid some serious injuries, that their luck was gone already. He was right. It seems that the injury bug was playing opossum and decided to sting players in the heart of the season.
Does any other coach allow his players to train individually in the offseason? I know Gibbs for the first time in his second stint allowed players to do that, could that be the reason for injuries?
Posted by: SkinsRealist | October 31, 2007 12:45 PM
Jasno-
You definately reacquired some respect witht the "In to The Wild" reference!
Well done Jasno!
Posted by: Into The Wild | October 31, 2007 12:48 PM
Alright! Real dcsween here. I tried to do a test and I got blocked, which I think is good (but is there a profanity filter? is anatomy profane?).
Let's try this again. Testes, testes. One, two. Is this thing on?
Posted by: dcsween | October 31, 2007 1:04 PM
Rogers going down was not good, but he has been adequate, not great. With all the CBs we've had thru here in the past few years, maybe we find a diamond in the rough? Torrence may be better than we expect and not a big drop off. Hope reigns supreme.
Posted by: zcezcest1 | October 31, 2007 1:06 PM
This is M&M
Now I am mul. That is a shtiy call sign.
I thought they said carlos 'might' be back to full speed in 9 months not 18. Pierson Prioleau looks as good as he ever has to me.
I am sure they will not know for a while.
Posted by: mul | October 31, 2007 1:07 PM
The registration wall seems to be up.
Jon DeNunzio
Sports editor, washingtonpost.com
Posted by: denunzioj | October 31, 2007 1:08 PM
This is Skinz. I didn't like the name and Sean Tizzy was one of my many diff handles I use.
SR,
Consider our lil' thing squashed. For my part I'm sorry as well.
Awe new beginning for all isn't this sweet? I'm blushing...
Posted by: SeanTizzy2DaHizzy | October 31, 2007 1:10 PM
From Gregskins,
To the blogger last night who said Carlos Rogers was a wasted first round pick, did you consider the alternative? Antrelle Rolle, who I thought was a better cover-corner/ball hawk during his time at the U can't crack the starting lineup in Arizona and I don't have to say anything about the corner the Titan's picked and why he can't play.... The Pacman was chased out by the speedy red ghost Goodell. Get well Los'
Posted by: gregorygibson | October 31, 2007 1:11 PM
I think CR was very strong so would play run better and not get pushed off as much as Torence.
People who can run with wide outs are not hard to find. But that in combination with the physical abilities is not easy.
We will see.
Posted by: mul | October 31, 2007 1:11 PM
Well well well. Regi is here
Posted by: Megskin | October 31, 2007 1:11 PM
I like little boys
Tom Brady
Posted by: mul | October 31, 2007 1:13 PM
Crap I can do it
Darn registration.
Posted by: mul | October 31, 2007 1:14 PM
Good to have the blog back.
Anyone else remember 6 months ago when we were all praising the Skins for adding depth at corner for when the inevitable injuries kicked in?
The time for the reserves to step up has arrived. Macklin will hopefully surprise us all.
Posted by: mugamack | October 31, 2007 1:15 PM
Was watching some of the game highlights at nfl.com ... all Pats, btw, not even the one Skins score. Looking at their play design. A few things stood out. First, they ran a great bubble screen. The key to that play is great blocking. Which includes an O lineman racing downfield to block a DB. Clearly an ineligible downfield. Also, they ran it off a play fake to the RB, which kept the linemen inside where they could not make a play. Another play was Moss's push off in the end zone. I know the Pats were better, but the refs did give them a lot more than i realized.
Lastly, the early running play to Maroney where he goes off the left side for about 15 was absolutely perfect in terms of play design and execution. Every Skin player was blocked, every Pat player knew exactly where to be and what to do. Both their WRs blocked well. It was a coaching clinic to watch it.
Posted by: zcezcest1 | October 31, 2007 1:15 PM
No more Nate clones and a-clowns! I'm picturing this outside the wall...
http://www.balinbraewesties.com/p7hg_img_2/fullsize/bardan_puppies2_fs.jpg
Posted by: SMACK1 | October 31, 2007 1:17 PM
"NBA Opening Night" is not a clause.
Posted by: Lindemann777 | October 31, 2007 1:17 PM
nice piece Jason - IMO losing Rogers will hurt a lot more than some people want to admit. playing corner in this league leaves one open to a lot of criticism but if Carlos' total body of work is reviewed (especially this season) he is well above average.
of course the situation w/Carlos and Smootie (and the OL) always leads back to one very important fact: THIS TEAM NEEDS A GM! does anyone else remember the season the Pats won the Super Bowl w/Troy Brown playing corner? all of their corners were injured but they still found a way to win. why? b/c they have a GM! and a great scouting dept. two things that the Skins lack.
maybe one day The Danny will figure it all out, but I'm not holding my breath.
Posted by: gibbshogs | October 31, 2007 1:24 PM
This is SkinsRealist. I now must suffer the embarrassment of having this name because "Da Post" won't allow me to change my email address. Is anyone else having the same issue. I cleared cookies, temp internet files, refreshed/closed the browser, still nothing... Oh well.
Skinz, I put our little spat behind us along time ago. Their was a shade of scarcasm in my shoutouts, but really I was saying whats up.
Registration... IT'S ALIVE!!!
Buh-bye to all the idiot highjackers. I guess we'll see how this plays out.
Posted by: vadude336 | October 31, 2007 1:24 PM
Yes dcsween. There is a profanity filter. Would not want anything to offend your over-sensitive virgin ears (or, eyes, I guess).
Posted by: mhaslup | October 31, 2007 1:25 PM
gibbshogs,
If New England's scouting had been that great that year they would not have had to play Troy Brown at corner. You disproved your own point.
Totally with you on finding a way to win though, Smoot, Macklin, and Prioleau (at safety) have all been starters in this league. Gregg will adjust the scheme if necessary, but they will be fine.
O-line will be better each week that they play together without losing someone to injury. By the time, we hit Dallas in Week 11, they should be a completely cohesive unit. Here's hoping no more injuries.
Posted by: mhaslup | October 31, 2007 1:29 PM
Smack,
Those Westies are too cute. They could not have been the trolls.
Mark (in 21132)
Posted by: Markin21132 | October 31, 2007 1:34 PM
Okay. This is registration. They're taking it off your e-mail address. I'm out of here.
Posted by: i4abuy | October 31, 2007 1:34 PM
Skinsrealist,
Looks like you can create a new user on the WashPo site, sign in under that and then post your comments.
That's what I just did.
A Fan
Posted by: notsaying | October 31, 2007 1:35 PM
SR,
You have to click on edit preferences i think. You aren't bound by your email address.
Posted by: SeanTizzy2DaHizzy | October 31, 2007 1:35 PM
M&M, I assume you tried logging out and re-registering under the name you wanted. [I needed to do so b/c I had initially registered under a different email account.] I'm thinking SMACK1 is the old SMACK (and another SMACK is doing cyber-squats on the name).
*** Fantasy post ***
SMACK, note that the jealous rage focused on the Patriots is also now focused on the Smack Daddies. May everyone cyber-squat and poop in your general direction for the rest of the fantasy season.
*** end fantasy post ***
Posted by: dcsween | October 31, 2007 1:36 PM
Please explain to me how everyone threw Rogers under the bus (including you JLC) and know you talk about it being a big lost.
Posted by: jm220 | October 31, 2007 1:40 PM
Golly, this is nice.
A hearty THANK YOU to Jasons' editor Cindy Boren and sports editor Jon Denunzio for making it happen.
Posted by: NateinthePDX | October 31, 2007 1:43 PM
sween, I am smuggling a lucky horseshoe in every fantasy league I'm in, with the excruciating exceptions of the two that actually pay money. So, no mercy here.
"SMACK" isn't very original. I wasn't surprised it was gone.
Posted by: SMACK1 | October 31, 2007 1:43 PM
jm220, as a former-bus-thrower, believer-come-lately, here's my thought about Rogers:
"Anyone else here NOT lamenting the loss of Carlos Rogers? I feel bad for the man on a personal level but I really see him as a #3 or #4 CB."
Posted by: Glass Half Full? | October 29, 2007 05:01 PM
I used to feel that way, but keeping up with results on the field so far this season, I think Rogers has picked up his game. I think he's fairly key in run support and good in man coverage. Admittedly, he's been burned on some big plays (other teams' highlight reels ... like the open field miss on Buress), but that's b/c he's been playing in the position of the #1 CB.
Posted by: dcsween | October 29, 2007 05:11 PM
Posted by: dcsween | October 31, 2007 1:43 PM
Jason:
There are way too many of you Red Sox fans around that don't live in Boston.
As for the Redskins, I hope to see them win, but they part of me that has endured 15 years of "not grabbing the bull by the horns", is expecting a loss and subsequent tumble. There is just way too many injuries, and they simply have no offensive production anymore with the O-line in tatters.
Maybe they'll win this game, but for me the season comes down to this: if they can stay in the race until Thomas gets back, and take on no other major injuries, there's a chance. Otherwise, they are toast.
Posted by: shaunsherman12 | October 31, 2007 1:44 PM
I hope JM got his name. If not just lose a pound or two and get a new one.
Posted by: SeanTizzy2DaHizzy | October 31, 2007 1:44 PM
Whoops, I see it's "DeNunzio." Shame on me for not editin' myself.
Posted by: NateinthePDX | October 31, 2007 1:44 PM
THAT part of me, not THEY. God, first post, and I look like I've got the education of 1st grader. Sheesh.
Posted by: shaunsherman12 | October 31, 2007 1:46 PM
Sweet! I'm in with my old screen name. I also have an original WaPo account, which prob will have to be retired now.
I also think the Redskins could be totally screwed with these injuries. I think they've lost too much on both sides of the ball, unless the backups miraculously end up being better than we all think they can be. I trust the front office to be able to identify quality starters most of the time, but not to get quality depth.
Posted by: jcabana | October 31, 2007 1:47 PM
OK, this is the poster formally known as SkinsRealist, formally known as vadude336.
Thank you Hizzy and notsaying.
Posted by: RedDMV | October 31, 2007 1:48 PM
Actually, posting uses your post UserID which is NOT changeable, unless you delete it and create a new logon. Joy
John D in Houston
Posted by: johndunsmore | October 31, 2007 1:48 PM
Finally registration is here but one big problem. I can't figure out how to change my name. The WaPo UserID goes by your e-mail address.
bigfish
Posted by: browntrevor | October 31, 2007 1:50 PM
I hope JM got his name. If not just lose a pound or two and get a new one.
Posted by: SeanTizzy2DaHizzy | October 31, 2007 01:44 PM
LMGO! Yes I was able to keep my name thanks to my man Nate.
Posted by: jm220 | October 31, 2007 1:51 PM
You can just put any email in there and get in
Posted by: SAK | October 31, 2007 1:51 PM
Nobody said this would be easy!
Hopefully everybody can land on a good 'display name' in one or two tries. I registered three times (using three different email addresses) so I could try on a few different display names.
It will take some getting used to, catching up with the new names for regulars whose usual handle wasn't available.
RedDMV, you da man.
Posted by: NateinthePDX | October 31, 2007 1:52 PM
bigfish,
I had the same issue. You must create another account. Changing the user name did not work when I tried.
Posted by: RedDMV | October 31, 2007 1:52 PM
there you go...
Posted by: johndinhouston | October 31, 2007 1:54 PM
Registration is lame isn't it!
Posted by: Campbell | October 31, 2007 1:54 PM
Thanks everyone.
Testing...
Posted by: browntrevor | October 31, 2007 1:54 PM
I just went to an article and hit "comment" when I did it asked me for a handle and my email addy.
Skinz
Posted by: SeanTizzy2DaHizzy | October 31, 2007 1:55 PM
Commenting on articles is a little different than discussion boards
Posted by: johndinhouston | October 31, 2007 1:56 PM
Woohoo. I got my identity back!
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 1:57 PM
I don't think its lame, but it will take a day or two to get familiar all over again.
That IMO, sucks.
Posted by: RedDMV | October 31, 2007 1:58 PM
I'm sure most of us already know this but there are major flaws in this registartion system which I will not point out. I still don't feel safe but it's better than nothing.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 1:59 PM
mhaslup - I see your point, too elaborate a little: I guess they thought Troy Brown was better than the 3rd best CB they had (after the injuries)?
all I know is they won the Super Bowl w/almost their entire starting secondary injured. and our team can never seem to overcome far fewer injuries.
it's just frustrating to watch the organization continue to tread water. this is Season 4 of Coach Joe's return and as last Sunday showed they are really not much better than when he first came back.
It's my feeling that the organization is rotten from the top down and nothing will change on the field until things are changed off the field. This means getting a GM, straightening out the coaching issues (too many Chefs in the kitchen) and The Danny not meddling anymore.
Posted by: gibbshogs | October 31, 2007 1:59 PM
Look, I'm not SkinsRealist but I can pretend to be.
Looks like registration doesn't stop anyone from posing, it justs makes you work harder.
RedDMV, If you want the profile I just created, lets figure that out.
Posted by: SkinsRealist | October 31, 2007 2:00 PM
Skinz has it right... that's the only way I can figure it out.
You get ONE chance to edit the display name per account, and in order to change it to something other than the first part of your email address, it seems like you have to do the following:
1. create a new account
2. go to an article on the site, like any news article on the home page
3. under the "Toolbox" area is the "Comment" area. where it says "POST A COMMENT You must be logged in to leave a comment," click on the "Log in" link
4. in the "My Post ID" field, enter the display name you want to use. cross your fingers that your usual blog nickname is available
5. submit that display name
6. come back here and start blogging your guts out
Posted by: NateinthePDX | October 31, 2007 2:02 PM
Hey Team, I'm still here with you swinging souls. This is a super smart idea up here.
Posted by: joe_gibbs | October 31, 2007 2:02 PM
Like I said, there will still be trolls.
Posted by: NateinthePDX | October 31, 2007 2:03 PM
Yeah I kind of gave one of the loopholes away. Sorry, was trying to help. Seriously, if someone is thinking about doing that a million times they really need to get out of the hole and get a life. Thats just a crazed lunatic starving for attention.
Posted by: RedDMV | October 31, 2007 2:03 PM
Gotta try the new wall, see what they put me in as
Posted by: Tyler84101 | October 31, 2007 2:04 PM
skinsrealist you apologize then you insult in the next sentence? posts like u did is why people attack u and the others who say i didnt do anything like 5 year olds.
Posted by: helloween | October 31, 2007 2:05 PM
Well, I'm utterly confused? There are two SkinsRealist's now? Joy again.
In my perch down south, I see the J*E*T*S game as pivotal for the season. Either they take a lesson from last Sunday and come out mad and ready to beat a team that they should easily beat, or they continue their timid approach, play not to lose and watch the season swirl down the drain.
Teams catch fire, based on even 1 half of play, (see New York Football Giants, last 5 games) and this team COULD do that.
Honestly, though, I don't see it happening. The coaches seem to be getting in the way, and don't want to take risks. Looking at 7-9, 8-8 or worse.
Sorry to be a pessimist.
Posted by: johndinhouston | October 31, 2007 2:06 PM
That 2PM post was a blast from the past.
Posted by: RedDMV | October 31, 2007 2:06 PM
When I initially tried to create a new account, someone had already had "bigfish@" something else. I'm going to be watching to make sure there's only one of us.
For the record this is the real fish.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 2:06 PM
nate u whine just like skinsrealist and then u also insult like the same 5 year olds that say i didnt do anything both of you need to grow up
Posted by: helloween | October 31, 2007 2:07 PM
Wow this sucks Cindy..Now my username is my real lastname..How do I change this
Posted by: Tyler84101 | October 31, 2007 2:08 PM
Welcome to the blog helloween! Do you have anything nice to say?
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 2:09 PM
My 2:03 post was NOT in regards to the 2PM post. I didn't notice until I posted at 2:03. Ask before, ASSuming.
Posted by: RedDMV | October 31, 2007 2:09 PM
Hooray! I had to create an email address that went along with what I'd been posting under, and since most email clients won't allow a 3 letter email address, I had to add "the" in front of my handle.
It's certainly nice to have this in place though. Hopefully we can finally say goodbye to the insane amount of nonsense and name stealing that was going on.
Posted by: -swb | October 31, 2007 2:12 PM
RedDMV,
This is A Fan.
I managed to create an account that show as SkinsRealist. I really just wanted to see if registration would stop what it was supposed to. Doesn't look like it.
I don't want to use the SR id as a poser. If you want it, say so and we will figure out a way to give you the info to use it.
Otherwise I will kill it forever.
Posted by: SkinsRealist | October 31, 2007 2:12 PM
You will be able to tell by my extremely poor grammar that this is the former SkinsRealist. To the guy posing as SkinsRealist, trust me my friend, you are about to shoulder a heavy burden with that name.
Posted by: RedDMV | October 31, 2007 2:13 PM
With a team as demoralized as the Jets -- who are 53 guys who do this for a living to pay the mortgage -- it is real important to strike hard and fast to keep them demoralized. Demoralize their guts out. [And maybe that way, they won't notice that we are putting Springs, bad wheel Smoot, and Macklin/Torrence up against Coles and Cotchery.] Also, Thomas Jones used to be good in Chicago (and I remember OT D'Brickashaw Ferguson and center Nick Mangold being first round O-linemen pick), so does anyone know what's going on with their rushing game?
Posted by: dcsween | October 31, 2007 2:14 PM
Interesting stuff about Gibbs.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/dr_z/10/30/running.up/index.html
Posted by: SeanTizzy2DaHizzy | October 31, 2007 2:14 PM
sween, I'm sure Pete Kendall can give us some sort of an idea as to how their line works. Thomas Jones isn't doing to good up there in Jersey this year but he is bound to break out in one of these games. Hopefully not ours.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 2:17 PM
It seems the Skins are right back to where they were last season in terms of the secondary. Ugh.
My boys are going as Spiderman (3) and a skeleton (1).
I'm excited for the season to start for the Wiz - I'm nervous though. Some are projecting them to win the East - seems a bit optimistic. I don't think they are going to fare much better than last year, and there have been some significant personnel upgrades in the conference.
We got a little rattled out here in NorCal last night - it was a bit freaky - timely for Halloween!
Posted by: brailey_patty | October 31, 2007 2:18 PM
It looks like I'm going to have to go to Southern Cal for 2-3 months for work at the end of November. Anyone up here in that area or plan on being there?
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 2:18 PM
SR,
Reveal your true self to me and the others.
Based on yesterday, I'm guessing this is Mike H. It could also be "A Disgusted Fan", we both at times can be very critical of the team.
Posted by: RedDMV | October 31, 2007 2:19 PM
I'm wondering why they can't go back to an offensive game like they had against the Lions. The playcalling was diverse, the ball was spread all over the field, and they were even going neat stuff such as direct snapping the ball to Portis. It seems like since then, they've gone into a shell of their former selves and haven't even attempted plays such as those.
Please come back!
Posted by: -swb | October 31, 2007 2:22 PM
I know everyone is at a low ebb after last week's loss and all the injuries we're dealing with. Indeed, the Skins have many problems they need to correct. The most troubling thing I see though is the listless manner in which they've played the past couple of weeks on offense. I expected more spirit out of the D as well. Perhaps getting spanked will wake them up and spark a fire. I'm not going to go on too much about how bad I thought the play calling on both sides of the ball was last week, but if something isn't working you damn well better change it. I'm yearning to see something different, so maybe this will be the week. Just get out there and start hitting to start with--they were way too passive Sunday.
I hope they take a set of walkie talkies to all their future games, or if there's a problem with communications just let JC call his own plays. It's too much stress on a young QB to not get the play until there's just a few seconds left on the clock, and that seems to happen anyway when the stupid radios are working fine. Maybe if he pretended the helmet radio was broken and put something together himself it could rally the troops. The wear and tear of keeping our D on the field too much is already showing. I think Jason has the tools to be a leader, and win or lose he needs to do something to get everyone's attention. He probably knows better than Al what plays might get his guys fired up. As Jasno reported way back, JC has been a winner at every level all the way through Auburn. I believe in the kid, and I feel like this team can play a whole hell of a lot better than they've been showing. Think positive.
Posted by: daveskin | October 31, 2007 2:22 PM
There's something I just can't understand, and hopefully someone here can help me. Why on earth is James Thrash ever in the game at wideout? Sure, he's a stalwart on special teams, but on offense, he's essentially useless. Who's making this decision?
Posted by: lwert99 | October 31, 2007 2:27 PM
I have been thinking that we lack leadership on offense. Whenever I see people like Tom Brady getting pizzed over a false start or Brett Favre getting excited over completing a pass or listen to people "Mike'd up" on ESPN I always think to myself, Who would they "mike up" on our offense? Who is the verbal leader on our offense because I don't see anyone making any noise.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 2:29 PM
RedDMV
Please refer to my post of 2:12
I also posted as notsaying at 1:35
The ID is yours for the asking, say the word. This is not a shake down. We just have to figure out how to get you the info. Maybe an email to Cindy that she can pass on to you?
Posted by: SkinsRealist | October 31, 2007 2:29 PM
BigFish, where in Southern Cal? If LA, I can give you a great rec for a skins bar.
Posted by: AlexBerger | October 31, 2007 2:32 PM
Has anyone looked at the 2008 HOF nominees? There are a lot of former Redskins on the list.
Can Art finally get his this year? The selection committee is a joke.
Posted by: RedDMV | October 31, 2007 2:33 PM
I must add my .02, on the new registration, for a few lines before returning to the appropriate topic at hand.
I have to agree with Nate that the dribble which overtook the Blog, shortly after the current season started, is what caused me to take an extended hiatus. Not, that my presence prior to vacating was that large, but none the less it didn't help that the atmosphere on this blog went from interesting, thought provoking, mainly fact based posts to resembling something more like I would expect to find on a Jr. High school student's MySpace/Facebook page.
And that isn't even addressing the insane attacks from Cowgirl and Pats fans the past few weeks.
Maybe registration will help to lessen the impulse for someone to simply enter a coy phrase or a page full of "Sign Chris Cooley" and return the Blog to the "true" fans who are here for a quality discussion about the team that we all love.
And, finally, for those of you calling out Nate for being a dork for meeting up with so many RI contributors, what's your problem with expanding a fan's circle of friends?
Personally speaking before I met Nate, I felt alone, on Sundays watching the Skins, in a city 3,000 miles away from Redskin Nation. Not having the ability to chat with someone who felt as impassioned about the Skins really brought me down and I actually didn't watch a lot of games for my first two years living in Portland after moving here from DC in '05.
(In fact, in my town: PDX, the local blogger at The Oregonian is launching a mini-crusade to ban all Native American sports team names from our largest paper due to the PC-ness of it all. So I really didn't feel that comfortable outing myself as a 'Skins fan at the local pub; yest I get an earful about how inappropriate it was that I cheered for a team that I became a fan of long before I learned how to read or realized that its name was offensive.)
So with all of that being said I am happy to have the restraints on RI and look forward to commenting more on here again, when the boss isn't looking of course.
Certainly the best treat that any RI regular could ask for on this Halloween.
Welcome back Kotter(s), Welcome Back!
Hail!
Posted by: cochran5 | October 31, 2007 2:35 PM
d
Posted by: DaTruef | October 31, 2007 2:35 PM
Am I still me?
Posted by: 4-12 | October 31, 2007 2:35 PM
Alex, I'll be in El Segundo.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 2:37 PM
Yay, this is fun!
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 2:37 PM
Yes!
HTTR! HTTB!
Posted by: 4-12 | October 31, 2007 2:38 PM
Where in So Cal?
It looks like I'm going to have to go to Southern Cal for 2-3 months for work at the end of November. Anyone up here in that area or plan on being there?
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 02:18 PM
Posted by: Tyler84101 | October 31, 2007 2:39 PM
Nah, RedDMV is the name from now on. You can keep the name, its too painful to reflect upon.
Your name is "A Fan"?
For a minute there you made me think I achieved star power.
*Ego returning to normal now*
Posted by: RedDMV | October 31, 2007 2:39 PM
And after that diatribe it looks like I still have a few kinks to work out as while I registered my RI name: StumptownChris on WP; It appears that my old registration name "Cochran5" still appears in the comments section. Even though I am logged in, currently, under StumptownChris.
Any ideas?
Posted by: cochran5 | October 31, 2007 2:41 PM
Guess my old name?
Posted by: RightWay | October 31, 2007 2:43 PM
Stumptown, Hit the "sign out" right above the comments section and then sign back in. I had the same problem at first.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 2:43 PM
I'm sure there will be some cyber-squatting - intentional or not - for a while until things settle down.
As someone else said, this doesn't make the trolls go away, but it does make them work hard enough that most give up and go to wherever underemployed trolls go.
We now return you to your normal jibba-jabba, interspersed with Redskin-related profundities.
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 2:44 PM
Are you WrongDog RightWay?
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 2:45 PM
Bigfish: Thanks for the suggestions. I have tried that before, and once again, and it still appears that I come up as Cochran5. Even though I registered a completely new e-mail address: Stumptownchris@gmail.com, for this specific reason...
Interesting....
Posted by: cochran5 | October 31, 2007 2:46 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3087519
Would there be any interest in Mike Williams?
Posted by: SmallPen15 | October 31, 2007 2:47 PM
Posted by: mugamack | October 31, 2007 2:48 PM
Try signing out above comments and signing out of WaPO. If that doesn't work then delete your cookies. Mmmmm cookies!
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 2:49 PM
BigFish, try Joxer Daly's... not too far from where you'll be (maybe 20 minutes). Awesome redskins bar.
http://losangeles.citysearch.com/profile/35670739/culver_city_ca/joxer_daly_s.html
Posted by: AlexBerger | October 31, 2007 2:51 PM
Mike Willimas is an undersized tight end.
IMO
Posted by: RedDMV | October 31, 2007 2:53 PM
Great post JLC, have fun with the kids tonight these times don't last long! Pretty soon they will be nagging you for the car keys and a twenty spot.....
Posted by: Bob2770 | October 31, 2007 2:53 PM
I don't feel like changing my email and all that.
So, I am now the blogger formerly known as 4th.....
did anyone ever post what happened to Jason Reid?
Posted by: RightWay | October 31, 2007 2:53 PM
the red sox will never be the yankees, no matter how much you wish it true.
win 2 championships in liek 80 years doesn't make you the yankees, it makes you the blue jays or the white sox, but not the yankees.
Posted by: gethanr13 | October 31, 2007 2:54 PM
RightWay is probably 4th, based on emailing with him in the past.
Posted by: 4-12 | October 31, 2007 2:55 PM
how do i add the 13 to the end of my name? it automatically set it to gethanr without me getting to pick
Posted by: gethanr13 | October 31, 2007 2:56 PM
Hi, 4th floor.
Posted by: Ocho-Ocho | October 31, 2007 2:56 PM
Thanks for the tip Alex. I should be home on the weekends in order to be able to catch the games unless we have a Thursday, Sunday or Monday nighter. Not sure if we have any scheduled.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 2:56 PM
did anyone ever post what happened to Jason Reid?
Cindy left some comments in the previous thread. In short, he went back to Cali for a little bit.
Posted by: Megskin | October 31, 2007 2:57 PM
Hello! Well, THAT wasn't at all annoying. Somebody has my name, so I am now TheCindy. Sheesh.
Posted by: TheCindy | October 31, 2007 2:57 PM
D'oh! Not quick enough.
How are you 4th?
Stumptown Chris- Follow Nate's advice from his 2:02pm post...It worked for me.
Posted by: 4-12 | October 31, 2007 2:57 PM
P Diddy is now "heath0005". Unfortunate name? Yes. Sadly, I've been using that login since, well, 1993. So, there it is.
Do we have a list of who became what after the Great Registration Event of 2007?
Posted by: PDiddy | October 31, 2007 2:58 PM
I knew you'd prob get it 4-12.
Anyway, back to business. How can the Redsox be the New Yankees after getting only winning 2 championships in 4 years and none in 90 years prior?
Posted by: RightWay | October 31, 2007 2:59 PM
TheCindy as in CynCity??
Posted by: Markin21132 | October 31, 2007 3:01 PM
So Cindy is "TheCindy". Don't we (didn't we) have a "TheDon" up here before?
P Diddy is now 007.
Posted by: 4-12 | October 31, 2007 3:01 PM
I think Jason was quoting Mike Greenberg from this morning. He said the exact same thing.
Posted by: RedDMV | October 31, 2007 3:01 PM
Major props to Nate. The majorest of major props.
Posted by: TheCindy | October 31, 2007 3:01 PM
WashPo has been online since '93?
Re: Reid - Any explaination on why he went back to Cali? Couldn't stand the East Coast? Redskins didn't like him?
Posted by: RightWay | October 31, 2007 3:01 PM
I think Jasno may have been referring to the comment form one of the Sox brass yesterday. Someone asked him if they were the new Yankees and he said "we ain't trying to be no Yankees".
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 3:01 PM
P Diddy is now "heath0005".
You have got to be kidding. Go and change it to PDiddy or something by following Nate's instructions. heath0-whatever is totally unacceptable.
Posted by: Megskin | October 31, 2007 3:02 PM
Everyone should list pre-registration name and current name. It would be funny to see how much the names have changed.
I also like to guess why that name was chosen.
Posted by: RedDMV | October 31, 2007 3:03 PM
Any explaination on why he went back to Cali?
Hey there! Jason Reid has NOT quit. Or been fired. Or disapparated. His wife and baby son have been in LA, because of the soft housing market. He went out there when the fires started and will return to our area, with his family, this week. He'll be back at Redskins Park Friday.
Posted by: Cindy | October 31, 2007 12:04 PM
So there ya go.
Posted by: Megskin | October 31, 2007 3:04 PM
I pondered being CynCyty, but opted not to....Still, I will answer to that. Happily and proudly.
Posted by: TheCindy | October 31, 2007 3:05 PM
Hi, Gang.
Just stopped in to see what was up with the new "secure" registration. LOL! The registration system should be referred to as "swiss cheese". Maybe we can trade it for a ham sandwich one of these days. (I still can't figure out why "Old Media" didn't want to just block IP numbers of offensive posters. Occam's Razor, and all that.)
Note to whoever asked: Cindy confirmed earlier that Jason Reid will be back on Friday. His family was in the fire zone in So. Cal.
Fewer tricks, better treats - a better Blog Halloween to all!
Posted by: Ocho-Ocho | October 31, 2007 3:06 PM
Formerly Redcoat.
Now.
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 3:07 PM
Haha, if Coles is out, then that almost negates the fact that Rodgers is out for the Skins. Nice
Posted by: -swb | October 31, 2007 3:07 PM
Wooo Hoo!
Finally, got my groove (aka my "handle") back.
Bigfish, thanks for the cookies suggestion as that was the trick.
Now it feels great to be back!
Posted by: StumptownChris | October 31, 2007 3:08 PM
Hey, Nate's instructions worked. I'm back. P Diddy is now "PDiddy". Nate, you're a genius.
Posted by: PDiddy | October 31, 2007 3:09 PM
Bet you can't guess my old name:-)
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 3:09 PM
No problem Stumptown. Mmmm Cookies (in my best Homer Simpson voice)
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 3:11 PM
Pardon my stupidididity, but why is Portland known as "Stumptown"? Is the indigenous population particularly length-challenged in some way or other?
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 3:11 PM
Formerly: Mark (in 21132). Before that: Mark, until another person started posting as Mark.
Posted by: Markin21132 | October 31, 2007 3:11 PM
Same as I ever was...
Posted by: 4-12 | October 31, 2007 3:12 PM
Bonjour Marc!!! I see you were casting nasturtiums on my sanity (or lack of) in a previous thread. I resemble that remark!
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 3:12 PM
How do you get your old name to be your signature rather than part of your email address?Help!!
Posted by: RockyTopSkin | October 31, 2007 3:13 PM
Ok, ok... updating my primer on "how to get a better blog nickname" based on the conversation up here:
a. if you're already logged in to WashPo, sign out
b. delete all WashPo cookies on yer computer
1. create a new account
2. go to an article on the site, like any news article on the home page
3. under the "Toolbox" area is the "Comment" area. where it says "POST A COMMENT You must be logged in to leave a comment," click on the "Log in" link
4. in the "My Post ID" field, enter the display name you want to use. cross your fingers that your usual blog nickname is available
5. submit that display name
6. come back here and start blogging your guts out
Hail to the blog!
Posted by: NateinthePDX | October 31, 2007 3:15 PM
I've had a WashPo Online account since they first went online and required registration. No idea when that was, but I was able to use Nate's instructions to associate a new handle with my existing email. Worked out great.
And I love Heath. Sure, bad football player, as yet undetermined about his effectiveness as a Congressman, but an all around good guy. Like I said, there are very few players who I actually hate.
Nate, thanks again. I feel "whole" again.
Posted by: PDiddy | October 31, 2007 3:15 PM
Repost Nates directions please
Posted by: Tyler84101 | October 31, 2007 3:16 PM
huh?
Posted by: skippy | October 31, 2007 3:16 PM
Soldat Anglais,
If you truely were posting as Skippy, you will have to pretend to be Skippy once in awhile. I enjoyed Skippy's posts.
Posted by: Markin21132 | October 31, 2007 3:16 PM
And thanks to Cindy for enabling registration!
SIGN CHRIS COOLEY!
Just kidding :-)
Posted by: PDiddy | October 31, 2007 3:17 PM
Yeah...Nate's the best. That will probably need to be reposted several times over the next week so people like myself who don't get to spend too much time on the blog can just follow directions.
Also, in response to DCSween's Carlos Rogers post a few hours back...I still don't buy this CR was so valuable schtick. Maybe I'll be proven wrong but I think they played a loose zone specifically to protect him. If he even had average to above-average coverage and tackling skills I think you'd see a lot more aggressive defense out of the Skins.
I guess the results on the field will prove some of us wrong. BTW, I also really liked what I saw out of Macklin and Eubanks earlier in the year/pre-season. Now you all know why I have this handle.
Posted by: Glass_Half_Full | October 31, 2007 3:17 PM
The founding fathers were in such a hurry to build this boomtown that, after cutting down many many trees hereabouts to get lumber, they left the stumps where they stood. In the streets or wherever. The derogatory nickname "Stumptown" came into use to indicate what in-a-hurry hicks the town's residents were. Now it's worn like a badge of honor.
[The judges would also have accepted "Rose City," "Bridgetown" and "Rip City."]
Posted by: NateinthePDX | October 31, 2007 3:18 PM
* Using best foreshadowing voice *
I don't know just how I know, but I feel sure we'll hear from our friend Skippy again sometime. :-)
In an 0-8 season that may be heading towards 0-16, what's a guy to do to maintain his tenuous grip on sanity?
Posted by: skippy | October 31, 2007 3:19 PM
I think this is a good assesment of the defensive situation. While there is more quality depth, The Redskins are a couple of injuries away from being in the same boat as last year. The D-line has been much improved over last year but the corners have held coverage longer and given the linemen more time to get to the QB.
Posted by: kcjdlj1 | October 31, 2007 3:20 PM
Cookies are good only if they're Oreos on a Domino's pizza.
Posted by: TheCindy | October 31, 2007 3:22 PM
Cindy, After last week I vote to retire the Oreo pizza and the Key Lime yogurt. Similar to the way that I have now retired my "lucky" jersey.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 3:24 PM
testing 1-2
Posted by: gregorygibson | October 31, 2007 3:24 PM
Thanks Nate. All of life's ineffable (always wanted to use that word) questions get answered "up here" at RI!
"Rip City" sounds kinda painful, and I believe that Petra may have beaten Portland to "Rose City" by about 5,000 years or so. I'll let you guys and the capital of Barbados battle it out for Bridgetown. My money's on the Barbadians!
Posted by: skippy | October 31, 2007 3:24 PM
I'm confused. Did skippy get the metal plate removed or is that Redcoat?
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 3:28 PM
I guess I'm "outed" now...
Posted by: skippy | October 31, 2007 3:28 PM
It is I!!!
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 3:29 PM
formerly "hmmmmm"
*sigh*
Posted by: vtplp2g | October 31, 2007 3:30 PM
I think the metal plate is still there, but it is loose and stuff is leaking out.
Posted by: Markin21132 | October 31, 2007 3:30 PM
I signed out/back in at the top and at the top it said I was 'me', but when I posted it said I was 'him'.
Goshdarn cookies!!
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 3:30 PM
formerly "hmmmmm"
*sigh*
Posted by: vtplp2g | October 31, 2007 03:30 PM
Wow, what's your real name!?!
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 3:31 PM
"formally known as, formally known as" LMGO!
RedDMV is the same illiterate fool SkinsRealist was.
I believe (read: know) the word you were looking for is formerly.
Posted by: mhaslup | October 31, 2007 3:32 PM
There is one big advantage to this registration lark, Loseable Type seems to post comments MUCH faster now.
When Cload turns up he can tell me why, unless any of you esteemed peeps know.
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 3:33 PM
test
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 3:34 PM
Ineffable?! Nothing up here is ineffable!
F Nate in the PDX
Posted by: NateinthePDX | October 31, 2007 3:35 PM
Redcoat - As I had feared loseabe type is still an issue. Still can't post two comments in the same minute. That's what the test thing was all about.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 3:36 PM
Nate, you stole my pun!! I was going (metaphorically) 'eff' ChRIs lARrY!!
D@mn, you! D@mn you all to h3ll!!
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 3:37 PM
alright, i'm back. I think it would have been to difficult for people to guess who I was if my name was still just gethanr, clearly too confusing
Posted by: gethanr13 | October 31, 2007 3:37 PM
Well, it could be formerly and formally - all things being driven by registration today.
Posted by: johndinhouston | October 31, 2007 3:38 PM
It's weird you say that 'fish, as my posts seem to appear about 50% faster than they used to. Maybe that's just good luck. I also haven't tried to post more than once in a minute anyway though.
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 3:39 PM
I like this new process with registration. I had gotten to the point with the blog that I would check a poster's name before I read the post. If I recognized the name, I would read the post. This got me past most of the drivel until the fake posters showed up.
I know we will still have trolls, but I hope we are safe from the fakes.
Posted by: Markin21132 | October 31, 2007 3:39 PM
Maybe this will lure other RI 'Blegends' out of their exile/retirement/work-related stuff to come back and post.
When was the last sighting of HaikuMan?
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 3:41 PM
same old bunch of geek crybabies on here...
Shapiro's article is right on the money today.
Posted by: chelseatest | October 31, 2007 3:43 PM
Same for me Mark (from the Future). Now you will know to always skip right by my posts!!
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 3:45 PM
Ok, I'm just testing....this is Lisa. The darn site would not let me be just Lisa...not even Lisa1 or LisaR.
Posted by: Lisa_R | October 31, 2007 3:47 PM
Hey Mark (dans deux une une trois deux), did you get your belltower/Francis Cupola/chimney/whatever fixed up okay?
And are you still mowing that lawn three days a week or whatever it was?
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 3:47 PM
i'm just wondering how many a$$clowns got to sign up under a regular's name, my bet is that wasn't the case for Lisa as I can see that being fairly common
Posted by: gethanr13 | October 31, 2007 3:51 PM
I think the application has an embedded rule that says that IDs must be 6 characters or more.
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 3:52 PM
johndinhouston,
Taken in context, it could not have been "formally." I understand the urge to try to cover for people who lack mastery of the English language, but enabling them is the worst thing you could do for them. It is best to correct them so they can stop embarrassing themselves.
Posted by: mhaslup | October 31, 2007 3:53 PM
then what about 4-12?
Posted by: gethanr13 | October 31, 2007 3:54 PM
Testing...testing...is this thing on?
say goodbye to ChRiS LaRRy....
Posted by: chrislarry | October 31, 2007 3:55 PM
Okay gethnr13, you got me there!! I forgot that one, but saw that 'swb' couldn't get on earlier until he/she added enough characters to get to 6.
I'll put my pointy hat on and stand in the corner facing the wall now.
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 3:56 PM
Soldat Anglais,
The cupola on the barn is fixed and painted. A good chore done. The lawn grass is down to once per week, but that should end soon. We have had about 4 heavy frosts in the past week with lows in the upper 20s by morning. We (my wife, that is) have only had to cut the pastures once in the last five weeks.
Thanks for asking - probably more than most wanted to know.
Posted by: Markin21132 | October 31, 2007 3:57 PM
cL!! Are you going to create about 50 versions of your ID with random characters capitalised so you can log on with them according to your mood?
Posted by: Redcoat | October 31, 2007 3:58 PM
mashlup,
Fair point - I shall abide by that.
Posted by: johndinhouston | October 31, 2007 3:58 PM
Sorry to hear about the injury to Carlos Rogers. Two torn ligaments? Not much chance he will be able to play in 2008. Prioleau only had the ACL tear, but Carlos has the MCL torn also, so they can't be compared. Takes a lot longer to heal both at once.
I am still fast enough to play the corner. Maybe Dan Snyder will give me a call in the off-season.
Has anyone seen my friend Periculum lately?
Posted by: wmoore703 | October 31, 2007 4:00 PM
"mashlup" - if that was intentional, it was very funny.
Posted by: mhaslup | October 31, 2007 4:00 PM
dang it, now this thing uses my real name for my ID.
Posted by: zcezcest1 | October 31, 2007 4:01 PM
Redcoat,
No way thats to much work. I think I will adopt Redskins Ray's MO...
- ChriS LarrY
Posted by: chrislarry | October 31, 2007 4:02 PM
You don't get a lot of pass attempts when you go three and out on every possesion.
Posted by: MrDumberton | October 31, 2007 4:04 PM
Unless you run well or complete the pass attempts you try...
Posted by: Glass_Half_Full | October 31, 2007 4:09 PM
Maybe there wouldn't be as many 3 and outs if they threw more.
Posted by: Original_etrod | October 31, 2007 4:10 PM
I'm confused. I'm also embarrassed by the "Tang". It was a high school decision over 7 years ago... I used up all my email addresses and couldn't get the thing to work so I could be just "Dorf".
I do not abide.
Posted by: DorfTang | October 31, 2007 4:12 PM
Redcoat, the site said at least 4 letters but would not let me be simply Lisa...kept suggesting Lisa8.
Posted by: Lisa_R | October 31, 2007 4:14 PM
Sweet, we finally have registration, now i don't have to put in the same freakin name everytime....anyone else like this?
So who do we think is gonna be the baller/screwup on Sunday?
Posted by: tweedr01 | October 31, 2007 4:14 PM
Dorf,
Hahahahahah!!! I'm sorry...that's just too funny. "Tang?" Really?
All in good fun, but I'm almost crying with laughter.
Posted by: jcabana | October 31, 2007 4:14 PM
How do I change my User ID???? Do I have to create a new email address?
Posted by: blink999 | October 31, 2007 4:20 PM
Lisa,
That probably meant that Lisa, and Lisa1 through Lisa7 were already taken.
Posted by: Markin21132 | October 31, 2007 4:23 PM
Well, I couldn't be JustMe. I had to add the stupid underscore or a number at the end. This feels kinda weird. I suppose I'll get over it, though, as it's a small price to pay to not have to scroll through dozens of ignorant, profane, rambling posts with lines of capitalized words that amplify the stupidity of the writer. This is kinda nice. :-)
Posted by: Just_Me | October 31, 2007 4:25 PM
Lisa,
I just got "Lisa" to work. You can use any domain name for the e-mail address. Just use Lisa@blahblahblah.com and that should work.
Posted by: lisa | October 31, 2007 4:31 PM
Sorry, That fake lisa was me. Just trying to help a sista out.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 4:33 PM
in there, like swimwear
Posted by: gregskins | October 31, 2007 4:33 PM
Lisa,
I just got "Lisa" to work. You can use any domain name for the e-mail address. Just use Lisa@blahblahblah.com and that should work.
Posted by: lisa | October 31, 2007 04:31 PM
That is what I was afraid would happen. So I could become NateinthePDX@blahblahblah.com and there would be two Nates?????
I hope this isn't the case because it would send Nate over the edge.
Posted by: blink999 | October 31, 2007 4:34 PM
That's the swiss cheese registration for you. Lets not talk about it anymore.
Cindy - Can you delete that comment please?
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 4:36 PM
What has RI thought us today?
That we care more about registering with our old tags rather than care about Double Move being put on IR........
Posted by: RightWay | October 31, 2007 4:39 PM
Thanks, bigfish....I will give it a try....
Posted by: Lisa_R | October 31, 2007 4:41 PM
I think both CP and Betts will have big days. Anyone know off hand how the team has responded under Gibbs 2.0 after humiliating losses?
Last year we followed up our embarassing opneding weekend loss to the Vikes by falling to the 'girls, but then stomped Houston. Looking through the results from last year, I don't really see too many really embarassing losses (scoring 3 against the gints may be considered embarassing though).
Posted by: mile.high | October 31, 2007 4:43 PM
Jasno,
The reason why Campbell has less completions during these 7 games than he did last year, IS BECAUSE THE RUNNING GAME IS HORRIBLE this year. Last year, we were able to sustain drives, and therefore give him more opportunities to throw. This year we can't, so not as many opportunities.
Posted by: tedunni1 | October 31, 2007 4:44 PM
I think we all care about Double Move being put on IR but there's only so much you can say about it. It is what it is.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 4:44 PM
One more comment on those screaming for Gibbs to let Jason open it up - Jason Campbell is not a good deep ball passer. Troy Aikman has pointed this out on TV (he throws a flat deep ball). In college he was great at the out's and passing across the middle, but if you asked him to put a lot of arc on the ball and get it down the field, he was not accurate. Some examples - remember early in the year when Moss was wide open on that play action fake and he missed him by 10 yards, Brandon lloyd on that deep one, two games ago. Not to say he can't do it (Cooley against the Eagles), its just that overall he is not accurate on the deep passes.
I think this coaching staff realizes this and therefore, in a effort to avoid mistakes, does not ask him to do what he can't do.
Posted by: tedunni1 | October 31, 2007 4:49 PM
Does this mean we will see more blitzing from GW now that he is without Rodgers?
I still don't know how Torrance leap frogged Macklin in PT? For some reason, I still believe Macklin will end up being the nickel corner. But, he won't be the one playing man, he'll be the CB playing in that cover 2 shell, where his skills can be utilized........
Posted by: RightWay | October 31, 2007 4:50 PM
been a lurker for a long time - another PDX current resident...
Wonder if it would make sense to play ST or LL as corner... Who better to try it against Clemens...
Posted by: byThorbyOdin | October 31, 2007 4:51 PM
Wow! Some good stats for our offense.
"The Redskins' offense may be ranked 28th currently, but it it has been effective in the red zone.
The unit is ranked third with a 59.1 percent clip in the NFC in touchdown percentage inside opponents' 20-yard line. That trails only Arizona (70.6 percent) and New Orelans (65 percent) in the conference.
The offense has also been successful on first downs. The unit is ranked third in the NFC and eighth overall with an average of 5.80 yards on first down."
http://www.redskins.com/gameday/default.jsp?gameId=83
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 4:51 PM
Jasno--
Carve out another night to see "Michael Clayton." Wear your thinking cap. Quality film making at its finest.
"Into the WIld" resonated, but I had a tough time getting past the guy's selfishness. Yeah, sure, his father was a jerk, but lots of people have fathers who are jerks. And certainly nothing wrong with "finding yourself" in the kind of journey of discovery that's the heart of much literature.
But, dude, couldn't you lob your poor sis a call? Could you care just a little beyond your own self-interests, just a smidge?
Sure, fine flick. I recommend it, but seeing a character grow to the point that he does the RIght Thing--as is the case in MC-- is a more satisfying cinematic journey for my money. But you know, no harm in seeing both movies. And adding "Gone Baby Gone" and "Rendition" to the list will help clean out anyone's brain of the accumulation of cinematic junk the brain acquires in Summer
Posted by: corkczar | October 31, 2007 4:51 PM
I'm in
Posted by: RickyBobby | October 31, 2007 4:52 PM
You could at least show some respect by retiring the disparaging moniker "Double Move". May I suggest "Double Tear"?
Posted by: SMACK1 | October 31, 2007 4:53 PM
May I suggest "Double Tear"?
Posted by: SMACK1 | October 31, 2007 04:53 PM
Now that's harsh.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 4:55 PM
It will be interesting to see how Torrence does. I thought he held up pretty well in the Pats game. Randy Moss had to push off on him to catch that TD pass so I don't really hold that against him. If GG thinks he's ahead of Macklin then I trust his decision. Just look at what he's done with the young guys on the D-line this year.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 4:58 PM
Wow Smack Wow! Leave it up to the cowboy fan to cross the line of good taste. One would think you're a Philly fan with that type of remark.
Posted by: SeanTizzy2DaHizzy | October 31, 2007 5:06 PM
I'm in.
Posted by: Joe_in_Raleigh | October 31, 2007 5:07 PM
Hello My Name is Forrest.
Posted by: Forrest | October 31, 2007 5:13 PM
C'mon now. A Philly fan would have wished that upon him before it happened. I wouldn't do that to Carlos. Brian Dawkins, yes. Lito Sheppard, maybe. But not Carlos.
Posted by: SMACK1 | October 31, 2007 5:16 PM
We're really sorry to hear the latest on Carlos up here. He really fought his guts out every week and if it weren't for him going down in the 1st quarter of the Patriots game, I have a feeling we would have won.
Now we have Leigh Torrence coming in here. He's really super smart and he' a good guy. We're really going to fight our guts out this Sunday against the Jets with what we got. We played rock, paper, scissors today and Vinny gets to call the plays on offense this weekend. It should be a great game.
Posted by: joe_gibbs | October 31, 2007 5:26 PM
ByThor...:
From one PDX Skins fan to another 'Welcome!'.
Also, if you're interested a group of us gather at On Deck, nearly every week, to watch the Skins. While it isn't the best bar, it is smoke free and in a central location as we have folks coming from SE, NE, N, and the 'Couv.
Hope to see you there sometime!
Posted by: StumptownChris | October 31, 2007 5:29 PM
byThorbyOdin, you reminded me: our fellow Portlander Redskin Willie is a big fan of Kellen Clemens from his Oregon days.
Do you know anything on Clemens that would give us a rough idea what we might expect on Sunday? Forgot to ask Willie what he thinks.
Does seem to be a big question mark over the game. The guy has to be better than Pennington right now, right? But still, a youngster at QB should be a pigeon, especially for our D coming in with its pride so wounded.
Posted by: NateinthePDX | October 31, 2007 5:29 PM
Woohoo!!!
Hail to the Rego!!!!
Posted by: kost52 | October 31, 2007 5:37 PM
Wouldn't a major reason that we have passed the ball less be because we've been in front more?
And the stat may be misleading, we might have thrown less, but have we actually ran more often? Or have we just had less possession?
Posted by: kost52 | October 31, 2007 5:41 PM
woohoo.
That was hard enough that it's going to eliminate most of the trolls. Thanks for explaining it in step by step, dcsween, so that even a guy as dumb as a troll could get through.
Wait, if I can do it, so can the trolls. They should have made it harder. Uh, oh. Catch-22.
Posted by: talent_evaluator | October 31, 2007 5:51 PM
Loving the registration. Still lots of crap posts, but whaddaya going to do?
Rogers is going to be out for longer than 9 months. He tore two ligaments. It seems like when players do that, they get back the year after, but they aren't the same. It takes at least a year for them to trust the knee and get it as strong as it was. He wasn't that amazing to begin with (though making strides for the better). He's going to need every bit of that knee to be okay.
I still say draft as many O-linemen as possible. Then corner. Then d-line. Sheesh, we need a WR or two, too.
Let's draft a GM.
Posted by: MNSkinsFan | October 31, 2007 5:52 PM
any 'Skins fans in houston?
Posted by: hardhitter | October 31, 2007 6:04 PM
Mr Watson -- come here--I want to see you.
Posted by: _Stumped_ | October 31, 2007 6:09 PM
I'm ready to make some craptasic comments.
Posted by: _Stumped_ | October 31, 2007 6:11 PM
so the technologically advanced WaPo has no concept of screen names? I have to create a faux email account to get the name I want. I also was able to create multiple names the same, so much for fake posters.
Now the next time my uses the computer she'll be wondering way I need another e-mail account.
Must be for my sexy chats will all you peeps. Kost you look great tonite!
Posted by: noone.from.tampa | October 31, 2007 6:29 PM
I least I won't forget to include my name now
Rego = PITA
Rego = PITA
Rego = PITA
Rego = PITA
Rego = PITA
Rego = PITA
Brittney must use a car seat for her kids. What a moron!!!
Posted by: noone.from.tampa | October 31, 2007 6:31 PM
Torrance will not be good because I did not blow at least a 3rd round draft pick!
Make sure to come to Redskins Park tonight, as I, the Great Cerratto, hand out draft picks to everyone! No NFL credentials necessary!!!
Posted by: It_is_I_Cerratto | October 31, 2007 6:32 PM
Ok, everyone out trick or treating?
Posted by: noone.from.tampa | October 31, 2007 6:32 PM
I must stick with the Key Lime yogurt. I luvs me the Key Lime yogurt.
Posted by: TheCindy | October 31, 2007 6:33 PM
If there is ANYONE using false credentials, let me know and I will give a conditional 6th round pick to how we can solve such treatchery! Ok, fine, you win, a 4th rounder.
For I, the great Cerratto, wish all of you a happy and prosperous Halloween!
Posted by: It_is_I_Cerratto | October 31, 2007 6:36 PM
tampa - you didn't need to create an e-mail account. You can even use a non-existent domain name for your e-mail address. That's just between me and you though. Shhhhh.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 6:39 PM
My latest obsession is (don't laugh) KFC. I can't stop eating KFC 3-piece meals. Ugh. I was doing so well on this exercise and diet plan, too...
Posted by: PDiddy | October 31, 2007 6:40 PM
Apparently I'm already registered. Am I still allowed to call for JLC to find a job at another newspaper?
Posted by: ygbrown2001 | October 31, 2007 6:41 PM
Ok Cindy. You can keep the Key Lime yogurt and Diddy can keep his Oreo pie but I have to let go of my "lucky" jersey and never wear it again.
FYI - My lucky jersey was Lavaar Arrington. Bring on the ridicule while I duck my guts out.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 6:42 PM
I'm done with Oreo Pizza. The Patriots stomped on it, vomited on it, and threw it in the garbage. From here on out, it's 3-piece chicken meals from KFC. Though, sadly, I'll be in Barcelona the next two games and will have to settle for tapas and Rioja. Oh the humanity!
Posted by: PDiddy | October 31, 2007 6:46 PM
i dont like registration. we dont need it and it takes away from some of the fun. it puts even more restrictions on people that our government is currently doing to us.
Posted by: Macaca_Johnson | October 31, 2007 6:46 PM
What just happened? I just did a massive long post full of heaps of stats and it didn't come through??
Posted by: kost52 | October 31, 2007 6:55 PM
loseable type strikes again.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 7:01 PM
A-Rod is a lot of things, but a fraud isn't one of them. That's a dumb thing to say. Also, the NBA is about ten times as exciting as the Redskins' offense.
Posted by: redskins | October 31, 2007 7:03 PM
Go 'Zards! Should be an easy game tonight vs the Pacers with no O'Neill. Good to see a 'Zards team with no injuries besides Etan "The Poet" Thomas. This team could have went all the way last year without all the injuries at the end of the year.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 7:04 PM
Here goes.
I was wondering if there is much difference between our passing game this year, compared to last year, so I did some research, comparing the percentage of passes ATTEMPTED per position this season against last season. I know the % don't add up to 100, but thats because of rounding off. I've included Sellars as a RB.
RB 2007 - 24.7% 2006 - 21.8%
TE 2007 - 23.2% 2006 - 23%
WR 2007 - 51.9% 2006 - 55%
So looking at that, it shows that while there are some passes being taken from the WR's and given to the RB's it's not the massive sort of difference I was looking for. So I delve a little deeper, here are the attempts/completed stats for each player this season-
Portis 23/19 - 82.6% Completion Rate
Betts 13/9 - 69.2% Completion Rate
Sellars 14/10 - 71.4% Completion Rate
Cooley 40/23 - 57.5 Completion Rate
Yoder 7/5 - 71.4% Completion Rate
Moss 44/20 - 45.4% Completion Rate
Randle-El 39/26 - 66.6% Completion Rate
Thrash 10/3 - 30% Completion Rate
Lloyd 8/2 - 25% Completion Rate
McCardell 4/4 - 100% Completion Rate
I'm surprised at the low rate from Thrash, I would've thought the lesser receivers would have higher % because when the ball gets thrown their way, it's generally because they're open. We really need to get the ball to McCardell more, and it's not like he's getting cheap catches either, he's averaging 17.2 yards per pop.
I think it shows that we're attempting to get the ball to our WR's enough, but the success % isn't high enough, especially when you consider how many of those passes are short ones.
I know a few people will say that these stats were a waste of time, but you're wrong. I'm at work, I got PAID to do it! Haha
Posted by: kost52 | October 31, 2007 7:14 PM
My latest obsession is (don't laugh) KFC. I can't stop eating KFC 3-piece meals. Ugh. I was doing so well on this exercise and diet plan, too...
Posted by: PDiddy | October 31, 2007 06:40 PM
Diddy, At least you're with the KFC diet. The urge will pass quickly. The Popeye's diet is for life.
Posted by: talent_evaluator | October 31, 2007 7:20 PM
Still think registration blows but at least won't have to scroll through SIGN SEAN TAYLOR after this season.
Posted by: cdubb | October 31, 2007 7:40 PM
Doubt that he will miss a chance to stick it to the Danny but Coles is uncertain. If our boys have any pride Sunday should be a Detroit type no stress win.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d803c7d96&template=without-video&confirm=true
Posted by: cdubb | October 31, 2007 7:43 PM
kost,
I really like the stats work.
It shows Moss is having a bad year. Thrash's stats don't surprise me, but Yoder's does.
And I recall never seeing McCardell drop one...so, why he doesn't get more targets I don't know.
Posted by: _Stumped_ | October 31, 2007 7:45 PM
tampa - you didn't need to create an e-mail account. You can even use a non-existent domain name for your e-mail address. That's just between me and you though. Shhhhh.
Posted by: bigfish | October 31, 2007 06:39 PM
I tried a fake email address and it came back and said "not a valid email account"
go figure, still is easy to spoof
Posted by: noone.from.tampa | October 31, 2007 7:52 PM
can there be a trick-or-treat rule like
> A cup you're too old to go out
on the otherhand the naughty nurses where nice until you remember they're some neighbors daughters
Posted by: noone.from.tampa | October 31, 2007 7:58 PM
Stumped, I was surprised to see that Moss is still our most targeted receiver. It reminds me of a point I wanted to make after the Green Bay game. A lot of people were unhappy with Weird Al for calling the reverse play on which Santana fumbled, I wasn't. I liked the call, to me it seemed like they had thought, "our main receiver and biggest playmaker is having a tough time out there, what can we do, how about we PUT the ball in his hands, and see how he goes, who knows if he breaks off a big one, maybe it will help get his confidence back". Obviously it didn't work out that way, but I think the right intent was there, but the execution wasn't.
Maybe now, we're at the stage where we need to give ARE the "No.1" role, temporarily, until Moss starts to hit some form. Release the pressure on him a bit you know.
Posted by: kost52 | October 31, 2007 8:10 PM
By the way, I had another post disappear. Maybe it's the longer ones that it struggles with. Seems like it sort of times out or something.
Posted by: kost52 | October 31, 2007 8:11 PM
Stumped, as for Yoder, his production could be a blessing for us, as dcsween was pointing out the other day, if we can get a backup TE who can be reliable, we'd probably see more 2 TE sets, which, given our OL woes, could provide us with a bit more safety, and versatility.
Posted by: kost52 | October 31, 2007 8:19 PM
I think the trick and/or treat rule is that once you're older, you no longer go bag snatching, but you do go ***** bagging.
Did I just say that? Sigh. I should get a demerit point for coming up with something so crass. But all these "naughty nurses" and "naughty schoolteachers" and "naughty secretaries" have me thinking naughty thoughts. Ah, it's going to be a wonderfully drunk night. My flight tomorrow is at 7pm, so I have plenty of time to recover.
>>> "The [KFC Diet] urge will pass quickly"
Sadly, in more ways than one...
Posted by: PDiddy | October 31, 2007 8:23 PM
Kost,
Interesting thought on the hand-off to Moss. I hadn't considered that.
Posted by: Markin21132 | October 31, 2007 8:23 PM
So did anyone figure out what Troy Vincent is up to right now? Last year, the 'Skins signed him right about now and he came up with the Play of the Century against Dallas...
Posted by: PDiddy | October 31, 2007 8:26 PM
kost,
Yeah, I like the thought behind handing off to Moss better than the execution.
The trouble is our team isn't fast enough to pull off those slow developing plays and they read it easily.
I think you've got to mix up JC's read a little bit too and spread it around.
But in that Pats game, JC didn't have the protection he needed (and for the first time really seemed to lose his cool). The only option he had was to head to the open field.
Posted by: _Stumped_ | October 31, 2007 8:32 PM
So did anyone figure out what Troy Vincent is up to right now?
Waiting for the Skins to call?
Posted by: Megskin | October 31, 2007 8:34 PM
I don't wish bad things on players, and I'm sorry he's hurt, but have we really lost anything in losing Carlos Rogers for the year? He gets smoked all the time, can't handle a double move even if the receiver was tied to him. He's often out of place in his coverage and he misses a lot of open field tackles. So who takes his place at the very least should can't be no worst than par for the course.
Posted by: clark202 | October 31, 2007 8:37 PM
I was just looking to see if there's somewhere which has a list of current free agents, bu
Wow first