Redskins Insider, by Jason La Canfora Redskins Insider

Jason Campbell NFC Offensive Player of Week

Good for JC. Great kid. More good stuff to come.

Also, Andre Carter was nominated for NFC Defensive Player of the Week, but didn't get it (not sure who did yet, haven't had time to check).

By Jason La Canfora |  October 10, 2007; 12:16 PM ET
Previous: A Tale Of Two Favres | Next: Practice

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



1st

Posted by: SAK | October 10, 2007 12:19 PM

Yeah, JC, he is the man. Lots of good things to come in the future from him.

Posted by: Pulldownclaw | October 10, 2007 12:20 PM

Good job for JC. HAIL

Posted by: SAK | October 10, 2007 12:20 PM

THreerd

Posted by: threve | October 10, 2007 12:21 PM

Eleventyteenth (my fav. #)

I'm not as good at my video searches of the interwidegooglewebnets that I am at text searches. Has anyone found a video of Andre Carter's safety on Kitna? I'm not so much interested in the sack itself, but the rag doll toss of the OT (its a shot from behind the defense). Some buddies who were at the game didn't get to see it, and I'm trying to make a point about Carter.

Posted by: dcsween | October 10, 2007 12:15 PM

I think you can see a clip on NFL.com

Posted by: Dik | October 10, 2007 12:22 PM

Dik and whoever posted the youtube on the previous thread, that angle I'm looking for is not on that youtube or any of the NFL thumbnails. I'm looking for the camera angle behind the defense (that funky floating camera on strings), not the one from up in the stands. thx though.

Posted by: dcsween | October 10, 2007 12:28 PM

That was a nice sack by Carter, but I think the o-lineman was off balance more than anything, and Andre just used his momentum to toss him that way. Not taking anything away from him, just that it didn't seem like it was one of those Reggie White sacks where he just picked a dude up, tossed him into the third row, then went and stomped the qb.

Posted by: Pulldownclaw | October 10, 2007 12:28 PM

You mean Jumpy Geathers. He was doing it in 1.0

Posted by: D | October 10, 2007 12:31 PM

And as far as a Cowpatty posting in the top 10... isn't that a double edged sword? Id' like to welcome our newest ThRedSkin, "D-x5" (and NO, I'm NOT typing the rest of that moniker_)

HAIL!

Posted by: Dik | October 10, 2007 12:31 PM

Ninth.

This is awesome news. Props to Soup.

Oh, and I think Jasno has proven that he can give credit where credit as due (just as he used to a couple of years back). If he had continued to be as negative as he was during the preseason, it really would have proved the finger-pointers (me included) correct. But he hasn't.

Posted by: jcabana | October 10, 2007 12:32 PM

Darn. Thanks for making me look like even more of a moron. Dik. :)

Posted by: jcabana | October 10, 2007 12:33 PM

sak... who would u put ahead of sellers not only for the pro-bowl, but a better all around, more skilled NFC full back. To me he is second to none in the national conference...

Posted by: sniksder | October 10, 2007 12:35 PM

Tried to search both the NFL and FedEx sites for the player of the week announcement. The site says they don't announce till Friday night on "Total Access."

Pulldownclaw, maybe he was off-balance, but that's not what I remember happening when I saw it the first time or on replay. That's why I want to find it again.

Posted by: dcsween | October 10, 2007 12:35 PM

Sween, I swore I saw that angle on the NFL site. I can't check it here, but I'll try to get it tonight & post it (unless anyone else can do it now.

I know what you're talking about - Carter threw that man like a Rag Doll!

Now there's an acquisition from SF (albeit Free Agency) that's worth something.

C'mon Receiver, The - MAN UP!

Posted by: Dik | October 10, 2007 12:36 PM

Hip Hip, HOORAY!

Posted by: 4th | October 10, 2007 12:38 PM

Nice to see the kid getting some notice for a hands down solid game!

Bummer on Carter though. He actually had the best stats all the way around versus the other Nominees, but I bet they gave it to the guy with the interception returned for a TD. His stats were close enough I could see the TD swaying the votes.

But there's no doubt that the safety really turned the tide of the whole game on Sunday!

Posted by: FBChick | October 10, 2007 12:40 PM

Hooray for Soupy!!!

HAIL!!!!!!!

Posted by: JC in NC | October 10, 2007 12:42 PM

sniksder,
I forgot alstot retired, but they usually put FB's that block for top rushing RB's, but I cant think of any single back in the NFC. Yea I guess sellars should make it, he is a beast and deserves to.

Posted by: SAK | October 10, 2007 12:42 PM

Tru Dat, FB Chick

jcabana - whud I do? whud I do??

Posted by: Dik | October 10, 2007 12:43 PM

Carter's sack was sick!!! I don't care if he was falling down or not. He forklifted that dude. Have you seen the arms on Carter?

Posted by: sicwidit | October 10, 2007 12:47 PM

He is the truth.

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 12:49 PM

Sween,

This might not be exactly what you're looking for, but it's probably closer than the other clip. 2:05

http://www.veoh.com/videos/v1286368djWYGqTp

Posted by: JustMe | October 10, 2007 12:50 PM

sak, i agree w/ about the lead blocker, and mac strong was a perenial pro bowler cuz he was blocking for alexander who has had guady #'s the past few years (until hutchison left for the vikes).. but on talent alone & versatility (not to mention intimidation factor) sellers is bar none the best fb in the nfc, maybe the entire NFL... he is very underated because he does alot of the dirty work.. people in dc have known his potential for years, but outside of dc he is seen more of a role player... that is until he has a game like this past weekend.

Posted by: sniksder | October 10, 2007 12:50 PM

Still Romo is the ULTIMATE truth!

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 12:50 PM

JLaC - You should've posted the JC - POW thing 1st, and then posted the Tale of 2 Favres, because I disagree with your assessment, specifically on them having a stout line. They are the youngest team in the league and their starting center is out for the game. Their OLine is inexperienced........

Posted by: 4th | October 10, 2007 12:51 PM

Who since Emmitt Smith has not totally gone down in production after 30? I think Marshall Faulk took a steep decline as soon as he hit 30/31.

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 12:53 PM

See, D-x5 - as a ThRedSkin you can't go around talkin' pure nonsense.

If you mean that RomOHNO! is truly a disaster waiting to happen (see last year's playoff run) then by all means, choke away...

but the TRUTH is: SOUPY is Player of the WEEK! whereas RomOHNO is truthfully player of the WEAK.

Posted by: Dik | October 10, 2007 12:54 PM

Posted by: Skinz | October 10, 2007 12:54 PM

x5,
There is some truth about throwing 6 picks in one game and still winning, but I don't know what it says about the QB.

Or simply baiting people on the blog, come on you're better than that.

Posted by: Stumped | October 10, 2007 12:55 PM

I agree about the Packer line being somewhat overrated, especially with injury. Favre was running for his life in the second half...albeit to a very good Bears D-Line.....

Also a team that runs as mediocre as they do can't have a punishing line.

Romo is the ULTIMATE over hyped media creation!

Posted by: chris laRry | October 10, 2007 12:56 PM

This just in...for the first time in 2 years Novacek picked us to win.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3690072/?pg=6#spt_novacek_07

Posted by: Skinz | October 10, 2007 12:56 PM

Lol,

Hilarious, it looks like they put the wrong pick if you read his article.

Posted by: Skinz | October 10, 2007 12:58 PM

SMACK rulz.
D-Boyzx5 drulz.

Posted by: filling in for Chirs Larry | October 10, 2007 12:58 PM

The Packers line while inexperinced is still one of the better O-line as a unit. True, the running game is non existent so far. I think if the Redskins keep the same game plan when they played De-troit, with a few adjustments, (Good luck with the self proclaimed "Smartest Defensive Mind" doing so) the Skins should be able to win, but probably won't.

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 12:59 PM

I'm a good friend of Carter's and I've seen that move before. To test his speed and strength one time I jokingly tried to block him and he tossed me just like that Lions tackle over his living room couch into the coffee table while he ate a sandwich with his other hand. And I'm 6'3 200lbs.

Posted by: Cartersdakid | October 10, 2007 1:00 PM

Who isn't a better Ex-Jock sports talking head than Emmitt Smith, keep on dancing twinkle toes.......

Posted by: CHris larry | October 10, 2007 1:00 PM

He is intimidating, and he is a good short yardage threat, Ive got to watch how he blocks closer this week. Dont get my wrong I love sellars, I want him to make the probowl.

Posted by: SAK | October 10, 2007 1:01 PM

Nice filling in for....I wish I had thought of that!!!!!

DBAGX500 your hard hitting FB anylasis is so enligtening, this blog has really taken a jump in our collective football acumen since you joined son....

Counting the days until Ramadan ends so JMM220 can get down to buisness on this dude!

Posted by: chris larry | October 10, 2007 1:04 PM

JLa's comment was something along the lines of "comparatively" or some such word. He was comparing it to the Lions.

It will be interesting to see what we do on Defense this week. It will be tempting to play it as we did last week but Kitna aint Favre and that O-line can pass block. If it's me I have my Dline play the run and blitz from the OLB and SS. It's time to turn Landry loose.

And CL is right. Romo is legit but you need to seperate the story from the qb. As I said yesterday, it's possible that Romo was the worst player in the NFL last weekend.

Posted by: Skinz | October 10, 2007 1:05 PM

Yesterday I have talked to Brett Favre. He say everything was good with him.

Today I am going to talked Eli Manning. Hopefully it go well.

Next week I have learn about tenses.

Posted by: Emmit Smith | October 10, 2007 1:08 PM

SAK, Sellers can block. He is a ferocious blocker.

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 10, 2007 1:09 PM

Cartersdakid.
Awesome, keep it coming!
An Insider Insider....

Posted by: Stumped | October 10, 2007 1:10 PM

Ref: JM220:

D-Bag if you have a motorcycle or batting helmet I'd wear it to work on Friday. I know you'll get made fun of but trust me, you'll thank me later.

Posted by: Skinz | October 10, 2007 1:11 PM

I havent watched sellars too much Ive been watching samuels pretty much manhandle whoever hes lined up against, although he did make a bad move one week and let their end get right by him, but it was only one play.

Posted by: SAK | October 10, 2007 1:13 PM

Absolutely stunning that Tony Romo didn't get NFC Offensive Player of the week, given the way he hung in there and shook off those six turnovers and won that game the other night. How does he not get the award for that? What the hell does a guy have to do?

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 10, 2007 1:13 PM

Good ol' Dr. Z. I wonder if he'll actually beat Brooklyn Decker at picking games one week this year.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/dr_z/10/10/ranks.part2/index.html

Posted by: Skinz | October 10, 2007 1:14 PM

*last week, sorry. Either way I would take him over any of the other FB's out there including neal.

Posted by: SAK | October 10, 2007 1:14 PM

"Packers have a better stable of RBs than the Lions."
-sween

I'm not sure about that, sween. Tatum Bell ate us up last year and I'm not even sure they have enough healthy backs to fill a "stable".

You are, as ever, the sinsei, though.

Posted by: Larry Bud | October 10, 2007 1:15 PM

If Romo threw 8 picks he'll still be King Romo, (In my supersmart voice) down here. Yes I know he may have been the worst player in the league this past Sunday, but where was everyone when he was putting up those 250+ games? On your commode shtiten bricks, thats where. All the Skins fans collectively asked "Who the F is Tony Romo? "Why is he in Dallas?" He answered by making a pro-bowl/playoff appearance. And to answer to the notion of me saying BS to stir the spot...

That is true about 20% of the time.

Oh and yes, yes, yes. An NFL analyst should not be an avenue of pursuit for the all-time rushing king. But he was rather entertaining on Dancing With The Stars. And don't act like if, for example, Art Monk were to appear on the show you wouldn't be sending txt msgs to vote for your HOF shafted receiver.

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 1:20 PM

I dont think there is a team in the league that fears the pack's running game, I wouldnt worry about their busted RB stable.

Posted by: SAK | October 10, 2007 1:21 PM

so then we all agree sellers=pro bowl/man beast/great blocker/short yardage back/good receiver & bad mutha SJKer.

Posted by: sniksder | October 10, 2007 1:21 PM

FYI, Dboyz, Michael Irvin is on the Art Monk for HOF bandwagon and you should tread very lightly on that subject up here.

Posted by: Larry Bud | October 10, 2007 1:22 PM

snik,

too true

Posted by: Larry Bud | October 10, 2007 1:23 PM

Skinz - JlaC said the Packers Oline is stout. They are no where close to 'stout' or a good line, if they are 31st in the NFL in rushing. Lions took over 32nd after playing us........

Now, Denver's line is stout because you can insert any no name and they become 1,000 yard rushers....

Posted by: 4th | October 10, 2007 1:23 PM

JustMe, that was EXACTLY the camera angle I remember. Thanks.

The guy blocking Carter was not falling down. He was moving inside and trying to block down. Admittedly, Carter stopped moving laterally and set his feet to cast off the guy, but THAT was what they call in Greco-Roman wrestling, an "upper body throw."

Larry Bud, I can't disagree about Tatum Bell, but whoever he used to be ... that guy didn't show up (maybe he's hurt or something). The Packers combo that concerns me is Morency/Wynn. The Lions didn't really show up with a combo of backs, just multiples ones (none of whom could accomplish much after their spirits were punctured in the first half). I don't think Bell even got any touches in the second half.

Posted by: dcsween | October 10, 2007 1:25 PM

right now dallas is #1 in the nfc... but they will always be #2 to skins fans....

Posted by: sniksder | October 10, 2007 1:26 PM

I dont think there is a team in the league that fears the pack's running game, I wouldnt worry about their busted RB stable.

Posted by: SAK | October 10, 2007 01:21 PM

Which is reason enough to worry. Thye did run the ball pretty well against the Bears in the first half. We also got caught a little flat footed a few times against the Lions.

I'm not scared, just cautious.

Posted by: Larry Bud | October 10, 2007 1:26 PM

sween,

As always, I yield to your wisdom.

Posted by: Larry Bud | October 10, 2007 1:27 PM

Snik,
That sounds about right.

Posted by: SAK | October 10, 2007 1:28 PM

Too bad about Carter not getting that, ever since the last month of the season last year he's been the guy they hope they had when they signed him.

- Ray

Posted by: Ray | October 10, 2007 1:29 PM

If no one here intimidates me, then how in the hell will JM220, or whatever, do so? C'mon I don't like the Redskins but I don't hate them. Sorry I don't hate anything/one. Hate is obtained through jealously, and we all know what fans are jealous of what team. If there is any team that I just plain can't stand, two comes to mind for the obvious reasons.

Pittsburgh Steelers (Although not so much after the super bowl win in 96')

San Francisco 49ers

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 1:29 PM

i apologize if someone has asked or posted this before. but does anyone have a clip of sean taylor's monster hit?

Posted by: nycskinsfan | October 10, 2007 1:29 PM

DBoyzx-5, to me, it didn't look like Romo really had much of a turnaround ... it seemed like it was the kicking team and the kicker who saved that one. I don't deny Romo has had a great start (and that pulling out of a tail spin like that first half against the Bills is anything other than daunting), but the Bills certainly exposed his Achilles' Heel (the metaphorical one, not the anatomical one). [Not sure if you've seen the WaPo print edition, but RI's very own Amazing Dik Shuttle lays it out quite nicely.]

Posted by: dcsween | October 10, 2007 1:31 PM

I keep saying this wont be our year, 9-7, but we have so many good building blocks for the future its unreal, unreal. BTW, good time to be a sports fan from this area: Wizards have just as much promise as the Skins and the Nats are getting a new stadium and aren't half bad. Celebrate everyone, good times are upon us soon enough. SKINS FOR LIFE

Posted by: Burg w/ a U | October 10, 2007 1:31 PM

Dboyz, in case you are outside the area, here's Dik's shout out:

"I think the way to beat the Cowboys was revealed: Stop Marion Barber and key against the run. Rush four [linemen] and let the outside linebackers spy [quarterback Tony] Romo -- you'll see [interceptions] by him in that instance. He's done it before, he'll do it again. Plus, Terrell Owens is dropping passes against the Bills' defense? Wait until Area 51 drills him a few times."

Posted by: dcsween | October 10, 2007 1:33 PM

That is true Larry Bud, but if they thought they were actually going to get somewhere running the ball they would have done it more, remember our safties were playing deep, and we didnt blitz once to help out our front 4. If we lose this week it wont be the running game that beats us, itll be the farve in the backfield.

Posted by: SAK | October 10, 2007 1:34 PM

1,000 yard rushers are highly overrated this day in age. Speaking of overrated,(Giving time for the Romo sneers) did anyone catch Sal whats-his-face on M&M in the morning? He thinks Joe Namath is the most overrated QB of all time. What are the thoughts of the blog of babel?

Again. I pause for the Romo jokes, ha, ha, laugh, laugh. Ok?

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 1:34 PM

C'mon I don't like the Redskins but I don't hate them.
-Dboyz

I think we covered this yesterday. It's OK, Dboyz, we know.

Just remember, denial ain't a river in Africa and will ultimately lead to self-loathing...

hmmm... we may be to late to save you after all.

Posted by: Larry Bud | October 10, 2007 1:34 PM

true larry.. thankfully those are correctable mistakes...it seems the skins d is tackling a lot better this year, keeping everything in front of them and swarming to the ball.. the def. depth has payed off and kept players fresh. rarely do you see them caught out of postion like last year.. London Flethcer deserves credit for not only being a tackling machine, but making the proper calls at the line and getting everybody in the right spots..

Posted by: sniksder | October 10, 2007 1:35 PM

If we lose this week it wont be the running game that beats us, itll be the farve in the backfield.

Posted by: SAK | October 10, 2007 01:34 PM

True, but what I am a bit nervous about is the superiority of the Packers' pass blocking and their ability to get draw plays, screens and shovel passes just in front of the LBs for 8 or 9 at a clip.

Posted by: Larry Bud | October 10, 2007 1:37 PM

in the midst of all that's going on in the sports world (isn't October great?)

why the SJK is ROMO on the front page of espn.com??? Its Wednesday for crimeny's sake.

I swear I hate that man.

Posted by: Dorf | October 10, 2007 1:37 PM

Dont forget the caps burg, they are 3-0 best start since their playoff year i think.

Posted by: SAK | October 10, 2007 1:37 PM

True, but what I am a bit nervous about is the superiority of the Packers' pass blocking and their ability to get draw plays, screens and shovel passes just in front of the LBs for 8 or 9 at a clip.

Posted by: Larry Bud | October 10, 2007 01:37 PM

As long as we react to the ball well like we did last week those shouldnt get 8-9 a pop. Im not saying we are going to shut down their off. completely but I think they will have to work to get their yards on our def.

Posted by: SAK | October 10, 2007 1:40 PM

4th,

What he said was:

"..and that's hardly assured given how abysmal Detroit's O Line is and how comparatively stout Green Bay's is "

Comparatively being the key word. For instance as I said before, I've never claimed to be smart. When you bring Cowboys fans into the equation however, I do claim to be comparatively smart.

Posted by: Skinz | October 10, 2007 1:41 PM

I think we'll be fine against their offense too, I just hope Joe gets a little piss and vinegar going again.

I realize my efforts to fight complacency are fruitless, but I feel that I must do my part karmacally speaking.

Posted by: Larry Bud | October 10, 2007 1:43 PM

Some people call them "shuffle passes," LB.

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 10, 2007 1:43 PM

Larry Bud, feel no compulsion to yield. Peeps here definitely will not, esp. about the possibility of a Packers' running game (given the rushing yardage to date ... which earns poop salad sandwiches for their O-line). But there are some guns that I stick to. For example, peeps pooped on me over the summer for suggesting that the Lions COULD have been a Saints for this season. Notwithstanding last Sunday's game, I still think they look better than the Bears and Vikings and could hang around long enough to scrap for a wild card spot. [Not that getting a wild card spot in the NFC has as much cache as, for example, a Skins belt buckle, but now they know what the need to fix ... pass protection.]

Also, as far as this Dallas talk goes, I gotta admit that for me, Monday night was about scouting the Bills. I got plenty of Dallas info from Big Media. The concern about the Cowboys game is going to be the return of the former Bears NT/felon. He will have had that many fewer weeks of game time wear and tear when he gets inserted over Rabach and the guards. Right now, the only team to think about is the Packers.

Posted by: dcsween | October 10, 2007 1:43 PM

No problem, Sween. :-)

Posted by: JustMe | October 10, 2007 1:44 PM

October and mid January to March. are the best months for sports. And to comment on the analysis on the keys to stopping the Dallas offense, I think you can use that game plan on 90% of the teams in the NFL. Not too many teams use more than 3-wide sets. Although I think that is changing. The Steelers are now using multiple sets. The Steelers? Good analysis, but everything is always easier said than done.

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 1:44 PM

Any blog peeps heading to Green Bay this weekend? Sounds like J-La will be out on the town Saturday night. Another opportunity for the blog to make plans and then stand him up.

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 10, 2007 1:46 PM

The key to stopping Dallas will be shutting down Witten. TO already learned his lesson when the Reaper took one of his fingers which he now wears as a necklace.

Posted by: Da Truef | October 10, 2007 1:47 PM

"...why the SJK is ROMO on the front page of espn.com??? Its Wednesday for crimeny's sake."

"I swear I hate that man."

Need I say anymore?
Oh, I know no one will never tell me (Must be an Redskin thing), whats SJK?

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 1:48 PM

mmmmmm... stooout ...

Posted by: dcsween | October 10, 2007 1:48 PM

I am not a front runner. I would definitely show up on a Redskins blog if the Cowboys were 0-5. I have no self-esteem issues.

Posted by: not D-boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 1:50 PM

DBoyz, learn about SJK and more at http://redskinsinsiders.wetpaint.com/page/Home?t=anon

Posted by: dcsween | October 10, 2007 1:50 PM

Who's shutting down Witten?

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 1:51 PM

Funny you should mention stout. I'm drinking a Guinness now, as I telework. Life is good.

Posted by: JustMe | October 10, 2007 1:51 PM

SJK is defined under "RI Lingo"

Posted by: dcsween | October 10, 2007 1:51 PM

Good for Campbell. He played well. Question: Why don't we get better "inside" info on Redskins Insider? The league announces players of the week; it doesn't take an investigative reporter to dig it out. Same question re: NFL Insider.

Posted by: Frank | October 10, 2007 1:53 PM

D-Bag,

One would think that the BEST team in the NFL with the Best QB, most HOF inductees and SUPERBOWL wins would have their own Blog to post in??????

You bother me! Go away!

F the Cowpokes (SJK)

HTTR, HTTB

Posted by: Forrest | October 10, 2007 1:54 PM

Ok, I give you that. Then my point changes to 'stout' in any sense shouldn't be used with GB's Oline, not even comparitively speaking. They are exactly like Detroit. Tops in passing and last in rushing.

Stout is not GB when compared to Detriot.

Posted by: 4th | October 10, 2007 1:57 PM

4th - GB has much better pass protection than Detroit.

Posted by: CC | October 10, 2007 2:00 PM

I did however pick up ITA.
With the expressed consent of respected regular RI bloggers (you know who you are), I would like to try using the acronym in my post...

ITA, Forrest. I never heard of you and if you haven't heard my stance on posting on here vs. posting else where please view the other 841 post regarding that matter. So with that said I choose to ITA.

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 2:01 PM

Just win next week and are breathing down dallas' (red) necks

Posted by: 35332 | October 10, 2007 2:01 PM

Thx for the info sween, but I'm sure everyone is familiar with network filters on the job. Screw the internet filters, like I'ma watch porn with 80,000 people passing my cube everyday.

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 2:05 PM

ITA...D-Boyzx5
D-Boyzx5...ITA.

Ignore this fool. He'll get tired of being 15 years old when nobody plays with him here.

not guy +2, by the way.

Posted by: speaking for everyone | October 10, 2007 2:05 PM

Romo looks like he has down syndrome, not that there is anything wrong with that.

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:05 PM

thx 4 tha props, sween!

I axed my mom to go secure a copy for me :)

They didn't have it at the Coral Gables Barnes & Noble... I could get all the news I wanted outta Venezuela, though.

Do you think Chavez is a CowPatty Fan?

Posted by: Dik | October 10, 2007 2:06 PM

GB also has a real QB. Kitna is the bigest joke of a starting quarterback, imho I just don't trust a man who only wears hats and dewrags with a giant cross on them, its offencive to us non-christians. Don't expect 4 to slip in his endzone for a free 2 pnts.

Anyone else kind wish we would wear the lombardi thowbacks in this weeks game?

Posted by: 35332 | October 10, 2007 2:07 PM

Being that Chavez is an uberliberal socialist I highly doubt that he is a fan of the Redneck team of America. Besides he is a soccer fan.

Posted by: 35332 | October 10, 2007 2:09 PM

no

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:10 PM

As difficult as it may be, I suggest that no one respond to my posts no matter how salient or inane.

Posted by: Not D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 2:14 PM

Once again if you ain't got the grapefruits to leave a somewhat real name, then I will not respond. 15 year olds only don't post with a name because they can't tolerate the heat that would be bestowed on them. Their adolescent brain will not be able to comprehend to anger, so they'll get mad and start to curse and leave jokes that are sexual in nature.

Had fun with the ITA acronym, but I'll retire it from my post, maybe. I don't feel right using it.

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 2:14 PM

35332, pack4life and I had some yuks about us showing up in the throwbacks -- it would be one big golden mess out there.

sween, 4th, others... if the Packers' O is so similar to the Lions' O, don't you think the biggest question this week is how they try to game plan for Grilliams' D, which they just watched thoroughly dismantle the Lions? (Shuffle passes, draw plays, and like such as?) This is the chess match. VIGILANCE!

Want to see our running game work well again. We didn't get the big runs last Sunday, but otherwise it was the right complement to that efficient passing game: move the chains, eat clock, punch it in. BALANCE!

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 10, 2007 2:16 PM

that's Not Guy. He's a ThRedSkin too

Posted by: redskirt | October 10, 2007 2:17 PM

SMELLY Dik
DC NOODLE gets player of the week TONY ROMO is player of the MONTH
REDSKINETTES are 3-1 and lost to the only hard team the GMEN SHUT them OUT in 2nd half(where was DC NOODLE of the WEEK)
COWBOYS are 5-0 UNDEFEATED and ROMOS worst game he still DROVE his team the last couple drives to WIN(where was DC NOODLE aginst GMEN??

REDSKINETTES have played 1 last game then the teams they are ahead of in standings but are tied for WINS 3!!ONLY SISSY REDSKINETTE FANS try to SPIN THE FACTS!! BUT THE NFL is use to that!!

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:17 PM

?????

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:18 PM

Uh... D-x5? Forrest was here a long time before you.

From what I can tell, people have been more than patient w/ your stuff. If you wanna talk shop, fine.

But you seriously can't expect to come in here, throw turds and expect not to get SJK blasted back at you... really, dude. Do you honestly think the same wouldn't happen to us where they heathen Cowpattys blog?

Where is your blog, anyway? Are you sick of all the CowPatty fans, too?

Posted by: Dik | October 10, 2007 2:18 PM

Yeah, JC!

According to The Phanatic Mag (http://daily.phanaticmag.com/2007/10/former-eagle-wins-nfc-defensive-player.html), Rod Hood of ARI won Defensive PotW.

Posted by: ES | October 10, 2007 2:19 PM

What time does school let out around here again?

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 2:19 PM

D-Bag,

I have been here since the beginning of this blog, although I don't post frequently, I usually enjoy lurking. I can see why you haven't heard of me since you just jumped on the bandwagon. Makes sense, Cowpokes winning D-bags crawl out of the wood work, best football sports blog a$$clown D-bags want to brag about their team.

F off D-bag!
F the Cowpokes

Posted by: Forrest | October 10, 2007 2:20 PM

What time does school let out around here again?

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 02:19 PM

I knew you were a se*ual predator!

Posted by: Chris Hansen | October 10, 2007 2:22 PM

Posted by: Not D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 02:14 PM

leave the not posts to the professionals.

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:22 PM

Limp Dik
You can throw whatever makes you Hard but fact is Those cowpattys are UNDEFEATED your Redskinettes are 3-1!

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:23 PM

The only reason that the Packers Oline is better is because of 3 things

1. Bret Favre
2. The don't put 5 receivers out in every pattern. The actually leave in RBs and TEs to block.
3. Bret Favre

Posted by: 4th | October 10, 2007 2:23 PM

... Hey " | "

Spin Facts?! Only thing I need to do is roll the tape. The fact that you're posting here is all the confirmation I need to see that you are:

1) askeerd!
2) over-compensating for a horrifying deficiency (see RomOHNO's pocket jockey problem)
3) ugly & lonely

"Maps"

Posted by: Dik | October 10, 2007 2:24 PM

Novacek-

"It's an evenly matched game and it was in Washington, I'd pick the Redskins. But playing in Green Bay should be the difference."

PICK: REDSKINS

What does that mean? is he picking the packers or the skins?

He got hit in the head too many times.

Posted by: Lyon | October 10, 2007 2:24 PM

I agree 4th, favre knows how to feel pressure and also how to react to it.

Posted by: SAK | October 10, 2007 2:25 PM

CRABBY Dik
ROMO is and always will be a Better,more exciting QB then your DC NOODLE!
Not 1 GM in the NFL would take NOODLE over ROMO! SORRY thats a FACT FACT FACT

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:25 PM

Nate the Packers are who we think they are. They aren't going to all of sudden sprout a running game this weekend. I'm sure "the 2nd G stands for Genius" is going to tweak last weeks scheme a bit to deal with Favre Bean but keep it basically the same. I see more picks and a fumble recovery or two.

Posted by: LH | October 10, 2007 2:25 PM

Novaeck's reasoning for his pick makes absolutely no sense.

"It's an evenly matched game and it was in Washington, I'd pick the Redskins. But playing in Green Bay should be the difference.

Pick: Redskins"

Am I missing something here, or does he really mean to pick the Pack??

Posted by: Ricky Bobby | October 10, 2007 2:27 PM

Lyon,

I to was feeling mixed up by that crazzy comment. What the hell does it mean?

Posted by: 35332 | October 10, 2007 2:27 PM

Note to Novacek--It's the middle of indian summer October. Lambeau is just another field in warm weather. The Pack got beaten at home last week, too.

Posted by: redskirt | October 10, 2007 2:27 PM

Dik-
Sure some people will act childish on a Cowboys blog, but other than kind of jokingly crown Romo and boast about the success of the Cowboys what have I really done to insult anyone here. Like I said a thousand times, keep it football. I would expect that people will want be to stop posting, but it's not going to happen. Why does everyone get so damn personal all the time? And to play the "He was here first", is truly juvenile. Are YOU serious?! I mean really chill the F out because I'm not going anywhere homie!

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 2:27 PM

4th, are you messing with us again (ES?)?

Dik, I'm pretty sure Hugo Chavez would be a Bills fan. From the bottom of his eyelids to the bottom of his jowls, he's got the face of a buffalo ... similar hairdo too.

Just like I defended Jack when he (eventually) came courteous, I'm siding with DBoyz on this current ado that seems to be brewing. I'm saying we're all friendlies here and maintaining the positive vibe/mojo is what keeps the Swinging Souls winning their guts out up here. Redcoat (and sometimes Adam) bring coherent football discussionry, which I favor over homerism. Quality over quantity (and rock over scissors! Rock rulz, scissors drulz).

Posted by: dcsween | October 10, 2007 2:27 PM

PIMPLE Dik
HOW BOUT THEM 2007 NFC EAST WINNING DALLAS COWBOYS!! dont worry Redskinette fans you still have that 6th seed WILD CARD win!!WOOOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOO

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:28 PM

How bout that Romo fumble in the playoffs...whoooo hoooo!

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:30 PM

LEAKY Dik
sure is alot of CRY BABYS on this KOOL-AIDE drinking BLOG!! WAWAWA

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:30 PM

Sam and Sonny were saying through the game that the seccondary was playing it safe cover 2 and cover 3, "keep the WR in front of you" I expect this to be our same playbook for GB and NE.

Posted by: 35332 | October 10, 2007 2:31 PM

I didnt catch the playoff game DC NOODLE was in DID YOU??WOOOO HOOOO

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:31 PM

F dcsween!

Posted by: filling in for Chris LarrY again | October 10, 2007 2:31 PM

My caveat (and the primary reason I posted that) is b/c I want to chat about the Packers, not the Cowboys. And I don't want to see the letters R-O-M-O again until I have to ... unless we are talking about a place that lover should "get" or Iago from Othello.

Posted by: dcsween | October 10, 2007 2:32 PM

if we're the redneck team of america - f u

if not, carry on

...i'm assuming that was a cowboys diss...

Posted by: pack4life | October 10, 2007 2:33 PM

"..., but other than kind of jokingly crown Romo and boast about the success of the Cowboys what have I really done to insult anyone here."
Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 02:27 PM

Isn't that enough? Nobody here wants to talk about the Cowboys and 'Skins the way you want to talk about the Cowboys and 'Skins.

Posted by: LH | October 10, 2007 2:33 PM

Only an IDIOT REDSKINETTE fan would TRY to bust on a 9-7 PLAYOFF team when REDSKINETTES were 6-10 LAST PLACE?? WOOOOOOO HOOOOOO

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:33 PM

And to answer the question about the Cowboys blog

http://blog.dallascowboys.com/

There it is. Go on and post BS, insult Cowboys fans, do whatever. I don't take the Cowboys personally.

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 2:33 PM

So [in an effort to calm people down and go back to fubball discussionary] Dboyz, what did you think of the Dallas-Patriots matchup? Does the D secondary have a chance against Moss & Co?

And before anyone jumps on me for talking non-Redskins football...we have both teams on the upcoming schedule, so I find it interesting in a fan-scouting sense.

Posted by: redskirt | October 10, 2007 2:33 PM

That said (and thanks cL fill-in poster), there is some turd posting now that is making the case for usernames and passwords.

Posted by: dcsween | October 10, 2007 2:33 PM

Rings matter, not playoff appearances...you idiot

Posted by: stop slobbin' on Romo's knob | October 10, 2007 2:34 PM

D-Bag

I'm fine - I'm just saying, don't expect to throw in a joke or any positive comment about The Cowgirls and not expect a load of flak right back at 'cha.

I realize you and your ever-so-erstwhile friend, " | " (man, can that guy write a quip) have no where else to go, but don't preach on one hand about 'football only' and then take shots at a blog regular. That's just silly.

And " | ", do you really want to run that GM survey after last week? My $$ says JJ doesn't award RomOHNO the contract he wants AND goes looking for a younger QB in the offseason.

"Maps"

" | ", do you realize how much you sound like Ms. Carolina, such as?

Posted by: Dik | October 10, 2007 2:34 PM

35332,
Yea I expect us to kinda sit back and react, I do think we will blitz a little more than we did last week though.

Posted by: SAK | October 10, 2007 2:34 PM

35332-

Maybe Novacek and Emmitt can start their own show- one can't speak and one can't think...

Welcome to the dumb and inarticulate hour w/ Jay and Emmitt!

Posted by: Lyon | October 10, 2007 2:34 PM

ROMO

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:35 PM

Aye, LH, that's what I'm talking about.

ES, Rod Hood? Not quite a candidate for the short name club, with Ty Law, Amp Lee, Al Toon and Ed Reed.

Shortest current Skins names are eight characters: H.B. Blades, Cody Body, Todd Wade, Mike Espy. Not an "Art Monk" (7) in the bunch.

It's Friday, right?

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 10, 2007 2:35 PM

ROMO

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:35 PM

redskirt, no no no. No more Cowboys and definitely no Pats. Not unless the conversation focus on interceptions and contraceptions, respectively.

Posted by: dcsween | October 10, 2007 2:35 PM

ROMO 5 PICK SHOULDA BEEN SEVEN

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:36 PM

Sween as usual you state a good point however, if a dude kick your front door in and acted like an A$$clown the first time you met him would you invite him over again for a beer and friendly football banter?

Posted by: Forrest | October 10, 2007 2:36 PM

ROMO

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:36 PM

ROMO

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:37 PM

ROMO almost set an NFL record for picks.

He shoulda signed the big contract when he could.
I am sure Jerry Jones pulled that right off the table tuesday morning.

Posted by: Lyon | October 10, 2007 2:37 PM

I don't mind D-Bag that much. He's not very smart but (wait for it 4th) :) comparatively he's the Dallas version of Einstein.

Althought that Williams being the best safety in the league was pretty stupid. I say we keep him.

Posted by: Skinz | October 10, 2007 2:37 PM

2nd that sween.

Posted by: SAK | October 10, 2007 2:37 PM

ROMO is UNDEFEATED

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:38 PM

d-boy is here because he can't figure out how to register for his own blog

Posted by: f dallas | October 10, 2007 2:38 PM

ROMO

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:39 PM

I find that about 1/2 of the NFL reporters on ESPN could co-host that show. The sad truth is that national NFL guys tend to be kina homerish. If you want good reporting or broadcasting you must go local. This is especally true with MLB broadcasts, I loved the guys who did the Nat's games last season.

Posted by: 35332 | October 10, 2007 2:39 PM

ROMO is about to have his ass handed to him.

Just wait til A. Carter body slams his ass...

Posted by: Lyon | October 10, 2007 2:39 PM

I also think we need to blitz quite often this week. Farve is not afraid to use his check downs if the defense sits back. However, if we tackle like we did last week, Favre's check down tosses won't result in more than 2-3 yards.

Posted by: CC | October 10, 2007 2:40 PM

d-boy is here because he can't figure out how to register for his own blog

Posted by: f dallas | October 10, 2007 02:38 PM

Best comment yet!

Posted by: LMAO | October 10, 2007 2:41 PM

***fantasy post***
sween,
Trade offer alert!
***end fantasy***

Posted by: Stumped | October 10, 2007 2:41 PM

ROMO

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:42 PM

Ok, whew.

The Cowboys for sure will have their toughest task when they play NE. I think they will force them to run by taking away the pass, and they have the secondary to do it. How I see it, the Cowboys have 4 average to very good receivers. It will be fun to watch for sure. The key is getting Jones/Barber^3 going. If they are able to get em' with the PA we all know that opens things up downfield, especially those 10-15 yard routes. Witten should and most likely be a non factor. He will be blanketed by A. Thomas all day. My heart is telling me they'll win but my mind is saying

Boys- 23
Pats- 35

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 2:42 PM

PATS are not the REDSKINETTES SISSY

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:43 PM

Hail Sween!
Hail Forrest!
Hail ThRedSkins!

F A$$clown Patty Fans

oh... and F ChRiS LaRrY!

Posted by: Dik | October 10, 2007 2:43 PM

Well, fine then. I gotta say, it doesn't sit very well with me to be told what I can and can't ask, when I had honest curiosity behind the question.

But, as this is the Redskins Insider blog, and not the NFL Insider blog (which is, admittedly, lame) I will acquiesce.

I have no questions about the Packers game at this point. Moss and ARE need to play, we need to keep our SJK together and play 4 quarters. Pressure, pressure, pressure Favre.

Nothing new here.

Posted by: redskirt | October 10, 2007 2:43 PM

ROMO

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:44 PM

That PACK D will eat DC NOODLE SOUP on SUNDAY

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:45 PM

Boyz of little faith!

Check out cold hard football facts. The Patriots are untested...they have faced 0 quality opponents.

I actually think SMACK's team will win this one, by catching them by surprise.

Remember you heard it from a Skins fan first.

Posted by: Stumped | October 10, 2007 2:46 PM

TONY ROMO 2007 NFC EAST DIV WINNING QB

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:46 PM

Beep beep

Posted by: Forrest | October 10, 2007 2:46 PM

ROMO

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:47 PM

ROMOHNOOOOOO!

I think he just threw ANOTHER pic

Posted by: Dik as " | " | October 10, 2007 2:47 PM

F D-BagX5.

Just another loser Cowgirl fan, looking for a place to harass others. Totally classless, just like his favourite team.

Posted by: KMA | October 10, 2007 2:47 PM

Hmmm..yes, New England has faced no one - this year - but the offense is so high powered now, plus the experience of the team as a whole - I still like NE - not be a lot, but they will win.

Posted by: John D in Houston | October 10, 2007 2:48 PM

ROMO rhymes with what that starts with an H?

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:48 PM

James Jones fumbled a couple times on Monday night heading across the middle of the Pack D. I can't imagine what will be going through his head when he runs across the middle of the field against our secondary. For his own sake...I hope he develops alligator arms.

Posted by: CC | October 10, 2007 2:49 PM

That's the ticket, redskirt: playing for four quarters.

My favorite thing of all from last Sunday was not letting the Lions get back in the game. We knocked them down and then we "put our foot on they neck," which we haven't been able to do with any consistency.

This will be a closer game than that one, and of course it's on the road, but I want to see the same exact spirit and focus from our boys, from kickoff to the final whistle.

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 10, 2007 2:49 PM

Forrest, I'm not trying to be protocol patrol (that's Nate's job), but its a question of maintaining some dignity as real Skins fans (as opposed to over-aggressive, angry homers, like on ExtremeSkins). There was a new poster awhile back who started as "Stop the Kool Aid" ... seemed like a new starter from the horde over at ES. After some civil discussion, he shortened it to "Stop" and picked up on how we talk about stuff, not scream about stuff.

D-Boyz (seriously, how about D-x5?), Adalius Thomas IS the reason why the Pats are so much trouble this year. Its not just about covering TEs. He's everywhere on the field. He is what Polamalu was fabled to have been. Pats' O (like the Colts' O) is overhyped ... but the Pats' D (like the Colts' D) is underhyped.

[I feel like shooting myself in the head for talking about the Pats and the Clots ... the Skins are facing Favre for cripessakes! Starting right now, I'm going to start pronouncing his name as is should be pronounced ... Farf ... like Barf.]

Posted by: dcsween | October 10, 2007 2:50 PM

Oh, I posted these after week 3. Here is an updated Conference Ranking. Each Confrance ranked by overal team W-L records. It still true that the No 1 and 2 are still the AFC S and NFC E
and last place is AFC E. Further proving my theroy New Englands not that great and the AFC East is just a AAA division.

AFC South14-4 .778
NFC East 12-6 .667
AFC North10-8 .556
NFC North10-9 .526
AFC West 8-11 .421
NFC West 8-12 .400
NFC South 7-12 .368
AFC East 7-13 .350

Posted by: 35332 | October 10, 2007 2:50 PM

Breaking News 2:48PM

Jerry Jones states in interview ROMO flash in the pan, withdraws extension. Also says 5 pick performance reminiscent of Steve Pelluer
and Gary Hogeboom, dark days in Dallas QB history.

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:51 PM

Ok, from here on out give me your best shot. I just read the 2:43 post from redskirt. Even your own can't believe how some of you actually try to regulate a blog. Posting is great, but if you feel you have to be the judge, jury, and executioner of a public, (Public people) blog, odds are you need to get more involved with your tasks at work or just simply get a life.

Posted by: D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 2:52 PM

Turnover Tony Romo? Too early to compair him to Tommy Maddox?

Posted by: 35332 | October 10, 2007 2:52 PM

Wait - SMACK is a CowPatty fan??

D-Bag - check out his posts for 'fairplay' he's usually ok, .... I guess... for a Dullard CowPatty Fan..

Ok - shots done for the day I'm ITA from here on in.

Sorry I couldn't make it last, Cin & Jasno.

I'll go back to my corner now.

Posted by: Dik | October 10, 2007 2:53 PM

Breaking News 2:53PM

Jones also states ROMO barely holding on to job, pulls a Steinbrenner and says next game a must win or he might be let go....

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:54 PM

beep

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:55 PM

" I thought you wanted to date Brett Farvere"
-Somthing about Marry

Posted by: 35332 | October 10, 2007 2:55 PM

Breaking Breaking News 2:56 PM

ROMO seen crying after practice, says pressure becoming too much, wants to be left alone with his stuffed animal....

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:56 PM

Ok D-x5 it is.

It better not have some sick and twisted meaning behind it either, lol.

Posted by: D-x5 formally known as D-Boyzx5 | October 10, 2007 2:57 PM

Breaking Breaking Breaking News 2:58PM

Stuffed animal last seen being chased by ROMO- whereabouts unknown....

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 2:59 PM

Two things from the "pre workday lunchbreak" Monday morning H-Back on Wednesday morning dialogue... if that makes any sense?

redskirt: i teach in the middle school in the city. I know its somewhat cryptic, but I don't actually know anyone personally on the blog and don't really trust guys like P Diddy and Dealer for obvious reasons.

webproxy guy: I caught a kid last year using a proxy in the computer lab and he lost his internet privileges for the entire year. Can't imagine what they'd do to me if they caught me doing that.

Redskins*

Posted by: Dorf | October 10, 2007 2:59 PM

On a non-football note I am just 8 MB away from downlaoding the new Radiohead album releasted today on the web.

Posted by: 35332 | October 10, 2007 2:59 PM

Breaking Breaking Breaking News 3:00PM

Stuffed animal to hold press conference. To divulge new information.....

Posted by: Anonymous | October 10, 2007 3:01 PM

Oh and on the question of who is better AFC vs NFC

Overall record AFC 39-36 .520 NFC 37-39 .487

Posted by: 35332 | October 10, 2007 3:04 PM

dcsween, nate, RI Stat-monkeys...

I've got Campbell & Favre on my fantasy team...who should I start this week?

Posted by: Fantasy Advise | October 10, 2007 3:24 PM

Right on SAK, I forgot about Ovechkin and Co.

Posted by: Burg w/ a U | October 10, 2007 3:32 PM

D-x5 or whatever you call yourself now.
You should be jealous of the following teams:

Patriots (because they are now commonly referred to as "Americas Team)... Dallas lost title of Americas team when they became America's Most Wanted team... looking at their fan base, Dallas is Mexicos team... but The Media's Team clearly fits them the past few years. What other team that hasn't won a playoff game in OVER a DECADE gets as much hype?

And the following teams have more, or as many, NFL championships as your Gloryboys:
Packers have 14 championships
Bears have 8
Redskins have 5
Colts have 5
49ers have 5
Steelers have 5
Cowboys have 5


If you wanna just talk superbowls, here ya go:
Dallas was not the first to win 4 (Steelers were) were not the first to win 5 (San Fran) and were not most recent to win 5 (Steelers again)

Recent History? Ok:
Since 1990, the Redskins have 5 seasons that resulted in at least one playoff victory. Dallas has 6. Not much to be jealous of over here, bro.

Posted by: 70 chip | October 10, 2007 3:35 PM

Hey losers----jason campbell winning player of the week is such a major accomplishment. He is definitely better than Tony Romo now right?

WRONG-----Tony Romo was the NFL offensive player of the month for September and has won player of the week 4 times in his 16 starts.

Looks like doug williams jr has some catching up to

And the fact that Dallas has won more Super Bowls, more playoff games and more NFC east division titles than any team in the NFL is made even more impressive by the fact that they have only existed for 47 years.

Now redskins fans, you can go ahead and skew all of those facts to try to make the redskins sound better but real football fans know the truth.

Cowboys, Yankees, Celtics, Canadiens, Notre Dame football, UCLA basketball, Tiger Woods. Those are the flagship francises/teams/players.

What is your response to that DIK eater?

Posted by: Cowboys fans | October 10, 2007 3:50 PM

No I completely understand, Dorf. I know which one you mean. I might even know some of the kids you teach, and some of your co-teachers, considering that I'm still pretty active in my church whenever I go home.

And D-x5, sween apologized for the misunderstanding. I took him more seriously when he was mainly just making a joke at Brady's and Romo's expense (I tend to do that, sorry guys!)

Posted by: redskirt | October 10, 2007 5:30 PM

"Cowboys, Yankees, Celtics, Canadiens, Notre Dame football, UCLA basketball, Tiger Woods. Those are the flagship francises/teams/players.

What is your response to that DIK eater?

Posted by: Cowboys fans | October 10, 2007 03:50 PM"

How unsurprisingly immature.

Assuming you even understood my opening three-word statement, "Cowboy fan," nobody is interested in debating which franchises are the "best" one. We're interested in talking about football right now - not talking about all the "flagship" teams whose bandwagon you've jumped on.

I love how you compare Jason Campbell (11 starts, 2 years) to the 5-year veteran Dallas QB who has more starts. You'd think an older, more experienced guy would be further along...and that it wouldn't be worth bragging about after a 5-INT game against the Bills.

I'm not interested in having a conversation with anyone whose tone makes it sound like they were somehow personally responsible for their team's historical success. Particularly when they bring up stuff that happened before they were even born.

Please take your weak-ass trolling back to wherever you jumped on the Dallas bandwagon from.

Posted by: jcabana | October 11, 2007 12:31 PM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




 
 

© 2007 The Washington Post Company