Redskins Insider, by Jason La Canfora Redskins Insider

Marcus Doubtful; Randle El Questionable

Everypone else probable.

Marcus and Antwaan were the only guys to miss practice.

Daniels practiced - no one thought he would be able to, including him - and while listed as probable said the coaches could still opt to be cautious and hold him out until next week. He also could end up stiff and sore Saturday, which would change things.

Randle El will be a game time decision and they expect him to warm up and go from there.

Smoot was back and talking trash after missing Thursday with the stomach flu. Iron Mike Sellers practiced fully also.

By Jason La Canfora |  October 12, 2007; 1:36 PM ET
Previous: TCCLs | Next: Hello From Lambeau

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



First

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 1:42 PM

1st, 2nd , or 3rd

Posted by: sniksder | October 12, 2007 1:45 PM

MW hurts.. but Godfrey filled admirably,it'd be nice to have ARE against that Pack D... Daniels always plays hurt... either way Demetric Evans has played well in his spot too...

Posted by: sniksder | October 12, 2007 1:49 PM

"Randle El will be a game time decision and they expect him to warm up and go from there."

This is why I sometimes hate fantasy football...

Posted by: CC | October 12, 2007 1:49 PM

tom crusie couch leap is for the danny and his signing of said TC. In his interview, he leapt on the couch about his love on Oprah.

so we (as in the original bloggers, not me) turned it into a scoring system. the more leaps the better

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 01:46 PM

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 1:53 PM

justme.. i guess it is not just me who feels the match-ups in this game favor the burgundy & gold. they just have to put it on the field and leave it all on the field. it makes going to work on monday almost tolerable after a W. on sunday HAIL...

Posted by: sniksder | October 12, 2007 1:54 PM

Marcus Doubtful; Randle El Questionable;
Sean Taylor Unstopable

Posted by: etrod | October 12, 2007 1:54 PM

I always hate fantasy football lol.

And Mr. Moss? They're playing him, I gather? I wouldn't - those groin injuries are deceptive and lead to other injuries if not fully healed.

Godfrey DANIELS, let's see some D on Sunday!

HAIL!

Posted by: Dik | October 12, 2007 1:56 PM

I'm in the top ten. Shows what a day off from work will do for you...

Posted by: noone from tampa | October 12, 2007 2:00 PM

This blog/bog war really heating up....or actuallly isn't...It is so majorly contrived. They are both probably laughing about it and intentially "upping the anti" to drive visitors to The Bog...

The sad fact is Steinberg's blog is actually better in almost every way but two: 1. Skins info and the commentor community.......

Jasno loves him some snark though...snap!

Posted by: CHRIS Larry | October 12, 2007 2:01 PM

Like I said on a previous post earlier this week... Daniels is a warrior!

If we can afford it with good play by Godfrey... It could be helpful to let Marcus sit out this week - it will give his elbow some more time to heal as well... Having that arm get heal up will only help him down the road... esp when rushing the passer!

Time for the O-Line to be big this weekend and pound that GreenBay D.

Let's Roll on Sunday...

HAIL!

Posted by: E in VB | October 12, 2007 2:01 PM

M. Washington is a major loss to the defense. He always has to be accounted for not just in blitz packages but also in coverage. Tremendous news about Daniels. After Fred "Capt. Stubing" Smoot played with a cracked sturnum it was clear the guy deserves warrior status. I read an article yesterday in ESPN Magazine while waiting to get a haircut. They referred to Randel El as barely a 3rd WR. Does Jason write for them too?

Posted by: Wayne P. | October 12, 2007 2:02 PM

Wayne P,

That shows what ESPN knows... El is going to continue to open eyes this year. I think he will only get better as a receiver as the season progresses and thus far he's been our best (no knock on Moss).

Some ESPN analysts are right on and others don't know JACK SJK!

Posted by: E in VB | October 12, 2007 2:06 PM

Did we get "reaper" for ST from somewhere or was that an RI invention?

Posted by: Skinz | October 12, 2007 2:06 PM

Marcus doubtful?

Someone remind me again why we cut Lemar Marshall?

Lemar >>>>> Godfrey

Posted by: Clinton Hill | October 12, 2007 2:06 PM

JustMe, sniks, not worried about playing a 4-1 team in their building? Surely you jest... yeah, we CAN win this game, but I hope the players don't go in as confident as you guys are.

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 12, 2007 01:46 PM

Nate in PDX, you've gotta point, but I doubt they will come into this game over confident.. Favre & Lambeau alone give cause for concern.. but match up wise, I believe favors the skins. Pack have a potent d (against lousy offenses mind you), o-line is nicked up, they have not faced a D with the speed that the skins' d has,2 of their top 3 receivers are inexperienced, their TE is big but he's not gonna stretch the field like say a shockey,they have no run game.. Hopefully the skins can put together 4 qtrs of hard nosed football and bring home a win, but I am not saying it will be easy.

Posted by: sniksder | October 12, 2007 2:08 PM

Has anyone ever seen the Tom Cruise Couch Leap animated gif where 'the force' eminates from his fingertips?

http://jasonjeffrey.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/tom_cruise_oprah.gif

Posted by: Dik | October 12, 2007 2:09 PM

or more properly asked - has anyone NOT seen it yet... lol.

Posted by: Dik | October 12, 2007 2:11 PM

Marcus is less critical against the Pack who throw short and quick. And we have depth at LB. D-line won't sack Favre much because of his quick passes, but they need to get their hands up to tip passes. ARE is important because he and Santana are really both dangerous and open up the whole offense. In case no one noticed, the Skins may think they are a power run team, but the offense is more effective with a pass first mentality. I think a big part of that is Campbell getting his rhythm down early. Still, its football and injuries will always be a part and so far, our depth has been good enough.

Posted by: AL | October 12, 2007 2:13 PM

Clinton Hill, are you being serious? Marshall on the field last year was akin to playing defense with only 10 guys.

Posted by: Greg(Boston) | October 12, 2007 2:16 PM

Marshall and Holdman sucked, Clinton Hill. They were not good. Even on a defense featuring Adam Archuleta, they managed to look bad in every game.

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 12, 2007 2:18 PM

tom cruise is truely crazy. sucks since i like almost every movie he is in. its almost like you forget that he is tom cruise and he actually makes you belive he is that character.

Kevin Spacey and Denzel do the same. Maybe Freeman, Nicholson. I.e. they are the least typecast peeps in showbiz

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 2:18 PM

E in VB, I concur. Randel El is a bona fide threat any time he touches the ball. It's just funny reading articles from September and what all these experts predict. They're all the same anyway. It's like one person writes an article and everyone else regurgitates it so either they're all right or all wrong. Man, dare to step outside the box once in a while.

Getting back to the injuries, I still think Randel El will play because he has value on the field even if he just runs a rout to draw coverage away from the primary WR. Also, with all the modern 'treatment' available to por ballers these days, isn't a week plenty of time for a hammy? Could this be a case of JJG fudging the IR's again? I'm thinking yes. Watch for Favre to look for screens and short dumps to RB's and TE's because Marcus has the speed and the smarts to make those plays - he's proven it.

Now we have a real 'chicken or the egg' theory. Is the D-Line playing well because of the brilliant secondary play - or vice versa?

Posted by: Wayne P. | October 12, 2007 2:21 PM

Watching NFL Network online, i watched the preview of the Lions game. Bill Mass and two other slubs basically saying the Skins had no chance... we all could do that job... it isnt that hard as long as you dont get flustered in front of the camera.

They dont have any more knowledge than we do with the advent of the interwebs and such as. they can just spew their filth without flinching

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 2:24 PM

If ARE is a game time decision, that means he is active and Reche Caldewell is inactive? Or, do teams not have to decide that till Sunday?

Posted by: CC | October 12, 2007 2:26 PM

Zebra
Get Dik off your tail and Nobody has to drink ROMO kool-aide because he is really that good! As a matter of FACT 3rd best & DC NOODLE is in BOTTOM 15!!
When was the last time REDSKINETTES were 5-0 like 20 yrs or so?? Those 2 picks you dweeled on in your earlier post forgot to mention the 2 he threw to WIN the game?

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 2:27 PM

Zebra
PS you also used ALOT of IFs in your comeback! Being obnoxis and ignorant explains that!!

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 2:28 PM

Great question, CC... and to take it one step further, if ARE is active, is it possible the inactive WR would be... Brandon Lloyd??

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 12, 2007 2:31 PM

One would hope Lloyd would be the inactive WR...but I'm sure Gibbs doesn't want the headaches from the media or create any team distractions.

Posted by: CC | October 12, 2007 2:36 PM

Still concerned about Marcus out and Daniels taking a diminished role in the rotation, if at all. This is a BIG test for the D front seven.

I have faith in Randall Godfrey. Not Marcus-London-Rocky-level faith, but faith.

VIGILANCE!

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 12, 2007 2:38 PM

Marshall and Holdman sucked, Clinton Hill. They were not good. Even on a defense featuring Adam Archuleta, they managed to look bad in every game.

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 12, 2007 02:18 PM

Marshall, I wasn't so down on. I think that had the Assistant Deity - Defence gone with game planning similar to the pared-down lean-and-mean scheme now instead of his super-fancy confuse-everyone-5-ways-to-Sunday work of 'genious', he might have actually performed a bit better. Not that I don't mind LoFleBaker being in the mix now...

But Holdmann, ugh. Godfrey might not be great, and might not be putting himself on the highlight reels anytime soon, but at least he doesn't draw attention to himself for playing badly. Can't Getta Holdmann was getting attention for all the wrong reasons. How'd Dale Lindsey think we'd get by with him, I'm not sure.

Posted by: FlimFlam | October 12, 2007 2:38 PM

Favre has never lost to the redskins....will this be the week? I am scared.

Posted by: ScaredGirl | October 12, 2007 2:38 PM

MAN.. I GOTTS TO GO>>> MY PARENTS ARE ON THERE WEY HOM and THEY DON"T NO THAT I HAVE THE CODE TO UNLOCK THE PARINTAL CODE ON THE COMPUTER.. HOPE THEY DONT MIND THAT I FLUNKED 4TH PERIOD.. MAN I"L be upset IF they GRound ME and DON"T let me WATCH ROMONOODLE get ABSOLUTLY demolisheded by NU enGLUND

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 2:39 PM

I think Clinton Hill is only here because he keeps clicking on the "marijuana" ad appearing in the top righthand corner of this page. Clinton, just call Travis Henry for a dub. Marshall was terrible, I hate to say. If I were a coach I would have every running play aimed at him and have my QB throw to anyone he was efforting to cover. he actually made Adam Archibald's look good.

I can't believe that Randel El is going to get all taped up, dress and warm up just to ride the pine this week.

Does Doc Walker have anymore nicknames this week? I can't keep up. Hey, what if the sister of the S.Carolina QB married the QB from USC. What would HER name be? Or if Rocky MacIntosh married Gwenneth Paltrow, what would Gwenneth's kid's name be? I think I need to start my own column.

Posted by: Wayne P. | October 12, 2007 2:40 PM

What's up with the Cowboy fans and the caps lock?

Posted by: P on the Alamo | October 12, 2007 2:40 PM

It's so the print is big enough that god can look down through the hole in Dallas Stadium and read it.

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 2:44 PM

I'm sure God can afford a flatscreen - or at least a skybox. Get it?

Posted by: Wayne P. | October 12, 2007 2:45 PM

I thought that hole was for God to Pi$$ all over em

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 2:46 PM

Really that good huh? What has he won? Anything other than games??? Then shut it. I havent said Campbell has won anything, but you can look back in JLa's chat yesterday where he said he would take Campbell over Eli or Tony.

In fact, in their only head to head meeting last year, JC and our team won that game. So now what?

"Tony might get better stats, but he will be up and down, a gunslinger type. Where JC will be cool calm and collected and will win games and not lose them."

All from a Ravens fan who is impartial.

So until you find an impartial person to back your POV then you got nothin. And learn to spell obnoxious... missing the o and u is not just quick typing, you really dont know how to spell do you?

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 2:47 PM

Wayne P, the answer to your 'chicken or egg' paradox is..... YES!

Posted by: Dik | October 12, 2007 2:53 PM

Zebra
Get Dik off your tail and Nobody has to drink ROMO kool-aide because he is really that good! As a matter of FACT 3rd best & DC NOODLE is in BOTTOM 15!!
When was the last time REDSKINETTES were 5-0 like 20 yrs or so?? Those 2 picks you dweeled on in your earlier post forgot to mention the 2 he threw to WIN the game?

...........................................

When is the last time the CowGirls won a Playoff game?

All Hail

Posted by: wstclair | October 12, 2007 3:02 PM

Is it ok that I find "DC NOODLE" a hilarious nickname for Soups? It cracks me up every time that Dbag writes it.

Posted by: WrongDog | October 12, 2007 3:03 PM

Could this be a case of JJG fudging the IR's again? I'm thinking yes.

Posted by: Wayne P. | October 12, 2007 02:21 PM

Ummm.. El isn't on IR, how can JJG be fudging IR when none of the players mentioned were even considered for IR.

But it could be a case of making the inactive decisions easier on the ol' man's heart strings. It's got to be easier to sit the guy with the injury. So far, injury has been his main reason for sitting starting players for a game all year (Springs, Smoot, Moss). Part me thinks he is trying to keep these guys off the field till they are closer to 100% to ensure we still have them come playoff time!

Posted by: FBChick | October 12, 2007 3:03 PM

From the ESPN Chat today:

Anthony (College Park, MD): You mentioned those Green Bay slants. How long do you think they're going to do that on Sunday with Laron Landry and Sean Taylor in the middle of the field?

Matt Williamson: The slants run more at the LBs. Wash's safeties-which are killers, I agree-probably won't get direct shots on them right after the catch. Very short throws.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Larry (Brooklyn, NY): Eli, Romo or campbell 3 years from now?...I take campbell because he's the most physically talented and makes the fewest mistakes

Matt Williamson: Very tough call, but give me Campbell. Right now: Romo. Then? Campbell. VERY bright future. That isn't a knock on either of the other two though.

Posted by: Greg(Boston) | October 12, 2007 3:03 PM

To the ESPN Chat Williamson's comment:

What happens when the LB holds the reciever up for a minute so the Reaper can wield his scythe?!

...smilin'

Posted by: Dik | October 12, 2007 3:07 PM

Great question, CC... and to take it one step further, if ARE is active, is it possible the inactive WR would be... Brandon Lloyd??

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 12, 2007 02:31 PM

I think it will be a telling tale on which one of the two sits, if ARE is active.

Posted by: FBChick | October 12, 2007 3:10 PM

I'm sorry, I forgot to factor in the people that don't read well when I write. IR's clearly stands for injury reports. If I meant injured reserve, I'd just type IR. I'll write like I am writing to 3rd graders next time - my bust.

Posted by: Wayne P. | October 12, 2007 3:11 PM

Zebra,

I don't think that Campbell has played the 'girls yet.

Posted by: gethanr13 | October 12, 2007 3:12 PM

If BLloyd is inactive for this game, then the Redskins need to take the necessary steps to either suspend this guy, or send him home. He's not contributing to this team, he's taking time away from someone who might have something to give.

Enough is enough with this guy.

Posted by: Greg(Boston) | October 12, 2007 3:16 PM

FBChick? Let me guess, the FB stands for either Fredericksburg, Fat Burger or fundamentally **tchy. Anyone typing "ummm" as if they're confused as to how anyone else can be so off base should put a little more thought into a direct-response to me rather than the actual topic. Thanks.

Posted by: Wayne P. | October 12, 2007 3:18 PM

Play the Flintstones theme song...

Clinton.
Clinton Portis.
He's the best of Gold and Burgundy.
From the town of DC,
He's about to score another TD.

Let's run behind the blocks of 45,
And a-cross the goal line he will fly.

When you run with Portis.
Have a super smart time, control the line time, we'll have a 4 and 1 time!!!!

(WILLLLLL-MAAAAA!)

OK, I'm outta here.

Posted by: Dorf | October 12, 2007 3:19 PM

Wayne, stop using, I, uh, big words everywhere like, such as to build up our future, such as.

"Maps"

Posted by: Dik | October 12, 2007 3:20 PM

You may be right g;

Campbell played in 8 games starting the last 7... I thought the girls came within that stretch but it looks like we played them right after the bye which was one game short of campbell playing. My bad

Ill retract that, but as another p[ointed out, peeps are taking campbell over romoron

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 3:21 PM

Nate,
It's not like they're going to run the ball down our throats. We just have to make some adjustments to cover the seams. I think the LB platoon will manage it.

Posted by: Stumped | October 12, 2007 3:21 PM

Gibbs interview on skins.com

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 3:24 PM

gethanr13: You're right, Boonell played against the girls last year when we beat them. that makes it even funnier that we beat them because Boonell playing!lol

Posted by: RockyTopSkin | October 12, 2007 3:25 PM

Dik? At least you live up to your name. have a great weekend.

Posted by: Wayne P. | October 12, 2007 3:26 PM

Per Jasnos previous post, BL has no future in DC.
Correct me if I'm wrong, there is no incentive to play someone that can't be traded and you'll just have to release after the season is over, right?

Posted by: Stumped | October 12, 2007 3:27 PM

Pretty short. No swinging souls, not much. Dissapointing, but maybe he tirade last week has lasting effects. you cant just do it to do it, thats fraudulant and the players will see right through that.

he did stress that it is an important game and he made everyone keenly aware.

Jla got in my question about ARE (not really mine but I did implore him yesterday) returning punts. Gibbs said that if he is in then he is in all the way.

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 3:29 PM

what's with Wayne P? slides in with normal football talk and then BAM, starts dumping on people.

Scary

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 3:30 PM

The names of the inactive players are due 90 minutes before game-time.

Posted by: CMoney | October 12, 2007 3:33 PM

I think if Lloyd can't step up right now with the way the WR corps are all banged-up, what use will he ever be? Keenan walked in, downed a few glasses of metimucil and accomplished more in one game than Lloyd has since well before the end of last season. Lloyd has a chance to do something this week but I fear that he got paid just doesn't care anymore.

I know Farve has been playing at an MVP level but just before the beginning of the 4th quarter in last week's game against Chicago, I swore I saw the re-emergence of "Bad Brett". I smell a 3-pick day coming on.

Posted by: Wayne P. | October 12, 2007 3:34 PM

Yeah;

Flag on the play Wayne P.

5 yard penalty for blog misconduct.

Someone getting confused over your abbreviating or IR (which is always regarded as Injured Reserve, but I understood what you meant after realizing what everybody thought you meant made no sense) is understandable and they dont need a tongue lashing.

Replay first down

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 3:35 PM

Zebra - That was 'intentional' and direct tongue lashing, which should result in a loss of down. No?

Posted by: Replay Booth | October 12, 2007 3:38 PM

Wayne P....You work for the government or some other large bureaucratic institution? 'cuz acronyms only work when everyone understands exactly what you mean? Like when i say FAQ, you may be some guy thinking...hmmm...'frequently asked question' when really i'm telling you to go f*ck yourself....

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 3:38 PM

3:30 was me - sorry

Posted by: mmok | October 12, 2007 3:38 PM

Hey Wayne,

That's soooo original. Man, you are impressive with your retorts. Scintillating.

Here I am backin' your sorry SJK up & try to rag on me?!

Sorry if my interaction with you offended, it was only meant as observation on your commentary.

As far as your weak attempt at an insult, I've seen/heard much better. Care to try again?

Posted by: Dik | October 12, 2007 3:38 PM

Did we get "reaper" for ST from somewhere or was that an RI invention?

Posted by: Skinz | October 12, 2007 02:06 PM

In case no one answered this: LaVar Arrington was the person who gave Sean Taylor the name, "Grim Reaper". Seems Sean walked into the locker room wearing a hoodie and LaVar made the comment.

Posted by: Chuck D. | October 12, 2007 3:39 PM

Man, you are all so fragile. Please don't think for a nanosecond that I care about any of you anonymous pot-shotters. It's actually a feather in my cap that you've gotten your panties in a bunch over me. Now, can we ignore the kiddie table and get back to the discussion? Thaaaaan youuuu.

Posted by: Wayne P. | October 12, 2007 3:41 PM

Wayne P,
Hamstring tears are almost impossible to heal correctly and take forever to do so. So hamstring pulls are treated very carefully and conservatively. A severe hamstring pull can take weeks or months to heal.

Posted by: Chuck D. | October 12, 2007 3:44 PM

Replay upheld... loss of down and game misconduct... just saw the dik comment.

Really, you come here for interaction as a newbie (unless you have blogged under a different name) and you expect a back and forth with that type of attitude.

Sorry dude, have fun mono-blogging cause no one will engage you if you act like an @ssclown

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 3:45 PM

Dik- You remind me of the back of my balls. I'm out.

Posted by: Wayne P. | October 12, 2007 3:46 PM

Wayne, you're treading dangerously close to ITA territory. U sure you're not a Cowpatty?

Posted by: Dik | October 12, 2007 3:47 PM

Thanks Dr. I don't remember anyone saying anything about a tear. I do, however, remember hearing that El was running in practice - in straight lines - I just choose to remain optimistic. I never heard the word "severe" either. I guess you know something no one else knows. Thanks for the update. If El plays this weekend and heaven forbid, scores, will you call it a miracle?

Posted by: Wayne P. | October 12, 2007 3:47 PM

Dik, I didn't type the 3:46 post. I would need a mirror to make such an assessment and frankly, I don't care, as long as that person's mother likes 'em. HAHA, take care and GO SKINS!

Posted by: Wayne P. | October 12, 2007 3:49 PM

Yeah Wayne P, your out.

Definately a troll having fun. But for the life of me I cant figure out why it is fun. Guess you gotta have to be a slack jawed yokel to get what he gets jollys from

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 3:52 PM

Wayne P...let me try to explain it to you like I would to a 3rd grader...Our good friend from Public Enemy (Chuck D.) was merely trying to state that given that El has a hamstring injury, the coaches and trainers do not want to make it worse. If it gets worse, it could turn into a more severe injury, such as a severe pull or tear, which may take longer to heal.

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 3:52 PM

A little anatomy lesson.

Hamstrings are the largest muscle group in the body and run down the back of the leg from the pelvis to the knee. The groin muscles are in the upper inside portion of the leg and across the lower front pelvic area. Both are very slow to heal since both are used for most everyday functions, including walking, running, sitting down, standing up, etc.

Santana has a groin muscle pull. ARE has a hamstring pull.

Muscle pulls and tears can be the result of improper stretching, but are most often caused by imbalances in muscle development. The hamstrings are balanced by the quadriceps (front of the thigh), for example. Over-development of either one will cause problems in the other.

Posted by: Chuck D. | October 12, 2007 3:53 PM

Wayne? Your dick is on the back of your balls? Definitely a cowboy fan.

Ok - you're an A$$clown. Someone does answer your question and you still come off like a jerk.

Sorry about your parents.

Posted by: Dik | October 12, 2007 3:53 PM

m'bad Wayne - A$$clowns got me.

I gotte remember to read between the lines.

Hail

Posted by: Dik | October 12, 2007 3:54 PM

I am surrounded by retards - and PE is nothing without Flava Flav. It's so telling when you can't honestly sign what you write. So I guess a bunch of bloggers hate me? Doesn't that make me an utter winner? Ciao.

Posted by: Wayne P. | October 12, 2007 3:54 PM

Thanks Chuck


Ignore that chode yoddler. He's a Dallas fan and his name is Wayne. Come on, ever met a guy named Wayne and thought "Man I'd like to be like that guy."

No, me either.


Posted by: Skinz | October 12, 2007 4:04 PM

Dik,
Thanks for the link to the Tom Cruise force lightning video. 1000 TCCLs to you. The best part was Oprah writhing on the couch!

Posted by: Mr. Dumberton | October 12, 2007 4:04 PM

I agree guys...no need for him to be such a smart a** and try to belittle others' opinions or chew them out sarcastically for misunderstanding.

Posted by: RockyTopSkin | October 12, 2007 4:05 PM

I T A

Go back to ES

Posted by: Dik | October 12, 2007 4:08 PM

Wayne Gretzky
Reggie Wayne
Wayne's World

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 4:08 PM

Wayne Newton

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 4:10 PM

Wayne Brady

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 4:11 PM

No reference yet for "Fountains of Wayne"?

Posted by: Where's Nate? | October 12, 2007 4:12 PM

Wayne's Wings at the corner of 11th and Mulberry

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 4:13 PM

Hail Dumberton
Hail RI ThRedSkins

Posted by: Dik | October 12, 2007 4:14 PM

John Wayne

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 4:14 PM

John Wayne (RIP)
Carol Wayne (RIP)
That idiot Wayne from MASH.

Posted by: No Way-ne | October 12, 2007 4:15 PM

Since we are playing the Wayne Game...

Bruce Wayne

Posted by: Cindy's boy toy | October 12, 2007 4:16 PM

Wayne Fontes

Posted by: Lion Eyes | October 12, 2007 4:17 PM

Places, not people

Wayne Manor
Fort Wayne

Posted by: Fake Wayne | October 12, 2007 4:18 PM

Wayne Rooney

Posted by: mmok | October 12, 2007 4:19 PM

Duh

Posted by: not Wayne | October 12, 2007 4:19 PM

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 4:19 PM

Lil' Wayne

Posted by: CC | October 12, 2007 4:19 PM

Meh... mostly in F Wayne mode at the moment.

Bruce Wayne

Marion Morrison

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 12, 2007 4:20 PM

Wayne the Stain

Posted by: I made this one up | October 12, 2007 4:20 PM

This is a fun game.

I don't teabag the ladies...I potato sack them!

Posted by: Chuck Norris | October 12, 2007 4:21 PM

Wayne Huzienga

Posted by: Trash Unlimited | October 12, 2007 4:21 PM

Wayne Chrebet (sp?)

Posted by: CC | October 12, 2007 4:22 PM

Sorry, Nate. I beat you to the Batman reference. By Don and Mike's rules, you are eliminated from the Wayne Game.

Posted by: Cindy's boy toy | October 12, 2007 4:22 PM

WAYNE GANDY

Posted by: POOP | October 12, 2007 4:23 PM

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 4:23 PM

D. Wayne Lucas

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 4:23 PM

Wayne Cochran

Posted by: unWayne | October 12, 2007 4:24 PM

Wayne P. is a D-bag?

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 4:24 PM

I Wayne

Posted by: I got Lil' Wayne first, too | October 12, 2007 4:24 PM

OOOOOOOklahoma Wayne

Posted by: POOP | October 12, 2007 4:25 PM

Somewhere Over the Waynebow

Posted by: daveb55 | October 12, 2007 4:26 PM

Wayne Kramer!

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 12, 2007 4:26 PM

Loudoun Wainwright III

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 12, 2007 4:27 PM

Lil' Wayne claims to have been shot in the single "Know What I'm Doin'". He mistakenly shot himself with his stepfather's gun as a child

Now that my friends is Irony.

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 4:28 PM

Wayne Sevier!!!!

And we call ourselves Redskins fans!

Posted by: Cindy's boy toy | October 12, 2007 4:29 PM

Reggie Wayne

Posted by: PM | October 12, 2007 4:29 PM

Wayne Millner

Posted by: Oh Yeah? | October 12, 2007 4:31 PM

What about me and my BBQ?

Posted by: Famous Dave | October 12, 2007 4:31 PM

Did you know that there have been 16 serial killers with the middle name wayne?

And guess who happens to have that middle name. And guess what his favorite number is.... yep you guessed it, 17.

Run away!

http://newsoftheweird.com/wayne.html

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 4:31 PM

Wayne "Tree" Rollins

another DC reference

Posted by: Lindsay Czarniak | October 12, 2007 4:31 PM

Wayne Wang!

Posted by: Maid in Manhattan | October 12, 2007 4:32 PM

Michael Waynestbrook

Donnie Waynerren

Joe Wayneshington

Posted by: trying to join in the fun | October 12, 2007 4:33 PM

Wayne Curry

New Stadium: Redskins owner Jack Kent Cooke, Maryland Gov. Parris N. Glendening and Prince George's County executive Wayne Curry sign a contract paving the way for the immediate start of construction for the new home of the Redskins in Prince George's County.

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 4:33 PM

was that a bangbros testimonial?

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 4:33 PM

Wayne State University

Posted by: Go Warriors! | October 12, 2007 4:35 PM

www stands for Wayne Wayne Wayne

Posted by: I am Wayne and I invented the internet | October 12, 2007 4:37 PM

Wayne Sevier

Posted by: JJG | October 12, 2007 4:37 PM

Singin' in the Wayne?

Posted by: SMACK | October 12, 2007 4:38 PM

okay, my bad.

BALANCE!

Posted by: JJG | October 12, 2007 4:39 PM

Wow...even with Z's comment, no John Wayne Gacy yet?

Clowns scare me!!!

Posted by: Circus Boy | October 12, 2007 4:39 PM

Love Story is also based on me and Tipper

Posted by: I am Wayne, hear me roar! | October 12, 2007 4:39 PM

I thought Z covered JWG with his serial killer post

Posted by: Cindy's boy toy | October 12, 2007 4:40 PM

You're so wayne. You probably think this song is about you.

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 4:40 PM

Wayne Gilchrest

Posted by: Maryland | October 12, 2007 4:41 PM

I won the Nobel Peace Prize

Posted by: I am Wayne and Al Gore wishes he was me! | October 12, 2007 4:41 PM

...ok...so he gets ALL the serial killers in one post?

dang...

F Wayne P!

Posted by: Circus Boy | October 12, 2007 4:41 PM

Whoa what have i started. Don't Wayne out on me here guys.

Posted by: Skinz | October 12, 2007 4:42 PM

Are we in the middle of a Wayne-timatum here? What did I miss, or do I not want to scroll back to see?

Posted by: 4-12 | October 12, 2007 4:43 PM

Two separate Helen Reddy references within one minute of each other.

I don't know whether to be impressed or scared.

Posted by: Cindy's boy toy | October 12, 2007 4:43 PM

Hang out with my WAYNE out!!

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 4:44 PM

pathetically off base on this one

Posted by: haynesworth is my hero | October 12, 2007 4:45 PM

first of all the skins do have a great chance at winning this game. However, i believe that the key is not so much the defense but rather the offense. against the lions the o showed great emotion, everyone was banging including the WRs. we basically told them to get up or the get the hell out of the way. think we can do it again this weekend?

Posted by: san | October 12, 2007 4:45 PM

1. Wayne has shot his wad.
2. Wayne has left the building.

Posted by: The Wayne-timatum is over when I say it is over | October 12, 2007 4:45 PM

No 4-12, started by a troll or a troll impersonating a poster named Wayne P. Called Dik the back of his balls or something.

Nice little tangent dont you think>??

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 4:46 PM

Everybody Wayne-chung tonite!

Posted by: waiting since '92 | October 12, 2007 4:46 PM

TWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEET

Posted by: farstriker | October 12, 2007 4:47 PM

first of all the skins do have a great chance at winning this game. However, i believe that the key is not so much the defense but rather the offense. against the lions the o showed great emotion, everyone was banging including the WRs. we basically told them to get up or the get the hell out of the way. think we can do it again this weekend?

Posted by: san | October 12, 2007 04:45 PM

What in the SJK is this guy talking about? What does this have to do with Wayne?

Posted by: Sans san from now on | October 12, 2007 4:48 PM

[running onto the field waving arms]

Okay, that's it. That's a Wayne warning.

Back to bidness as usual.

Posted by: farstriker | October 12, 2007 4:48 PM

Time Out?

Flag?

Or is it the bass dropping tweet tweet tweet that gets the club bumpin?

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 4:49 PM

wait, are we going to employ the term Wayne for when someone gets flammed for no reason? tha'd be AWESOME!

Kinda like "...he was Munsoned out in the middle of nowhere.."

So it'd be like: "I dunno, I was responding to his post about the LB's and he just started Wayneing on me..." or "Don't Wayne on ChriS LaRRy"

wotsay?

Posted by: Dik | October 12, 2007 4:49 PM

I Wayne to please

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 4:49 PM

The FB stands for Football. Period.

And for the rest of the RI gang.. NICE!


Posted by: FBChick | October 12, 2007 4:49 PM

Yeah, the third one

so let's get the party jumpin

Posted by: farstriker | October 12, 2007 4:50 PM

Gotcha Zeb. Anything to help with anticipation of this weekend's game. I guess.

Posted by: 4-12 | October 12, 2007 4:50 PM

Are you suggesting we add "Wayne" to our RI lingo?

I'm game.

Posted by: Cindy's boy toy | October 12, 2007 4:51 PM

Do we really want to make that fleeting troll a part of RI Lore?

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 4:51 PM

The Reaper will be Wayneing on the Pack receivers!!!

Posted by: Area 51 | October 12, 2007 4:53 PM

fleeting troll to you

I call him "father"

wait . . .

or was it "strange guy on the bus who pressed up against me"?

can't remember

Posted by: farstriker | October 12, 2007 4:53 PM

nah, I guess not - but it was pretty funny. Like Woody Hurleson (sp??) in that bowling movie.

Posted by: Dik | October 12, 2007 4:53 PM

Bring the Wayne!!!!

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 4:54 PM

Kingpin?

Posted by: CC | October 12, 2007 4:54 PM

"strange guy on the bus who pressed up against me"?

Damn, you too.... LOL

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 4:54 PM

Hail FBChick!

Posted by: Dik | October 12, 2007 4:54 PM

Yes, Kingpin. too funny in some spots. "Munsoned" being one of them.

Posted by: Dik | October 12, 2007 4:55 PM

Do not feed the Muslim troll. The troll (Faris Jawad) uses many names
including: Wayne, Ian Balchin, Qahir Al-Ashrar, Venkataraman the
Biiiig Hindu, Liu Yan, ISLAMOPHOBIA, Möbius Pretzel, Buddy III,
Mujahid, V i v a P a l e s t i n e!, Burhan, Farid Ahmed, Kope...

Posted by: Google this | October 12, 2007 4:56 PM

Later Gators...wow can't beleive I just wrote that. That is so Wayne of me.


HTTR

Posted by: Skinz | October 12, 2007 4:56 PM

Of course, I had to call my cell phone provider this afternoon with an account issue, so who do I get on the phone at customer service? Wayne, naturally.

Posted by: Chuck D. | October 12, 2007 4:57 PM

I am the real Wayne (and the Fake Nate)

Posted by: Faris Jawad | October 12, 2007 4:57 PM

Posted by: 4-12 | October 12, 2007 4:58 PM

Chuck D. - Wayne is Everywhere

Posted by: Mojo Nixon | October 12, 2007 4:59 PM

Does that get a "Do What?"

All I hear in my head is that alarm

" CEREBRAL PALSY, BRAIN DAMAGE ALERT"

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 4:59 PM

You know, guys and gals, let's not forget that Wayne P. has been a valued part of the RI regular bios on the wiki for, like, minutes.

http://redskinsinsiders.wetpaint.com/page/RI+Regulars+Bios

Posted by: farstriker | October 12, 2007 5:01 PM

Well, it's gettin on to quittin time here.

Let's recap:

Skins face a tough challenge at Lambeauxgh this weekend as one of the original members of the Rolling Stones throws dink passes at our linebackers.

Receiver, The will be watching from the team bus while Washington and El give him 'noogies'

Joe Gibbs will start taking his heart medication again as Grilliams actually barbeques on the sidelines.

Fred Smoot will try to hire a boat on the bay as he thinks Cheeseheads are actually Chickenheads w/ money.

And Dallas looses to the Patriots, both quarterbacks getting suspended for being 'too annoying to play football'

Sounds like a great weekend!

Hail to ThRedSkins
Hail Victory!

TTYL

Posted by: Dik | October 12, 2007 5:01 PM

Wayne needs boats
Wayne needs boats
Wayne, Wayne, Wayne, Wayne, Wayne, Wayne, Wayne, needs boats

Apologies to Mojo, don't know if I got the count of Waynes correct in the final verse.

Posted by: Cindy's boy toy | October 12, 2007 5:03 PM

Don't Wayne on my parade!

Posted by: Mark Moseley | October 12, 2007 5:05 PM

Anyone want a Brat?

Posted by: GG | October 12, 2007 5:07 PM

Jasno ugh! Horrible shirt/tie combo on WaPoLive

Posted by: noone from tampa | October 12, 2007 5:07 PM

Speaking of which, it's been a while since the roster of RI regulars was added to on the wiki.

Don't be shy--post a bio! It's a Cialis thing--when the moment is right you'll know.

Posted by: farstriker | October 12, 2007 5:09 PM

I guess it's official. I will try to incorporate "Wayne" into my everyday conversation.

I hear if you use a word three times, you own it.

Posted by: Cindy's boy toy | October 12, 2007 5:09 PM

Jasno has the uber-cool punk fashion down pat. Goes well with his cheap designer glasses.

Posted by: Plaid & Pink Rocks! | October 12, 2007 5:10 PM

Also the list of Mayberry is incrediably weak.

Come on, volunteer today!

Posted by: Zebra | October 12, 2007 5:12 PM

Redskins coach Joe Gibbs demonstrated last weekend how much he likes playing NFC North teams. During his coaching career, Gibbs has racked up a 30-6 record against NFC North teams. Unfortunately for Gibbs and the Redskins, that record is only 2-2 against the Packers, Sunday's opponent. -- NFL Network

Posted by: POOP | October 12, 2007 5:16 PM

Viva Viagara!

Posted by: not farstriker | October 12, 2007 5:16 PM

Joe will be 3-2 against the Packers after Sunday...

Posted by: POOP | October 12, 2007 5:17 PM

It appears that Viagr* is a banned word by TWP.

Posted by: They're kidding, right? | October 12, 2007 5:19 PM

By the way, I love TWP as an acronym for The Washington Post. It reminds me of "twerp".

Posted by: Rocking' the iPod | October 12, 2007 5:22 PM

I'm surprised Jason didn't try to use this injury report to try to bash Stein some more. Get over it dude. I want to hear about Redskins, not your petty rivalries.

Posted by: Smith | October 12, 2007 6:15 PM

Can someone post a link to the blog entry where Steinberg calls JLC "that little twerp?" I can't find it.

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 6:18 PM

As an airplane is about to crash, a female passenger jumps up frantically and announces, "If I'm going to die, I want to die feeling like a woman."

She removes all her clothing and asks, "Is there someone on this plane who is man enough to make me feel like a woman?"

A man stands up, removes his shirt and says, "Here, iron this!".

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 6:19 PM

Smith,
The whole thing is rather amusing, no?

At RI there is no ordering a la carte.

Everything is served up with a wry smile (or a wink and a nudge, as some hamsters might prefer), not a Wise smirk.

Posted by: Stumped | October 12, 2007 6:23 PM

Novacek is at it again-

Green Bay gets a lot more attention because of Brett Favre and the season he's had, while Washington has been under the radar. It's an evenly matched game and if it was in Washington, I'd pick the Redskins. But playing in Green Bay should be the difference.

Pick: Packers.

////if it were on the moon....

Posted by: X | October 12, 2007 6:25 PM

....i'd pick the moontians.

Posted by: Anonymous | October 12, 2007 6:28 PM

No odoriferous emanations coming from here. This blog is rockin'!

Posted by: not "who farted? this blog stinks" | October 12, 2007 6:38 PM

I pee'd my pants.

Posted by: not POOP | October 12, 2007 6:40 PM

Stumped,
If I believed that it actually was in good fun, I think I would enjoy it more. But it really seems like Stein managed to get under Jason's skin. I think this because Jason has promised it's no big deal, but then he keeps bringing it up in a passive-aggressive way. I'm all for humor and info by the way.

Posted by: Smith | October 12, 2007 6:40 PM

F Bawdymore.
F the iPod.
Hail Steinbog!

Posted by: not Jasno | October 12, 2007 6:43 PM

Posted by: JustMe | October 12, 2007 6:45 PM

I like younger women.

Posted by: not Cindy's Boy Toy | October 12, 2007 6:45 PM

Chuck,
If the quads are the counter balance to the hamstrings... what muscle group is the counter balance to the groin?

Posted by: Dante | October 12, 2007 6:47 PM

St. Petersburg?

Posted by: not noone from Tampa | October 12, 2007 6:49 PM

ESPN INSIDER, Take 2: Skins vs. Packers

http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/feat...ameId=271014009


Earlier this week, our scouts filed their advance scouting report on this week's matchup between the Redskins and packers. Now they're back with a second look.

Matchup to watchWashington offensive coordinator Al Saunders vs. Green Bay defensive coordinator Bob Sanders
Saunders has kept defenses on their heels this season and his feel for when to call a run or pass has been exceptional. And his use of screens and some gimmick plays with WR Antwaan Randle El gives opponents even more to prepare for. Saunders also likes to use TE Chris Cooley on option routes and on the backside of play-action passes to force the opposing safeties to come down and help in pass defense, which in turn opens up deeper routes.

Sanders will have a lot of his plate this weekend his defense must be the aggressor and dictate the tempo of the game. The Packers can do that by penetrating upfield with defensive lineman and hurrying Redskins' QB JasonCampbell. The right combination of blitzes and coverages can confuse the Washington and get Campbell in a panic state. The advantage goes to Saunders and his hot hand, though.


How can the Redskins force turnovers against the Green Bay passing game?
It's always easier said than done, but if Washington can put enough pressure on Packers QB Brett Favre and keep him uneasy in the pocket he is prone to make mistakes and throw interceptions. Favre has limited his mistakes so far this season, though, and Washington defensive coordinator Gregg Williams will have to find a way to not only pressure Favre but also disguise coverages. The Redskins defense shutdown the Detroit passing game last week with pressures and tight coverage and the recipe for success will likely be the same this week. Washington FS Sean Taylor and CB Carlos Rogers have been playing well and have become ball magnets, while DE Andre Carter has been relentless off the edge and OLB Marcus Wasington has timed the blitzes well in recent weeks. All four will have to play well again this week to force mistakes from Favre and get a win for the Redskins.

Can Washington QB Jason Campbell remain hot against a solid Green Bay defense?
Campbell is one of the most underrated and improved players in the NFL this season. He has been playing at a high level, making big plays and limiting his mistakes. Campbell is finally comfortable with offensive coordinator Al Saunders' play book, which is as thick as a phone book, and Saunders is adding new wrinkles and concepts each week.

On the other side of the ball, the Packers come with very solid coverage players in CBs Al Harris and Charles Woodson. Both are capable of being shutdown corners in man coverage and taking away Redskins' WRs Santana Moss and Antwaan Randle El. Injury could force Randle El out of the lineup this week, but if he does play he is capable of stretching the field vertically. Green Bay LBs A.J. Hawk and Nick Barnett will be tested on play-action and must stay disciplined and get good coverage drops. Overall, it looks like Campbell should still have a solid day even with the talent on the Packers' defense.

Can Green Bay run the ball against the Redskins defense?
The Green Bay offense has two capable running backs in DeShawn Wynn and Vernand Morency and is capable of getting over 100 yards in most games. However, the Packers are facing a Redskins defense that has been stingy against the run and is playing with a lot of intensity. In order for Green Bay to be successful on the ground there must be a commitment to getting Wynn and Morency more carries than the 22 they had last week against Chicago. The offensive line has been playing well and moving defenders off the line of scrimmage and if offensive coordinator Joe Philbin can establish the running game early it will open up play-action for Favre, something the veteran excels at.

Scouts' Edge
The Scouts Inc. Position Advantage
QBRBWROLDLLBDBSTCoach

The Redskins are on a roll and everyone in Washington is playing well, while the Packers are coming off a loss to the Bears in a game they feel got away from them. Lambeau Field is a tough place for a road team to win but the Redskins still get the edge this week. Washington should be able to establish the run game well and control time of possession, and if they stick to their strengths they can get the win. In addition, Washington should be able to keep Favre on the sideline with Turnovers and three-and-out possessions, and avoid it second loss of the season.


Prediction: Redskins 24, Packers 14

Posted by: JustMe | October 12, 2007 6:54 PM

Is it too late to add D'Wayne from What's Happening?

Posted by: spunky | October 12, 2007 7:11 PM

I love Jenna Jamesons girl-on-girl scenes

Posted by: Not Zebra | October 12, 2007 7:11 PM

I don't think that this is the real not guy, mainly because the real not guy is actually funny

Posted by: gethanr13 | October 12, 2007 7:22 PM

Someone needs to alert Florio that our FO seems to have learned restraint (whether forced or voluntary) during the last offseason.


Five NFL trades that make sense:

http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=288983

Posted by: JustMe | October 12, 2007 7:27 PM

Posted by: JustMe | October 12, 2007 7:32 PM

DID LIONS QUIT? Redskins tight end Cooley says Detroit didn't care in 2nd half
October 12, 2007

FREE PRESS STAFF AND NEWS SERVICES


Redskins tight end Chris Cooley told Washington-based radio station DC101-FM that the Lions quit in the second half of their 34-3 loss this past Sunday, partly because of the heat.

"I think it was a contributing factor in why we won the game," Cooley said. "I mean, Detroit's not practicing in 90-degree heat. We have been. It's been hot every day. We were pretty used to it. They were dead in the second half. They didn't care. It seemed like they didn't care what happened.

"When you get tired, fatigue kind of takes over. We were dominating the first half of the game and it stayed close, but we really pulled away in the second half when they made a lot of errant plays."

When asked if he could tell the Lions' heads were not into the game, Cooley said, "You could definitely tell."

"For example, we come out (in the first quarter), we come out and try to run the ball, and they're real physical. They're playing solid. It's tough to get yards -- everything's high-speed. And then, a couple plays into the second half, and it's just like, I get into blocking a guy, and they pretty much just stop and let me block them.

"It's like, 'Well, thanks, buddy,' I'll just hold you here and we'll run away from you."



Find this article at:
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071012/SPORTS01/310120004/1049

Posted by: 4th via Home Floor | October 12, 2007 7:51 PM

I'd love to see any of those trades happen. See your Jason Taylor and raise my Tank Johnson. That sounds dirty, but actually is not.

But trading is scary. In 10 years of fantasy football, I've made maybe 4 trades. You just don't want to get your azz handed to you.

Hate to inform you guys, but you remember that radar? It is now under you. If you beat the Pack, Soup hits the 'zine covers, and Tony's chauffeur stars up the bandwagon.

Posted by: SMACK | October 12, 2007 8:03 PM

PackerReport.com staff predictions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Todd Korth
PackerReport.com Oct 12, 2007

Some on panel feel Packers will drop second straight game; others say Pack will bounce back

Bob Fox, Correspondent
Packers 2007 season prediction record: 4-1
Pre-season prediction on Green Bay's 2007 record: 10-6
Sunday's game: Packers 27, Redskins 17
Comment: The Packers have to protect the football better. There is NO excuse for 5 turnovers like Green Bay had against the Bears. TE Chris Cooley has to be covered better than the Packers covered the Chicago tight ends. The Redskins have perhaps the best set of hard hitting safeties in football, so ball security has to be a priority. The Packers have to re-establish the Lambeau Field home field advantage after their meltdown vs. the Bears.
Tyler Dunne, Correspondent/Rookie pundit
Packers 2007 season prediction record: 4-1
Pre-season prediction on Green Bay's 2007 record: 9-7
Sunday's game: Redskins 24, Packers 23
Comment: Through the first five games, Green Bay caught teams at the best time. Sunday they're catching a 'Skins team on a warpath. Last week the Redskins sacked statistical juggernaut Jon Kitna five times, forced two interceptions, and outgained Detroit by 222 yards in a 35-0 wipeout. Washington isn't spectacular, rather solid in every aspect. Heady third-year quarterback Jason Campbell is evolving into more than a caretaker and Clinton Portis has shown flashes of his '03 self. This will be a very entertaining, tight game between two young teams becoming NFC powers.

Steve Lawrence, Correspondent
Packers 2007 season prediction record: 4-1
Pre-season prediction on Green Bay's 2007 record: 8-8
Sunday's game: Packers 16, Redskins 13
Comment: This is the toughest test of the year, and this game should really shed some light on whether this is a playoff team. Sometimes, a loss is a good thing, and I think that was the case against the Bears. As long as the Packers listened and learned from what happened last week, they'll eke out a last-minute win.

W. Keith Roerdink, Correspondent
Packers 2007 season prediction record: 3-2
Pre-season prediction on Green Bay's 2007 record: 9-7
Sunday's game: Pack 27, Skins 17
Comment: The Skins are coming on strong behind quarterback Jason Campbell. But the second half collapse against the Bears will be all the motivation the Packers need for this week. Look for them to try to re-establish the running game, but also exploit a talented, but young safety tandem in Sean Taylor and rookie LaRon Landry, through the air.

Jay Royle, Publisher
Packers 2007 season prediction record: 3-2
Pre-season prediction on Green Bay's 2007 record: 9-7
Sunday's game: Redskins 27, Packers 17
Comment: I think this Sunday will be a real measuring stick for the Packers because of last Sunday night's complete meltdown with turnovers and everything else. I think they respond without any turnovers, but unfortunately the Redskins are playing well and I think the once 4-0 Packers fall to 4-2 and what was once all smiles gets a little worrisome.

Harry Sydney, Correspondent
Packers 2007 season prediction record: 3-2
Pre-season prediction on Green Bay's 2007 record: 7-9
Sunday's game: Washington 24, Green Bay 17
Comment: This is a hard game to pick because you don't know what team will show up. Saying that I think the Redskins might be the most complete team that Green Bay will face up to this point. So I think the Packers will struggle because of the Skins' defense.

Todd Korth, Managing Editor
Packers 2007 season prediction record: 3-2
Pre-season prediction on Green Bay's 2007 record will be 8-8
Sunday's game: Redskins 20, Packers 16
Comment: In the NFL, it's all about when you play a team, and not so much who you play. Washington dominated Detroit last Sunday and is playing well in all three facets - offense, defense and special teams. The Packers struggled on offense in the second half of their loss to the Bears, and now face the top defense in the NFC that plays a similar defense as the Bears. Not good for the Pack.

Tom Andrews, Correspondent
Packers 2007 season prediction record: 2-3
Pre-season prediction on Green Bay's 2007 record: 8-8
Sunday's game: Packers 24 Redskins 17
Comment: No doubt, the Redskins will present a formidable challenge to the young Packers. They have a steady young quarterback, Jason Campbell, leading a ball control offense that also features running back Clinton Portis and explosive wide receiver Santana Moss. Moss is coming back from a groin injury and didn't play last week against Detroit. Joe Gibbs has his defense playing well, too. They're tough to gain yards against and they can bring the heat against the quarterback (they sacked Lions QB Jon Kitna five times last week). Still, I look for the Packers to bounce back at home after giving a game to the Bears in front of a national audience last Sunday. If the Packers stop shooting themselves in the foot with turnovers and can build on the modest success they had against Chicago with the running game, they should be able to turn back the Redskin threat and gain pleasant entry into Bye Week.

Matt Tevsh, Correspondent
Packers 2007 season prediction record: 2-3
Pre-season prediction on Green Bay's 2007 record: 7-9
Sunday's game: Packers 20, Redskins 17
Comment: Packers' fans will forget about the Bears loss with a hard-fought win against the Redskins. Look for the Packers' defense to slow down Jason Campbell and shut down Clinton Portis.

Doug Ritchay, Correspondent
Packers 2007 season prediction record: 2-3
Pre-season prediction on Green Bay's 2007 record: 7-9
Sunday's game: Packers 21, Redskins 20
Comment: The Packers' loss last week makes this week interesting. How do they respond against a good Redkins team? The Bears' loss was tough to take, because it could've put the Bears four games behind the Packers. Still, in a 16-game season you can't lool like a Mercedes every week. Once in a while, you will look like a junker. The Packers can't possibly give the game away again like last week, but I think we all realize this team is only good, not great. With that in mind, the Packers edge Washington.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Story URL: http://packers.scout.com/2/689948.html

Posted by: 4th via scout.com | October 12, 2007 8:30 PM


I see burgundy and gold in the winner's circle Sunday. Redskins over the Pack 27-17.

Brett tosses three picks, one at the end of the game. Our D gets 3 sacks and recovers one fumble.

Posted by: Montana'Skins Fan | October 12, 2007 8:33 PM

4th, thanks for inside posts! keep it up please!

Posted by: dealer | October 12, 2007 9:24 PM

sorry...i meant JustMe! thanks justme!

and i belive 4th posts "inside" info as well...

Posted by: dealer | October 12, 2007 9:27 PM

if i've learned anything from watching all that football all these years is that good teams find a way to win. no matter who is injured or how many.

so no worries. if the skins are a good team they will win and if they're not they won't. it's just that simple. and i believe they're good.

also i actually heard mike golick say "the run set up the pass in the win against detroit for the skins", "their running game was stellar" was he watching the same game? do these people EVER watch the games they comment on?

Posted by: dealer | October 12, 2007 9:33 PM

watch the games? All of them??

That's a good one!

Posted by: cload and daggar | October 12, 2007 9:39 PM

Cowboys coach denies saying spying scandal taints Pats' titles

LOL smack, you're better off going golfing during the game. you guys are soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo dead!

Posted by: dealer | October 12, 2007 9:46 PM

4th thanks for the hookup on the inside stuff. Keep it coming.

Posted by: Skinz | October 12, 2007 10:30 PM

LOL smack, you're better off going golfing during the game.

Posted by: dealer

You've never seen me golf. F the Pats. F the Pats worship amongst all of you up here. Even if we lose, we will get another crack at them.

Hopefully we worked that lameness out of our system last week, but just like last week, I won't give up.

We got this.

Posted by: SMACK | October 12, 2007 10:46 PM

NFL Network
NFC Playbook: Packers vs. Redskins

http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d803340e5

Posted by: JustMe | October 12, 2007 11:04 PM

Can we just TIVO Saturday and go right to Sunday? I am pumped!

Posted by: SMACK | October 12, 2007 11:08 PM

Packers shuffling injuries, linemen before game against Redskins

http://www.wifr.com/sports/headlines/10512597.html

Posted by: JustMe | October 12, 2007 11:19 PM

DREW SHARP: Redskins' Cooley shouldn't have said the Lions quit

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071012/SPORTS01/71012072/1049/SPORTS05

Posted by: JustMe | October 12, 2007 11:23 PM

Williams fined $15K for second 'horse-collar' tackle of season

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3060841&campaign=rss&source=ESPNHeadlines


When are they gonna start suspending this dude? He obviously doesn't care about the fines. This money is chump change for him.

Posted by: JustMe | October 12, 2007 11:31 PM

"Some felt that Williams was responsible for four significant injuries that season."

Sean Taylor doesn't need to play dirty to injure people. God granted him that ability.
If the Reaper wasn't such a cool name, I'd propose a blaw that ST be deemed "Sean the Baptist"

Posted by: Dorf | October 13, 2007 12:54 AM

redskins 31 pack 9

Posted by: chillsonic | October 13, 2007 12:54 AM

Everypone just settle down with these predictions, now! I wish I could be so optimistic. I predict this will be of to those gut-wrenching close games which we saw the first three weeks of the season.

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 13, 2007 12:58 AM

on a more secular note...

If I had to choose whether to be stuck on 64 East traffic on Friday evening or be involved in the Wayne-bingus that took place earlier... i'd take 64 East traffic.

and luck would have it...

I can't believe my portis/flintstones parody didn't even get a snicker. F Wayne P. for stealing my poetic thunder.

Posted by: Dorf | October 13, 2007 12:58 AM

I agree with the F Wayne P. part of your post, Dorf. That dude was like instant chooch, just add water.

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 13, 2007 1:05 AM

so you don't agree with anything else I say? It's going to be a good game this weekend. What am I? Talking to a 3rd grader? I like our mismatches that Cooley creates. I can't believe you're such an idiot. Hail to the Redskins!

My best Wayne P.

Posted by: Dorf | October 13, 2007 1:08 AM

i haven't had this much confidence in the skins since i don't remember when...and i am not talking about enthusiasm.

Posted by: chillsonic | October 13, 2007 1:32 AM

sounds like you're a fellow "Norver." I was too young to appreciate Joe Gibbs 1.0 and pretty much Norv Turner was my father figure on Sunday afternoons. I too look at a 14-0 halftime lead (or a 17-3 lead) and think... we're going to lose.

Posted by: Dorf | October 13, 2007 1:37 AM

this place is beat like a drum, nerds

Posted by: Anonymous | October 13, 2007 2:58 AM

The feeling of the Blog is Skins WIN.

They are going to throw slant pattern!!!

The reaper will kill them.

Lets start talking about NE.

What do the match ups look like?

Posted by: M&M | October 13, 2007 4:30 AM

Really getting excited. Looks like the game is on here in the ATL!

Posted by: Cindy's boy toy | October 13, 2007 9:27 AM

Hey how about this for our first offensive play of the game when we see the Cowpukes in Dallas:Lets put the Reaper in at receiver and intentionally throw a soft interception directly to Roy Williams just as the Reaper shows up at the ball and then,well you know the rest.

Posted by: Fat Guy in a Little Coat | October 13, 2007 9:37 AM

sorry...i meant JustMe! thanks justme!

and i belive 4th posts "inside" info as well...

Posted by: dealer | October 12, 2007 09:27 PM

That's what happens when you mix late night drinking and randomly surfing....

Posted by: 4th | October 13, 2007 9:51 AM

Ok, this is the 1st time I have caught the intro of Game Day and it seems like it is the same one 3 years in a row.

I love the song, but I was hoping they would retire that song and come up with a new one that could even top it. I guess they couldn't.....

Posted by: 4th via Home Floor | October 13, 2007 10:04 AM

Big game calls for big performance by defense
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Steve Lawrence
PackerReport.com Oct 13, 2007

The Packers' defense has been solid, but not spectacular, and has fallen far short of the preseason hype it helped create, PackerReport.com's Steve Lawrence says.

With 5-0 Dallas hosting 5-0 New England on Sunday, the media are frothing at the mouth like a couple of rabid dogs sitting in front of the meat counter at the grocery store.
Oh, what could have been, though.

Had Joe Gibbs not forgotten how to coach in the waning moments against the New York Giants and had the Packers not treated the football like it was covered in angry hornets last week against the Bears, the Packers and Redskins would be entering Sunday's tilt at Lambeau Field with a combined 9-0 record.

Alas, we'll have to settle for merely a combined record of 7-2, and, frankly, a bigger game in the grand scheme of things.

That's especially so for the Packers, who are riding high in first place but could be riding low if they suffer a second consecutive loss heading into next week's bye.

When you looked at the schedule back in late August, you would have thought the games against San Diego and Chicago would have been the toughest on the first half of the tricky season schedule. Looking through the prism of today, however, it's safe to say Sunday's game against the Redskins will be the toughest.

Much has been made of the matchup between Brett Favre and the Packers' receivers against the Redskins' star-studded secondary. Washington is allowing a ridiculously low 4.52 yards per pass attempt this season, while Favre is having a sublime year at this late juncture of his career.

The opposite matchups, however, are just as intriguing, and not just because the Packers' defense needs to step up should the offense falter.

Led by budding quarterback Jason Campbell, Washington ranks fourth in the NFC in offense, including third in rushing and ninth in passing. Campbell has been sacked just five times, a testament not only to his line but the third-year pro's unexpected poise in his first year as the unquestioned starter.

"He's young at quarterback, we know that, but I felt like he made some real good decisions," Gibbs said. "And many times your quarterback, the best decision he makes is when it's not there, when he chooses to do the smart thing."

The Packers' defense, meanwhile, hasn't been bad -- not by a long shot -- but it hasn't been the standout unit everyone expected.

That group talked boldly of developing into a top-five unit this season. Instead, after five games against not exactly the most potent offenses the NFL has to offer, the Packers rank 17th in the NFL in yards allowed -- 14th against the run and a surprising 23rd against the pass -- and 12th in points allowed with 18.6 points per game.

Fortunately, the Packers' defense has come up huge at some opportune times -- Aaron Kampman's sack and strip of Eli Manning against the Giants, Nick Barnett's interception against the Chargers and Atari Bigby's interception against the Vikings -- but overall, this group hasn't met the lofty expectations it set for itself.

A few players haven't taken their necessary and expected steps forward. Chief among them is safety Nick Collins, who has been little more than a tease during his brief career. A.J. Hawk, like the Barnett of last season and 2005, has made a bunch of tackles but few of significance. Bigby was all over the place in the preseason but largely quiet during the first five games.

"I think our defense has played outstanding in spurts and has played very good for the most part," Packers coach Mike McCarthy said this week. "But we're having those explosive gains come up ... three, four a game that's really not giving them the opportunity to close an offense out."

While hardly disappointments, Charles Woodson -- who had eight interceptions last season but is looking for his first this season -- and Al Harris haven't been quite as dominant. That's led to the pass defense's disappointing ranking and an abundance of "explosive plays" -- 26 completions of at least 16 yards, including the huge breakdown that led to Desmond Clark's late 34-yard, go-ahead touchdown that lifted the Bears last week.

So far, it's been the surprising Packers offense that's been carrying the team. Sunday's showdown would be a perfect time for a talented Packers defense to play up to the hype it created.

Steve Lawrence is a regular contributor to PackerReport.com. E-mail him at steve_lawrence_packers@yahoo.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Story URL: http://packers.scout.com/2/690152.html

Posted by: 4th via scout.com | October 13, 2007 10:09 AM

Lombardi blog: October edition
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John Lombardi
PackerReport.com Oct 12, 2007

Thoughts on Redskins tight ends; James Jones, Packers sluggish 2-minute offense

October 12, 2007
Redskins Tight Ends
The Packers have had trouble covering opponents' tight ends for a year or so. The Redskins have a good tight end in Chris Cooley. He has some crazy hair but will be a challenge for the defense.
I hope Washington goes with two tight ends, though. Their backup TE is Todd Yoder. He went to Vanderbilt and I was one of the folks who recruited him. He came to Vandy for his visit and nobody was around, so Eric Johnson, who is now a coach at Iowa and I had to host Yoder. Not much was going on, so we took him to a Women's Basketball game against the USA national team. He was a high school running back his senior year, came to Vandy as a wide receiver and has now bulked up to play tight end. This is his seventh year and he has played for the Bucs and Jaguars in prior years. He is a special teams guy mostly but he has good hands. As a freshman, he was Vandy's only offensive weapon. They would just throw it up for him and hope he caught it.

Probably the most coincidental part is that he married a young lady who also went to Vanderbilt. After I finished my graduate degree at Vanderbilt, I was an assistant coach of the women's lacrosse team (it is a long story) for about six months and his wife Sue was the team's best player. Todd is about 6-5 and Sue is close to 5-foot so they are a contrast in styles. She was as fast as they come though and a fierce competitor.

The world is a small place.


Posted by: 4th via scout.com | October 13, 2007 10:26 AM

*Poking Blog with a Stick*

Posted by: 4th via Home Floor | October 13, 2007 11:05 AM

4th you're are evidently mono-blogging

Posted by: noone from tampa | October 13, 2007 11:11 AM

What does SJK mean?

Posted by: Essex | October 13, 2007 11:12 AM

I can't believe my portis/flintstones parody didn't even get a snicker. F Wayne P. for stealing my poetic thunder.

Posted by: Dorf | October 13, 2007 12:58 AM


Damn, I meant to say something yesterday but was busy. The guy next to me at work is a 'girls fan and he was cracking up!

Posted by: gethanr13 | October 13, 2007 11:15 AM

Ah, so the blog is still breathing!

Posted by: 4th via Home Floor | October 13, 2007 11:22 AM

HBO NFL show is talking about the Redskins SCABS 20 years ago right now...

Posted by: 4th via Home Floor | October 13, 2007 11:24 AM

Try this one on for size Dorf,to the tune of the Adams Family:

They're angry and they're moody,
They knock receivers goofy,
Leave drawers soiled with doodie,
The Reaper and L2,duh,duh,duh,duh,
SNAP,SNAP.

Posted by: Fat Guy in a little Coat | October 13, 2007 11:27 AM

Does anyone know if these SCABS got SB rings or any comp for aiding to get the Skins there (other than the game checks they rcieved)?

Posted by: 4th via Home Floor | October 13, 2007 11:33 AM

Small-town Mississippians Favre and Campbell face off on Sunday

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Associated Press

ASHBURN, Va. -- Brett Favre and Jason Campbell grew up 100 miles apart in rural Mississippi. The combined population of their hometowns -- Kiln and Taylorsville -- is less than 4,000.

"You have nothing else to do but sit outside and throw footballs at trees," Campbell said Wednesday. "That's how you work on your accuracy. Knock some bark off a tree."

Small-town people not only have their own set of jokes, they are also quiet neighborly. So during the offseason Campbell figured he would pay a visit to the Green Bay Packers legend, who now lives in Hattiesburg. The Washington Redskins quarterback walked up -- unannounced -- to the call box outside Favre's gated home.

No answer. Campbell waited five minutes and went away.

"I didn't want a helicopter to come by," Campbell said.

Told on Wednesday that Campbell had come calling, Favre seemed bemused.

"I didn't know he came by," Favre said. "What did he say he was coming by for?"

Rest of the story -

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/wire?section=nfl&id=3057961

Posted by: 4th | October 13, 2007 11:48 AM

Marino has now hoped on the bandwagon!

Posted by: 4th | October 13, 2007 11:58 AM

My guess is no, the scabs did not get SB rings... just seems like that would be beyond the pale.

So let me guess, smeone is implicitly or explicitly saying that our SB win is tainted because we went 3-0 with replacement players? F anybody who says so. We played the same schedule as everybody else, and hello, we did win those playoff games.

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 13, 2007 12:07 PM

Nate - No one said that. But Marino/Carter/Collinsworth collectively bashed all SCABS for playing and taking food from their plate. Of course non of their teams won more than 1 game during those games.

Costas made the point that Gibbs and Walsh knew these games would count and they did there best to motivate and coach up these players to win these games. The players gave those coaches the credit for that...

Posted by: 4th | October 13, 2007 12:27 PM

Also Nate you may want to talk with Cindy about getting some $$$ since you are on Page 2 about 2-3 times a week.

They (WP) are abusing the rules they set (about reusing comments and names) if you ask me.

Maybe we (reg bloggers) should go on strike until we come up with a better deal?

Posted by: 4th | October 13, 2007 12:30 PM

how about favorite unsung or little known player by decade..
70's - Bill Malinchak (James Thrash w/o the catched)
80's - Babe Laufenberg (aka Mr. August)
90's - Torn between Leslie Shepherd and Terry Allen
00's - Mike Sellers no doubt

I'll check back later to see everyone's comments

Posted by: noone from tampa | October 13, 2007 1:54 PM

80's - Art Monk

Posted by: SMACK | October 13, 2007 2:01 PM

What does SJK mean?

Posted by: Essex | October 13, 2007 2:13 PM

http://redskinsinsiders.wetpaint.com/

There is a section on blog lingo and terms

Posted by: gethanr13 | October 13, 2007 3:03 PM

90s - Brian Mitchell

Posted by: gethanr13 | October 13, 2007 3:04 PM

on second thought I don't think that Mitchell qualifies as little known, he was awesome in his prime.

Posted by: gerthanr13 | October 13, 2007 3:07 PM

Everyone seems so confident about beating the Pack. Kinda the same vibe b4 the Giants game. No prediction from Cindy this time though. I'm worried about a strong D exposing the right side of our o-line. Though Wade and Fab have filled in admirably.

Posted by: Dr. Octagon | October 13, 2007 3:17 PM

where's this page 2? I never see it


Nate, wonder if you could add that to your resume!

Posted by: dealer | October 13, 2007 3:19 PM

also wonder if that counts as being published

"published in washington post thirty five times in 2007 "

Posted by: dealer | October 13, 2007 3:22 PM

This team is trying to win consecutive road games since 2005 (are you kiding me)The hot air in this blog is mind altering! Wining consecutive road games in 2 yrs is PATHETIC & they really SUCK!FACT LADIES!

Posted by: I cant breath OPEN door let me out!! | October 13, 2007 3:37 PM

how oftern are posts put in the print version, and is there any way to see which one on the web?

Posted by: gethanr13 | October 13, 2007 4:11 PM

not that I ever had typed anything worthy of this, it would be nice to know

Posted by: gethanr13 | October 13, 2007 4:13 PM

Every Redskins player counts
http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071013/SPORTS01/110130057/1005

"For one play against the Detroit Lions last week, the Washington Redskins' backfield featured Sellers -- 6-foot-3, 284 pounds -- as the tailback and Clinton Portis -- 5-foot-11, 223 pounds -- as the fullback in motion.

"I played tailback in Canada, but it was weird doing it in the NFL because there was little Clinton Portis in front of me and when he motioned out, I started cracking up because I didn't realize how small he was," Sellers said."

Posted by: JustMe | October 13, 2007 4:28 PM

Posted by: JustMe | October 13, 2007 4:32 PM

gathanr13, you'll be pleased to hear that I misspelled sniksider's name the other day. I believe I honored you by misspelling your name once upon a time? Soory aboot that.

I guess the WashPo people pick out stuff from their online comments and publish them. Their standards (obviously) are pretty low. I get the impression this is a regular feature, but I don't know how frequent, and I don't know if it's limited to Sports or other sections.

Bear in mind that I haven't seen a brick and mortar WashPo in over a year... so it's up to me old mum, back in the wilds of Prince William County, to compile me clippings...

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 13, 2007 4:34 PM

JustMe, I freaked out when I saw Sellers behind Portis on that one play! I was practically yelling at everyone at the sports bar, pointing madly at the screen.

Needless to say, I am probably a difficult person to watch a Skins game with.

Posted by: Nate in the PDX | October 13, 2007 4:37 PM

the calm before the storm...

bring on the Pack
F Favre

thanks for the shout out gethanr13... nice follow up fat guy in a little coat.

Post