ZoneAlarm for Windows Vista Released
For the millions of computer users who purchased a new PC during the past five months, there have been precious few options for true, two-way firewall software on Windows Vista. But now, Check Point Software Technologies has released its popular line of ZoneAlarm products with versions designed to run on the latest Windows operating system.
At the moment, hardly any security vendors offer firewall protection for Windows Vista users, let alone free versions. Kudos to Check Point for continuing to offer its free version of ZoneAlarm, when almost all other security software vendors have abandoned the free firewall market with the advent of Vista.
Microsoft made a great deal of noise about the security improvements it was bringing to Vista, but in my opinion it failed to deliver on true, two-way firewall protection in Vista's Windows Firewall. Yes, the built-in firewall allows users to build custom lists that block not only incoming connection attempts but also outgoing attempts. But the Windows Vista firewall interface is hardly much different from the one included in Windows XP, which is not very intuitive or interactive for the average user.
Check Point's entry into the Vista market was delayed in part by wrangling between the security software industry and Microsoft over just how deeply security vendors could delve into the operating system to stave off new attacks that seek to undermine the security of the system at a fundamental level. At the core of this rather public row was a Microsoft technology called "PatchGuard," which was designed to help block malicious programs from making key changes to the core of the Windows operating system. For a while, it looked as though Microsoft planned to keep security vendors out of this space as well, but ultimately Redmond and the industry that it helped spawn came to an agreement of sorts: Microsoft would develop a custom programming interface that third-party security providers could use to approximate that fundamental level of access.
Check Point, like most other security vendors, offers various security suites that seek to provide additional layers of protection, including anti-virus (from Russian software maker KasperskyLab) and anti-spyware features. Key among the features not included in the free version of ZoneAlarm is the OS-Firewall, which tries to block activity from programs that exhibit certain suspicious behaviors.
All of the ZoneAlarm suites come with a free 15-day trial period, so if you're running Vista and are curious about the non-free options, check them out. I'm still experimenting with the copy of the suite I received from Check Point, and so far it's fairly impressive. Customers who purchased a license for one of the suites on Windows XP should be able to transfer that license over to a Vista machine, according to Laura Yecies, general manager of ZoneAlarm's consumer and small business division.
However, my experience with software security suites has fairly consistently been one of "jack-of-all-trades, master of none." Most of these suites tend to be a tad bloated and heavy users of system resources, even on modern machines with plenty of memory and processing power.
Case in point: Up until last month, my father-in-law was using the ZoneAlarm Security Suite to protect his Dell PC, which sports a 3.0 GHz Pentium 4 processor and more than 2 gigabytes of RAM. But he complained the system just wasn't running as swiftly since he had installed the program. Earlier this month, he un-installed the suite and opted for the free version of the firewall alongside a third-party anti-virus program. He now says the change has sped up the performance of his machine remarkably.
What about you, Security Fix readers? Tell us about your experience with software security suites, or whether you've chosen to mix and match security software on your Windows PC.
By Brian Krebs |
June 13, 2007; 10:35 AM ET
Misc.
, Safety Tips
Previous: Microsoft Plugs 15 Security Holes |
Next: FBI Unveils Movable Feast with 'Operation Bot Roast'
Posted by: Matt | June 13, 2007 11:31 AM
I've been looking forward to getting ZA for my new vista laptop and also thank Check Point for keeping it free. I am not familiar with the OS-firewall feature. How important/useful is it?
BK, in answer to your question, I also think suites are more trouble than they're worth. I uninstalled Mcafee and Norton from my two computers before the free trials were up. There's the memory drain like you mentioned. The other thing was the interface, sometimes I wasn't sure exactly what it was I was looking at. I don't have that problem without a suite b/c I know Zone Alarm = my firewall settings, AVGfree = my AV settings, Ad-aware = spyware. I also use a limited user account for surfing the net/random programs. Aside from tracking cookies that Ad-aware finds, I haven't been concerned that the computer may be compromised.
Posted by: Ugh | June 13, 2007 12:29 PM
Mr. Matt: Having a loose conceptual grasp of a thing clearly doesn't confer common sense.
Bad guys don't *persuade*, they *trick* or simply *break in*. And so, your assertion is exactly analogous to the imbecilic assertion that, if someone breaks into my house while I'm at work, makes a few phone calls, raids the fridge, and then takes a nap on the couch, it's *his* house now.
The fact of modern computer usage, especially on the Windows platform, is bound up with deception and co-option. If a package does *not* provide outbound filtering, run.
Posted by: Junior Shabadoo | June 13, 2007 12:30 PM
The OS-Firewall was the most annoying part of ZoneAlarm when I used it. It threw up warning dialogs anytime a program tried to do *anything*. I couldn't turn the useless feature off fast enough.
Posted by: dgc | June 13, 2007 12:49 PM
Geez. I wonder what/if/who these guys complain to when they actually PAY for software, like Vista...
.
Posted by: J. Warren | June 13, 2007 1:03 PM
One question I have is whether the new version also works on Windows XP or is tailored solely for Vista? I now have the latest ZoneAlarm 7.0 version running on XP.
Posted by: wolf25 | June 13, 2007 3:50 PM
If you're getting rid of their security suite and want to start over from scratch:
Be sure to uncheck the option to "load Zonealarm at startup" BEFORE uninstalling Zonealarm. Otherwise, ZA's "Truevector" service will continue to run in the background, even after the rest of ZA has been uninstalled.
And you can't stop this service from the Windows snap-in for services (services.msc).
I noticed this behavior with ZA 6 on Windows 2000 and Win XP.
Posted by: Ken L | June 13, 2007 4:19 PM
Zone Alarm? No thanks.
Used it for quite a long time before learning that it was 'phoning home' to the vendor - Checkpoint.
I'm not sure, and I don't care whether that's been 'fixed'. They lost my trust in them.
Posted by: Nick | June 13, 2007 5:25 PM
yea but the free versions of zonealarm are worthless and useless.
Posted by: jack | June 13, 2007 5:57 PM
I've been using Zone Security Suite for a few years now. I've had no problems with it. Hasn't seemed to hog my resources. I've had it long enough to tweak it into doing what I want it do. I like the 'Privacy' feature, that will not allow something to download unless I give the go-ahead. I also use other anti-spy progs. And Firefox. However, after reading the article, I'm going to uninstall the Suite from my daughter's slow, weak PC. I'll put a bit more zip in her machine by using the free version, a free anti-virus and my usual anti spy. Both of our PCs have been pretty clean for a long while now. Suite. PS: good tip about uninstalling; doing it 'wrong' can be a real hassle.
Posted by: twosticks | June 13, 2007 7:23 PM
If the guy who breaks into your house sets up a video camera or three without your knowledge, is it still your house? Obviously you still own it, but would you want to live in it?
Or the guy could sabotage the house such that an electric fire starts when you turn on the telly and burns your house down.
The point is, it doesn't matter *how* the guy gets in, it's that he got in period. Once in, he can do whatever he wants, and can most likely do it without you ever knowing about it. With malware, once on your box, it is ridiculously trival to circumvent your true outbound filtering kit from ZA or whomever.
I never said that outbound filtering doesn't have merits. But as a way to increase your security, it's a complete sham.
Posted by: Matt | June 13, 2007 11:19 PM
In some cases outbound filtering will alert the user to malware seeking to connect (take a look at the Comodo forums if you don't think this is the case). True, the malware is already on the machine and the machine is thus already compromised, but if the firewall's outbound filtering can alert the user to the presence of malware, then it surely does provide extra security. To say that it's a "sham" is a crude oversimplification.
Posted by: t_joe | June 14, 2007 7:35 AM
Zone Alarm customer service tells me that the Krebs piece is wrong: the new Zone Alarm for Vista has not (rpt, not) been released. Further, that when it is released, if you have registered with ZA, you'll automatically receive an email with directions for a free download. To register, go to www.zonealarm.com/vista
Posted by: tom zinger | June 14, 2007 8:19 AM
Suites are okay if you enjoy watching that stupid flashlight rolling around.
Posted by: Keith Warner | June 14, 2007 8:32 AM
ZoneAlarm Vista is, unfortunately, still in Beta!!!!
See: http://www.zonealarm.com/store/content/catalog/products/vista.jsp
Posted by: Dom | June 14, 2007 10:07 AM
ZoneAlarm Vista has not been released yet, it's still in Beta and available (in Beta) for months already.
Posted by: Filipe | June 14, 2007 1:21 PM
Found it: http://www.linkbucks.com/link/ffc46ff0.
Posted by: Filipe | June 14, 2007 1:29 PM
"...Krebs piece is wrong"
Excuse the (apparent) double-negative, but "The beta has ended"
> http://forums.zonealarm.com/zonelabs/board/message?board.id=gen&message.id=43387
06-11-2007 11:12 PM - "The beta is ending so the discussion group was removed.
Forum Moderator - http://forums.zonealarm.com/zonelabs/board/message?board.id=gen&message.id=43385
.
Posted by: J. Warren | June 14, 2007 9:33 PM
I'm not sure what you're saying. There is a link to the Vista version of ZoneAlarm in the above blog post. It works great. Am I missing something?
Posted by: Tom | June 14, 2007 11:25 PM
Dropped windows. I use Linux Simply Mepis. Everything in it just works and best off all it is free.
Posted by: Philippe | June 15, 2007 2:39 PM
Muahahaha! People make such stupid comments here. Most don't know what they are talking about. Muahahaha!
Posted by: Chi | June 15, 2007 8:06 PM
@wolf25
"One question I have is whether the new version also works on Windows XP or is tailored solely for Vista?"
The ZoneAlarm web site has been updated, and it appears the new version is for Vista only; the link for it (version 7.1.078) is now given as:
http://download.zonealarm.com/bin/free/1025_update/zlsSetup_71_078_000_en.exe
The current version 7.0.337 for Win 2000 / XP, which has been out for a while, is downloadable from:
http://download.zonelabs.com/bin/free/1025_update/zlsSetup_70_337_000_en.exe
The press release on the Vista version talks about the use of a new "Filtering Platform API" in Vista, so it makes some sense that there are two versions.
Posted by: Rich Gibbs | June 16, 2007 3:31 PM
I downloaded from the link provided in the article. But when I try to install it, it first messes up the anti-virus software, but nothing much happens after that. The system pretty much hangs and I have to hit the power button to get it to reboot.
I guess it is still in beta, like some of the postings above say.
Posted by: Raghu | June 18, 2007 1:15 PM
I'm running the new ZA free Firewall for Vista. It seems to be OK with program control but although it's been active for four days it hasn't thrown up a single intrusion alert. Normally I would have expected a few dozen alerts using Windows XP & this makes me wonder if it's working. The program also seems to disable the diagnostics function of my speedtouch modem. Any of you guys had similar problems or know any answers?
Posted by: Weyland | June 29, 2007 12:11 PM
I have been testing Zone Alarm Beta and received the full Vista Version on the 11th June. I also gave a feedback with regard to the time it took to install the beta version which is just the same with the full version. With the XP version of Zone Alarm it would report that it had blocked hits on my PC with the new version it has not reported any. Either nobody is interested in my PC or Zone Alarm is not blocking.
Posted by: PhilG | June 29, 2007 3:15 PM
I use zone alarm with avg antivirus and avg antispyware in zone alarm I use the program controlls to disable IE completely and use a different web browser called crazy browser this way I have the best security while using the IE engine to browse with a third party browser I still get all the copatability that IE gives and without the threats. Hope this is some helpful Ideas on security I have been browsing this way bor many years and so far it has kept me safe.
Posted by: Kenneth | June 29, 2007 3:59 PM
I use zone alarm with avg antivirus and avg antispyware in zone alarm I use the program controlls to disable IE completely and use a different web browser called crazy browser this way I have the best security while using the IE engine to browse with a third party browser I still get all the copatability that IE gives and without the threats. Hope this is some helpful Ideas on security I have been browsing this way bor many years and so far it has kept me safe.
Posted by: Kenneth | June 29, 2007 4:00 PM
Guys, let's just wait for another 12 months before the things settle with Vista! :)
Posted by: Vlad | June 29, 2007 6:26 PM
It seems that the new [free] firewall for vista doesn't really block spyware from accessing your computer. I scan my computer everyday with Ad-Aware SE and it identifies at least couple of dozen tracking cookies that managed to bypass the Zone Alarm firewall for Vista. This scenario did not occur when I used the XP operating system. In my view, the current firewall version for Vista leaks quite extensively. Hopefully, future updates will improve the current state of Vista's firewall inefficiency, and thus, blocking more effectively the intruders that freely navigates on the World Wide Web (WWW) looking for a host computer.
Dr. Brady Brockway
Posted by: Dr. Brady Brockway | July 2, 2007 12:36 AM
zonealarm on vista seems to work ok now I get blocked intrusions all the time , thx for the great article, and zonealarm thx for the free firewall.
Posted by: mario bother | July 15, 2007 11:49 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.










"True, two-way firewall protection" is just marketing drivel. Anytime someone tells you that a two-way host based firewall will make you more secure, you should run away.
Outbound filtering for security (as opposed to management) purposes violates the 1st law of computer security: If a bad guy can persuade you to run his program on your computer, it's no longer your computer.