Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

U.S.-Based ISPs Count Known Terror Groups as Clients

Herndon, Va.-based Network Solutions said Wednesday that it suspended Hizbollah.org, an official site of Hezbollah, a Lebanese political and paramilitary group.

Turns out, Network Solutions, which was one of the original firms in the domain registration business, was accepting payment for the domain in violation of a U.S. law that bars American companies from doing business with organizations listed by Uncle Sam as terrorist groups. Closer inspection also reveals that Network Solutions and other U.S.-based Internet service providers and domain registrars provide services to other groups on the government's list of terrorist organizations.

For example, Network Solutions also is the registrar for The Palestine Information Center (palestine-info.com), a Web site tied to Hamas, a group listed on the U.S. State Department's list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations. FTOs are designated under section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which makes it illegal "for a person in the United States or subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to knowingly provide 'material support or resources' to a designated FTO."

In addition, Network Solutions collects registration fees for Hamas Web properties palestine-info-urdu.com, palestine-info.net, and fm-m.org, the Web site for the Hamas publication "Filistin Almusalima".

Aaron Weisburd, a terrorism expert who tracks terror-related Web sites at his site InternetHaganah.com, said he alerted Network Solutions to the offending domains more than a year ago.

"This has been going on for years," Weisburd said.

A spokeswoman said the company was investigating the claims. In a written statement, Network Solutions said that it does not "proactively police the content of our customers' sites," but that "if a complaint is received, however, we do conduct a review to determine whether the site's content violates our company's acceptable use policy."

The U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Asset Control maintains a far more expansive list of foreign entities with which U.S. businesses are prohibited from doing business. On its Web site it publishes guidance to help companies remain within the law when doing business abroad, and it frequently fines companies (usually banks) that ignore those restrictions. But OFAC doesn't publish guidance specificaly for ISPs, nor could the agency provide evidence than any ISP had ever been penalized for providing services to terrorist groups.

While ISPs can be criminally liable for providing support to terror groups, most ISPs -- upon receipt of a complaint about a problematic or legally murky customer site -- will simply cease doing business with the offending party, citing violations of their terms of service, said Perry Aftab, an Internet attorney who specializes in cybercrime law.

Matthew Devost, president of Total Intelligence Solutions, a risk management firm based in Arlington, Va., said for federal law enforcement agencies, the intelligence benefit of leaving such sites operating is often greater than shutting them down.

"In some cases, it may be that companies and or the government is aware of these sites, but what they post there gives us intelligence that we'd rather have," Devost said. "Sometimes there's a general concern that if you shut down these sites, while they might move to somewhere else online where they start making it password protected or otherwise harder to get access to the content."

Below are a few more examples of sites linked to groups on the government's list of designated foreign terrorist organizations that are operating online with the help of U.S. companies:

* kataebaqsa.org: A Web site belonging to the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade - currently #3 on the government's FTO list - is hosted on servers run by New York City-based Endurance International Group Inc.

* alqasem.info: Bellevue, Wash. based eNom is the registrar for this site, linked to Asbat al-Ansar, #6 on the government's FTO list.

* wa3ad.org: Another site that Weisburd and others have connected to Hezbollah, is powered by servers at R&D Technologies LLC in New York City. The site is registered through GoDaddy.com Inc., which is based in Scottsdale, Ariz.

* filistinetkinlik.com: Also known as Hamas TV, this site is registered through PublicInterestRegistry.com, based in Beaverton, Ore. Another Hamas site, alqassam.com, is hosted via servers at Los Angeles based Oversee.net.

* Qudsnews.net and shikaki.net: Weisburd said both are affiliated with Palestinian Islamic Jihad -- #30 on the government's FTO list. Both are registered through directNIC.com, the domain registration arm of New Orleans based Intercosmos Media Group, Inc. Shikaki.net is hosted on servers at Softlayer Technologies Inc. in Dallas.

* Aleph.to: the new name for Aum Shinrikyo (the Japanese cult responsible for the deadly sarin gas attacks in a Tokyo subway in 1995) is supported by domain name services offered by Ultradns.net, a division of Sterling, Va. based Neustar Inc.

By Brian Krebs  |  March 27, 2008; 4:46 PM ET
Categories:  From the Bunker , U.S. Government  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Don't Depend on Anti-virus to Save You
Next: The Curious Case of Dmitry Golubov

Comments

Great column Brian. One can only hope that someone in the F.B.I. or the T.S.A. reads it and does something about it!

Posted by: dbm1rxb | March 27, 2008 11:39 PM | Report abuse

Yeah go Brian! Our site contacted Network Solutions about this.
You may find it entertaining.
http://www.therudenews.com/archives/516

Posted by: The Rude Dog | March 27, 2008 11:46 PM | Report abuse

Matthew Devost is completely correct in his observation, is he not !!!

Since the NSA, CIA, DIA, etc. do not make public what, when & how they monitor ...

well, if the 'Big Boys' wanted these down, guess where they would be.

Posted by: brucerealtor | March 28, 2008 1:17 AM | Report abuse

First, the "Cold War." Then the "War on Drugs." Now the "War on Terror." How many times are you people going to have an invisible enemy marketed to you?

And so your anti-Arabism isn't too obvious, you might want to list some Jewish terrorist groups here, starting with the Kahanists.

Posted by: Lamer | March 28, 2008 2:05 AM | Report abuse

It's not enough that the companies just 'cease doing business' with these terrorist organizations. The ISP companies should be heavily fined and the money used to fight the war on terror and help keep our country safe from future terrorist attacks.

Posted by: Janet in PA | March 28, 2008 8:23 AM | Report abuse

The websites listed belong primarily to organizations which threaten Israel and not the US. Our interests are by no means identical, though they do from time to time converge.

I'd be interested to know about organizations which are direct threats to the US!

The question of whether to allow terrorist and other malicious websites to stay up and collect information is an open question. As I recall, a December Washpost article in which police detectives investigating pedophiles said that online communication was a great enabler for pedophile networks.
The officers seemed to wish that the forums and message boards would go away. Are the terrorist sites analogous?

Posted by: kfritz | March 28, 2008 1:49 PM | Report abuse

With over 5,000 terror websites active and with the FBI unable to provide Arabic translators to monitor Jihad Sites and supposed terrorist intercepts, as per Sibel Edmonds ex FBI translator, not much is getting done.

If the FBI is sorely lacking Arabic translators to monitor terror sites, then the Jihad terror sites hosted in the USA must be shut down.

The FBI has conceded that some people in the language department are unable to adequately speak English or the language they're supposed to be translating.

Cyber vigilantes who track terror-related web sites and alert authorities that the sites are being hosted on U.S. servers have been heralded by some as heroes for exposing the threat from radical Islam, those "Terror Experts" that make money off the US Govt with "intel reports" call the Cyber Vigilantes a nuisance.

Bill Warner

Posted by: Bill Warner | March 28, 2008 4:52 PM | Report abuse

It is about time that you start being serious at facing and confronting terrorism around the world and stop being so democratic with those fanatic stratigic killers as hezbollah and hamas and terrorist regimes backing them up like syria and iran.

Posted by: said | March 30, 2008 3:14 AM | Report abuse

God be with us all.
God is the most important things in my life.

Posted by: teresa | March 30, 2008 10:44 PM | Report abuse

I would I learn more about ISPs?
so could you send me more information.

Posted by: teresa | March 30, 2008 10:46 PM | Report abuse

«While ISPs can be criminally liable for providing support to terror groups, most ISPs -- upon receipt of a complaint about a problematic or legally murky customer site -- will simply cease doing business with the offending party, citing violations of their terms of service, said Perry Aftab, an Internet attorney who specializes in cybercrime law.»

Has the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States been repealed de jure as well as de facto ? I must have missed the news in the flood of (dis)information regarding pop stars and such....

Henri

Posted by: M Henri Day | March 31, 2008 7:15 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company