I installed SP1 a couple of weeks ago on my laptop and had zero problems. It also made a HUGE system performance boost. It is now tolerable for me to run!!

Windows vista Home Premium SP1 it runs a way better than the RTM version :)

Windows Vista SP1 is very stable, no problems so far

I'm waiting for Windows XP Service Pack 3 (due end of this month?, see SANS link below) as the OS is still more viable on my slightly older hardware. I'll probably wait for Vista's successor (Windows 7) due circa 2010 when I purchase new hardware too.

http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=4297

Meanwhile, enjoy this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPv8PPl7ANU

I backed up my files and installed SP1 a few days after it came out. Overall it worked fine. My only gripes are 1) b/c of the user access control, my plan to have the update finish after I went to bed didn't work. 2) some of the power settings had changed and I had to readjust them.

Haven't noticed any difference in the way the computer runs.

I put Vista SP1 on my HP Laptop, and it installed OK, and the computer seems to be working normally after the installation. I have a Vista Desktop, and have not installed SP1 on that one yet. My Vista w/o SP1 seems to be working just fine, but will install SP1 within the next week or so. Wanted to see if other people were having trouble with it. So far have not seen any negative comments. Both of my computers are fairly new and were delivered with Vista installed, so all my hardware was compatible with the initial version of Vista

I installed SP1 on my Vista Ultimate 64-bit version machine using the built-in update tool with no trouble. I haven't noticed much performance improvement, but I didn't have any complaints to begin with. From my perspective, I cannot understand any of the bellyaching about Vista. It just works for me.

vicodin addiction

"Vista users who are staying up-to-date with security patches from Redmond don't have to install this update"

This is clearly not true! Especially as you go on to describe other updates not previously installed.

"Vista includes a backup utility called the Backup and Restore Center"

Except for vista home Basic.

I installed SP1 yesterday and because of the expected hour I left it running overnight, found it booted up in the morning with a Bluescreen error reported on the screen, clicked OK and it seems to be ok still - does seem to perform better too.

Earlier this week I added Vista 64 SP1. The piecemeal download failed, so I grabbed the entire 730Mb distribution. I thought it was nice that it told me it was going to take an hour. However, it was more like 3 hours with reboots and post-processing of the update.

The system seems faster in copying files, but certain applications still seem glacially slow when compared to win xp. (My machine is multi-boot; I usually run XP except when I need to access 4Gb of memory.) I am still able to crash Vista periodically, usually if the machine is heavily bogged down. I noticed that most of the Office 2003 patches have failed with "Code 779" or some such. Office seems to still work, though.

You wrote: "Microsoft says it's a good idea to check to make sure there are no corrupted files on your computer."

This expectation of system fiddling is an unreasonable request for a consumer operating system. It (and disk defragmentation, which has been in linux/unix for >20 years) seems to be something the OS ought to do in the background.

"This expectation of system fiddling is an unreasonable request for a consumer operating system."

System fiddling? Hardly. It's called preventative maintenance, as well as recommended prerequisites to ensure a successful installation. Not what I would call unreasonable.

"It (and disk defragmentation, which has been in linux/unix for >20 years) seems to be something the OS ought to do in the background."

Huh? What about Windows XP prefetch? Which optimizes the boot process and the use of installed applications or the self optimization when idle, all done in the background. Vista takes the concept a little further with superfetch.

Manually running disk defragmenter once a month builds on the prefetch/superfetch optimization. Along with checkdisk and disk cleanup, consider it preventative maintenance for your computer.

Then again, some never do maintenance on their vehicles either, then can't figure out why it breaks down or doesn't operate at peak performance. :::scratching head::::

SP1 was fine for me, although the total process took around 2 hours - when you reboot the files are installed in three stages so it's worth finding something better to do meanwhile...

I have installed Vista SP1 on my actual computer (Vista Home Premium, pre-installed on the NEW machine by the manufacturer the past November) as well as a vmware virtual machine running the same version with no problems.

My first blue screen came /after/ the SP1 install, but otherwise there have been neither positives nor negatives that I can detect. Local file copying still seems to take longer than absolutely necessary, and scanning directories over a local network Samba share still takes unreasonably long (up to 30 seconds to scan a directory of maybe 40 files and directories before I can even see them in explorer!).

Note that backup options depend heavily on the "version" of Vista that you have. Full disk backups are only available on "business" and "better" versions, and, as another posted pointed out, "backup and restore center" does not exist at all on "home basic" versions.

@TJ Finally, *nix "defragmentation" basically does not exist. Sure, you can get ext2's defrag, but even /they/ tell you not to use it. Also, that program requires that you invoke it yourself -- nothing is automatic.

730MB???? BLOAT!!!

I installed SP1 in the same manner that you did and it worked fine for me. I also downloaded the 435mb file as the Update feature did not work for me either. Before the install I had 46 optional updates available [I only update monthly those updates required when choosing the Express update option.] . After the install, I now have 9 optional updates available.

SP1 is completely incompatible with one of the most important features of Vista Ultimate, the ability to make it multi-lingual by installing full MUIs for any of the 30+ language flavors of Vista. For some of us, this is very important, because Vista Business, e.g., has inadequate language support for some applications.

In fact, Microsoft tech support recommended upgrading the Vista Business on my new computer to Ultimate to install Korean language support. Microsoft tech support did not know (nor did the salesman at Best Buy) that SP1 does not support any languages. So upon "upgrading" to "Vista Ultimate with SP1" (already so listed on the box, capsule or whatever they call that thing), it became impossible to download any language MUIs. No warning on the "box" either or anywhere I could find on Microsoft's website, which continued to tout the multi-language capability of Vista Ultimate.

The MS SP1 incompatibility team (yes, MS has a special group available to address such problems) explained the above to me by e-mail, for which there is no fix. Microsoft intends to have a language-compatible version of Vista with SP1 available by the end of the year! Microsoft did offer me a refund. So I am stuck using XP (on an old computer) for Korean language purposes. MS should not have released Vista Ultimate with SP1 until it is compatible with other languages.

Having trouble after previous Windows Updates received an error10 message on my network adapter. Followed MS's recommendations of the SP1 update to resolve the issue.

After installing SP1 on my Vista 32bit home premium system my network adapter no longer works, (no wifi) and I can not restore my backup files as they were stored on a plug n play hard drive and my usb ports are not responding.

Hopefully system restore will resolve the issue. I am currently waiting for the reboot with fingers crossed!

People are not serious enough about their jobs or work at Microsoft. There is no pride in the work or the company, just the paycheck and the ability to live cushy in the Seattle/Redmond area.

I am sing a Sony laptop model VGN-CR2G/R running Vista Home Premium. Until today Vista SP1 was not offered to me as a download via Windows Update. This was puzzling.

Research using Microsoft KB948343 appeared to show no obvious difficulties. Contrary to what it said on the Sony Australian web site for my Vaio, no Chinese language pack was installed. Norton Internet Security 2008 was uninstalled using their clean tool and then re-installed using the latest version available from their web site. (This Symantec recommends.) Device Manager was checked. Realtek AC97, and the other audio drivers were not shown. There is no fingerprint scanner on this computer and there never has been. Display drivers seemed OK. My Intel driver did not fall within the problem range. There is no smart card.

Wait! Just because the hardware is not there does not mean that there is no offending software for that hardware. An advanced scan showed that the UPEK fingerprint sensor driver file tcusb.sys WAS there and fell within the range for causing problems with the install of Vista SP1!

A visit to UPEK at http://www.upek.com/support/downloads/drivers/windows.asp found suitable drivers. The offending drivers were renamed with the extension tcusb.old. I found it useful to turn off UAC for this!

The bottom line is that Sony probably uses an image when loading software onto a hard drive and this image is the same for all the series, irrespective of installed hardware. (In my case series CR2.) Undoubtedly other OEMs do the same. If you don't get Visat SP1 showing in Windows Update, check for possible problems using advanced search as well as looking in Device Manager!

Hope this helps! (I have spent 10 days on this, on and off!)
Cheers,

With the release of 1TB internal HDD and ability to utilize PC3 1333 RAM at ~ 32GB how can anyone complain about "BLOAT". It's not the manufacturers fault that you're broke and can't afford a better system. I don't have much money either. The economy is not at it's best. Vista is meant for the new hardware/peripherals that have recently been released. I'm running a Phenom X4 on a 790x chipset motherboard. I'm running Vista H.P. 64-bit with 6GB of PC2 800Mhz RAM. And i'm running a RAID 0 config. with two 160 GB HDDs. My computer runs Vista great and it runs even better with SP1. Stop screaming BLOAT! and all the Vista errors B/S. If your machine was up to date you wouldn't have those problems.

-Warehouse worker $25k / yr ... If I can do it so should you be able to.

--ps.. however... if you use Vista in a Business environment God help you. But that's a whole other discussion. But you Home users should have no beef!

I just installed the SP-1 on my laptop a couple of hours back, seems like there's a slight performance improvement. Everything else is just as was before.

I just installed the SP-1 on my laptop a couple of hours back, seems like there's a slight performance improvement. Everything else is just as was before.

My Vista Ultimate had multiple languages installed - probably a big mistake on my part, because they inflated the already large OS footprint by at least 2x the size. I think the base backup now is 60gb !

Because of that the SP1 wasn't offered to me until this last week. It was approximately an 880mb download via Windows Update. It took forever to download, and then needed manual intervention to begin the installation which took at least another hour to complete. I think it was more.

Even though I'm using it right now, I haven't used it enough since the update to see if there are any related problems.

Additionally even if SP1 isn't available the first run through Windows Update when all fixes were previously installed, I've found that running WU a second time tends to have that and other items show up if they are actually available. However I am sure that it would have been alot faster to download the complete SP1 updater manually, than use WU as I did.

I could not install SP1 via the standalone installer for Windows Vista Home Premium on a Dell Inspiron 1720 laptop. I may have some of the device drivers for which Microsoft doesn't yet have SP1 support. The whole thing make me say "GRRRR!" - I'm hoping SP1 fixes all the blue screens of death we see on this OS.

The error I get while trying to run the SP1 install is "An internal error occurred while installing the service pack. 8007000D..." and then a "hyperlink" to a web article. I put the quotes around "hyperlink" (and you can rest assured I'll do the air quotes when I tell my friends about this little experience" because, not only can I not click it, I can't even copy-and-paste it. So Microsoft wants me to retype it in Internet Explorer? GRRRR....

It certainly appears from the article and these comments that Vista blows Apple away in every sense.

Once you go Mac, you'll never go back.

Due to Vista (or rather the impending support drop for WinXP) I bought an iMac and Leopard at the beginning of Feb. I added a virtualizer called VMWare Fusion that allows me to run WinXP concurrently with Leopard OS. (I can even drag and drop between the two...). With this as a transition crutch, I'll be off WinXP in about 6 months. 95% of my work is moved over.

Adobe even allowed a license change, deactivating PS CS3 under XP and shipped me a new disk for Mac OS X (I had to pay shipping). Not bad for a $600 package.

What's nice is the absolute quiet. No disk drive thrashing itself continuously. Time Machine backup is well done (could use some user settings).

Face it, Vista is really a major patch that MS sold as an OS. And you fell for it. And now they're patching the patch. Oh my!

"Face it, Vista is really a major patch that MS sold as an OS. And you fell for it. And now they're patching the patch."

You mean like Mac OS X (Cheeta, Puma, Jaguar, Panther, Tiger, Leopard)?

And didn't Apple also charge for each of those "major patches"? Silly fan boys!

I had problem installing on Dell Inspiron laptop, but after puting laptop in safe mode and then installing, no problem(s).

Just curious. Bought a new desktop with MS Vista Prem w/SP1 installed. Has there been any feedback/complaints for this flavor of OS w/SP1?

I did my first installation of the release version of SP1 Friday on a computer running Home Premium that I built about 4 months ago. The downloaded file was just over 50 MB, and the installation took 17 minutes counting the 3 reboots required. Totally painless.

I installed Service Pack 1 on my HP laptop and now my large HP monitor no longer exists. I plug it in and Vista has no idea that it's there. Also my nvidia software seems to have vanished. I'm attempting to restore to my previous configuration. It worked fine before. Idiots.

I installed the service pack without incident on my gateway it took about minutes and after the reboot it took an additional 15 minutes and it works fine. It even recognizes my full 2 gigs of ram

No problems so far, I just don't like the black theme of vista. I'm black though.

After getting the SP1 update, my computer got slower and my search engine in start/supposed to be in the right side panel, disapeared. The only one I had is when you hit the windows start to all programs, I still had the search box but the original file was gone. No longer have the advanced search. so I did a restore and made a short cut on my desktop, so when the update took affect again I would not loose it. I did not see any good in the SP1 update for Vista.. Sorry. RJL ~~

I installed the new service pack, and now it wont let me connect to the secure internet connections at uni, it says its connected to local only. really need xp back!

Last week - the last time I used Vista, I mentioned that because of the multiple Language Paks on my Vista Utimate, sp1 was a quite lengthy 880mb download and install process.

I'm here this week to report that there were an additional 680 mb download of SP1 updates for the language packs, which I just did tonight. Reasonably successfully in about 3 hours (so making a bit of progress timewise).

That is 1560mb of total SP1 updates - so far.

Only one of the Language (- Serbian) updates failed to install on multiple attempts using different mechanisms to coax it into existence here. Since there seemed to be not many reports about sp1 language pak problems, I logged a incident about this with MS. It's nice that MS has a special section for SP1 support. Which I'm not expecting to happen any too soon.

I continue to wonder when this OS will become more user friendly. And less demanding in it's upkeep. This isn't the first time it's taken forever to keep itself synced.

Of course as I said, in retrospect all those nice additional languages I installed were most likely a big mistake in judgment on my part.

I have always preferred the Mac OS, but have to work with Windows in my job. That being said, I found Windows XP Pro to be the best version of Windows I've ever had to work with.

Recently, I purchased a Duo-Core Laptop to use for work that had Vista pre-installed. It is the SLOWEST operating system I've ever had the displeasure of dealing with. Things take FOREVER. While I had no problem with the SP1 upgrade, I found NO IMPROVEMENT in so far as speed is concerned. Vista is horrible in my opinion for that reason. Vista is to XP what dial-up is to Broadband.

I'm wiping the drive to install XP. There are only so many hours in a day, and they should not be wasted waiting for an operating system to do its tasks.

You simply don't see this kind of crap go on with OSX....

I installed Service Pack 1 and could no longer connect to our Xerox printer 6400n at work. Upgraded drivers made no difference. Uninstalled Service Pack 1 and I'm good to go at work again. Service Pack 1 is BAD.

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.