Note to Lawmakers: Don't Feed the Pages!

After a rough couple of years of House page scandals, the House Page Board has come up with new guidelines for lawmakers on their "communications and interactions" with the teenagers clad in navy blue suits who run errands for the powers that be on Capitol Hill.

The bottom line message is: drop the Blackberry and back away from the pages.

Mainly, the rules appear to be aimed at preventing another sexually explosive Mark Foley scandal. But they also address the more recent concerns arising out of last year's page dorm scandal, in which four House pages were expelled from the program -- two for shoplifting and two for engaging in sexual activity in a dorm elevator while their classmates watched.

Last year's incidents prompted two outraged lawmakers to resign from the House Page Board, which led to an investigation of the security of the page program by the House Inspector General.

The new rules, a list of twelve commandments, spells out common-sense approaches on where and how to draw boundaries with the youngsters, and includes blunt language on rules against touching and entertaining pages. The rules, which were first reported by Roll Call newspaper (subscription required), were disseminated to members in a "Dear Colleague" letter sent Thursday by Rep. Dale Kildee (D-Mich.), chairman of the House Page Board.

Rule No. 1: "Treat all House Pages with respect, integrity, dignity and consideration." Rule 2 reminds members to "maintain a professional relationship and appropriate physical and emotional boundaries." Rules 3 through 6 address safety and security issues before getting to the seventh rule of conduct:

"Exchange no gifts with a Page having a value in excess of $50.00."

In one of his infamous but less tawdry messages to a teenage House page, Foley, the former GOP congressman from Florida who had a penchant for the finer things in life, asked, "What do you want for your birthday?" The discovery of Foley's sexually explicit messages to underage male pages led to his resignation in 2006 and helped cost Republicans their majority in Congress.

Lest members think it's OK to take a page to an economy lunch or buy that inexpensive occasional present for a page, the new guidelines address that in rules 8 through 10.

"8. To avoid any conduct that could create even the appearance of impropriety;

"9. To decline participation in any off-campus activities involving a Page that is not part of an officially approved Page Program function, except where permission is granted by the Page's parents in consultation with the Office of the Clerk;

"10. To avoid, where practicable, being alone with a single House Page, either on Capitol Hill grounds, or off, except where permission is granted by the Page's parents in consultation with the Office of the Clerk."

Is that clear enough?

By Mary Ann Akers |  April 4, 2008; 2:16 PM ET
Previous: You Decide: Is Mitch McConnell's Pie A Flop? | Next: Validity for Draft Condi Movement?

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.




Obama & Rezko: 18 Years of Chicago Politics
Posted by: Eniap Samoht | 04/04/2008 4:00 AM


With the Tony Rezko trial now under way, it is about time to delve into exactly who this guy is and what connection he has with Presidential candidate Barack Obama. You may not have known it, but these two have a friendship spanning nearly two decades, and it is my intent to dig a little deeper.

Antoin "Tony" Rezko and Barack Obama first met in 1990 through one of Rezko's companies, Rezmar. Rezko had a knack for finding future political talent and investing in it early. Three years later in 1993, Obama took a job at the Chicago law firm Davis Miner Barnhill & Galland, which represented three community groups in partnership with Rezmar. Through them, and with Obama's help, the law firm helped Rezko obtain over $43 million in government funds to 'improve' low-income apartments. Years later, in one of Chicago's coldest winters in recent years, we would find out that a dozen different lawsuits came to light in which the City of Chicago had to force Rezmar to turn on heat for its tenants; some of them had gone over five weeks without heat of any kind. Also, more than half of Rezmar's buildings went into foreclosure, and several had to be boarded up. It turned out Rezmar had done the work on the cheap, according to a former employee who wished to remain anonymous. Great use of government spending, eh?

At this point, Rezko had not only been sued by the City of Chicago for failing to heat his low-income apartments, but was also caught using a black business partner to obtain a minority set-aside to illegally get a fast-food franchise at O'Hare Airport. By now, Rezko had become a pro at exploiting the black community. Yeemployees at Rezmar, as well as bundling an unknown amount from other cohorts. Apparently Obama saw no reason to return these donations at the time (he was short on cash), but conveniently returned it eight years later after having already raised over $100 million in his bid to become President. Funny how ethics tend to matter less when you are strapped for cash.

Of course this is only the beginning of Rezko's fundraising for Obama. When Obama began his campaign for United States Senate in 2003 and 2004, Rezko was there again to help Obama. This time Rezko wasn't holding back. He gave $11,500 of his own money, had his Rezmar partner-in-crime Dan Mahru give another $5,000, his wife and brother each gave $1,500, and three employees of Rezmar gave $3,500, $3,000 and $1,500 each. Rezko also held a fundraiser on Obama's behalf and personally bundled for his Senate and Presidential Campaigns until Obama found it suddenly convenient to return his donations when people began to learn who Rezko was.

Fast forward to 2005. Obama, now a sitting U.S. Senator was as close to Rezko as ever. After his victory in the previous year, Obama needed a much nicer home. And who better to talk to than the slumlord Tony Rezko? Obama purchased a Georgian revival mansion for $1.65 million and Rezko bought the adjacent vacant lot for $625,000 on the exact same day. Obama, several months later in early 2006, would then buy a portion of Rezko's lot at cost for a mere $104,500, greatly increasing his current lot's value.

The fact is, Tony Rezko and Barack Obama have been friends for almost twenty years. Rezko's antics of exploiting the black and low-income communities in Obama's own district were enough to be sued by the City of Chicago, and now he has been indicted by the United States Department of Justice. But apparently this was not enough for Obama to turn down his dirty money and connections.

A man who finds it convenient to excuse ethics when it helps propel his political career is not a man I want as my President.t Barack had decided to move into politics with a run at State Senate, and despite knowing all of this, Obama would accept plenty of his donations for this and future runs. The day his State Senate campaign started, Obama received $2,000 each from two of Rezko's fast-food businesses. Rezko was not only a donor, but had become someone Obama could rely on to build his early political foundation.

When Obama decided to run against Democrat incumbent Congressman Bobby Rush in 2000, Rezko lined up another $1,000 each from himself, his wife, and four other

Posted by: JABBER | April 5, 2008 11:43 AM

Interesting post on the house pages, Jabber

Posted by: bobxoftheivorycoast | April 5, 2008 1:53 PM

what a waste, the whole page program should be abolished

Posted by: Anonymous | April 7, 2008 9:22 AM

Thomas Paine/samoht eniap is absolutely correct and wonderful. Great field work, keep at it.

Posted by: Adrian | April 8, 2008 3:37 PM

I was quite surprised when I came upon the link of one of my articles here. Please feel free to check my blog out at:

www.thepamphletpage.blogspot.com

Thank you,
Eniap

Posted by: Eniap Samoht | April 29, 2008 6:27 PM

You insolent jerk. You really need to stop writing harmful things about the page program. Those are very good rules.

I am a former page myself. Last year you totally screwed up all of the events that happened in the page dorm scandal. Yes, you were among the first to get a hold of the news, but you totally took it out of context, and blamed all of the pages for the actions of two pages in an isolated incident. The leadership was in no way responsible for what they did either.

Words cannot express the anger that I feel towards you for lying about and blaming the pages for that. You lied in that article more times than I can count on both hands.

You then, a few days later, edited the article to present it in a more "acceptable" light, but you still slanted it sbjectively to your own opinions misleading others. I have no respect for you.

*** You might want to know that if I was not representing such an honorable institution ad the page program, that this comment would be riddled with curses aimed at yourself. GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT and do a better job REPORTING, NOT ASSUMING!

Posted by: john | May 1, 2008 11:15 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2007 The Washington Post Company