Critique this: Building a better BP story
Whenever reporters settle on one angle for a complex story, readers and experts inevitably write back saying we totally missed the bigger story.
How could you miss the elephant in the room?
Your story's been done a million times!
Are you naive?
These are the kinds of emails that can quickly crush a reporter's sense of self-worth. Today, Story Lab wants to know: How could we have done it better?
I'm not an energy reporter, but I decided to write a quick feature about BP gas station customers and whether they feel guilty about doing business with the company responsible for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. With so many calls to boycott BP gas stations, I wondered whether BP customers really cared, or whether they had other priorities in deciding where to buy gas.
But should I have selected a different angle? Should I have focused more on the plight of independent franchise owners who operate BP gas stations? Or should I have zeroed in on rivals Texaco or Shell to see if they were enjoying any schadenfreude?
Take a read on our story and then let us know how you would approach the topic. We welcome your criticisms, alternatives and story ideas on the comment board below.
| May 25, 2010; 3:22 PM ET
Categories: Hard choices, Journalism
Save & Share: Previous: Pick of the Day: Henry Allen on the prestige of combat
Next: Pick of the Day: You can't make this stuff up
Posted by: happy11 | May 25, 2010 4:52 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.