The Trail: A Daily Diary of Campaign 2008

The Fact Checker

Did Obama "lie" about Ayers?

The McCain campaign claims that Barack Obama "lied" about his relationship with the former Weather Underground leader Bill Ayers. It would be more accurate to say that he "told the truth slowly." ( 4:48 PM ET) | More »

Dan Balz's Take

More '08 Blogs

Archives

More Campaign '08

Politics Newsletter (M-F)

Multimedia

The Presidential Field

Calendar / Events

Interaction

Polls

CT: Small Prize, But Big-Name Visits

By Lyndsey Layton
Just 60 Democratic delegates are at stake in Connecticut -- a sliver of the 2,025 needed to secure the nomination. But Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton are neck-and-neck and battling hard there, giving it the kind of attention normally reserved for states with bigger jackpots.

Today, Clinton was in New Haven in the morning, and Obama hit Hartford in the late afternoon. Clinton's daughter, Chelsea, is expected in Hartford tonight, while Obama's wife, Michelle, visited Greenwich on Wednesday.

That kind of attention is unknown in Connecticut, which used to hold its primary in March, long after the front-runners were determined by New Hampshire and Iowa. By holding an earlier primary in a year when the race is competitive, Connecticut is suddenly off the sidelines and into the game.

Both Clinton and Obama have been running frequent television ads, and Clinton has sent direct mailings targeted to female voters.

A SurveyUSA poll taken over the weekend showed Obama leading Clinton, 48 percent to 46 percent.

The tightening race follows a spike in voter registration. About 32,000 people have joined the rolls in recent weeks, with Democrats outpacing Republicans by two to one, said Adam Joseph, spokesman for Connecticut Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz.

Three of the five members of the state's congressional delegation are backing Obama -- Rosa DeLauro, John Larson and Chris Murphy. State Attorney General (and Clinton's Yale Law School study buddy) Richard Blumenthal is supporting Clinton. Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, who dropped out of the presidential race, is staying neutral.

On the Republican side, McCain is the clear leader, with 53 percent to Romney's 31 percent. McCain is campaigning with Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) and also has the support of Rep. Christopher Shays.

Posted at 7:43 PM ET on Feb 4, 2008
Share This: Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Tag in Del.icio.us | Digg This
Previous: NJ: Obama in Striking Distance of Garden State | Next: NY: Clinton's Home-Field Advantage


Add The Trail to Your Site
Be the first to know when there's a new installment of The Trail. This widget is easy to add to your Web site, and it will update every time there's a new entry on The Trail.
Get This Widget >>


Comments



Something is happening. I was at the rally at the Hartford XL Center last night. Everyone talked to each other as the lines snaked around the building and then while we waited to go through security. Phone numbers were exchanged. In our seats we all smiled and clapped with one another. All backgrounds, all ages. All amazed that we had been lucky enough to get inside the building.

And then the Senator made such an unobtrusive entrance, because we had been expected that he'd be introduced, but he just walked on a few minutes after Sen. Kennedy and Caroline, Congressmen John Larson and Chris Murphy and Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro, and without an introduction he just walked in like a normal down-to-earth person, and when we realized that it was really him, the room rocked. I mean rocked!

And he was so humble, just looking up at all of us, and it reminded me of how great humility is often found in the world's greatest leaders.
And during his speech, which went on longer than we'd been told it would go, 48 minutes I think it was clocked at, he would turn and face every single part of the arena and wave up to each level and make eye contact even with those in the highest seats.

The proof of how dramatic an evening this was when we all left. No pushing, no crowding, everyone so polite to each other, just as they'd been going in. And everyone all aglow and asking one another, "Did you hear him say this?" Did you hear him say that?" For many single mothers when Senator Obama spoke about his own Mom, how much she meant to him, and losing her to cancer when he was young, it really hit home to so many single parents there in the audience.


Here are some great photographs by the Hartford Courant's staff:
http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hc-obamarally-0204-pg,0,3564408.photogallery

Something is happening, America. Something is happening.

Posted by: willowbarcelona | February 5, 2008 11:41 AM | Report abuse

My letter to earth-loving Democrats:

Well it's almost time now. Here's my quivering argument for whatever it counts.

Let's first perspectify the Clinton legacy. Obama supporters are very tearful about Clinton's affair with Lewinsky and his hurtful lying. There are politicians, you know, who are both, pristine in private life and make competent presidents. Let's take a historical shot at this Audacity of Hope. JFK was a serial philanderer, poking every hole in sight. He gave us Bay of Piglets and near Apocalypto. Then, LBJ fatally perpetuated Vietnam. Nixon - criminal. Carter - exquisitely incompetent. Reagan of soaring national debt/Iran Contra/S&L crises. George Recession Sr - no, he was in bed only with the Saudis. Then, Bill Clinton. Wipe away the scum thrown at your faces by the republican propaganda, and if you attained puberty a bit before 90s, you will see quite easily, Bill Clinton's were the best presidential years in recent history. Who compares?

Let's get to near history and Hillary's vote for the Iraq war resolution. Our country had just been devastatingly attacked. Such was the patriotism that a Democratic Senator who left most of his body parts in the fields of Vietnam was knocked out of the senate for not being patriotic enough! 29 Democratic senators voted for the resolution. Many of them, like Kerry, were finally persuaded that the vote will be used primarily for getting Saddam Hussein to come clean. They might not have trusted him. Bush was going to war anyway. Only, we might have given Republicans a 60 vote senate. Friends, Hillary Haters, Monday Morning Quarterbacks, Backseat Drivers, what would have happened then?
Meanwhile, on a hilltop, far away from the battlefield, there was a Senator in the safe confines of a very blue state. His state not devastated like New York. Sears Tower still towering. He made a fine anti-war speech. Simultaneously, he was lustily voting Present in his state legislature instead of taking a stand on radioactive issues to avoid providing propaganda material to the Republicans. Political expediency, it's called. Clinton haters are very intimate with this phrase. If Obama had to be politically expedient in the Bluest of Blue states, what, you must think, he would have done in the jingoistic pressure cooker of the 2002/03 senate? When we did not know where and when again we might be hit again. One anti-war commentary given from the distant, safe, liberal confines of IL should not a president make!
Predictably, once Obama was in Senate, his voting was identical to democrats like Clinton. He raised no hell, showed no leadership. Why should he? You see, voting against war funding is a somewhat unpopular thing. You can't do that and hope to become President. And you can't just say Present, you know. You have to vote.

So now we have a tight race. Hillary might very well lose. No doubt, Hillary supporters will have to show up.

Obama supporters also feel about his electability. Good night, good luck and sweet dreams. We wouldn't let Hillary lay a hand on Obama. No, we must be all tea/coffee only. If you criticize - you are racist. Dearest, I am going to go out on a very dangerous limb here. I have a feeling, Republicans won't be so sensitive. No, I think they will have a thing or two to say about that. *Despite* all the hype, Obama is not doing dramatically better than Hillary against McCain. How will it look after Republicans have worked him over? To those who insist that our gem, Obama is still unknown - he has spent aver $120 million dollar introducing himself. Media has been all ga-ga about him. Can it really get better for him? You know, Fox, i.e., conservative media won't keep giving him a pass. They won't mind asking him about his drug use. Pox on them but they will - and much more. Though, in my personal opinion they ought not to bother with that. McCain's strong, maverick character and years of experience will be quite enough. To a left of center and right of MoveOn org type of a person like me, when I put Obama next to McCain, I see a shrub next to a Titan. Obama's experience? He has organized in Chicago - shame on me if I deny him that. In a general election, Comrades, that only works if the public has a seizure while rolling on the floor in laughter. Bird flu, global warming have nothing on the effect Obama's record-setting lack of experience might have on the general population.

No, wrong, I am not a purple Democrat. I thought Howard Dean was a better candidate than Al Gore/John Kerry. I was devastated when he was knocked out because he dared to be emotional/spontaneous. He had such a strong executive experience but the media didn't like his laughter. He had no style. In America we must have Style.

I doubt if an undecided voter comes all the way here. And I don't have the Audacity of Hope to believe I can make any impression on those who love Obama. But try I must.

Posted by: vishalg_99 | February 4, 2008 8:33 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2008 The Washington Post Company