The Trail: A Daily Diary of Campaign 2008

The Fact Checker

Did Obama "lie" about Ayers?

The McCain campaign claims that Barack Obama "lied" about his relationship with the former Weather Underground leader Bill Ayers. It would be more accurate to say that he "told the truth slowly." ( 4:48 PM ET) | More »

Dan Balz's Take

More '08 Blogs

Archives

More Campaign '08

Politics Newsletter (M-F)

Multimedia

The Presidential Field

Calendar / Events

Interaction

Polls

NARAL Endorses Obama, but Unity in Short Supply

By Garance Franke-Ruta
NARAL Pro-Choice America endorsed Barack Obama today in a bid to unify the Democratic Party.

It was a bid that rapidly fell short, provoking an outcry on NARAL's blog and a statement of displeasure with NARAL's timing from the president of Democratic women's political action committee EMILY's List, which supports Hillary Rodham Clinton. Clinton pronounced herself disappointed with the news.

In a statement early this afternoon, NARAL president Nancy Keenan gave Obama the support of her group's political action committee. "Sen. Obama has been a strong advocate for a woman's right to choose throughout his career in public office. He steadfastly supports and defends a woman's right to make the most personal, private decisions regarding her reproductive health without interference from government or politicians," Keenan said. "Sen. Obama has been a leader on this issue in the United States Senate."

She continued: "We are confident that Barack Obama is the candidate of the future. Americans are tired of the divisive politics of the last eight years, and will unite behind Obama in the fall. We look forward to working with a pro-choice Obama White House in January."

NARAL had defended Obama in January against Clinton campaign attacks in the runup to the New Hampshire primary accusing him of being weak on choice -- the group had earlier endorsed Clinton and Obama during their Senate bids, pronouncing them both solid supporters of abortion rights -- and former NARAL president Kate Michelman was a fierce critic of Clinton during the campaign while acting as a surrogate for former N.C. senator John Edwards.

"I think it is tremendously disrespectful to Sen. Clinton -- who held up the nomination of a FDA commissioner in order to force approval of Plan B and who spoke so eloquently during the Supreme Court nomination about the importance of protecting Roe vs. Wade -- to not give her the courtesy to finish the final three weeks of the primary process," said EMILY's List president Ellen Malcolm of the endorsement. "It certainly must be disconcerting for elected leaders who stand up for reproductive rights and expect the choice community will stand with them."

Asked about NARAL's move by Brian Williams today in an interview for "NBC Nightly News," Clinton pronounced herself disappointed. "I am disappointed because of the work that I've done for so many years," she said. "I'm proud to have the support of, you know, many other groups that -- share my -- views and my commitment to issues. But we're going forward. And we're gonna see where this process -- finally -- resolves. And -- we'll have a nominee. And then we'll all be united."

News of today's endorsement was met less diplomatically on NARAL's blog, "Blog for Choice", where critics frequently echoed Clinton's earlier criticisms of Obama in expressing their annoyance with the endorsement. "Why settle for thirty years of fighting for women's rights when you can have 'present' votes and obscure statements of 'support' from Obama?" wrote someone with the username Shelley. "To say this is a low point for NARAL is an understatement. I will need to consider alternative vehicles for my contributions toward women's reproductive rights."

Added username Charlotte: "I am so disappointed as a woman that you endorsed Obama before the Democratic primary is even over! You have thrown all of the progressive men and women who have fought for reproductive rights and are fighting for the first women nominee under the bus. Particularly for a man who votes "present" on tough reproductive issues. I am blown away."

The comments continued on and on in this vein, suggesting that feelings may still be running too high among Clinton supporters for unity moves to have their intended effects at the present time. "I have never been so disgusted," wrote N Miller. "How dare you claim to represent pro-choice women and then turn your back on one of the most influential women's right advocates in recent history? I am a lifelong activist and I will never, never forgive you for this." Said Angry Pro-Choice Voter: "I am outraged. This is absolutely ridiculous. I will never give money or support to NARAL again. Shame on you, NARAL, for selling out to the left wing of the Democratic Party." Added Mary Jane Casper: "I am disappointed that NARAL, whom I have supported for years, is endorsing Obama prematurely. You are dividing your critical supporters by taking this stand."

More than 1,000 comments later, the criticisms of NARAL -- as well as of Clinton supporters who criticized the group's endorsement -- were still flooding in.

Posted at 6:30 PM ET on May 14, 2008
Share This: Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Tag in Del.icio.us | Digg This
Previous: Judge Rebuffs DNC Lawsuit Against McCain | Next: Obama Emphasizes Faith in Kentucky


Add The Trail to Your Site
Be the first to know when there's a new installment of The Trail. This widget is easy to add to your Web site, and it will update every time there's a new entry on The Trail.
Get This Widget >>


Comments



To "ladies join the party please"
You understand losing is hard? Well your understanding is about to increase in leaps and bounds as I and millions of others will vote for McCain first. Obama and company spent the entire campaign belittling our candidate and those who support her and now you actually have the nerve to call for "Unity"? Wow, seems someone just figured out that you need our support to win. Well I've got news for you for you dear; Snide remarks and insults do not constitute "unifying" behavior. Betraying her loyalty of 30 years in a blatant attempt to force her out is not unifying and telling us to "stop crying", "get over it" and back your candidate is likewise not unifying. Last but not least, telling us all the things Hillary may be able to do after the campaign is not unifying, of course Hillary will go on and do many great things. She is an extraordinary woman and for you to remind us of this is patronizing.
Unfortunately it now appear that the better candidate will lose, so I have a bit of advice of my own. All campaign long I've heard Obama tell us how he will heal the nation and Unify us .. so prove it. He can start with the party, if he at least offers the VP position to Hillary I and I dare say most if not all of us will sing his praises and vote Democrat. If not, then I will take my chances on McCain. So there you have it, no bickering, no crying, just a simple warning against the continued lack of respect you have shown for more than half the party. You want unity, put your money where your mouth is .. the ball's in your court Sen. Obama, lets see what kind of man you are.

Posted by: Tim Keller | May 20, 2008 12:46 AM | Report abuse

I understand losing is hard but as you can see democrats and democratic ladies .....mother teresa is out of the running......so would you please stop whining and support the potential nominee....Hillary is getting over it......we need to win come november......if Obama loses Hillary loses ......even if she is not vice president ...there will be numerous positions that she will be able to have attaining alot of power like Leader or Speaker of the house.....many cabinet postions will open up for all our democrats but we have to win......all this bickering and crying.....Obama supporters are mean......well let me tell you competition is mean.....but the in house competition is over now we are going to a different neighborhood to compete........lets go and win Dems or dont cry when Mc Cain doesn't change like he is saying he will do.......Lastly....it takes more than a president to get done what America needs done...so we all need to tighten or belts and get to work for the U.S........and if Mc Cain still makes you comfortable then enlist one of your children to fight in the Armed services for him and bush and Cheaney

Posted by: Ladies join the party please | May 15, 2008 2:59 PM | Report abuse

See how unifying Obama is everyone? HAHA, what a joke! He voted "present" consistantly on important choice issues because he was too scared to take a stand -while Hillary has worked 35+ years for reproductive freedom for every woman in this country, how in the world could they have endorsed Obama? A man who says women shoudl consult w/their ministers before making the personal decison to end a pregnancy? Give it up people, this is a joke and you're lying if you don't admit that. Of course woman are outraged today. It's a sad day for women in America.
Maybe Obama called Nancy "sweetie" and she was just so beside herself she had to endorse him?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4STLISLdxi4

Posted by: Jessica | May 15, 2008 3:10 AM | Report abuse

Awe, JakeD -- I was so eagerly awaiting your response. I so wanted to see the kind of mental gymnastics you'd have to do to work that one out. Bummer.

Posted by: Nuffsaid | May 14, 2008 8:26 PM | Report abuse

JakeD,

It was just disclosed that Cindy McCain has just divested herself of $2 million in mutual funds that were invested in Sudan, the very same government that supports the genocide in Darfur. Please clarify how that fits into your pro-life stance. How is McCain a better (i.e. more moral) candidate when his partner invests in a government that supports the killing, maiming and rapping of women and children? I'm very much confused by this apparent contradiction. Thanks.

Posted by: Nuffsaid | May 14, 2008 8:07 PM | Report abuse

You can criticize this move but Hillary stood by and was as happy as a pig in s**t when Right to Life spent $1.3 million dollars in Indiana attacking Obama during the primary but never said a word about being against Clinton, even though they share the same pro=choice position. I say Obama has the scars to prove he earned this endorsement by the lashing he took while Clinton stood idly by, cackling.

Posted by: majorteddy | May 14, 2008 7:50 PM | Report abuse

It is time for all Democrats to get together now and work toward a Democratic victory. Hillary can either jump on the bandwagon or risk being labeled as a Harold Stassen. somebody that can not see their own irrelevance developing.

Posted by: LetthemdrinkCrownRoyal | May 14, 2008 7:45 PM | Report abuse

Once the California Supreme Court rules gay marriage LEGAL....

Posted by: JakeD | May 14, 2008 7:20 PM
----

Again, only fear comes from the Republican extremists.

Posted by: Franky | May 14, 2008 7:42 PM | Report abuse

Anonymous at 7:27 PM:

Hillary is just as "immoral" (if not more so, since she stopped NATIONWIDE abortion bans) than Obama on abortion -- killing LIVE-BORN children is infanticide, as you rightly noted -- no longer abortion. So, I'm with you all the way up until YOUR ENDORSEMENT of Hillary Clinton! I don't quite understand that position. Wouldn't you rather vote for McCain? Please clarify ...

Posted by: JakeD | May 14, 2008 7:38 PM | Report abuse

It seems people have forgotten this is politics. Those PRESENT votes were a political move agreed upon by parties in the women choice movement with OBAMA.

It gave home a middle road political stance and he did not contribute to any votes that hurt their cause.

Go back to the start of the race and DO THE RESEARCH.

I swear, people have short memories or simply like to cry without using all of the facts at hand.

Unreal..

FYI.. You better go a look at HRC's PRESENT votes... you will be surprised.

I bet most of you don't know how to look up senate votes..

DO YOU?


Hmmmmmmmm?

Posted by: Vance McDaniel | May 14, 2008 7:33 PM | Report abuse

It was brave of NARAL to take the stand they did and I applaud their attempt to bring this primary campaign to a close. For Hillary Clinton supporters to accuse NARAL of traitorous behavior shows a lack of self-knowledge.

For two months Senator Clinton's only hope of getting the nomination is to so damage Senator Obama that he cannot win in the fall and she has tried her hardest to do that but she has failed. If we want a pro-choice President in the fall that person will be Barack Obama and we had better get started now working for him because McCain with his zero percent choice rating is going to be tough to beat.

If McCain is elected, we can expect more Scalias and Alitos and a final overturn of Roe v. Wade and other liberties we support. Please think before you condemn NARAL for their brave move to get us on the path to victory - and away from self-defeating infighting. It is time to take back the White House!

Posted by: Chuck | May 14, 2008 7:33 PM | Report abuse

National Abortion Rights Action League's Endorsement of OBAMA

Well, it becomes real clear that NARAL's endorsement is a hope that Obama will appoint to the Supreme Court to remove the recent Supreme Court's decision to disallow "Late Term Abortions"......what many of us in health care call INFANTICIDE!

Here is Obama's action in Illinois:


What Barack Obama don't want his followers to know about his dirty little secret while in the IL Senate;


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?AR TICLE_ID=51121

"I know his reasoning, because I was there"

As a nurse at an Illinois hospital in 1999, I discovered babies were being aborted alive and shelved to die in soiled utility rooms. I discovered infanticide.

Legislation was presented on the federal level and in various states called the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. It stated all live-born babies were guaranteed the same constitutional right to equal protection, whether or not they were wanted.

BAIPA sailed through the U.S. Senate by unanimous vote. Even Sens. Clinton, Kennedy and Kerry agreed a mother's right to "choose" stopped at her baby's delivery.

The bill also passed overwhelmingly in the House. NARAL went neutral on it. Abortion enthusiasts publicly agreed that fighting BAIPA would appear extreme. President Bush signed BAIPA into law in 2002.

But in Illinois, the state version of BAIPA repeatedly failed, thanks in large part to then-state Sen. Barack Obama. It only passed in 2005, after Obama left.

I testified in 2001 and 2002 before a committee of which Obama was a member.

Obama articulately worried that legislation protecting live aborted babies might infringe on women's rights or abortionists' rights. Obama's clinical discourse, his lack of mercy, shocked me. I was naive back then. Obama voted against the measure, twice. It ultimately failed.

In 2003, as chairman of the next Senate committee to which BAIPA was sent, Obama stopped it from even getting a hearing, shelving it to die much like babies were still being shelved to die in Illinois hospitals and abortion clinics.

(As chair of that same committee, Obama once abruptly ended a hearing early, right before Scott and Janet Willis, the parents of six children killed as a result of Illinois' drivers licenses for bribes scandal, were to testify in favor of Choose Life license plate legislation. I was there for that one, too. The Willises had traveled three hours. Reporters filled the room. Obama stalled. He later killed the bill when no one was around.)

So, the reason Keyes said Jesus Christ wouldn't vote for Barack Obama was because of Obama's fanatical support of abortion to the point of condoning infanticide.

I have framed on my wall a Chicago Sun-Times cartoon published during the campaign. Obama is holding a sign with "LIVE BIRTH ABORTION" on it. God is reaching down from heaven to a baby in front of Obama, and the baby is reaching up to God. Obama is yelling at God, "You keep out of this!"

In his USA Today opinion piece, Obama admitted being "nagged" by the Jesus-wouldn't-vote-for-him statement, but only because he wished he'd given a different comeback.


OBAMA is AMORAL, NARAL is AMORAL!

Vote Clinton!!!

Posted by: Anonymous | May 14, 2008 7:27 PM | Report abuse

Ellen, you and Hillary's brand of gender politics failed and belong to the past. Get over it Ellen. You had more than your required 15 minutes of fame. Everyone else has moved on.

Posted by: A Mother of Four | May 14, 2008 7:24 PM | Report abuse


Originally I was concerned about how polarizing Hillary would be in a general election and what that would mean to an already divided country. I honestly didn't realize how that ability to polarize could take place within the party itself. I don't think this is an accident or some random occurrence. She is a carrier.

Posted by: jes_fine | May 14, 2008 7:21 PM | Report abuse

Posted by: pubichaironmycokecan | May 14, 2008 7:20 PM | Report abuse

Franky:

Once the California Supreme Court rules gay marriage LEGAL here tomorrow -- and the Constitutional Amendment to ban gay marriages passes in November, handing the State with the most Electoral Votes to John SIDNEY McCain -- then talk to me about "backlash" ; )

Posted by: JakeD | May 14, 2008 7:20 PM | Report abuse

baracki boy can get all the endorsements he can buy.

It won't matter a bit.

he's a racist fraud and he won;t get mine.

Posted by: dylan | May 14, 2008 6:56 PM

*************************
yep, a lot of weeping from the Obama campaign on that loss...

Posted by: Poof! dylan is a super delegate | May 14, 2008 7:17 PM | Report abuse

you're too dumb to see what this poster sees easily

________________________

newagent99 wrote:

ARTICLE: Racist Incidents Give Some Obama Campaigners Pause at 5/14/2008

why the hell is this article still on the top of the page? It's an attempt to undercut the Clinton blow out of Obama, and it's an attempt to tie racism to West Virgina.

Why not run an article on Black welfare rates under an Obama win in N. Carolina...

at least that would be a true statement instead of this racist slur at West Virginans.

5/13/2008 8:53:07 PM

___________________________

Posted by: hello bama | May 14, 2008 7:16 PM | Report abuse

"House Republicans struggled to regroup Wednesday in the aftermath of a devastating election loss in Mississippi, acknowledging that their party faced a significant challenge in November after the loss of three Republican seats in special elections this year."

The Republican Grand Failure is coming to an end! Thanks to Rush and his stooges for helping create a further backlash to get this done! Gotta love seeing these Republican Cowards running around like headless chickens!

Posted by: Franky | May 14, 2008 7:13 PM | Report abuse

The sad fact is, that Hillary would have a very hard time with mccain for one reason...Bill.He is her running mate no matter how you cut it, and the republicans will shred him to pieces.

He is a heavy load for hillary to carry.If he had any self control,we would not have had 8 years of bush! Thanks Bill!
She should have divorced him.

I like Hillary, but I will NEVER vote to allow W.J Clinton into the peoples house again.

Posted by: thopaine | May 14, 2008 7:10 PM | Report abuse

wow, the bitterness from Clinton supporters is fierce! People, Clinton and Obama have identical platforms. Let's all finally get behind the one with real momentum.

Posted by: Janet | May 14, 2008 7:09 PM | Report abuse

More politicians and politico groups.. All the more resson to vote for Hillary. Just hope she will hold out to the convention. She must be the nominee. He certainly can't defeat the GOPers and Bush supporters. This is very, very skeery! We really need a cleansing and he certainly won't do it. And you know McCain will not! Please, please don't buy into these superdelegates support now. This can change at the convention. Just hold on Hill!

Posted by: jimbeaux | May 14, 2008 7:01 PM | Report abuse

baracki boy can get all the endorsements he can buy.

It won't matter a bit.

he's a racist fraud and he won;t get mine.

Posted by: dylan | May 14, 2008 6:56 PM | Report abuse

Since the ELECTION MAP, the real one, not the one that Obama is selling or paying off Super delegates to buy into, CLEARLY shows that Obama LOSES, this is one of the STUPIDEST things this PROCHOICE organizations has done! If Obama is the nominee, WE LOSE! And the ENDORSERS of OBAMA LOSE in a BIG WAY! especially this organization. Down in texas, votes of cheers are ringing with this endorsement! WHAT WERE YOU THINKING? OBVIOUSLY, YOU WERE NOT!

Posted by: TEXAS DEMOCRAT | May 14, 2008 6:47 PM | Report abuse

These are the most laughable endorsements yet!

The NARAL Polical Action Committee mind you not naral.

Is someone holding a gun to the head of NARAL?

Next Laughable is John Edwards endorsement.

Does anyone know politics 101 or they on something?

Next they will have Obama mimicking the boston accent of JFK.

Or maybe Obama sailing off cape cod--that would be a nice touch.

How about Michelle in a pillbox hat?

Put us out of misery and get Obama and this cast of characters off the stage.

Posted by: JohnAdams1 | May 14, 2008 6:45 PM | Report abuse

I could never vote for a pro-choice President.

Posted by: JakeD | May 14, 2008 6:40 PM | Report abuse

For the past few years NARAL has been nothing more than a money generator for Nancy Keenan. Their endorsements, and lack of hard action for Choice, is pathetic.

(Anyone else note that NARAL endorsed Al Wynn over Donna Edwards?)

What makes me sad is that NARAL's fecklessness has been easy to see for years. And yet, it took them coming out for Obama to get all of these women riled up.

It is time for a new type of politics. We need the people taking charge of their own issues, and not depending on groups like NARAL to pretend to defend them.

Keep in mind that Obama isn't the answer. WE are the answer. Obama is just the vehicle to make it happen.

Obama in '08!

Posted by: Kelly | May 14, 2008 6:38 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2008 The Washington Post Company