Your site is realy very interesting.

http://www.suomifutis.net/firnal/rapeporn/free_rape_films.html basicsunbuttonedwalls

http://sawiin.descom.es/sceens/news.html dimlyfingeringwelcomed

Posted by: rds | Oct 7, 2005 11:54:13 AM

Ah, yes, that's me. An extreme left winger.

Except that I was a registered Republican until 2000.

Welcome to a creation of the Republican party's policies.

Excuse me but "that tool Froomkin" just happens to be one of the best writers at the Washington Post! If you dont care for his opinions and the info,links he shares with us daily you are in the minority--check out Bush's new poll numbers at CBS,only a 37 percent approval number!

"Chris:

Thanks for this informative column. I find it puzzling why the comments on this site are dominated by extreme left-wingers. I think perhaps Dan Froomkin's tone attracts them."

I think it could be because conservatives, having only discovered the benefits of "fire" a couple of decades ago and still trying to determine if this "evolution" thingie of Darwin is going to catch on still haven't yet bought into this new fangled "Internets" doohicky.

Kidding! Kidding! I'm only joking. Don't shoot!

Yeah where is that tool Froomkin, he needs to be back so i can explicitly not read his crap. :P

Yeah where is that tool Froomkin, he needs to be back so i can explicitly not read his crap. :P

Yeah where is that tool Froomkin, he needs to be back so i can explicitly not read his crap. :P

Chris:

Thanks for this informative column. I find it puzzling why the comments on this site are dominated by extreme left-wingers. I think perhaps Dan Froomkin's tone attracts them.

President Bush can have flunkies "re-assuring" everyone all he wants. We now discover, in addition to being unaware of how to balance a budget and conduct emergency relief actions, President Bush is unfamiliar with conducting a job search.

This lifelone conservative and Republican is now only describing himself as conservative. The GOP and President Bush have virtually no support among my conservative friends. They have richly earned this disfavor.

Once again, the best part of this blog, by far, are the comments.

Shouldn't the MSM be investigating what extremist right-wing ideologues are being told to pacify them? Perhaps, just speculation of course, administration assurances that Roe V. Wade will be overturned?

I am sick to death of the Christian Taliban holding this country hostage, but equally as sick of the lack of investigation of this by alleged 'news' organizations.

correction- its

Chris,

I was on that phone call. That's not exactly what happened and I think you are intellectually dishonest to suggest that it was.

To begin with, Melhman sounded both irritated and exercised that he even had to make the phone call. The rest of the folks were the conciliatory ones. Mehlman didn't strike a tone anywhere near conciliation until more than halfway through the call.

Frankly, you missed blogging the more interesting parts of the phone call. For example, the part where Colson stated that he and Dobson were "joined at the hip", or the part where Dobson said that he had had four meeting with the White House since the choice of Miers was clear.

More importantly, and in light of the President's speech today, and John Warner's well prepared appearence on Hardball this evening, you missed the part where Ken Mehlman said that Harriet Miers should be supported because, as a justice, she wouldn't get in the way in the War on Terror.

Also, when you refer to Charles Colson, it would be more honest to refer to him as "convicted Watergate felon and leader of the evangelical group Prison Ministries."

Let's be clear that the RNC is using a felon to push it's choice for the Supreme Court.

All in all, not an inspiring job blogging the "Call to the Faithful."

Where's Froomkin?

Who is this Bush apologist?