The Fix Hits the Road
I'll be posting intermittently between now and late Friday as we take The Fix on the road. I'll be in South Carolina meeting with Gov. Mark Sanford, an important power broker in the 2008 presidential primary in the Palmetto State, who also faces his own re-election campaign in 2006.
I'll also sit down with Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who is stumping in the state with an eye on a 2008 presidential bid, and state Rep. Ralph Norman, who is running against Democratic Rep. John Spratt in the Upstate 5th U.S. House district. I'll also be huddling with a number of political operatives along the way.
Make sure to check back over the next few days for updates. And, don't forget the Friday Line, which will be dedicated to House races this week.
By washingtonpost.com Editors |
February 22, 2006; 12:45 PM ET
| Category:
Fix Notes
Previous: Parsing the Polls: Unmasking the "Push Poll" |
Next: S.C. Primary Watch: Sanford a Free Agent in '08

Get This Widget >>

Comments
Posted by: Alcohol counselor | April 17, 2006 3:47 PM | Report abuse
The need for change can not be seen by the far right. If things are broke but doing what I like why fix it.
Posted by: reececonrad | February 26, 2006 4:29 PM | Report abuse
Geez that's 4 times as high as another Republican Governor, Bob Taft of Ohio. Sanford's re-election seems like a done deal.
Posted by: Judge Crater | February 23, 2006 8:38 AM | Report abuse
Hahaha, Palmetto, a hard question from "The Fix"? Hahahaha. You must be mistaking Cilliza for an actual journalist.
Posted by: FairAndBalanced? | February 23, 2006 7:34 AM | Report abuse
Please be sure to ask "power broker" Sanford why he's sporting a 47% job approval in a dark red state.
http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollTrack.aspx?g=79bc576e-2f1d-4cec-a2b4-94aecce55b09
Posted by: Palmetto Republican | February 22, 2006 8:36 PM | Report abuse
otherside123.blogspot.com
www.onlinejournal.com
www.takingaim.info
www.wsws.org
www.infowars.com
Secret Service agents say Cheney was drunk when he shot lawyer
DOUG THOMPSON / Capitol Hill Blue | February 22 2006
A written report from Secret Service agents guarding Vice President Dick Cheney when he shot Texas lawyer Harry Whittington on a hunting outing two weeks ago says Cheney was "clearly inebriated" at the time of the shooting.
Agents observed several members of the hunting party, including the Vice President, consuming alcohol before and during the hunting expedition, the report notes, and Cheney exhibited "visible signs" of impairment, including slurred speech and erratic actions, the report said.
According to those who have read the report and talked with others present at the outing, Cheney was drunk when he gunned down his friend and the day-and-a-half delay in allowing Texas law enforcement officials on the ranch where the shooting occurred gave all members of the hunting party time to sober up.
We talked with a number of administration officials who are privy to inside information on the Vice President's shooting "accident" and all admit Secret Service agents and others saw Cheney consume far more than the "one beer' he claimed he drank at lunch earlier that day.
"This was a South Texas hunt," says one White House aide. "Of course there was drinking. There's always drinking. Lots of it."
Cheney has a long history of alcohol abuse, including two convictions of driving under the influence when he was younger. Doctors tell me that someone like Cheney, who is taking blood thinners because of his history of heart attacks, could get legally drunk now after consuming just one drink.
If Cheney was legally drunk at the time of the shooting, he could be guilty of a felony under Texas law and the shooting, ruled an accident by a compliant Kenedy County Sheriff, would be a prosecutable offense.
But we will never know for sure because the owners of the Armstrong Ranch, where the shooting occurred, barred the sheriff's department from the property on the day of the shooting and Kenedy County Sheriff Ramon Salinas III agreed to wait until the next day to send deputies in to talk to those involved.
Sheriff's Captain Charles Kirk says he went to the Armstrong Ranch immediately after the shooting was reported on Saturday, February 11 but both he and a game warden were not allowed on the 50,000-acre property. He called Salinas who told him to forget about it and return to the station.
"I told him don't worry about it. I'll make a call," Salinas said. The sheriff claims he called another deputy who moonlights at the Armstrong ranch, said he was told it was "just an accident" and made the decision to wait until Sunday to investigate.
"We've known these people for years. They are honest and wouldn't call us, telling us a lie," Salinas said.
Like all elected officials in Kenedy County, Salinas owes his job to the backing and financial support of Katherine Armstrong, owner of the ranch and the county's largest employer.
"The Armstrongs rule Kenedy County like a fiefdom," says a former employee.
Secret Service officials also took possession of all tests on Whittington's blood at the hospitals where he was treated for his wounds. When asked if a blood alcohol test had been performed on Whittington, the doctors who treated him at Christus Spohn Hospital Memorial in Corpus Christi or the hospital in Kingsville refused to answer. One admits privately he was ordered by the Secret Service to "never discuss the case with the press."
It's a sure bet that is a private doctor who treated the victim of Cheney's reckless and drunken actions can't talk to the public then the memo that shows the Vice President was drunk as a skunk will never see the light of day.
Posted by: che | February 22, 2006 4:32 PM | Report abuse
Also Chris will you tell Mitt to get is butt back to work. Last time I checked he was still pulling a check from the us folks in Mass.
Ask him why he doesn't think 2 years is enough time to get his message out there in the early primary states. Also if your in Charleston go out to Bull Island. The place is an adventure.
Posted by: Andy R | February 22, 2006 1:57 PM | Report abuse
CC: enjoy your trip and write something controversial for us to argue about. Although the fact that you are only interviewing Republicans is controversial all by itself. Ask Mark Sanford if he's going to start bottling his style of governance. I'd buy a case or two for my State.
Posted by: lpdrjk | February 22, 2006 1:42 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.
![[Pick a President]](http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/interactives/campaign08/contest/elexgame_45x35.gif)
![[Landscape]](http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/interactives/campaign08/images/electionmap_45x35.gif)








Sanfords' reelection is a done and not a bad deal. I'd vote for.
http://www.test-mall.com/alcohol/index.html