<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>The Fix: PAC Watch</title>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:36:50 -0400</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.36</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Campaign Reform: &apos;527&apos; Restrictions Could Hurt Dems</title>
<description>The fight over immigration reform seems sure to dominate Capitol Hill over the next few weeks, but the lower-profile effort by Republicans to curtail the influence of 527 political groups could have a more direct impact on the 2006 midterm elections. Republicans in the House and Senate have introduced legislation that would force 527s (named for the section of IRS tax code that governs their activities) to comply with the same donation limits of federal political action committees, a move that would greatly reduce the ability of a single individual to donate millions of dollars to a group aimed at influencing the election. The push to regulate 527s came in the wake of the 2004 election when affluent progressives like financier George Soros and insurance executive Peter Lewis dumped tens of millions into pro-Democratic groups like America Coming Together and the Media Fund in hopes of defeating President George W.</description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2006/03/reforming_527s.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2006/03/reforming_527s.html</guid>
<category>PAC Watch</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:36:50 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Democrats Dodge a PAC Bullet</title>
<description><![CDATA[In a move that went largely unnoticed Monday, Sen. Christopher &quot;Kit&quot; Bond (R-Mo.) pulled a provision from an appropriations bill that would have removed limits from donations by politicians' leadership political action committees to their national party. The decision came amid threats by Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Russ Feingold (D-Wisc.) to hold up the bill until the provision was removed.&nbsp; McCain said today he was &quot;pleased&quot; by Bond's action. &quot;I feel strongly that our nation's campaign finance laws should not be changed without adequate debate, amendments and votes,&quot; said McCain.&nbsp; &nbsp; Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) commended the decision Tuesday, adding that he had made it clear to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) &quot;that [Democrats] will not accept a conference report with reemergence of this provision.&quot; This rare pullback by Republican leadership was a major win for Democrats. Why? Let's go to the math: In the last]]></description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/democrats_dodge_a_pac_bullet.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/democrats_dodge_a_pac_bullet.html</guid>
<category>PAC Watch</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 12:02:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Emily&apos;s List Turns 20</title>
<description><![CDATA[The pro-choice political action committee Emily's List is celebrating the 20th anniversary of its founding this week.&nbsp; Chris Cillizza has a piece in today's Post about the group's successes over the years in supporting pro-choice women candidates. Read the story: &quot;Emily's List Celebrates Clout as It Turns 20.&quot;]]></description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/emilys_list_turns_20.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/emilys_list_turns_20.html</guid>
<category>PAC Watch</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:51:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>California Democrat Forms Defense PAC</title>
<description><![CDATA[Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) is forming a new political action committee that seeks to bolster Democratic candidates' credibility on defense issues. SecureUS PAC, as the organization will be known, is designed not only as a fundraising mechanism but also as a medium to hone the party's message on defense-related matters and train candidates to speak intelligently and effectively on them. &quot;The goal of the PAC is to improve Democrats' message and policies on national security and defense issues,&quot; said a source close to the group, who requested anonymity because the PAC's existence will not be public until tomorrow.&nbsp; The source said the idea for the new PAC germinated during the 2004 election as President Bush scored political points by questioning Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry's ability to keep America safe. Harman is currently the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee and has recruited an impressive cadre of board members for]]></description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/california_democrat_forms_defe.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/california_democrat_forms_defe.html</guid>
<category>PAC Watch</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 18:34:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>