<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>The Fix: Politics and the Court</title>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:16:00 -0400</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.36</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>R.I. Senate: Chafee Rolls Dice With &apos;No&apos; on Alito</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Moderate Republican Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R.I.) announced today that he will vote against confirming Samuel A. Alito Jr. to the Supreme Court, the first -- and likely only -- GOPer to declare opposition to the nomination.&nbsp; &quot;I am a pro-choice, pro-environment, pro-Bill of Rights Republican, and I will be voting against this nomination,&quot; Chafee said in a statement. However, Chafee said he will not support Democratic attempts to sustain a filibuster on Alito. Chafee's unwillingness to toe the party line complicates his chances at reelection this fall. His &quot;no&quot; vote on Alito provides Cranston Mayor Steve Laffey (R) considerable fodder for his challenge to Chafee in the state's Sept. 12 primary. Republicans and independents can vote in the primary, but not Democrats. Laffey has already come out in support of Alito and called on Chafee to follow that lead. Chafee's decision shocked many in the Republican political world who]]></description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2006/01/ri_senate_chafee_rolls_dice_wi.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2006/01/ri_senate_chafee_rolls_dice_wi.html</guid>
<category>Politics and the Court</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:16:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>R.I. Senate: Does Chafee&apos;s Future Hinge on Alito Vote?</title>
<description>With the confirmation vote on Samuel A. Alito Jr. nearing, Rhode Island Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R) faces a Hobson&apos;s choice that could dramatically affect his reelection campaign this November. GOP Sen. Chafee is being challenged on the left and the right. (AP Photo) Chafee remains the most high-profile undecided senator on Alito, and regardless of which side he eventually chooses, he can expect to be bashed for it. Chafee faces a primary challenge from Cranston Mayor Steve Laffey (R). Should he get through that race, he will face off against either former state Attorney General Sheldon Whitehouse (D) or Secretary of State Matt Brown (D) in a state that went for the Democratic presidential candidate by 20 points in 2004. A Chafee vote for Alito will make for considerable fodder for either Brown or Whitehouse. But a vote against Alito could give Laffey the GOP nomination. Asked about the seeming</description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2006/01/ri_senate_does_chafees_future.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2006/01/ri_senate_does_chafees_future.html</guid>
<category>Politics and the Court</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Pro-Alito Ads Target Two Senate Dems</title>
<description><![CDATA[Seeking to capitalize on what they believe was Democrats' poor performance during last week's confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito Jr., a conservative soft-money group is launching television ads against South Dakota Sen. Tim Johnson and North Dakota Sen. Kent Conrad this week designed to sway the two lawmakers' votes on the nominee and also soften them up for their future reelection races. The ads, which are being funded by Coalition for Fair Judiciary, will run statewide in both Dakotas and cost the group &quot;six figures&quot; combined, according to Keith Appell, a spokesman for the group.&nbsp; The coalition is a 501(c)(4) group, meaning that it does not need to disclose either its sources of funding or disbursements. Appell's firm -- Creative Response Concepts -- handled the public relations for the Swift Boat Veterans For Truth ads against John Kerry in 2004. &quot;The strategy of the pro-Alito coalition]]></description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2006/01/proalito_ads_target_two_senate.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2006/01/proalito_ads_target_two_senate.html</guid>
<category>Politics and the Court</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:23:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Watching the Alito Hearings: A Political Primer</title>
<description>All eyes in the nation&apos;s capital are on Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr.&apos;s Supreme Court confirmation hearings this week, as it it widely believed Alito would swing the balance on the high court in a decidedly conservative direction. But Alito is not the only one with something to prove in these hearings. Fully one-third of the senators who sit on the Judiciary Committee either face difficult reelection challenges in 2006 or have their eye on the White House in 2008. Each of these senators sees a unique role for himself in the proceedings; for some (like Ohio Republican Sen. Mike DeWine) it is to assure Republicans that he is a strong defender of Bush&apos;s nominee, while for others (like Delaware Democratic Sen. Joe Biden) it it serve as a lead interrogator in order to bolster their liberal credentials. Here&apos;s a primer on the larger political context of the Alito hearings:</description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2006/01/watching_the_alito_hearings_a.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2006/01/watching_the_alito_hearings_a.html</guid>
<category>Politics and the Court</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:15:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Alito Nomination: Gang of 14 to Meet</title>
<description><![CDATA[The 14 senators whose compromise earlier this year defused a potential floor fight over the filibustering of federal judges is set to meet Thursday to discuss the nomination of Samuel A. Alito Jr. to the Supreme Court. The meeting will take place Thursday morning in the office of Arizona Sen. John McCain (R) -- one of the bipartisan gang's most visible members.&nbsp; The group met once on Oct. 5 to discuss the Harriet Miers nomination. It remains unclear how serious a role the group will play in the Alito nomination.&nbsp; Both Democrats and Republicans seem to be girding for a fight, though no one has invoked the specter of a filibuster to block the nomination.&nbsp; If that prospect is raised, expect the Gang to be in the middle of an effort to short circuit it.]]></description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/alito_nomination_gang_of_14_to.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/alito_nomination_gang_of_14_to.html</guid>
<category>Politics and the Court</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 16:50:02 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>RNC Rallies the Base for Alito</title>
<description><![CDATA[Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman sent out an e-mail to more than 10 million activists this morning, asking them to sign an online petition in favor of Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr.'s nomination to the Supreme Court. The RNC organized a similar petition drive for former nominee Harriet Miers and the new Chief Justice John Roberts. Mehlman urged recipients to call their senators to voice support for Alito and write letters to the editors of local newspapers to back the president's choice. &quot;Don't let the spin from media pundits or attacks from Democrats distort Judge Alito's distinguished record as a judge,&quot; Mehlman wrote.&nbsp; The RNC has also organized a series of phone calls with social conservatives, state party leaders and the conservative blogging community. The goal of all this activity is to rebut the idea that Alito is simply a tool of the Republican right, making sure examples of]]></description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/rnc_rallies_the_base_for_alito.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/rnc_rallies_the_base_for_alito.html</guid>
<category>Politics and the Court</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 13:35:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Republicans Ready for a Fight</title>
<description><![CDATA[Even before President Bush introduced Samuel Alito as the next Supreme Court nominee this morning, Senate Judiciary Committee member Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) labeled Alito as a &quot;nominee likely to divide America.&quot;&nbsp; Minutes later, Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman slapped Schumer on the wrist rhetorically, saying, &quot;The Supreme Court selection process should be about American jurisprudence, not litmus tests for campaign fundraising.&quot; The fight is clearly on.&nbsp; Which side benefits most from a brawl over Alito?&nbsp; The long-term winner is still hard to gauge, but Republicans were generally elated this morning about the prospect of a major dust-up.&nbsp; A high-profile skirmish over Alito and the conservative ideas he allegedly represents is seen by Republicans as a two-fer: It helps unite the party's base, which had been unhappy with the selection of Harriet Miers as well as the administration's policies on immigration and spending, and it&nbsp; serves as a major distraction]]></description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/republicans_ready_for_a_fight.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/republicans_ready_for_a_fight.html</guid>
<category>Politics and the Court</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 10:41:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Alert: Supreme Court Justices on Capitol Hill</title>
<description><![CDATA[Washington Post reporters are covering every aspect of Miers's decision to step aside. Here's a slice of life from Capitol Hill today as written by The Post's Charles Babington: &quot;While senators, aides and reporters continued to discuss the Miers withdrawal in scrums just off the chamber floor, a curious lunch crowd was gathering in the nearby LBJ Room. Democrats were holding their weekly 'policy luncheon' and the guests -- chosen weeks in advance -- were Supreme Court justices Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer. The planned topic, one Democratic staffer said, was 'judicial philosophy' and relations between the courts and the Congress.&quot; And The Post's Juliet Eilperin pointed The Fix toward the statement by Focus on the Family Chairman James Dobson on Miers's withdrawal. &quot;I believe the president has made a wise decision in accepting Harriet Miers's withdrawal as a nominee to the Supreme Court,&quot; said Dobson, who had initially expressed]]></description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/alert_supreme_court_justices_o.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/alert_supreme_court_justices_o.html</guid>
<category>Politics and the Court</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:28:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Miers: The Political Fallout</title>
<description>The week went from bad to worse for the Bush White House this morning when Harriet Miers asked the president to withdraw her Supreme Court nomination. President Bush is in Florida today, but House and Senate Republican leaders met with him yesterday. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), Senate Majority Whip Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) and House Majority leader Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) attended that meeting. No mention was made of withdrawing the Miers nomination, according to informed sources, although planning for her potential confirmation fight was a topic of discussion. Several high-level Republican sources said today that the Bush White House was not caught by surprise by her decision. Miers&apos;s departure comes 24 hours before special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald is expected to announce the results of his investigation into the 2003 leak of a CIA operative&apos;s name to the news media -- with the potential that</description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/miers_the_political_fallout.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/miers_the_political_fallout.html</guid>
<category>Politics and the Court</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:15:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>White House Pressures &apos;08 Hopefuls on Miers</title>
<description><![CDATA[The White House is trying its best to get Republican senators considering a run for the presidency in 2008 to go on the record in support of Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers.&nbsp; Seems the goal is to put the heat on those presidential hopefuls when they travel to the key primary state of New Hampshire. New Hampshire Union Leader political writer John Di Staso unearthed a nugget about a a group of activists who approached Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) during his visit to St. Anselm College Tuesday night.&nbsp; The group carried a letter detailing Miers's qualifications for the court. Brownback has been the most outspoken of the would-be 2008 GOPers about his concerns regarding the Miers nomination. The effort, apparently, was stage-managed by the White House political arm. DiStaso's nugget is the second item in his &quot;Granite Status&quot; file. -- Chris Cillizza]]></description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/white_house_pressures_08_hopef.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/white_house_pressures_08_hopef.html</guid>
<category>Politics and the Court</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:32:02 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>RNC Tries to Rally Bloggers Behind Miers</title>
<description><![CDATA[Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman held a conference call today with a group of Republican bloggers in yet another attempt to build grassroots support for the Supreme Court nomination of Harriet Miers. Mehlman's message, put simply: Harriet Miers does not want to hang out in Georgetown. The RNC chief repeated an appeal he (and many other Bush administration officials) has made repeatedly over the past few days in defense of Miers: &quot;The president knows this nominee better than any president has ever known any nominee before.&quot; Mehlman insisted that Miers -- unlike Justices David Souter or Anthony Kennedy, who are seen as traitors by conservative ideologues -- will be a true-blue conservative on the bench because of the president's personal relationship with her. Conservatives need not wonder whether Miers wants &quot;to curry favor with the Georgetown cocktail set,&quot; added Mehlman. Mehlman's call was organized by Patrick Ruffini, a blogger]]></description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/rnc_tries_to_rally_bloggers_be.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/rnc_tries_to_rally_bloggers_be.html</guid>
<category>Politics and the Court</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:57:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Miers Through the 2008 Lens</title>
<description><![CDATA[With conservative unrest toward Harriet Miers's nomination to the Supreme Court showing no signs of abating, I wondered why we haven't seen any of the Republican senators mentioned as 2008 presidential candidates come out against her, a move that would win them plaudits among the party's ideological right -- not to mention scads of press coverage. I made several phone calls to Republican consultants and advisers to try and find answers.&nbsp; The overwhelming consensus was that even though President Bush's approval ratings are not stellar currently, none of the potential '08 candidates is willing to risk his wrath by making the political gambit of publicly opposing Miers. &quot;Nobody wants to take a sharp stick and poke it in the eye of the president no matter what his approval rating is,&quot; said Glen Bolger, a Republican pollster with the firm Public Opinion Strategies. &quot;He is too strong with Republican primary voters]]></description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/miers_through_the_2008_lens.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/miers_through_the_2008_lens.html</guid>
<category>Politics and the Court</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:21:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>RNC Reassures the Roots</title>
<description><![CDATA[GOP leaders and close allies in the evangelical movement hosted a conference call today aimed at easing conservatives' concerns about the nomination of White House counsel Harriet Miers to the U.S. Supreme Court. Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman hosted the call this afternoon and was joined by a cavalcade of movement conservatives, including Chuck Colson, the head of Prison Fellowship ministries, and James Dobson, founder and chairman of Focus on the Family.&nbsp; The speakers sought to reassure an audience of grassroots conservative activists from all 50 states that Miers was indeed the right (literal and ideological) pick. Mehlman struck a conciliatory tone in the call, pointing out that concerns on the right are understandable.&nbsp; &quot;So many people in the past have had voting records that are different than have been advertised,&quot; he said. But he quickly noted that because President Bush knows the nominee on a personal level &quot;it]]></description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/rnc_reassures_the_roots.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/rnc_reassures_the_roots.html</guid>
<category>Politics and the Court</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 17:18:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Audio: Cillizza on Miers Nomination</title>
<description><![CDATA[The Fix's Chris Cillizza was on WTOP radio this morning to discuss how the Harriet Miers Supreme Court nomination is playing in the Senate. Listen to his audio here. Also, Chris authored the Politics column in today's Post.&nbsp; Read it here:&nbsp; &quot;Multiple Choice in California.&quot;]]></description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/audio_cillizza_on_miers_nomina.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/audio_cillizza_on_miers_nomina.html</guid>
<category>Politics and the Court</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Miers Nomination: The Gang Meets</title>
<description><![CDATA[The bipartisan group of 14 senators that averted a showdown over President Bush's judicial nominees earlier this year is set to meet today to discuss the nomination of White House counsel Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court. The &quot;Gang of 14,&quot; as the group is often called, will gather today in the Hart Senate Office Building at 4:30 p.m. ET, with Nebraska Sen. Ben Nelson (D) playing host. All but one of the 14 senators will be in attendance, according to an informed Democratic source. Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman (D) will be the only absentee as he observes a Jewish holiday. The Gang of 14 membership includes a number of senators being targeted in 2006, including: Nelson, West Virginia Sen. Robert Byrd (D), Ohio Sen. Mike DeWine (R) and Rhode Island Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R). Sources familiar with the meeting paint it as a chance for members to get a]]></description>
<link>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/miers_nomination_the_gang_meet.html</link>
<guid>http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2005/10/miers_nomination_the_gang_meet.html</guid>
<category>Politics and the Court</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 12:29:00 -0400</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>