Afternoon Update (couldn't come up with anything better; pretty weak, I know)

Early reaction to the Redskins unusual quarterback rotation:

Jason Campbell seemed pretty excited by the prospect of actually playing football this season, and took his "long-term" backup role as a major sign of faith. Todd Collins says he was "surprised," by the unconventional decision, and seemed a bit confused about how all of this might play out, but at least a semi-hopeful that should he get in a game and perform well, he might still got a shot at his first start since 1997. As for Al Saunders, he seems on board with everything, praised Campbell's progress in the latter stages of training camp, and, like Gibbs, said all you can really bank on is one week at a time, and entering Monday's opener, Collins in the guy behind Brunell.

Any changes to this plan based on team performance, injuries, individual performances, etc. would be Gibbs's all the way, Saunders said, and not his. Most importantly, let's not forget the chasm between the big dog - Mark Brunell - and the backups. Unless Brunell gets hurt, I see him keeping the starting job indefinitely, even if his play somehow slipped to 2004 levels. So in the end, this might be much ado about nothing. But, hell, who doesn't love a quarterback controversy, even a nonsensical one.

I don't think there's much of a chance top cornerback Shawn Springs will be able to go Monday night (Springs, Clinton Portis and Renaldo Wynn all missed practice today).

Springs says he's "a work in progress," but admits it would take significant practice time and progress for him to be ready to play after undergoing abdominal surgery last month. Springs, however, was in good spirits and eager to talk about former Redskins corner Fred Smoot, The Mouth Of The South, who makes his long-awaited return to DannyLand Monday night with the Vikes.

"Tell Silky Johnson (Smoot's nickname) he ain't got nothin' on me,'" Springs said, a nickname with it's roots in, what else, a Dave Chappelle sketch ("The Playa's Ball," if I remember correctly).

Springs went on to reminisce about the days he and Smoot went at each other through every meeting and practice, arguing about who was better at his craft. "Then the next day we'd be like best friends again, and then go at it some more," Springs said. Ah, the memories. Methinks that should Springs find his old buddy along the sidelines before the game, Smoot might end up the target of at least a few "Love Boat" comments ...

How 'bout my boy Dan Steinberg, and his Sports Bog, trying to recruit three of my top posters - Pink CC, P Diddy and Mucus Membrane (in no particular order) - for his new blog? Is nothing sacred? Oh, the seedy side of the blogosphere. Dan will come on strong, like a corrupt street agent at a high hoops game, like one of those corporate sneaker pimps, a Sonny Vacarro trying to get you to chose Adidas over Nike.

Yeah, the Steinblogger will promise you the moon and stars. Whatever it takes to lure you. But after a while you'll see how good you had it over here. You'll long for references to Ratt, malt liquor, Entourage, Chris Cooley's hair,. the English Premier League, and qusi-conversations with the owner of a certain local pro football team ... and you'll be back for good, never to stray again.

No, seriously, there's plenty to go around for everyone. Steinberg is a funny dude and a talented writer with an eye for the obscure. Check him out at blog.washingtonpost.com/dcsportsbog (I'm so lame on the tech front that I don't know how to post a link), and, by all means, don't forget about my dinky little blog here. The one with no name that is kept hidden in the tiniest crevices of Washingtonpost.com ...

Anyone else psyched about all of the dating ads that seem to have popped up around this blog? Those advertisers know their demographic. We're coveted baby. To paraphrase from a classic thriller, 'Would you date me? I'd date me." ... Skins signed O lineman Todd Wade today and cut Ike Ndukwe. Our special section on the NFL comes out Wednesday, and, to cut this off at the head, you will Ndukwe still on the depth chart and not Wade. It's not my deal. That stuff had to be set in print Monday at midnight, I'm told, so we're stuck with what we had.

By Jason La Canfora |  September 5, 2006; 2:17 PM ET
Previous: Who's Up Second? |

Blogs That Reference This Entry

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/cgi-bin/mt/mtb.cgi/10200

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



In theory, I like the Backup QB rotation plan. But what will the Redskins do if Brunell is what Gibbs likes to call "day-to-day." That is, he's neither definitely out nor definitely in for an upcoming game. This scenario seems likely to occur.

If he's not practicing during the week with the hope of being ready for Sunday, who gets the practice reps? If Campbell gets the reps, and Brunell plays, who is the gameday backup?

Posted by: Joe in Raleigh | September 5, 2006 03:08 PM

Todd Wade? Is he any good? Well I guess he can't be any worse then the backups we already have.

Posted by: Rob (DC) | September 5, 2006 03:10 PM

I'm comfortable with the situation. But even more.......who but the Redskins would come up with the 1st ever backup QB Controversay? Collins is a "Saunders' Guy" and Cambell's is a "Gibbs' Guy" and at the end, the HC always rules in decision making. I think he'll give TC one time (if given the opportunity), then if he fouls up, it will be Cambell all the way............

Posted by: A Dog | September 5, 2006 03:22 PM

I would never leave you Jason :-)

Posted by: P Diddy | September 5, 2006 03:33 PM

Any sense about what separates OL Todd Wade (massive, former starter, cut early, leg injuries) from OL Spencer Folau (massive former starter, cut early, leg injuries), who was cut a few days ago?

Posted by: dcsween | September 5, 2006 03:43 PM

all i see is Toyota truck ads....

Posted by: what dating ads? | September 5, 2006 03:55 PM

Hey Folks,

How about some positive energy! There's nothing wrong with believing that the QB situation will work out very well for all. All of the QB's are being placed in a position to succeed. Brunell will stay healthy. Campbell is being given an opportunity to grow properly (it worked for McNair and others) and Collins' strengths are being utilized well.

Much health and successful performance to the Skins!

Posted by: | September 5, 2006 04:04 PM

Did we really just pick up a back-up lineman from a team that is notorious for a bad O-line? I think this must just be rookie hazing and they will bring the freshman back...if not...I am going back to playing Madden '07.

Posted by: a timbie | September 5, 2006 04:05 PM

Jason, in case you missed my post from the previous blog topic:

Go ahead and watch my dvd. it's going in a frame up on my wall anyways...

Posted by: Rudy (The barno who wrote "wake me up before you go, Joe") | September 5, 2006 04:48 PM

Why is everybody worried about the whole back-up QB situation....I simply read it for what it is, Gibbs is using his players to the best of their abilities which is what a good coach does.

Collins is plain and simple a back-up QB. He is 34 (I think) and has not started since the '90s. He is a come off the bench, mop it up, execute the remaining game plan cold kinda guy. He knows the offense and he does it well! So if you need those services he is your guy.

Campbell on the other hand is going to be a starting QB some day fairly soon ('07?). He is not quite there so I guess they will have to "coach him up" and put in a specific game plan that works to his strengths, but if you need a starter he is your man and you hope the coaches do their job giving him a plan he can succeed with that plays to his athletic strengths (not one meant for Brunell).

Yes this is Washington and yes this is QB so it is always a big deal...but lets just throw a touch more blind faith at Gibbs that he will use his guys to the best of their skills.

Great Blog Jason!! It keeps us football a-hol-ics attention on something other than work.

Posted by: tink | September 5, 2006 04:51 PM

I was brought in because I can kick off. I'm now also one of the #2 backup QBs.

Posted by: Todd Wade | September 5, 2006 05:02 PM

The Redskins entire season rests on the arm of a very old, fragile QB - no matter who the back-up is. What they need is another coach.

Posted by: Do Gooder | September 5, 2006 05:19 PM

>>> "What they need is another coach."

Wow. I can't even fathom how to respond to this. Is this directed at St. Joe?

Posted by: P Diddy | September 5, 2006 06:07 PM

Shapiro thinks they're going 7-9. I can understand why some prognosticators have little faith, but it seems silly to give up on this team before Game 1 has been played. Plus, they need to do well so I can have bragging rights around Mr. Bob Levey.

Posted by: Colin | September 5, 2006 07:36 PM

Okay, Barno first - do you want him to autograph it to Barno, or to Rudy? If you're going to frame it, guess he should make sure he signs the outside of the box. I'll give Chris explicit directions.

This Wade character has like 50 starts and is a massive dude; guess sometimes the big guy you don't know is better than the one you have (Folau). Gibbs says they tried to sign him in the past and have had their eye on him.

I checked on Ortega. The Skins essentially chose ot keep Manuel White on the practice squad over him from what I gather. They felt like Buck had a chance to have a better shot to play somewhere else. His blocking needed work.

P Diddy, thanks for sticking with ... even if the allegations of this blog going big time, getting some luv and becoming easier to find are false. My guess is its called "Training Camp Insider" all year. Then again, what's better than the preseason, eh?

Todd Wade, welcome to town. Look forward to seeing you kickoff in practice Thursday. Can you throw the deep fade?


Posted by: Jason La Canfora | September 5, 2006 08:05 PM

Thanks for the Springs update... Are Betts, Cartwright and Duckett all getting along? This might be old news, but I can understand the "slap in the face" comment. Rock has been a valuable back and deserves to see time on the field.

National media has been down on the Redskins. Before pre-season they were up there with the Panthers and the Seahawks to be NFC favorites. Now they aren't even going to be a .500 team? The Danskins definately came on late and over-achieved at the end of last season, but how are the Cowboys all of a sudden the team to beat? Oh Monday night, come soon!

Posted by: Dorf | September 5, 2006 08:07 PM

So, I read that Springs is a long shot. I know Rogers is starting but is it going to be Kenny Wright or Mike Rumph as the other corner?

Posted by: calebt17 | September 5, 2006 08:59 PM

KAKA!

Thank you for the link to find Steinblogger-I've been searching for it tonite...off to find him now...

No worries "Pink C.C." will be true to your blog haus., but "Wise Girls" will be at it again Post-OLY. now, in Steinblogger's latest newest mess haus.-ha!

Posted by: Pink C.C.- | September 6, 2006 12:13 AM

It was the "Haters Ball." "The Playas Ball" is a song by OutKast.

Posted by: Doug | September 6, 2006 12:53 AM

Actually it was the "Playa Hate-a's Ball"

Posted by: JT | September 6, 2006 08:17 AM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




 
 

© 2006 The Washington Post Company