Investigating the 'Bank for Rural America'

Since the 1970s, a little-known loan program from the Agriculture Department has endured nearly $1.5 billion in losses -- while backing almost $14 billion in guarantees to private banks.
That's the latest finding in The Post's ongoing investigation of waste, fraud and abuse in the nation's farm support programs. In today's installment, Gilbert M. Gaul shows how loans or grants that are supposed to improve rural development were given to a car wash in Milford, Del.; a country club in Great Falls, Mont.; a movie theater in Smithfield, N.C.; a water park in Myrtle Beach, S.C.; an alligator hunter in Dade City, Fla.; snowmobile clubs in Maine; and dozens of gas stations and convenience stores in Maryland, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Arkansas. Agriculture officials call the system an 'investment bank for rural America.'
Update: In response to The Post's investigation, Sen. John Kerry, chairman of the Senate Committee on Small Business, today called for stronger oversight of the loan program and said the administration should act fast to recover the money and prevent more losses. Kerry held a hearing last month to look into problems with other loans originated by Business Loan Express, a company spotlighted in The Post's article.
By The Editors |
December 5, 2007; 11:28 AM ET
Harvesting Cash
Previous: Doctors Don't Always Tell |
Next: Follow the Money


If you have solid tips, news or documents on potential ethical violations or abuses of power, we want to know. Send us your suggestions.

I'm not sure that the U.S. military's new tactic of trying to negotiate down the number of civilian victims is much of an improvement of the old policy of just denying they happen.
The Washington Post's permanent investigative unit was set up in 1982 under Bob Woodward.
We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.